Verbal Communication Behaviors: How Male and Female University Students Interact in Gendered Talks
International Journal of Language and Linguistics
Volume 5, Issue 5, September 2017, Pages: 135-142
Received: Jul. 4, 2017; Accepted: Jul. 18, 2017; Published: Aug. 16, 2017
Views 2149      Downloads 185
Kenneth G. Opina, Department of Communications, Linguistics, and Literature, University of San Carlos, Cebu City, Philippines
Article Tools
Follow on us
With the existence of language and gender studies emphasizing the male and female dichotomy in interactional strategies, this study aimed to investigate the verbal communication behaviors of language classroom mixed-gender and same-gender group conversations involving the same interlocutors. The transcribed data obtained from the three fifteen-minute recorded group interactions indicated that questions and expressions of agreement were the typical behaviors employed by the interlocutors. The results showed that aside from the gender of the interlocutor and the gender composition of the group, the nature of talk and the group size influence the use of particular behaviors. The findings have implications on providing a locally-acquired data on classroom peer talks in the field of language and gender.
Mixed-Gender, Same-Gender, All-Male, All-Female, Peer Talk, Interactional Strategies
To cite this article
Kenneth G. Opina, Verbal Communication Behaviors: How Male and Female University Students Interact in Gendered Talks, International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 5, No. 5, 2017, pp. 135-142. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20170505.13
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Borlongan, A. (2008). Tag-questions in Philippine English. Philippine journal of linguistics, 39, 1, p. 109-133.
Bunyi, J. (1986). Language, sex, and communication – Implications for research in the Philippines. Philippine journal of linguistics, 17, p. 65-69.
Cameron, D. (1997). Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. in Johnson, S. & Meinhof, U. (Eds.) Language and Masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chavez, M. (2001). Gender in the language classroom. USA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Chen, L., et al. (2006). A multimodal analysis of floor control in meetings. Retrieved January 27, 2012 from 06.pdf.
Coates, J. (1987). Gossip revisited: Language in all-female groups. In Coates, J. (ed.). (2004). Language and gender: A reader. UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Coates, J. (2004). Women, men and language. 3rd ed. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.
Coates, J. & Pichler, P. (Eds.). (2011). Language and gender: A reader. 2nd ed. UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Cowie, C. (2000). Gender language-interruption and overlapping: How to interpret the two categories of simultaneous speech. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from
Dita, S. (2011). Slow down, women at work: An analysis of marital conversation. Issues and trends in applied linguistics in the Philippines: A decade in retrospect. Manila: DLSU Academic Publications Office, p. 223-239.
Eakins, B. & Eakins, R. (1978). Sex differences in human communication. USA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Fishman, P. (1978). Interaction: The work women do. Social problems, 25, 4, 397-406.
Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of pragmatics. Retrieved August 5, 2012 from the World Wide Web at
Freed, A. & Greenwood, A. (1996). Women, men, and type of talk: What makes the difference?. Language in society, 25, 1-26.
Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. London: Longman Publishers Inc.
Krasny, K. (2013). Gender and literacy: A handbook for educators and parents. USA: ABC-CLIO, LLC.
LaFrance, M. (1992). Gender and interruptions: Individual infraction or violation of the social order. Psychology of women quarterly, 16: 497-512.
Laskowski, K. (2010). Modeling norms of turn-taking in multi-party conversation. Retrieved May 21, 2011 from the World Wide Web at
Liu, B. (2009). Chinese discourse markers in oral speech in mainland Mandarin speakers. Proceedings of the 21st North American conference on Chinese linguistics, 2: 358-374.
McCloskey, L. & Coleman, L. (1992). Difference without dominance: Children’s talk in mixed- and same-sex dyads. Sex Roles, 27: 241-257. Retrieved December 4, 2011 from
Mellor, B. (2012). Deficit, dominance, difference and discursive: The changing approaches to language and gender. Diffusion, 4, Issue 2.
Michael, A., Chone, L., Mthusamy, C., & Veeravagu, J. (2010). Gendered-linked differences in speech styles: Analysing linguistic and gender in the Malaysian context. Cross-cultural communication, 6, 1: 18-28.
Mojica, L. (2011). The role of apologies in preserving couples’ relationships. Issues and trends in applied linguistics in the Philippines: A decade in retrospect. Manila: DLSU Academic Publications Office, p. 131-139.
Mojica, L. (2000 a). How do selected students describe male/female language in Filipino? Philippine journal of linguistics, 31, 1, p. 67-78.
Mojica, L. (2000 b). Gender differences in students’ constructed dialogues using Filipino. Philippine journal of linguistics, 31, 2, p. 85-92.
Montenegro, C. (1982). An exploratory study of male and female language in Pilipino. Philippine journal of linguistics, 13, 1, p. 75-95.
Palomares, N. (2008). Gender and intergroup communication. in Giles, H. (2012). The handbook of intergroup communication. UK: Routledge.
Pavlenko, A. & Piller, I. (2008). Language education and gender. in May, S. & Hornberger, N. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of language and education. (2nd ed.). Volume 1: Language policy and political issues in education: 57-69.
Piller, I. & Pavlenko, A. (2006). Bilingualism and gender. in Bhatia, T. & Ritchie, W. (Eds.). The handbook of bilingualism. UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation Analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. USA: Sage Publications Inc.
Rowe, B. & Levine, D. (2012). A concise introduction to linguistics. 3rd ed. USA: Pearson Higher Education Inc.
Stenström, A.-B. (2004). An introduction to spoken interaction. London: Longman.
Stenström, A.-B. (2011). Pauses and hesitations. in Andersen, G. & Aijmer, K. (Eds.) Pragmatics in society. Germany: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. 537-568.
Swann, J. (1993). Talk control: An illustration from the classroom of problems in analyzing male dominance of conversation. in Coates, J. & Pichler, P. (Eds.). (2011). Language and gender: A reader. 2nd ed. UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Tannen, D. (1996). Researching gender-related patterns in classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 30, No. 2: 341-344.
Turner, L., Dindia, K., & Pearson, J. (1995). An investigation of female/male verbal behaviors in same-sex and mixed-sex conversations. Communication reports, 8, No. 2: 86-96.
Wilkinson, I. & Fung, I. (2002). Small-group composition and peer effects. International journal of educational research, 37, p. 425-447. Retrieved November 5, 2013 from
Wood, J. & Dindia, K. (1998). What's the difference? a dialogue about differences and similarities between women and men. in Canary, D. & Dindia, K. (Eds.). Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication: Critical Essays and Empirical Investigations of Sex and Gender in Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Science Publishing Group
NEW YORK, NY 10018
Tel: (001)347-688-8931