International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology

| Peer-Reviewed |

Management of Septoria Tritici Blotch (Septoria tritici) of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia

Received: 25 December 2018    Accepted: 21 March 2019    Published: 13 April 2019
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Septoria tritici blotch (STB) is an economically important foliar disease in the major wheat-growing areas of Ethiopia. The current research was conducted to determine the impact of wheat varieties and fungicides on disease development and wheat yield. Besides, the effect of bread wheat varieties and fungicides on STB development, wheat yield was evaluated at Holleta and Kulumsa in a factorial field experiment involving three bread wheat varieties and six fungicide spray schedules. At Holetta, variety Kekeba had the highest AUDPC (2548) value followed by Madawalabu and Alidoro; whereas at Kulumsa the highest AUDPC (1509) was recorded on variety Madawalabu followed by Alidoro and Kekeba varieties. STB incidence and severity were significantly reduced by the application of fungicides across varieties but fungicide-variety combinations had differential effects on disease development. Wheat grain yields were the lowest from unsprayed plots regardless of variety and location. Kekeba variety treated with Mancozeb-Tilt-Mancozeb-Tilt (MTMT) fungicide combination produced the highest yield (5.05t/ha). The highest (577.31%) and lowest (-19.95%) marginal rate of return were obtained from Tilt and MTMT sprayed fields at Holetta planted with Kekeba and Madawalabu varieties, respectively. On the other hand, at Kulumsa, the highest marginal rate of return (886.88%) and the lowest marginal rate of return (-63.98%) was obtained from Tilt and Mancozeb sprays on Madawalabu and Alidoro varieties, respectively. The present findings confirmed the importance of STB in Ethiopia and the role fungicides play in managing the disease on partially resistant varieties.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.14
Published in International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology (Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2019)
Page(s) 32-41
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

AUDPC, Bread Wheat, Cost-benefit Analysis, Septoria Tritici Blotch

References
[1] Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). 2018. Crop Prospects and Food situation: Global Cereal Productionbrief. Newsroomavailableat http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/23Dec,2018/1000805/index.html.
[2] CSA (Central Statics Agency). 2018. Agricultural sample survey: Report on area and production of major crops (Private peasant holdings, Meher Season). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.1: Pp 14.
[3] Kumar, A., Solanki, I. S. and Kumari, S., 2015. Management of Foliar Blight (Spot Blotch) of Wheat the Most Threatening Disease of North Eastern Plain Zone (NEPZ) through Chemicals. Journal of Agroecology and Natural Resource Management, 1(1), pp.4-6.
[4] Dixon, Braun HJ. &Crouch JH. 2009. Overview: transitioning wheat research to serve the future needs of the developing world. In: Dixon J, Braun HJ and Crouch JH (eds). CIMMYT, Mexico.
[5] Weigand C. 2011. Wheat import projections towards 2050. US Wheat Associates, USA.
[6] Negasa, D. and Chauhan, D. K. 2016. Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advances in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Breeding lines grown at Horro Guduru Wollega Zone, Western Ethiopia. International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Management. 1(1):24-28.
[7] Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). 2017. Crop Prospects and Food situation: Global Cereal Production brief. News room available at http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/23Dec,2017/1000805/index.html.
[8] Onwueme, I. C. and T. D. Sinha. 1999. Field crop production in tropical Africa, Center for Tropical Agricultur, Wageningen, Nether lands. 236pp.
[9] Beard, C., Jayasena, K., Thomas, G. and Loughman, R. 2004. Managing stem rust of wheat. Plant Pathology, Department of Agriculture, Western Australia. 8:23-34.
[10] Campbell C. L. 1998. The Epidemiology of Plant Diseases. London: Kluwer Academic publisher. Chapter 9: Disease Progress in time: Modelling and data analysis. Pp. 181- 206.
[11] Tesfaye Zegeye, Girma Taye, D. Tanner, H. Verkuijl, Aklilu Agidie and W. Mwangi. 2001. Adoption of improved bread wheat varieties and inorganic fertilizer by small-scale farmers in Yelmana Densa, and Farta districts of Northwestern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO) and International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). Mexico city, Mexico. Pp. 3-5.
[12] Endale Hailu and Getaneh Woldeab. 2015. Survey of Rust and Septoria Leaf Blotch Diseases of Wheat in Central Ethiopia and Virulence Diversity of Stem Rust Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici. Advanced Crop Science Technology. 3(2):2-5.
[13] Ghaffary, S. M. T., Faris, J. D., Friesen, T. L., Visser, R. G., van der Lee, T. A., Robert, O. and Kema, G. H. 2012. New broad-spectrum resistance to Septoria tritici blotch derived from synthetic hexaploid wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 124(1):125-142.
[14] Kema, G. H. J., Annone, J. G., Sayoud, R. A. C. H. I. D. and Van Silfhout, C. H. 1996. Genetic variation for virulence and resistance in the wheat-Mycosphaerella graminicola pathosystem. I. Interactions between pathogen isolates and host cultivars. Phytopathology. 86:200-212.
[15] Benbelkacem, A., Jenadi, C. and Meamiche, H. 2016. Mitigation of the global threat of septoria leaf blotch of cereals in Algeria. International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences, 2: 28-35.
[16] Teklay Abebe, Muez Mehari and Muruts Legesse. 2015. Field Response of wheat genotypes to Septoria tritici blotch in Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Natural Sciences Research. 5(1):146-152.
[17] Abera Takele, Alemu Lencho, Endale Hailu and Bekele Kassa. 2015. Status of Wheat Septoria Leaf Blotch (Septaria tritici Roberge in Desmaz) in South West and Western Shewa Zones of Oromiya Regional State, Ethiopia. Research in Plant Sciences. 3(3): 43-48.
[18] Alemar Said and Temam Hussein. 2016. Epidemics of Septoria tritici blotch and its development overtime on bread wheat in Haddiya-Kambata area of Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Health Care, 6(1): 47-57.
[19] Ponomarenko, A., S. B. Goodwin and G. H. J. Kema. 2011. Septoria tritici blotch (STB) of wheat. Plant Health. Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University. Pp. 1-10.
[20] Arama, P. F., 1996. Effect of cultivar, Isolate, and Environment on resistant of wheat to Septoria tritici blotch in Kenya. PhD, Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 115 pp.
[21] Eyal, Z., Scharen, A. L., Huffman, M. D. and Prescott, J. M. 1985. Global insights into virulence frequencies of Mycosphaerella graminicola. Phytopathology. 75(12):1456-1462.
[22] Saari, E. E. and Prescott, J. M. 1975. Scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases. Plant Disease Reporter. 59:377-380.
[23] Eyal, Z. 1987. The Septoria diseases of wheat: concepts and methods of disease management. 52pp.
[24] Sharma, R. and Duveiller, E. 2007. Advancement toward new Spot Blotch resistant wheat in south Asia. Crop Science. 47:961-968.
[25] Sharma, R., Sissons, M. J., Rathjen, A. J. and Jenner, C. F. 2002. The null-4A allele at the waxy locus in durum wheat affects pasta cooking quality. Journal of Cereal Science. 35(3):287-297.
[26] Campbell, C. L. and Madden, L. V. 1990. Introduction to plant disease epidemiology. John W. & Sons, New York City. Pp. 386-427.
[27] American Association of Cereal Chemists (AACC). 1983. Approved Methods of American Association of Cereal Chemists. Methodes Approved. 10:8-76.
[28] CIMMYT. Farm agronomic data to farmer’s recommendations a training manual completely revised edition international maize and wheat center, Mexico. 2011.
[29] SAS (Statistical Analysis System). 2014. Statistical Analysis System SAS/STAT user’s guide Version9.3. Carry, North Carolina, SAS Institute Inc. USA.
[30] Madden, L. V., Hughes, G. and Bosch, F. 2007. The study of plant disease epidemics. American Phytopathological Society (APS Press). Pp. 19-20.
[31] Slafer, G. A. and Satorre, E. H. 1999. An introduction to the physiological–ecological analysis of wheat yield. Wheat Ecology and physiology of yield determination. Pp. 3-12.
[32] Rechcing, N. A. and Rechcing, J. E. 1997. Environmental Safe Approaches to Crop Disease Control. Pp. 372-451.
Author Information
  • Department of Crop Protection (Plant Pathology), Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia; Department of Plant Pathology, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (Holleta Agricultural Research Center), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Department of Crop Protection (Plant Pathology), Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia

