Research Hotspots and Frontiers of Language Studies in China in the Context of the Belt and Road Initiative —— Bibliometrics Analysis Based on CiteSpace
International Journal of Language and Linguistics
Volume 8, Issue 3, May 2020, Pages: 100-107
Received: Apr. 2, 2020; Accepted: Apr. 20, 2020; Published: May 12, 2020
Views 170      Downloads 90
Chen Xi, English Language and Literature, the School of Translation Studies, Shandong University, Weihai, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
The Belt and Road Initiative was proposed in 2013, which develops economic partnerships with countries along the route actively, and builds a community of shared future, interests and responsibility, borrowing the historical symbol of the ancient Silk Road. Language plays an important role in serving the construction of the Belt and Road Initiative. Therefore, by means of bibliometrics analysis, the research tool, CiteSpace, was used to analyze the annual output, authors, keywords, institutes, and hotspots of 1430 papers related to the field of language studies in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative by CNKI database from 2014 to 2018. This paper adopts research methods of co-word analysis and co-word cluster analysis, and more specially, uses research yield analysis, cooperation diagrams analysis and strategic diagram analysis methods. The aim of this research is to sort out the relevant research comprehensively and systematically, outline the overall situation and development trend of these researches, summarize and analyze the hotspots and frontiers. The research shows that the overall trend of language studies in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative has rapid and linear growth. In recent years, the focus of research has been on personnel training, translation strategy, education reform, foreign language talents and so on.
The Belt and Road Initiative, CiteSpace, Language Studies, Bibliometric Analysis
To cite this article
Chen Xi, Research Hotspots and Frontiers of Language Studies in China in the Context of the Belt and Road Initiative —— Bibliometrics Analysis Based on CiteSpace, International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 8, No. 3, 2020, pp. 100-107. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20200803.12
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Junping, Q. and Yuefen, W. (2008). Bibliometric content analysis. Beijing: National Library Press.
Huichao, Z. and Ke L. (2017). China’s Critical Discourse Analysis in Past Twenty Years Based on Bibliometric Methods. Journal of North China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition): Series 6, 111-117.
Liping, C. (2014). Promote the re-dissemination of Chinese civilization in Eurasia based on the Belt and Road. Journalism Quarterly: Series 5, 96-101.
Xingyun, L. (2016). Plights and Development Routes of Chinese Higher Education against “The Belt and Road Initiatives”. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology: Series 5, 1-5.
Yan, Z. (2016). “The Belt and Road” Strategy and Chinese Higher Education Development Orientation. Journal of Yangzhou University (Higher Education Study Edition): Series 6, 8-12.
Zhimin, L., Lu, L. and Shunshun, H. (2016). On the Process of Mass Higher Education of 73 Countries along the Belt and Road Initiative Regions. International and Comparative Education: Series 4, 1-8.
Yunsheng, Y. (2015). The Construction of One Belt and One Road and the Training of Foreign Language Talents. Journal of Hainan Normal University (Social Sciences): Series 9, 130-144.
Qiufang, W. (2016). Producing Language-qualified Personnel for “the Belt and Road Initiatives”. Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning: Series 2, 26-32.
Xing, H. (2015). Cross-border language situations in China and in the core countries along the One Belt and One Road. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition): Series 5, 1-8.
Wenxue, H. and Jinjia, W. (2010). Survey on visualization and visual analytics. Journal of Yanshan University: Series 2, 95-99.
Haiyan, H., Zeyuan, L. and Yue, C et al (2006). Mapping of science studies: the trend of research fronts. Science Research Management: Series 3, 90-96.
Jiguang, Z. (2016). Scientometric analysis of China’s translation Studies (2005-2014)——Based on the Word Frequency Statistics of 12 Core Journals on. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science): Series 4, 429-435.
Aiqing, Y. (2012). Visualization research on the research situation of Library and Information Science in China. Shandong: Qufu Normal University.
Jianhua, H. and Zhigang, H. (2013) Review on the Application of CiteSpace at Home and Abroad. Journal of Modern Information: Series 33 (04), 99-103.
Ting, S. and Changlin, X. (2015). Visual analysis of literature on the Belt and Road based on CiteSpace. Library and Information Service: Series 2, 135-137.
Guangyang, L. (2017) Application in China-Based on the Statistical and Visual Analysis of Cross-Database Data from 2006 to 2015. Documentation, Information & Knowledge: Series 2, 60-74.
Dongjun, C. (2017) Review of the Studies on “the Belt and Road” --An Analysis Based on Citespace. Resource Development & Market: Series 33 (10): 1236-1241+1253.
Jing, P. and Yunhuan, F. (2017). A Visualized Study on the Relevance between the Belt and Road Initiative and the Literature of Customs Research based on CiteSpace III. Journal of Customs and Trade: Series 2: 1-11.
Kaiyue, S. and Jun S. (2015). Research on the Frontiers of World Economic. Economic Perspectives: Series 6, 95-99.
Haiyan, H. et al. (2010) Interdisciplinary feature of knowmetrics. Studies in Science of Science: Series 28 (03), 328-332+350.
Jiyuan, Y. (2005). Xueshu guifan tonglun (An introduction to academic norms), 123. Shanghai: Huadong shida chubanshe.
Law et al. (1998) Policy and the Mapping of Scientific Change: A Co-word Analysis of Research into Environment Acidification. Scientometrics: Series14, 3-4.
Coulter Neal et al. (1998) An Evolutionary Perspective of Software Engineering Research through Co-word Analysis. Technical Report: Series5, 19-23.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186