| Peer-Reviewed

On the Contribution of Iranian EFL Teachers' Sense of Plausibility to Language Teaching Pedagogy

Received: 28 April 2014    Accepted: 12 May 2014    Published: 14 June 2014
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The present study was conducted to investigate the impact of the teachers' sense of plausibility on their classroom practices. The participants were 42 male and female high school English teachers and some of their students. To fulfill the purpose of the study, a 60-item teacher's sense of plausibility questionnaire was administered to the teachers and a 29 item questionnaire was administered to their students to determine the effect of the teacher's sense of plausibility on the classroom performances. The analysis of data was done through Pearson Correlation and the parametric independent t-test analyses. The findings indicated that there is a close relationship between the teacher's sense of plausibility and his/her teaching performances. With respect to these findings, it could be concluded that the students whose teachers had a higher sense of plausibility had better language performances than those students whose teachers had a lower sense of plausibility which is worth considering.

Published in International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 2, Issue 3-1)

This article belongs to the Special Issue Foreign Language Teaching and Learning (Models and Beliefs)

DOI 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.11
Page(s) 1-11
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Sense of Plausibility, Self-Esteem, Teacher's Belief, Method, and Pedagogy

References
[1] Akbari, R.(2008) Postmethod discourse and practice. TESOL Quarterly. 42/2.
[2] Alemi, M. & Daftarifard. P. (2010). Pedagogical Innovations in language teaching methodologies. Academy Publisher. 1, 6, 765-770.
[3] Barg, S.(2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching. Lang. teach. 36, 81-109.
[4] Benson. P. & Voller, P (1997). Autonomy and Independence in language learning. London; Longman.
[5] Brown, H. D.(2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. A Pearson Education Company.
[6] Candy, (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. California: Jossey.
[7] Da Silva, C. P. (2004). Teachers and Learners: Investigating the language classroom. TESOL Quartly, 17, 3, 163-176.
[8] Doff, A. (1990). Teach English. Cambridge University Press.
[9] Garter, R. & Nunan, D. (2001). Teaching English to speakers other of Languages. Cambridge university press.
[10] Gatbonton, E. (2008). Looking beyond teacher's Classroom Behavior: Novice And Experienced ESL teacher's pedagogical knowledge. LTR, 161-182.
[11] Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times. New York: Teacher College.
[12] Hinkel, E. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching the four skills. TESOLQuar-terly. 40, 1, 109-131.
[13] Jia, Y, Eslami, Z, R. &Burlbaw, I. (2006). ESL teachers' perceptions and factors
[14] Influencing their use of classroom- based reading assessment. Bilingual Re- Search Journal. 29(2), 459-482.
[15] Kumaravadivelu, B.(1994). The Post method condition : (E)merging strategies for second/ foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarter-ly .28
[16] Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a post method Pedagogy. TE-SOL
[17] Quarterly, 35(4), 537-560.
[18] Kumaravadivelu, B, (2003). Ten Macro strategies for teaching language.
[19] Yale university press.
[20] Lewis, M. & Hill, J.( 1990). Practical techniques for language teaching.
[21] Commercial color press, London.
[22] Micheslo, w. & Harvey, A. S. (2000). Is teacher's work never done? Time-use and subjective outcomes. ICAAP. 1-8.
[23] Nation, I.S.P & Macalister, J(2010). Language Curriculum Design. Rutledge: New York.
[24] Nunan, D.(1993). Syllabus Design. Oxford University Press.
[25] Nunan, D.(2000). Second Language Teaching and Learning. USA: Heinle & Heinle.
[26] O'Malley, J.M and Cha-mot, A.U (1990). Learning strategy in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
[27] Pallant, J.(2007). SPSS-Survival Manual . Open University Press.
[28] Parajes, M.F(1998). Teachers' beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning up a Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research 62(3), 307-332.
[29] Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, In-terested knowledge, and the Politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly. 23, 4, 589-613.
[30] Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method-why ? TESOL Quartly, 24, 2, 161-176.
[31] Prabhu, N.S. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford University press.
[32] Prabhu, N,S. (1992). The dynamics of the language lesson. TESOL
[33] Richards, J. C. & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language Teaching. Cambridge university press.
[34] Salmani, M. A. (2006). Language teaching: State of the art. The reading matrix, 6,2, 125-137.
[35] Schmitt, N. (2002). Applied Linguistics. Arnold, New York
[36] Spratt, M.(1999). How good are we at knowing what learners like? System, 27, 141-155.
[37] Stern, H.H(1991). Fundamental concept of language teaching. Oxford University Press.
[38] Thanasoulas, S. (2011). What is learner autonomy & how can it be fostered? In-ternet TESOL journal. 1-12.
[39] Ur, P(1996). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
[40] Wenden, A. L. (1985). Learner Strategies. TESOL Newsletter, 19, 1-17.
[41] Williams, M. & Burden, R. L.(2000). Psychology For Language Learning. Cambridge University press.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Fahime Farjami, Hanieh Davatgari Asl, Ali Rezaee Javidan. (2014). On the Contribution of Iranian EFL Teachers' Sense of Plausibility to Language Teaching Pedagogy. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3-1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Fahime Farjami; Hanieh Davatgari Asl; Ali Rezaee Javidan. On the Contribution of Iranian EFL Teachers' Sense of Plausibility to Language Teaching Pedagogy. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2014, 2(3-1), 1-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Fahime Farjami, Hanieh Davatgari Asl, Ali Rezaee Javidan. On the Contribution of Iranian EFL Teachers' Sense of Plausibility to Language Teaching Pedagogy. Int J Lang Linguist. 2014;2(3-1):1-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.11,
      author = {Fahime Farjami and Hanieh Davatgari Asl and Ali Rezaee Javidan},
      title = {On the Contribution of Iranian EFL Teachers' Sense of Plausibility to Language Teaching Pedagogy},
      journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
      volume = {2},
      number = {3-1},
      pages = {1-11},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.s.2014020301.11},
      abstract = {The present study was conducted to investigate the impact of the teachers' sense of plausibility on their classroom practices. The participants were 42 male and female high school English teachers and some of their students. To fulfill the purpose of the study, a 60-item teacher's sense of plausibility questionnaire was administered to the teachers and a 29 item questionnaire was administered to their students to determine the effect of the teacher's sense of plausibility on the classroom performances. The analysis of data was done through Pearson Correlation and the parametric independent t-test analyses. The findings indicated that there is a close relationship between the teacher's sense of plausibility and his/her teaching performances. With respect to these findings, it could be concluded that the students whose teachers had a higher sense of plausibility had better language performances than those students whose teachers had a lower sense of plausibility which is worth considering.},
     year = {2014}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - On the Contribution of Iranian EFL Teachers' Sense of Plausibility to Language Teaching Pedagogy
    AU  - Fahime Farjami
    AU  - Hanieh Davatgari Asl
    AU  - Ali Rezaee Javidan
    Y1  - 2014/06/14
    PY  - 2014
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.11
    T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 11
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0221
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.11
    AB  - The present study was conducted to investigate the impact of the teachers' sense of plausibility on their classroom practices. The participants were 42 male and female high school English teachers and some of their students. To fulfill the purpose of the study, a 60-item teacher's sense of plausibility questionnaire was administered to the teachers and a 29 item questionnaire was administered to their students to determine the effect of the teacher's sense of plausibility on the classroom performances. The analysis of data was done through Pearson Correlation and the parametric independent t-test analyses. The findings indicated that there is a close relationship between the teacher's sense of plausibility and his/her teaching performances. With respect to these findings, it could be concluded that the students whose teachers had a higher sense of plausibility had better language performances than those students whose teachers had a lower sense of plausibility which is worth considering.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 3-1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Young Researchers and Elite Club, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran

  • Department of English Language Teaching, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran

  • Department of English Language Teaching, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran

  • Sections