International Journal of Literature and Arts
Volume 3, Issue 5, September 2015, Pages: 108-119
Received: Aug. 4, 2015;
Accepted: Aug. 14, 2015;
Published: Nov. 10, 2015
Views 3409 Downloads 74
Javed Akhter, Department of English Literature and Linguistics, University of Balochistan, Quetta, Pakistan
Shumaila Abdullah, Department of English Literature and Linguistics, University of Balochistan, Quetta, Pakistan
Khair Muhammad, Department of English Literature and Linguistics, University of Balochistan, Quetta, Pakistan
The aim of this research paper is to explore by comparing and contrasting between the two literary characters Hamlet and Oblomov how they are in their essence indecisive that are exploited by William Shakespeare and Ivan Goncharov in different historical ages to project different visions of the human situation. Every author is influenced by his age to certain degrees and if the art of characterization of William Shakespeare is set against that of Ivan Goncharov, it is because of the difference of ideological perspectives. William Shakespeare’s character Hamlet comes from the Renaissance England and Ivan Goncharov’s character Oblomov comes from the nineteenth century Russia. The former is in certain ways different from the latter despite the fact that those traits of the both characters are the same as indecision and procrastination. The comparison and contrast will be highlighted in this paper in terms of Marxist hermeneutics, which is scientific theory and method of analyzing the social and literary types in the context of class milieu. Applying Marxist literary hermeneutics to the art of characterization of both the authors, the present study tries to introduce new portrait and re-evaluation of the personages of the two literary types in an innovative perspective.
Hamlet and Oblomov: A Comparative Study, International Journal of Literature and Arts.
Vol. 3, No. 5,
2015, pp. 108-119.
Alexander, Peter. (1953). Hamlet Father and Son: The Lord Northcliffe Lectures University College. London, Oxford: Clarendon.
Althusser, Louis. (1969). For Marx. Paris, France: The Penguin Press.
Althusser, Louis. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Trans. Ben Brewster. London, Great Britain: New Left Books.
Belsey, Catherine. (1980). Critical Practice. London, Great Britain: Routledge.
Belsey, Catherine. (1985). the Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama, London: Methuen.
Borowec, C. (1994). “Time after Time: The Temporal Ideology of Oblomov,” The Slavic and East European Journal, 38. 4, pp. 561-573.
Caudwell, Christopher. (1977). Illusion and Reality. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Cornwell, Neil. (2001).The Routledge Companion to Russian Literature. London: Routledge. pp. 111-122.
Diment, Galya. (1998). “The Precocious Talent of Ivan Goncharov,” In: Galya. Diment (ed.), Goncharov’s Oblomov: A Critical Companion, pp. 3-50. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Diment, Galya. (2001). “Ivan Aleksandrovich Goncharov,” In J. Ogden and J. Kalb (eds.), Russian Novelists in the Age of Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. Detroit, pp. 90-106.
Dobrolyubov, Nikolai Aleksandrovich. (1956). “What is Oblomovism?” In: Selected Philosophical Essays. Moscow. Pp. 182-194, 204-217.
Eagleton, Terry. (1986). William Shakespeare. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Ehre, M. (1973). Oblomov and His Creator. Princeton.
Ehre, M. (1985). “Goncharov, Ivan Aleksandrovich,” in: V. Terras (ed.), the Handbook of Russian Literature. New Haven, pp. 178-179.
Egan, Gabriel. (2004). Shakespeare and Marx. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frank. J. (2014). “Being and Laziness,” The New Republic, TheNewRepublicMag.(web),http://www.mewrepublic.com/articlebeing-and laziness,29.1.2007,25.1.2014 (acc.)
Gerschenkron, A. (1975). “Time Horizon in Russian Literature,” The Slavic Review, 34. 4, pp. 692-715.
Goncharov, Ivan. (1915). Oblomov. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Jameson, Fredric, (1995). Marx’s Purloined Letter. New Left Review. 1/209, January-February 1995.
Kuhn, A. (1971). “Dobrolyubov’s Critique of Oblomov: Polemics and Psychology.” Slavic Review 30.1, 1971, pp. 93-109.
Leerssen, J. (2007). “Imagology: History and Method,” “Image,” “Identity/ Alterity/Hybridity,” in: M. Beller, J. Leerssen (eds.), Imagology: The Cultural Construction and Literary Representation of National Characters, Amsterdam, pp. 17-32, and 335-344.
Lenin, V. I. (1970). Collected Works, Vol. 33. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Lifshitz, Mikhail. ” (1938). Literature and Marxism: A Controversy. New York: Critics Group.
Lukacs, Georg. (1981). the Historical Novel. Penguin Books.
Lunacharsky, Anatoly. (1973). “Bacon and the characters of Shakespeare’s Plays” in Lunacharsky on Literature and Art, pp. 218-243.Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Marx, Karl and F. Engels. (1965) Selected Correspondence. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Marx, Karl and F. Engels. (1975). Marx-Engels Reader. Robert C. Tucker. Ed. 2nd edn. New York: Norton.
Marx, Karl and F. Engels. (1975). “The Manifesto of the Communist Party”. The Marx-Engels Reader. Robert C. Tucker. Ed. 2nd edn. New York: Norton. Pp. 469-500.
Marx, Karl and F. Engels. (1975). Collected Works, Vol. 25. New York: International Publishers.
McLean, H. (1998). “The Countryside,” in: M. Jones, R. Miller (eds.), the Cambridge Companion to the Classic Russian Novel, Cambridge, pp. 41-62.
Muza, A. (2000). “Science, Philosophy, Muse: Chekhov’s Three Germans,” in: Gold Fusion, pp. 185-196.
Peace, Richard. (1991). Oblomov: A Critical Examination of Goncharov’s Novel. United Kingdom: Birmingham Slavonic Monographs of Department of Russian Language and Literature, University of Birmingham.
Rafi, Abu Saleh Md. (2012). The Comparative Nature in Comparative Literature: A Case Study of Some Major Bengali Literary Works in Conjunction of Other National Literatures in: Bangladesh Research Foundation Journal. Vol 1, ISSN: 2224-8404, (February 2012). pp. 1-14.
Reeve, Franklin. “Oblomovism Revisited,” American Slavic and East European Review, XV, pp. 112-118.
Seeley, F. (2003). “Oblomov,” The Slavonic and East European Review, 54. 3, 1976, pp. 335-354.
Seeley, F. “The Heyday of the ‘Superfluous Man’ in Russia,” The Slavonic and East European Review, XXXI, pp.92-112
Senese, D. (2003). Nikolai Aleksandrovich Dobrolyubov, In: A Gillespie (ed.), Russian Literature in the Age of Realism (= Dictionary of Literary Biography, 277), Gale, Detroit, pp. 80-93.
Setchkarev, V. (1967). “Andrey Schtoltz in Goncharov’s Oblomov: An Attempted Reinterpretation,” in: To Honour Roman Jakobson. Essays on Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, 3, The Hague, Paris 1967, pp. 1799-1805.
Shakespeare, William. (2005). Hamlet. London: Penguin.
Shishkin, M. (2008). “Afterword,” in: I. Goncharov, M. Schwartz (trans.), Oblomov, New York, pp. 545-552.
Smirnov, A.A. (1936). Shakespeare: A Marxist Interpretation, New York: Critics Group.
Stacy, R. H. (1985). “Dobrolyubov, Nikolai Aleksandrovich.” The Handbook of Russian Literature, (ed.), Victor Terras. New Haven: Yale University Press. p. 101.
Stallman, Leon. “Oblomovka Revisited,” American Slavic and East European Review, VII, pp. 45-77.
Turgenev, Ivan. (1990). Sketches from a Hunter’s Album, trans. Richard Freeborn. London: Penguin.
Walker, Joshua S. (2013). “Neither Burgher nor Barin: An Imagological and Intercultural Reading of Andrey Schtoltz in Ivan Goncharove’s Oblomov (1859)”, in: Slevene, International Journal of Slavic Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2. pp. 5-30.
Wiggins, Kathleen Cameron. (2001). the Drama in Disguise: Dramatic Modes of Narration and Textual Structure in Mid-Nineteen-Century Russian Novel. A Ph. D Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.