International Journal of Language and Linguistics

| Peer-Reviewed |

Applications of Robot Assisted Language Learning (RALL) in Language Learning and Teaching

Received: 28 April 2014    Accepted: 12 May 2014    Published: 14 June 2014
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

This study covers a complete overview of the theoretical rationale of application of robots, other instructional inter faces like CALL, MALL, m-learning, r-learning, different types of robots, their instructional roles , their educational activities, the related researches, findings, and challenges of robotic assisted language learning . Since robotic revolution, many investigators in different countries have attempted to utilize robots to enhance education. As many people in the world have personal computers (PCs), in the following years, Personal Robots (PR) may become the next tool for every one’s life. Robots not only have the attributes of CALL/MALL, but also are able for independent movements, voice/visual recognition and environmental interactions, non-verbal communication, collaboration with native speakers, diagnosing pronunciation, video conferencing with native speakers, native speaker tutoring, adaptability, sensing, repeatability, intelligence, mobility and human appearance. Robot- aided learning (r- learning) services can be described as interactive and instructional activities which can be interacted and performed between robots and learners in both virtual and real worlds.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.12
Published in International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 2, Issue 3-1, June 2014)

This article belongs to the Special Issue Foreign Language Teaching and Learning (Models and Beliefs)

Page(s) 12-20
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

RALL, CALL, MALL

References
[1] A. Meghdari, M. Alemi, M. Ghaazisaidi, A. R. Taheri, A. Karimian, and M. Z. Vakili, Applying Robot Teaching Assistant in EFL Classes at Iranian Middle-Schools. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Education and Modern Educational Technologies (EMET2013), Venice, Italy September 28- 30, 2013.
[2] B. House, J. Malkin, and J.A. Bilmes, The VoiceBot: A voice controlled robot arm. In Proceedings of CHI 2009. New York: ACM Press. 2009.
[3] C. C. Wu, C. W. Chang, B. J. Liu, and G. D. Chen, Improving vocabulary acquisition by designing storytelling robot. In Proceedings of 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2008, pp. 498–500.
[4] C. F. Shih, C. W. Chang, and G. D. Chen, Robot as a storytelling partner in the English classroom: Preliminary discussion. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2007, pp. 678–682.
[5] C. Y. Li, “A study of in-service teachers’ beliefs, difficulties and problems in current teacher development programs,” HKBU Papers in Applied Language Studies, Vol. 7, pp. 64–85, 2003.
[6] D. Carless, Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOLQuarterlyVol.38, No.4, 2004, pp.639–662.
[7] D. Nunan, The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region, TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 37,No. 4, 2003,pp. 589–613.
[8] E. Garvie, Story as vehicle: Teaching English to young children. Clevedon, Avon, UK,1990
[9] E. Hyun, S. Kim, S. Jang, and S. Park, “Comparative study of effects of language education program using intelligence robot and multimedia on linguistic ability of young children.” Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN. 2008, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2008.
[10] G. Stockwell, A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature. European Association for Computer-Assisted Language Learning (ReCALL), Vol. 19, No. 2, 2007, pp. 105–120.
[11] H. Jeonghye, K. Dongho, L. Kyung Seon, P Sung Ju, and S. Kyung Chul, A teaching assistant robot in elementary schools. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence. Seoul, South Korea, 2005.
[12] H. Ryu, S. S. Kwak, and M. Kim, A study on external form design factors for robots as elementary school teaching assistants. In Robot and Human interactive Communication, 2007. RO-MAN 2007. The 16th IEEE International.
[13] H. W. Kam, English language teaching in East Asia Today: An overview. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. Vol.22, No.2, 2002, pp 1–22.
[14] J. Han, Robot-aided learning and r-learning services. In D. Chugo Ed., Human-Robot Interaction. Retrieved from: http://sciyo.com/articles/show/title/robot-aided-learning-and-r-learning-services, 2010.
[15] J. Hendler, Robots for the Rest of Us: Designing Systems Out of the Box. Robots for Kids–Exploring New Your,2000
[16] J. J. Asher, Learning another language through actions: The complete teacher’s guidebook, 2nd ed., Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks Productions. 1982.
[17] J. M. Han, S. Park, and S. Kim, The Educational Use of Home Robots for Children. In Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN, 2005), 378–383. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2005.
[18] J. R. Movellan, F. Tanaka, B. Fortenberry, and K. Aisaka, The RUBI/QRIO Project: Origins, principles, and first steps. In Proceedings of The 4nd International Conference on Development and Learning, 2005, pp. 80–86, Retrievedfrom http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2005.1490948.
[19] L. S. Shulman, Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform, Havard Educational Review, Vol. 57, No. 1, 1987, pp. 1-22
[20] L. Xie, A. N. Antle, and N. Motamedi, Are tangibles more fun? Comparing children’s enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces. In TEI ’08: Proceedings of the2nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, New York: ACM, 2008, pp. 191–198.
[21] M. F, Csikszentmihalyi, The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row. 1990
[22] P. J. T. F. Morris, R. Au. M. L. Adamson, K. K. Chan, W. Y. Ko. P. Y. Chan, and P. H. Wong, Target-oriented curriculum evaluation project: Interim report. Hong Kong: INSTEP, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, 1996.
[23] R. Heinich, M. Molenda, J. D. Russell, and S. E. Smaldino, Instructional media and technologies forlearning, 7thed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall, 2002.
[24] R. E. Mayer, and R. Moreno, A cognitive theory of multimedia learning: implications for design principles. In Proceedings of Annual meeting of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 1998.
[25] R. E. Mayer, Multimedia learning, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001
[26] R. P. Taylor, The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee, Ed., New York: Teacher's College Press, 1980
[27] S. C. Yang, and Y. J. Chen, Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 23, 2007, pp. 860–879.
[28] S. E. Smaldino, J. D. Russell, R. Heinich, and M. Molenda, Instructional media, and technologies for learning, 8th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Stockwell, G, 2007. A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature. European Association for Computer-Assisted Language Learning (Re CALL), Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 105–120.
[29] S. Krashen, and T. Terrell, The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford Pergamon, 1983.
[30] S. Lee, H. Noh, J. Lee, K. Lee, and G. G. Lee, “Cognitive effects of robot-assisted language learning on oral skills,” In INTERSPEECH 2010 Satellite Workshop on Second Language Studies: Acquisition, Learning, Education and Technology, 2010.
[31] S. Papert, The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. Basic Books. New York, 1993.
[32] T. Kanda, and H. Ishiguro, “Communication robots for elementary schools,” In Proceedings of the Symposium on Robot Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Robot-Human Interaction, (pp. 54–63). Brighton, 2005
[33] T. Kanda, T. Hirano, D. Eaton, and H. Ishiguro,. Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Journal of Human Computer Interaction, Vol.19, No.1–2, 2004, pp. 61–84.
[34] W. Littlewood. Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice, ACELT Journal, Vol.7, No.1, 2003, pp. 3–13.
[35] Z. You, C. Shen, C. Chang, B. Liuand, and G. Chen, A robot as a teaching assistant in an English class. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning. Technologies, New York, NY: IEEE, 2006, pp. 87–91.
Author Information
  • Department of English Language Teaching, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran

  • Post Doctoral Research Associate, Faculty of Applied Linguistics, Sharif University of Technology, Iran

  • Young Researchers and Elite Club, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran

  • Department of English Language Teaching, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Nader Assadi Aidinlou, Minoo Alemi, Fahime Farjami, Muhammad Makhdoumi. (2014). Applications of Robot Assisted Language Learning (RALL) in Language Learning and Teaching. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3-1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Nader Assadi Aidinlou; Minoo Alemi; Fahime Farjami; Muhammad Makhdoumi. Applications of Robot Assisted Language Learning (RALL) in Language Learning and Teaching. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2014, 2(3-1), 12-20. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Nader Assadi Aidinlou, Minoo Alemi, Fahime Farjami, Muhammad Makhdoumi. Applications of Robot Assisted Language Learning (RALL) in Language Learning and Teaching. Int J Lang Linguist. 2014;2(3-1):12-20. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.12,
      author = {Nader Assadi Aidinlou and Minoo Alemi and Fahime Farjami and Muhammad Makhdoumi},
      title = {Applications of Robot Assisted Language Learning (RALL) in Language Learning and Teaching},
      journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
      volume = {2},
      number = {3-1},
      pages = {12-20},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.12},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.s.2014020301.12},
      abstract = {This study covers a complete overview of the theoretical rationale of application of robots, other instructional inter faces like CALL, MALL, m-learning, r-learning, different types of robots, their instructional roles , their educational activities, the related researches, findings, and challenges of robotic assisted language learning . Since robotic revolution, many investigators in different countries have attempted to utilize robots to enhance education. As many people in the world have personal computers (PCs), in the following years, Personal Robots (PR) may become the next tool for every one’s life. Robots not only have the attributes of CALL/MALL, but also are able for independent movements, voice/visual recognition and environmental interactions, non-verbal communication, collaboration with native speakers, diagnosing pronunciation, video conferencing with native speakers, native speaker tutoring, adaptability, sensing, repeatability, intelligence, mobility and human appearance. Robot- aided learning (r- learning) services can be described as interactive and instructional activities which can be interacted and performed between robots and learners in both virtual and real worlds.},
     year = {2014}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Applications of Robot Assisted Language Learning (RALL) in Language Learning and Teaching
    AU  - Nader Assadi Aidinlou
    AU  - Minoo Alemi
    AU  - Fahime Farjami
    AU  - Muhammad Makhdoumi
    Y1  - 2014/06/14
    PY  - 2014
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.12
    T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    SP  - 12
    EP  - 20
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0221
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.12
    AB  - This study covers a complete overview of the theoretical rationale of application of robots, other instructional inter faces like CALL, MALL, m-learning, r-learning, different types of robots, their instructional roles , their educational activities, the related researches, findings, and challenges of robotic assisted language learning . Since robotic revolution, many investigators in different countries have attempted to utilize robots to enhance education. As many people in the world have personal computers (PCs), in the following years, Personal Robots (PR) may become the next tool for every one’s life. Robots not only have the attributes of CALL/MALL, but also are able for independent movements, voice/visual recognition and environmental interactions, non-verbal communication, collaboration with native speakers, diagnosing pronunciation, video conferencing with native speakers, native speaker tutoring, adaptability, sensing, repeatability, intelligence, mobility and human appearance. Robot- aided learning (r- learning) services can be described as interactive and instructional activities which can be interacted and performed between robots and learners in both virtual and real worlds.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 3-1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections