International Journal of Language and Linguistics

| Peer-Reviewed |

The Inapplicability of Huebner’s Semantic Wheel to Some English Nps: A Debatable Viewpoint at the Deeper Level

Received: 04 April 2016    Accepted: 15 April 2016    Published: 27 April 2016
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

The current paper is an argumentative outlook of Huebner’s Semantic Wheel. The researcher wanted to investigate the difficulties in the use of English articles by the Yemeni EFL learners. Huebner’s Semantic Wheel was used to identify the most frequently substituted NPs. However, some shortcomings in the applicability of such model in some cases were found. The curiosity of discovering the reasons behind the inapplicability of Huebner’s model to some noun phrases led to some notable conclusions; which are put, here, for discussion.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijll.20160403.12
Published in International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 4, Issue 3, May 2016)
Page(s) 96-102
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Huebner’s Semantic Wheel, Definiteness, Specificity, Transfer, Article System

References
[1] Geng, J. (2010). The Semantic Analysis of the Definite Article’ Misuse by Chinese Learners of English. Asian Social Science, vol 6, pp180-184.
[2] Huebner, T. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers, Inc.
[3] Master, P. (1987). A Cross-Linguistic Interlanguage Analysis of the Acquisition of the English Article System. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UCLA
[4] Master, P. (1997). The English Article System: Acquisition, Function and Pedagogy. System, 25, 215-232.
[5] Parrish, B. (1987). A New Look at Methodologies in the Study of Article Acquisition for Learners of EFL. Language Learning, vol 37, pp361-383.
[6] Shalaby, A. I. (2014). English– and Arabic-Medium of Instruction and Second Language Acquisition of English Articles System by ESL Arab Sophomores in Sharjah, Master Thesis, The British University: Dubai, UAE.
[7] Ionin, T., Ko, H. and Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2-acquisition: the role of specificity. Language Acquisition, vol 12, pp3-69.
[8] Takahashi, T. (1997). Japanese Learners’ Acquisition and Use of the English Article System. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, vol 8, pp98-110.
[9] Thomas, M. (1989). The Acquisition of English Articles by First and Second Language Learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, vol 10, pp 335-355.
[10] Wing-man, C. (2005). Acquisition of the English article system by Hong Kong students. Master Thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong: Hong Kong, China.
Author Information
  • Department of Linguistics, University of Mysore, City of Mysore, India

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Thekra Mohammed Abdullah Yehia. (2016). The Inapplicability of Huebner’s Semantic Wheel to Some English Nps: A Debatable Viewpoint at the Deeper Level. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 4(3), 96-102. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20160403.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Thekra Mohammed Abdullah Yehia. The Inapplicability of Huebner’s Semantic Wheel to Some English Nps: A Debatable Viewpoint at the Deeper Level. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2016, 4(3), 96-102. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20160403.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Thekra Mohammed Abdullah Yehia. The Inapplicability of Huebner’s Semantic Wheel to Some English Nps: A Debatable Viewpoint at the Deeper Level. Int J Lang Linguist. 2016;4(3):96-102. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20160403.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijll.20160403.12,
      author = {Thekra Mohammed Abdullah Yehia},
      title = {The Inapplicability of Huebner’s Semantic Wheel to Some English Nps: A Debatable Viewpoint at the Deeper Level},
      journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
      volume = {4},
      number = {3},
      pages = {96-102},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20160403.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20160403.12},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20160403.12},
      abstract = {The current paper is an argumentative outlook of Huebner’s Semantic Wheel. The researcher wanted to investigate the difficulties in the use of English articles by the Yemeni EFL learners. Huebner’s Semantic Wheel was used to identify the most frequently substituted NPs. However, some shortcomings in the applicability of such model in some cases were found. The curiosity of discovering the reasons behind the inapplicability of Huebner’s model to some noun phrases led to some notable conclusions; which are put, here, for discussion.},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Inapplicability of Huebner’s Semantic Wheel to Some English Nps: A Debatable Viewpoint at the Deeper Level
    AU  - Thekra Mohammed Abdullah Yehia
    Y1  - 2016/04/27
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20160403.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.20160403.12
    T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    SP  - 96
    EP  - 102
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0221
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20160403.12
    AB  - The current paper is an argumentative outlook of Huebner’s Semantic Wheel. The researcher wanted to investigate the difficulties in the use of English articles by the Yemeni EFL learners. Huebner’s Semantic Wheel was used to identify the most frequently substituted NPs. However, some shortcomings in the applicability of such model in some cases were found. The curiosity of discovering the reasons behind the inapplicability of Huebner’s model to some noun phrases led to some notable conclusions; which are put, here, for discussion.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections