Boundary Assignment: A Cognitive Motivation for Lexicalization
International Journal of Language and Linguistics
Volume 6, Issue 4, July 2018, Pages: 110-117
Received: Jun. 26, 2018; Accepted: Jul. 9, 2018; Published: Aug. 4, 2018
Views 1472      Downloads 154
Author
Liu Chendan, Foreign Languages School, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Lexicalization is a process of structural innovation in language change, which is motivated by a human cognitive ability of structural boundary assignment in the construction of linguistic structures. In this process, the first innovative form may be a result of a language user’s intentional violation of a structural organization rule for a certain communicative purpose. The receiver, trying to correctly understand what the producer means, will have to make cognitive efforts to establish a structural gestalt by way of assigning structural boundaries. If the receiver’s boundary assignment comes to an agreement with the producer’s and accords with Gestalt Laws in human cognition, the innovative form will be accepted and spread in the language community and then finally entrench itself as new grammatical convention. That is the general process of lexicalization. The boundary assigning tendency manifested in the process of linguistic structure construal is a cognitive ability dominated by Gestalt Laws in human cognition of the world and world relations, which is actually a driving force for linguistic structural organization, and therefore an important motivation for lexicalization.
Keywords
Lexicalization, Gestalt Establishment, Boundary Assignment, Cognitive Motivation
To cite this article
Liu Chendan, Boundary Assignment: A Cognitive Motivation for Lexicalization, International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 6, No. 4, 2018, pp. 110-117. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20180604.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Dong, X. F. The syntactic evolution of the Chinese language and lexicalization [J]. Chinese Language. 2009(5):399-409.
[2]
Brinton, L. & E. Traugott. Lexicalization and Language Change [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2005.
[3]
Liu, L. The process of lexicalization of ran’er and its motivation [J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Science Edition). 2008(5):49—55.
[4]
Dong, X. F. Lexicalization: the derivation and development of Chinese disyllabic word [M]. Chengdu: Sichuan Nationalities Publishing House. 2013.
[5]
Guo, X. L. The development of word-building in the Pre-Qin Chinese [A]. In Guo, X. L. (ed.) A Collection on the History of the Chinese Language [C]. Beijing: Commercial Press. 1997.
[6]
Shi, Y. Z. The Establishment of Modern Chinese Grammar: The Formation of Resultative Construction in the History of Chinese and its Effects [M]. Philadelphia & Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 2003.
[7]
Liu, H. N. Lexicalization of napa [J]. Nankai Linguistic Journal. 2010(1): 142-150.
[8]
Wang, M. H. The manifestation of lexicalized particles and non-words at synchronic level [J]. Journal of Ankang College. 2011(5):38-41.
[9]
Croft, W. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach [M]. London: Longman. 2000.
[10]
Langacker,R. Cognitive Grammar —A Basic Introduction [M]. New York: Oxford University Press. 2008.
[11]
Wang, C. L. Two examples of lexicalization—the relation between lexicalization and grammaticalization [J]. Contemporary Linguistics. 2005(3):225-236.
[12]
Ma, Q. H. The motivation of lexicalization [J]. Chinese Lnguage Learning. 2003(2):15—20.
[13]
Liu, C. D. Boundary movement: a motivation for linguistic innovation [J]. Foreign Languages Research. 2012(1):30-34.
[14]
Liu, C. D. The establishment of structure-boundary unity: a cognitive basis for the construction of linguistic expressions [J]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research. 2008(3): 204-210.
[15]
Givón, T. Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: an archaeologist's field trip [A]. Proceedings of the 7th regional meeting of the Chicago linguistics society [C]. Chicago: linguistics society, 1971: 394-415.
[16]
Langacker, R. Syntactic reanalysis [A]. In Li, C. (ed.) Mechanisms of Syntactic Change [C]. Austin: University of Texas Press.1977:57-139.
[17]
Evans, V. & M. Green. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction [M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 2006.
[18]
Keller, R. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language [M]. London: Routledge. 1994.
[19]
Cao, R. The lexicalization of rongyi and rong’s meaning of “permission” [J]. Chinese Language Learning. 2007(1):37-40.
[20]
Bielak, J. Applying Cognitive Grammar in the Foreign Language Classroom [M]. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2013.
[21]
Li, W. S. The three haiyou in modern Chinese –lexicalization in synchronic materials [J]. Chinese Language Learning. 2008(5):55-61.
[22]
Xing, G. W. A seemingly prevalent suspicious syntactic structure--VO+O [J]. Language Planning. 1997 (4): 21-23.
[23]
Pan, G. Y. & H. Y. Qi. Lexicalization of yehao. Chinese Lnguage Learning. 2009(5): 20-27.
[24]
Dancygier, B. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2017.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186