  • Department of Plant Pathology, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (Holleta Agricultural Research Center), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Yitagesu Tadesse, Alemayehu Chala, Bekele Kassa. (2019). Management of Septoria Tritici Blotch (Septoria tritici) of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology, 4(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Yitagesu Tadesse; Alemayehu Chala; Bekele Kassa. Management of Septoria Tritici Blotch (Septoria tritici) of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Int. J. Ecotoxicol. Ecobiol. 2019, 4(1), 32-41. doi: 10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Yitagesu Tadesse, Alemayehu Chala, Bekele Kassa. Management of Septoria Tritici Blotch (Septoria tritici) of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Int J Ecotoxicol Ecobiol. 2019;4(1):32-41. doi: 10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.14,
      author = {Yitagesu Tadesse and Alemayehu Chala and Bekele Kassa},
      title = {Management of Septoria Tritici Blotch (Septoria tritici) of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia},
      journal = {International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology},
      volume = {4},
      number = {1},
      pages = {32-41},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.14},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijee.20190401.14},
      abstract = {Septoria tritici blotch (STB) is an economically important foliar disease in the major wheat-growing areas of Ethiopia. The current research was conducted to determine the impact of wheat varieties and fungicides on disease development and wheat yield. Besides, the effect of bread wheat varieties and fungicides on STB development, wheat yield was evaluated at Holleta and Kulumsa in a factorial field experiment involving three bread wheat varieties and six fungicide spray schedules. At Holetta, variety Kekeba had the highest AUDPC (2548) value followed by Madawalabu and Alidoro; whereas at Kulumsa the highest AUDPC (1509) was recorded on variety Madawalabu followed by Alidoro and Kekeba varieties. STB incidence and severity were significantly reduced by the application of fungicides across varieties but fungicide-variety combinations had differential effects on disease development. Wheat grain yields were the lowest from unsprayed plots regardless of variety and location. Kekeba variety treated with Mancozeb-Tilt-Mancozeb-Tilt (MTMT) fungicide combination produced the highest yield (5.05t/ha). The highest (577.31%) and lowest (-19.95%) marginal rate of return were obtained from Tilt and MTMT sprayed fields at Holetta planted with Kekeba and Madawalabu varieties, respectively. On the other hand, at Kulumsa, the highest marginal rate of return (886.88%) and the lowest marginal rate of return (-63.98%) was obtained from Tilt and Mancozeb sprays on Madawalabu and Alidoro varieties, respectively. The present findings confirmed the importance of STB in Ethiopia and the role fungicides play in managing the disease on partially resistant varieties.},
     year = {2019}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Management of Septoria Tritici Blotch (Septoria tritici) of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia
    AU  - Yitagesu Tadesse
    AU  - Alemayehu Chala
    AU  - Bekele Kassa
    Y1  - 2019/04/13
    PY  - 2019
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.14
    T2  - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology
    JF  - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology
    JO  - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology
    SP  - 32
    EP  - 41
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1735
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20190401.14
    AB  - Septoria tritici blotch (STB) is an economically important foliar disease in the major wheat-growing areas of Ethiopia. The current research was conducted to determine the impact of wheat varieties and fungicides on disease development and wheat yield. Besides, the effect of bread wheat varieties and fungicides on STB development, wheat yield was evaluated at Holleta and Kulumsa in a factorial field experiment involving three bread wheat varieties and six fungicide spray schedules. At Holetta, variety Kekeba had the highest AUDPC (2548) value followed by Madawalabu and Alidoro; whereas at Kulumsa the highest AUDPC (1509) was recorded on variety Madawalabu followed by Alidoro and Kekeba varieties. STB incidence and severity were significantly reduced by the application of fungicides across varieties but fungicide-variety combinations had differential effects on disease development. Wheat grain yields were the lowest from unsprayed plots regardless of variety and location. Kekeba variety treated with Mancozeb-Tilt-Mancozeb-Tilt (MTMT) fungicide combination produced the highest yield (5.05t/ha). The highest (577.31%) and lowest (-19.95%) marginal rate of return were obtained from Tilt and MTMT sprayed fields at Holetta planted with Kekeba and Madawalabu varieties, respectively. On the other hand, at Kulumsa, the highest marginal rate of return (886.88%) and the lowest marginal rate of return (-63.98%) was obtained from Tilt and Mancozeb sprays on Madawalabu and Alidoro varieties, respectively. The present findings confirmed the importance of STB in Ethiopia and the role fungicides play in managing the disease on partially resistant varieties.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections