Are the Forms Targeted in the Enriched Input Noticed by Learners
International Journal of Language and Linguistics
Volume 2, Issue 6, November 2014, Pages: 374-378
Received: Jul. 9, 2014; Accepted: Jul. 28, 2014; Published: Dec. 16, 2014
Views 2767      Downloads 157
Authors
Mansoureh sajjadi, Islamic Azad University Abadeh Branch, Abadeh, Iran
Farzaneh khabazi, Islamic Azad University Gheshm Branch, Gheshm, Iran
Firooz sadighi, Islamic Azad University Shiraz Branch, Shiraz, Iran
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
This work is an attempt in order to clarify whether the forms targeted in the enriched input are noticed by learners or not. Whiles taking Schmidt’s Noticing Hypothesis and the frequency Hypothesis into consideration all through the study. It also describes how enriched input works for the acquisition provided that learners actually focus on the target structure, which by itself is a demonstration of how important noticing is. While taking the results of several related and partly-related works, it tries to prove the efficacy of enriched input as an FFI option.
Keywords
Enriched, Input, Noticing
To cite this article
Mansoureh sajjadi, Farzaneh khabazi, Firooz sadighi, Are the Forms Targeted in the Enriched Input Noticed by Learners, International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 2, No. 6, 2014, pp. 374-378. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20140206.16
References
[1]
Schmidt, Coordinate Structures and Language Universals in Interlanguage, Language Learning, (2001)
[2]
Schmidt, Attention, New York Cambridge University Press, (2001)
[3]
Stauffer, F. An Introduction to Linguistic Research, University of Chicago Press, (1995)
[4]
Ota, Language learning Strategies around the World. University of Hawaii Press, (1995)
[5]
Boyson, M. Language Learning. New Yourk Academic Press, (1995)
[6]
Jourdensis, R.Does Textual Enhancement Promote Nothing? Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, (1995)
[7]
Doughty, Effects of Instruction on Learning Second Language, Blackwell. (1995)
[8]
Youshimura, N, F.Does Manipulating for Knowledge of Output Tasks Lead to Differences in Reading? ELT Journal, (2006)
[9]
Trashey, Positive and Preemption in the Second Language Classroom. ? (1996)
[10]
Leeman, Integrating Attention to Form in Content Based Spanish Instruction. University of Hawaii Press, (1995)
[11]
Ellis, Explicit form-focused instruction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (2001)
[12]
Chomsky, N.Reflextions on Language, New York: Pantheon Press, (2000)
[13]
Tomlin and Villa. Attention in Cognitive Science and Second Language Acquisition? (1994)
[14]
Leow, R..Do Learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with L2? , TESOL QUARTERLY, (2000)
[15]
Krashen,S,D. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition, London: Pergamon Press,(1982)
[16]
Skehan,P.A. Framework for The Implementation of Tasked-based Instruction. Applied Linguistics, (1998)
[17]
Long,M.H. Focus on Form, John Benjamins,Amesterdam press, (1991)
[18]
Izum,S.H,Out Put Input Enhancement and The Noticing Hypothesis, TESOL QUARTERLY, (2002)
[19]
Posner M & Petersen .The Attention System of the Human Brain. Ann Rev Neurosci 13:25-42. [4], (1990)
[20]
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P.M ,Instructed second language acquisition. In N. Schmitt (Ed.). An Introduction to Applied Linguistics. (2nd edition) London, (2010)
[21]
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. M. How languages are learned. Oxford [England: Oxford University Press. (2006)
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186