The "Dynamic" Behavior of Group Psychology Represented by Culture
International Journal of Literature and Arts
Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2020, Pages: 6-11
Received: Dec. 27, 2019;
Accepted: Jan. 16, 2020;
Published: Jan. 31, 2020
Views 296 Downloads 100
Quanhua Song, Faculty of United Front Theory, Chenzhou’s Party School, Chenzhou, China
Hongji Wang, School of Economics and Finance, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China
Follow on us
In culture and information transmission, signifier and signifier of symbols have changed into a new field with the change of ideology. For characterization of out of control and illegal ethnic composition for structural analysis of the existing culture, through the interactive relations between social groups - personal interpretation of the change of the psychological development, from the "social identification gradient" and "ideology", "the dilemma of characterization in different areas of the" three aspects to explore group psychological factors of kinetic energy release at the same time through the group of the unconscious psychological construct reshaping symbol categories,"maximum-minmum value new dynamic psychological field. Through the analysis of experience in the field of culture phenomenon, this paper proposes experience world was generated from surface world by inner-spirit selection. The main information of experience world was awaken by interactive ceremony that the public participated. Although information is an extension of the "self" image in the communication, the mirror is not the result of individual choice. The mirror is only from the guide and the interaction of internal spirit of the world, and finally forms our cognitive field.
Dynamic Psychology, Characterization, Ideology
To cite this article
The "Dynamic" Behavior of Group Psychology Represented by Culture, International Journal of Literature and Arts.
Vol. 8, No. 1,
2020, pp. 6-11.
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Emile Durkheim. 2011. Les Formes Elementaires de la Vie Religieuse. Commercial Press. 18.
Gerald Prince. 2013. Narratology The Form and Functioning of Narrative. Renmin university of China press. 79.
Gustave Le Bon. 2005. The Crowd A Study of the popular mind. Central Compilation & Translation Press. 25.
Li Peng. 2013. Representation and decriminalization of Dual crisis. Modern communication 32-35. (In Chinese)
Roland Barthes. 2009. Translated by Li Youzhen, Elements de semiology. Renmin university of China press. 54-57.
Richard West/Lynn H. Turner. 2007. Introducing Communication Theory Analysis and Application. Renmin university of China press 122.
Max Weber. Max Weber Sociological anthology. people’s publishing house. 2010. P166-173
Geertz, C. Thick Description, inc. 1973. Geertz The Interpretation of cultures. New York, Basic Book 13-20.
Rudolf Arnheim. 2001. Visual thinking, Sichuan people’s publishing house. 36.
Schopenhauer ARTURE. 2007. Translated by Li Chengming, Schopenhauer's philosophy of life. Kyushu press 238.
Walter Bendix Shoeflies Benjamin. Translated by Wan Caiyong by translation: 2001. The Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. China city press 90.
EARL Babble. translated by Qiu Zeqi. 2009. The Practice of Social Research. Huaxia press 10.
Michel Foucault, Translated by Xie Qiang. 1998. L’Archeologie du Savoir. The joint publishing company LTD. 68.
MARCUSE, H. Translation by Liu Ji. 2008. One Dimensional Man. Shanghai century publishing group 103.
Song Quanhua, The spread of national mirror image from the perspective of Chinese culture. Southwest Jiaotong University. 2017. 1. (In Chinese).