The Problems of Implementing the Bologna Process in the Higher Education System of Uzbekistan
International Journal of European Studies
Volume 3, Issue 1, June 2019, Pages: 23-26
Received: Mar. 2, 2019;
Accepted: Apr. 4, 2019;
Published: May 6, 2019
Views 586 Downloads 69
Zukhra Abdikarimova, Department of Professional Education, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Follow on us
Globalization processes can be seen in the system of socio-economic relations worldwide. These processes, including the higher education system, focus on increasing the effectiveness of education, supporting international coverage of education, and, most importantly, the use of modern methods of modernizing higher education. The article examines the current state of the Higher Education in Uzbekistan and the role of Bologna Process to create innovative environment in Higher Education System of Uzbekistan. In addition, problems related to the implementation of this process in the higher education system are discussed. As well as, the further reforms are given to eliminate those problems.
Higher Education, Bologna Process, Diploma Supplement, Credit System, Quality of Education, Mobility, Qualification
To cite this article
The Problems of Implementing the Bologna Process in the Higher Education System of Uzbekistan, International Journal of European Studies.
Vol. 3, No. 1,
2019, pp. 23-26.
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Laurel S. Terry. The Bologna process and Its impact in Europe: It’s so much more than degree changes.
David Crosier, Teodora Parveva The Bologna Process: Its impact in Europe and beyond UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning.
Clifford Adelman, “The Bologna Process for U. S. Eyes: Re-learning Higher Education in the Age of Convergence”. Institute for Higher Education Policy, 2009.
Majidov, T., D. Ghosh, and K. Ruziev. 2010. Keeping Up with Revolutions: Evolution of Higher Education in Uzbekistan. Economic Change and Restructuring 43: 45–63.
Pomfret, R. 2000. The Uzbek Model of Economic Development, 1991–1999. Economics of Transition 8: 733–748.
Ruziev, K., and U. Burkhanov. 2016. Higher Education Reforms in Uzbekistan: Expanding Vocational Education at the Expense of Higher Education? Higher Education in Russia and Beyond 2: 14–15.
Ruziev, K., D. Ghosh, and S. Dow. 2007. The Uzbek Puzzle Revisited: An Analysis of Economic Performance in Uzbekistan Since 1991. Central Asian Survey 26: 7–30.
United Nations Development Programme. 2008. Education in Uzbekistan: Matching Supply and Demand. Tashkent: United Nations Development Programme.
Weidman, J., and B. Yoder. 2010. Policy and Practice in Education Reform in Mongolia and Uzbekistan During the First Two Decades of the Post-Soviet Era. Excellence in Higher Education 1: 57–68.
Ministry of Higher and Secondary Specialized Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan. 2013. Statistical Collection: Main Activities of the Higher Education Institutions 2012–13. Tashkent: MHSSE.
Olssen, M. and M. Peters (2005) Neoliberalism, Higher Education, and the Knowledge Economy: from the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, Vol.20, No. 3, pp.313-345.
Pegkas, P. and C. Tsamadias (2014) Does Higher Education Affect Economic Growth? The Case of Greece. International Economic Journal, Volume 28, No.3, pp.425-44.
Pomfred, R. (2000). The Uzbek Model of Economic Development, 1991-1999. Economics of Transition. Vol. 8, pp. 733-748.
Weidman, J. and B. Yoder (2010) Policy and Practice in Education Reform in Mongolia and Uzbekistan during the First Two Decades of the Post-Soviet Era. Excellence in Higher Education, Volume 1, No 1&2, pp. 57-68.
Gyimah-Brempong, K., Paddison, O. and W. Mitiku (2006) Higher Education and Economic Growth in Africa. Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp.509-529.