The reported high loss mortality rate of green lacewing, (Chrysoperla carnea) have been attributed to diverse factors including unattended use of insecticides. Since chemical control is one of a significant practice to manage insect pest in cotton. However, this kind of practice may impair the natural control provided by generalist predator C. carnea. Although, natural control adoption is limited in crops, area and season due to wide-spread use of insecticides but presence of resistance potential in C. carnea may improve the design of solid IPM strategies. Herein, we aimed to assess the toxicity of four insecticides to two strains of C. carnea (viz. laboratory reared and field collected adults) and to evaluate their resistance potential by calculating their resistance ratio. LC50 was calculated at 24 h following topical application administered when the adults were 3 days old. Control adult mortalities were less than 10% at 24 h. The LC50 values (µl mL-1) for laboratory reared strains of each tested insecticide were: acetamiprid, 0.0064; bifenthrin, 3.75; chlorpyrifos, 0.067; and profenofos, 0.052. The LC50 values for field collected strains were 0.096 (acetamiprid), 34.8 (bifenthrin), 0.21 (chlorpyrifos) and 0.44 (profenofos). The toxicity of the test insecticide to C. carnea from more to least toxic was acetamiprid > profenofos > chlorpyrifos > bifenthrin. Field collected strain possessed 15 (acetamiprid)-, 9.28 (bifenthrin)-, 3.13 (chlorpyrifos)-, and 8.5 (profenofos)-fold more resistance than the susceptible population. These results are pretty worthwhile for integration of C. carnea in IPM programs, impairing with insecticides.
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.11 |
| Published in | International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology (Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2019) |
| Page(s) | 1-7 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Green Lacewing, Chrysoperla, Resistance Potential, Insecticides, Toxicity
| [1] | Reddy, P. P., 2016. Selective pesticides in IPM, in Sustainable Crop Protection under Protected Cultivation. Springer: New York, USA. pp. 121-131. |
| [2] | Jonsson, M., Wratten, S. D., Landis, D. A., and Gurr, G. M. 2008. Recent advances in conservation biological control of arthropods by arthropods. Biological Control. 45 (2): pp. 172-175. |
| [3] | Ali, A., Desneux, N., Lu, Y., Liu, B., and Wu, K. 2016. Characterization of the natural enemy community attacking cotton aphid in the Bt cotton ecosystem in Northern China. Scientific Reports. 6: pp. 24273. |
| [4] | Ruberson, J. R., Thompson, M. D., and Roberts, P. M. 2003. Pesticide effects on insect natural enemies of cotton pests. Cotton Research Extension Report: pp. 124-132. |
| [5] | Lavagnini, T., Morales, A., and Freitas, S. 2015. Population genetics of Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and implications for biological control. Brazilian Journal of Biology. 75 (4): pp. 878-885. |
| [6] | Vargas Castilhos, R., Dionei Grützmacher, A., Baier Siqueira, P. R., de Moraes, Í. L., and Gauer, C. J. 2014. Seletividade de agrotóxicos utilizados em pessegueiro sobre ovos e pupas do predador Chrysoperla externa. Ciência Rural. 44 (11). |
| [7] | Rugno, G. R., Zanardi, O. Z., and Yamamoto, P. T. 2015. Are the pupae and eggs of the lacewing Ceraeochrysa cubana (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) tolerant to insecticides? Journal of Economic Entomology. 108 (6): pp. 2630-2639. |
| [8] | Ndakidemi, B., Mtei, K., and Ndakidemi, P. A. 2016. Impacts of synthetic and botanical pesticides on beneficial insects. Agricultural Sciences. 7 (06): pp. 364. |
| [9] | Pasini, R. A., Grützmacher, A. D., de Bastos Pazini, J., de Armas, F. S., Bueno, F. A., and Pires, S. N. 2018. Side effects of insecticides used in wheat crop on eggs and pupae of Chrysoperla externa and Eriopis connexa. Phytoparasitica. 46 (1): pp. 115-125. |
| [10] | Desneux, N., Decourtye, A., and Delpuech, J.-M. 2007. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annual Review of Entomolology. 52: pp. 81-106. |
| [11] | Fogel, M. N., Schneider, M. I., Desneux, N., González, B., and Ronco, A. E. 2013. Impact of the neonicotinoid acetamiprid on immature stages of the predator Eriopis connexa (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Ecotoxicology. 22 (6): pp. 1063-1071. |
| [12] | Stark, J. D., Vargas, R., and Banks, J. E. 2007. Incorporating ecologically relevant measures of pesticide effect for estimating the compatibility of pesticides and biocontrol agents. Journal of Economic Entomology. 100 (4): pp. 1027-1032. |
| [13] | Moura, A. P., Carvalho, G. A., Moscardini, V. F., Lasmar, O., Rezende, D. T., and Marques, M. C. 2010. Selectivity of pesticides used in integrated apple production to the lacewing, Chrysoperla externa. Journal of Insect Science. 10 (1): pp. 121. |
| [14] | Vilela, M., Andrade Carvalho, G., Freire Carvalho, C., Alvarenga Vilas Boas, M., and Santos Leite, M. I. 2010. Seletividade de acaricidas utilizados em cafeeiro para larvas de crisopídeos. Revista Ceres. 57 (5). |
| [15] | Castilhos, R. V., Grützmacher, A. D., Nava, D. E., Zotti, M. J., Siqueira, P. R. B., and Spagnol, D. 2013. Selectivity of pesticides used in peach orchards on the larval stage of the predator Chrysoperla externa (Hagen)(Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Semina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina. 34 (6sup1): pp. 3585-3596. |
| [16] | Silva, R. A., Andrade Carvalho, G., Freire Carvalho, C., Rebelles Reis, P., Souza, B., and Andrade Rezende Pereira, A. M. 2006. Ação de produtos fitossanitários utilizados em cafeeiros sobre pupas e adultos de Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861)(Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ciencia Rural. 36 (1). |
| [17] | de Fátima T, A., Andrade, C., Costa, L. V., and Fonseca, M. 2013. Selectivity of seven insecticides against pupae and adults of Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Revista Colombiana de Entomología. 39 (1): pp. 34-39. |
| [18] | Bielza, P., 2016. Insecticide Resistance in Natural Enemies, in Advances in Insect Control and Resistance Management. Springer: New York, USA. pp. 313-329. |
| [19] | Hoy, M. A., 1990. Pesticide resistance in arthropod natural enemies: variability and selection responses, in Pesticide resistance in arthropods. Springer. pp. 203-236. |
| [20] | Gaglio, G., Napoli, E., Falsone, L., Giannetto, S., and Brianti, E. 2017. Field evaluation of a new light trap for phlebotomine sand flies. Acta Tropica. 174: pp. 114-117. |
| [21] | Mansoor, M. M., Raza, A. B. M., Abbas, N., Aqueel, M. A., and Afzal, M. 2017. Resistance of green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea Stephens to nitenpyram: Cross-resistance patterns, mechanism, stability, and realized heritability. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 135: pp. 59-63. |
| [22] | Mansoor, M. M., Abbas, N., Shad, S. A., Pathan, A. K., and Razaq, M. 2013. Increased fitness and realized heritability in emamectin benzoate-resistant Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ecotoxicology. 22 (8): pp. 1232-1240. |
| [23] | Abbas, N., Mansoor, M. M., Shad, S. A., Pathan, A. K., Razaq, M., and Zulfiqar, M. 2014. Fitness cost and realized heritability of resistance to spinosad in Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research. 104 (6): pp. 707-715. |
| [24] | Robertson, J. L., Jones, M. M., Olguin, E., and Alberts, B., 2017 Bioassays with arthropods. Taylor and Francis Group, Florida, USA: CRC press. 998. |
| [25] | Finney, D. J., 1971 Probit Analysis. 3rd ed., Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 358. |
| [26] | Shrestha, G., Enkegaard, A., and Giray, T. 2013. The green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea: preference between lettuce aphids, Nasonovia ribisnigri, and western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis. Journal of Insect Science. 13 (1). |
| [27] | Vogt, H., Bigler, F., Brown, K., Candolfi, M., Kemmeter, F., Kühner, C., Moll, M., Travis, A., Ufer, A., and Viñuela, E. 2000. Laboratory method to test effects of plant protection products on larvae of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ecotoxicology: pp. 27-44. |
| [28] | Kimura-Kuroda, J., Komuta, Y., Kuroda, Y., Hayashi, M., and Kawano, H. 2012. Nicotine-like effects of the neonicotinoid insecticides acetamiprid and imidacloprid on Cerebellar neurons from neonatal rats. PLoS One. 7 (2): pp. e32432. |
| [29] | Firestone, J. and Keifer, M. C. Neurotoxicity of Pesticides. in Proceedings from the Medical Workshop on Pesticide-Related Illnesses from the International Conferen. 2017. Routledge. |
| [30] | Basit, M., Sayyed, A. H., Saleem, M. A., and Saeed, S. 2011. Cross-resistance, inheritance and stability of resistance to acetamiprid in cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Genn (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Crop Protection. 30 (6): pp. 705-712. |
| [31] | Siegfried, B. D. and Scharf, M. E., 2001. Mechanisms of organophosphate resistance in insects, in Biochemical sites of insecticide action and resistance. Springer: New York, USA. pp. 269-291. |
| [32] | Lapied, B. 2017. Insecticide mode of action: From insect to mammalian toxicity. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 24 (27): pp. 2910-2911. |
| [33] | Kishk, A., Hijaz, F., Anber, H. A., AbdEl-Raof, T. K., El-Sherbeni, A.-H. D., Hamed, S., and Killiny, N. 2017. RNA interference of acetylcholinesterase in the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, increases its susceptibility to carbamate and organophosphate insecticides. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 143: pp. 81-89. |
| [34] | Haider, I., Suhail, A., and Aziz, A. 2017. Toxicity of some insecticides against cotton jassid (Amrasca devastans dist.) and its predator (Chrysoperla carnea steph.). Journal of Agricultural Research. 55 (2). |
| [35] | Abreu-Villaça, Y. and Levin, E. D., 2018. Developmental Neurobehavioral Neurotoxicity of Insecticides: Handbook of Developmental Neurotoxicology. Elsevier: New York, USA. pp. 453-466. |
| [36] | Malik, J. K., Aggarwal, M., Kalpana, S., and Gupta, R. C., 2017. Chlorinated hydrocarbons and pyrethrins/pyrethroids, in Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology (Second Edition). Elsevier. pp. 633-655. |
| [37] | Panini, M., Manicardi, G., Moores, G., and Mazzoni, E. 2016. An overview of the main pathways of metabolic resistance in insects. Invertebrate Survival Journal. 13: pp. 326-335. |
| [38] | Muthusamy, R., Suganya, R., Gowri, M., and Shivakumar, M. 2013. Biochemical mechanisms of organophosphate and pyrethroid resistance in red hairy caterpillar Amsacta albistriga (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 12 (1): pp. 47-52. |
| [39] | Ahmad, M. and McCaffery, A. R. 1999. Penetration and metabolism of trans-cypermethrin in a susceptible and a pyrethroid-resistant strain of Helicoverpa armigera. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 65 (1): pp. 6-14. |
| [40] | Afzal, M. B. S., Shad, S. A., and Abbas, N. 2015. Genetics, realized heritability and preliminary mechanism of spinosad resistance in Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae): an invasive pest from Pakistan. Genetica. 143 (6): pp. 741-749. |
| [41] | Pree, D., Archibald, D., and Morrison, R. 1989. Resistance to insecticides in the common green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in southern Ontario. Journal of Economic Entomology. 82 (1): pp. 29-34. |
| [42] | Yang, M., Zhang, J., Zhu, K., Xuan, T., Liu, X., Guo, Y., and Ma, E. 2009. Mechanisms of organophosphate resistance in a field population of oriental migratory locust, Locusta migratoria manilensis (Meyen). Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology. 71 (1): pp. 3-15. |
| [43] | Carvalho, R. A., Omoto, C., Field, L. M., Williamson, M. S., and Bass, C. 2013. Investigating the molecular mechanisms of organophosphate and pyrethroid resistance in the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda. PLoS One. 8 (4): pp. e62268. |
| [44] | Puinean, A. M., Foster, S. P., Oliphant, L., Denholm, I., Field, L. M., Millar, N. S., Williamson, M. S., and Bass, C. 2010. Amplification of a cytochrome P450 gene is associated with resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides in the aphid Myzus persicae. PLOS Genetics. 6 (6): pp. e1000999. |
APA Style
Mubasshir Sohail, Muhamad Haider Nasar, Raza Muhammad, Qadeer Ahmed Soomro, Muhammad Usman Asif, et al. (2019). Resistance Potential of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) to Insecticides Used Against Sucking Complex of Cotton. International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology, 4(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.11
ACS Style
Mubasshir Sohail; Muhamad Haider Nasar; Raza Muhammad; Qadeer Ahmed Soomro; Muhammad Usman Asif, et al. Resistance Potential of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) to Insecticides Used Against Sucking Complex of Cotton. Int. J. Ecotoxicol. Ecobiol. 2019, 4(1), 1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.11
AMA Style
Mubasshir Sohail, Muhamad Haider Nasar, Raza Muhammad, Qadeer Ahmed Soomro, Muhammad Usman Asif, et al. Resistance Potential of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) to Insecticides Used Against Sucking Complex of Cotton. Int J Ecotoxicol Ecobiol. 2019;4(1):1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.11,
author = {Mubasshir Sohail and Muhamad Haider Nasar and Raza Muhammad and Qadeer Ahmed Soomro and Muhammad Usman Asif and Jan Muhammad Maari},
title = {Resistance Potential of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) to Insecticides Used Against Sucking Complex of Cotton},
journal = {International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology},
volume = {4},
number = {1},
pages = {1-7},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijee.20190401.11},
abstract = {The reported high loss mortality rate of green lacewing, (Chrysoperla carnea) have been attributed to diverse factors including unattended use of insecticides. Since chemical control is one of a significant practice to manage insect pest in cotton. However, this kind of practice may impair the natural control provided by generalist predator C. carnea. Although, natural control adoption is limited in crops, area and season due to wide-spread use of insecticides but presence of resistance potential in C. carnea may improve the design of solid IPM strategies. Herein, we aimed to assess the toxicity of four insecticides to two strains of C. carnea (viz. laboratory reared and field collected adults) and to evaluate their resistance potential by calculating their resistance ratio. LC50 was calculated at 24 h following topical application administered when the adults were 3 days old. Control adult mortalities were less than 10% at 24 h. The LC50 values (µl mL-1) for laboratory reared strains of each tested insecticide were: acetamiprid, 0.0064; bifenthrin, 3.75; chlorpyrifos, 0.067; and profenofos, 0.052. The LC50 values for field collected strains were 0.096 (acetamiprid), 34.8 (bifenthrin), 0.21 (chlorpyrifos) and 0.44 (profenofos). The toxicity of the test insecticide to C. carnea from more to least toxic was acetamiprid > profenofos > chlorpyrifos > bifenthrin. Field collected strain possessed 15 (acetamiprid)-, 9.28 (bifenthrin)-, 3.13 (chlorpyrifos)-, and 8.5 (profenofos)-fold more resistance than the susceptible population. These results are pretty worthwhile for integration of C. carnea in IPM programs, impairing with insecticides.},
year = {2019}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Resistance Potential of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) to Insecticides Used Against Sucking Complex of Cotton AU - Mubasshir Sohail AU - Muhamad Haider Nasar AU - Raza Muhammad AU - Qadeer Ahmed Soomro AU - Muhammad Usman Asif AU - Jan Muhammad Maari Y1 - 2019/03/05 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.11 T2 - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology JF - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology JO - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology SP - 1 EP - 7 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1735 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.11 AB - The reported high loss mortality rate of green lacewing, (Chrysoperla carnea) have been attributed to diverse factors including unattended use of insecticides. Since chemical control is one of a significant practice to manage insect pest in cotton. However, this kind of practice may impair the natural control provided by generalist predator C. carnea. Although, natural control adoption is limited in crops, area and season due to wide-spread use of insecticides but presence of resistance potential in C. carnea may improve the design of solid IPM strategies. Herein, we aimed to assess the toxicity of four insecticides to two strains of C. carnea (viz. laboratory reared and field collected adults) and to evaluate their resistance potential by calculating their resistance ratio. LC50 was calculated at 24 h following topical application administered when the adults were 3 days old. Control adult mortalities were less than 10% at 24 h. The LC50 values (µl mL-1) for laboratory reared strains of each tested insecticide were: acetamiprid, 0.0064; bifenthrin, 3.75; chlorpyrifos, 0.067; and profenofos, 0.052. The LC50 values for field collected strains were 0.096 (acetamiprid), 34.8 (bifenthrin), 0.21 (chlorpyrifos) and 0.44 (profenofos). The toxicity of the test insecticide to C. carnea from more to least toxic was acetamiprid > profenofos > chlorpyrifos > bifenthrin. Field collected strain possessed 15 (acetamiprid)-, 9.28 (bifenthrin)-, 3.13 (chlorpyrifos)-, and 8.5 (profenofos)-fold more resistance than the susceptible population. These results are pretty worthwhile for integration of C. carnea in IPM programs, impairing with insecticides. VL - 4 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: