The Impact of Alternate Furrow Irrigation on Water Productivity and Yield of Potato at Small Scale Irrigation, Ejere District, West Shoa, Ethiopia

Adisu Tadese Eba; Teshome Seyoum

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11

| Peer-Reviewed

The Impact of Alternate Furrow Irrigation on Water Productivity and Yield of Potato at Small Scale Irrigation, Ejere District, West Shoa, Ethiopia

Adisu Tadese Eba, Teshome Seyoum

Published in Applied Engineering (Volume 2, Issue 1)

Received: 18 June 2018 Accepted: 9 July 2018 Published: 1 August 2018

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

As a result of water resource shortage and the need for food self-sufficiency in Ethiopia, it has become essential to improve the productivity. In this study, an attempt was made to evaluate the impact of alternate furrow irrigation technique on yield and water productivity. Alternate furrow irrigation versus every furrow, fixed furrow and farmer practice (open-ended and unstructured furrow) were evaluated at full crop water requirement. The experimental design used was randomized complete block design with four treatment replicated five times. Results obtained revealed that average water application efficiency of alternate furrow irrigation was 67% which was high as compared to other irrigation methods at all irrigation events. Average application efficiencies of ever furrow irrigation, fixed furrow irrigation and farmer practice were 52%, 61% and 34.4% respectively. The average distribution uniformity of alternate furrow irrigation and every furrow irrigation methods were 89.3% and 85.3% respectively, which showed no significant difference between the two methods. However, average distribution uniformity of fixed furrow irrigation was 75.4%, which showed significant difference between alternate furrow and fixed furrow irrigation methods. Alternate furrow irrigation method produced total tuber yield of 33198 kg/ha which showed insignificant difference as compared with that obtained under every furrow irrigation (33369 kg/ha). Total tuber yield harvested from fixed furrow irrigation and farmer practice were 30177 kg/ha and 30098 kg/ha respectively, which showed insignificant difference between the two methods. High marketable yield of 32667.8 kg/ha was recorded from alternate furrow irrigation. Water productivity of 11.2 kg/m³, 10.7 kg/m³, 6.1 kg/m³ and 4.1 kg/m³ were produced under alternate furrow, fixed furrow, and every furrow and farmer practice respectively. It was found that alternate furrow irrigation method saved 50% of water as compared with every furrow and 68.4% as compared with farmer practice. Therefore, it is recommended alternate furrow irrigation method with appropriate irrigation interval is suitable irrigation method; for humid climate where soil is dominated by clay soil and water is liming factor for potato crop production.

Published in	Applied Engineering (Volume 2, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11
Page(s)	1-18
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Alternate Furrow, Water Productivity, Tuber Yield

References

[1]	Rockstrom, J., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L. and Hoff, H. 2009. Future water availability for global food production: the potential of green water to build resilience to global change. Journal of Water Resources Research. doi: 10. 1029/2007jWR006767.
[2]	Gan, Y., Siddique, K. H. M., Turner, N. C. and Li. X. G. 2013. Ridge-furrow mulching systems: an innovative technique for boosting crop productivity in semiarid rain-fed environments. Journal of Advances in Agronomy 118:429–476. doi:10. 1007/j. 11104-010-0312-7.
[3]	FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). 2012. Crop yield response to water: FAO irrigation and drainage paper 66. Food and Agricultural organization, Rome, Italy.
[4]	CSA (Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia). 2008/2009. Agricultural sample survey: Report on area and production of crops. Paper 126. Addis Abeba, Ethiopia.
[5]	Yuldashev, F., Khalikov, D., Condori, B., Mares, V. and Monneveux, P. 2014. Effect of different irrigation regimes on yield, water use efficiency and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in the lowlands of Tashkent, Uzbekistan: A field and modeling perspective. Field crop Research, 163:90-99.
[6]	Amare Haileslassie, Zeleke Agide, Teklu Erkossa, Hoekstra, D., Schmitter, P. and Langan, S. 2016. On-farm smallholder irrigation performance in Ethiopia: From water use efficiency to equity and sustainability. LIVES Working Paper 19. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).
[7]	Abebe Chindi, Gebremedhin W. Giorgis, Daniel Mekonnen. And Amsalu Ayana. 2016. Review of Potato Agronomic Research in Central highlands of Ethiopia: Achievements and Future Prospects. International journal of advances in life science and technology, 51:8-14.
[8]	Gebremedhin Woldegiorgis, Endale Gebre. And Berga Lemmaga. 2008. Potato seed management. In Root and Tuber Crops: The Untapped Resources. (Eds.) Gebremedhin Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR). ISBN: 978-99944- 53-19-1. Pp. 53-77.
[9]	Anton, J. H. 1982. Irrigation Water Management Potato Production. Technical Information Bulletin 15. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru. 13 pp.
[10]	Zamil, M. F., Rahman, M. M. and Robbani, M. G. 2010. Combined effect of nitrogen and plant spacing on the growth and yield of potato with economic performance. Bangladesh Research publication Journal, 3:1062-1070.
[11]	Aallen. 1998. Water consumption by agricultural plants. pp. 1–22. In: Kozlowski T. T. (ed.), Water deficits in plant growth, Vol. II. Academic Press, New York.
[12]	Skogerboe, G. V., Hyatt, M. L. and Eggleston, K. O. 1967. Design and calibration of submerged open channel flow measurement structures. Part 3, Cutthroat flumes. In: Report WG31-4, Utah Water Research Laboratory, College of Engineering, Utah State University.
[13]	Ali, M. A., Hoque, M. R., Hassan, A. A. and Khair, A. 2007. Effects of deficit irrigation on yield, water productivity and economic return of wheat. Journal of Agricultural Water Management, 92: 151-161.
[14]	Zerihun, D., Sanchez, A. and Farrell, K. L. 2001. Analysis and design of furrow irrigation systems. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 127(3):161-169. doi:10. 1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2001)127:3(161).
[15]	Irmak, S., Odhiambo, L. O., Kranz, W. L. and Eisenhauer, D. E. 2011. Irrigation efficiency and uniformity, and crop water use efficiency. Biological Systems Engineering Papers and Publications. 451:2-8. University of Nebraska, Licoln, USA.
[16]	Hillel, D. 2004. Introduction to Environmental Soil Physics 1st Edition. Elsevier Science, USA: Elsevier Academic press.
[17]	Micheal, A. M. 2008. Irrigation Theory and Practice, 2ND Edition. New Delhi, India. Pp. 427-429.
[18]	Okalebo, J. R., Gathua, K. W. and Woomer, P. L. 2002. Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis: A working manual 2nd edition. TSBF-CIAT and SACRED Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
[19]	Pereira, A. B. and Schock, C. C., 2006. Development of irrigation best management practices for potato from a research perspective in the United States. Oregon State University Agricultural station, Oregon, USA.
[20]	Webber, H. A., Madramootoo, C. A., Bourgault, M. and Smith, D. L. 2006. Water use efficiency of common bean and green gram grown using alternate furrow and deficit irrigation. Journal of Agricultural Water management, 86:259-286.
[21]	Eduardo, A. H., Carlos, L., Miguel, A. M., Jerónimo, P., José, L. A. and Max, B. 2010. Furrow irrigation management and design criteria using efficiency parameters and simulation models. Chilean Journal of agricultural research, 70(2):287-296.
[22]	Shayannejad, M. and Moharreri. A. 2009. Effect of every-other furrow irrigation on water use efficiency, starch and protein contents of potato. Journal of Agricultural Science, 1(2):107-112.
[23]	Rogers, D. and Lamm, R. F. 1997. Irrigation and water losses of irrigation systems. Irrigation Management Series. Cooperative Extension Service, Kansas State University, Manhattan.
[24]	Martin, E. C. 2006. Determining the amount of irrigation water applied to a field. Arizona Cooperative Extension. The University of Arizona-85721: 1-3 sited online, URL: http://www.enorasis.eu/uploads/files/Business%20 modeling/4.arizona water Series 29.pdf
[25]	Ebrahimian, H., Liaghat, A., Parsinejad, M., Abbasi, F. and Navabian, M. 2011. 21st International Congress on Irrigation and Drainage of Tehran, October 15-23. Congress of Tehran.
[26]	Rodrigues, M. L., Santos, T. P. and Rodrigues, A. P. 2008. Hydraulic and chemical signaling in the regulation of stomatal conductance and plant water use in field grapevines growing under deficit irrigation. Functional Plant Biology, 35: 565-579.
[27]	Liu, F., Shahnazari, A., Andersen, M. N. and Jacobsen, S. E. 2006a. Physiological responses of potato (Solanum tubersum L.) to partial root-zone drying: ABA signaling, leaf gas exchange, and water use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57: 3727-3735.
[28]	Ahmadi, S. H., Andersen, M. N., Plauborg, F. and Poulsen, R. T. 2010b. Effects of irrigation strategies and soils on field grown potatoes: Yield and water productivity. Journal of Agricultural Water Management. doi: 10. 1016/j. 2010. 07. 007.
[29]	Jovanovic, Z., Stikic, R., Vucelic, B., Paukovic, M., Brocic, Z., Matovic, G., Rovcanin, S. and Mojevic, M. 2010. Partial root-zone drying increases WUE, N and antioxidant content in field potatoes. European Journal of Agronomy, 33: 124-131.
[30]	Sepaskhah, A. R. and Parand, A. R. 2006. Effects of alternate furrow irrigation with supplemental every-furrow irrigation at different growth stages on the yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Plant Production Science, 9(4):415-421.
[31]	Shock, C. C., Pereira, A. B. and Eldredge, E. P. 2013. Successful irrigation scheduling of potato. Sustainable Agriculture Techniques. Oregon State University, USA.
[32]	Kaman, H., Kirda, C., Cetin, M. and Topcu, S. 2006. Salt accumulation in the root zones of tomato and cotton irrigated with partial root-drying technique. Journal of Irrigation and. Drainage, 55: 533-544.
[33]	Ibrahim, M. A. M. and Emara T. K. 2010. Water saving under alternative furrows surface irrigation in clay soils of north Nile delta. 14th International Water Technology Conference (IWTC), Cairo. 21-23 March 2010. Water Technology Association (WTA), Cairo, Egypt.
[34]	Saeed, H., Grove, I. G. and Kettlewell. P. S. 2008. Potential of partial root zone drying as an alternative irrigation technique for potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Annals of Applied Botany, 152: 71-80.
[35]	Wang, H., Liu, F., Andersen, M. N. and Jensen, C. R. 2009. Comparative effects of partial root-zone drying and deficit irrigation on nitrogen uptake in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Journal of Irrigation Science, 27: 443-447.
[36]	Nouri, M. and Nasab, S. B. 2011. Study of effect of alternate furrow irrigation in sugarcane (Var CP69-1062) at different growth stages on quality and quantity of yield. 21st International Congress on Irrigation and Drainage (ICID), Tehran, Iran, 15-23 October 2011.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Adisu Tadese Eba, Teshome Seyoum. (2018). The Impact of Alternate Furrow Irrigation on Water Productivity and Yield of Potato at Small Scale Irrigation, Ejere District, West Shoa, Ethiopia. Applied Engineering, 2(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Adisu Tadese Eba; Teshome Seyoum. The Impact of Alternate Furrow Irrigation on Water Productivity and Yield of Potato at Small Scale Irrigation, Ejere District, West Shoa, Ethiopia. Appl. Eng. 2018, 2(1), 1-18. doi: 10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Adisu Tadese Eba, Teshome Seyoum. The Impact of Alternate Furrow Irrigation on Water Productivity and Yield of Potato at Small Scale Irrigation, Ejere District, West Shoa, Ethiopia. Appl Eng. 2018;2(1):1-18. doi: 10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11,
  author = {Adisu Tadese Eba and Teshome Seyoum},
  title = {The Impact of Alternate Furrow Irrigation on Water Productivity and Yield of Potato at Small Scale Irrigation, Ejere District, West Shoa, Ethiopia},
  journal = {Applied Engineering},
  volume = {2},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-18},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ae.20180201.11},
  abstract = {As a result of water resource shortage and the need for food self-sufficiency in Ethiopia, it has become essential to improve the productivity. In this study, an attempt was made to evaluate the impact of alternate furrow irrigation technique on yield and water productivity. Alternate furrow irrigation versus every furrow, fixed furrow and farmer practice (open-ended and unstructured furrow) were evaluated at full crop water requirement. The experimental design used was randomized complete block design with four treatment replicated five times. Results obtained revealed that average water application efficiency of alternate furrow irrigation was 67% which was high as compared to other irrigation methods at all irrigation events. Average application efficiencies of ever furrow irrigation, fixed furrow irrigation and farmer practice were 52%, 61% and 34.4% respectively. The average distribution uniformity of alternate furrow irrigation and every furrow irrigation methods were 89.3% and 85.3% respectively, which showed no significant difference between the two methods. However, average distribution uniformity of fixed furrow irrigation was 75.4%, which showed significant difference between alternate furrow and fixed furrow irrigation methods. Alternate furrow irrigation method produced total tuber yield of 33198 kg/ha which showed insignificant difference as compared with that obtained under every furrow irrigation (33369 kg/ha). Total tuber yield harvested from fixed furrow irrigation and farmer practice were 30177 kg/ha and 30098 kg/ha respectively, which showed insignificant difference between the two methods. High marketable yield of 32667.8 kg/ha was recorded from alternate furrow irrigation. Water productivity of 11.2 kg/m3, 10.7 kg/m3, 6.1 kg/m3 and 4.1 kg/m3 were produced under alternate furrow, fixed furrow, and every furrow and farmer practice respectively. It was found that alternate furrow irrigation method saved 50% of water as compared with every furrow and 68.4% as compared with farmer practice. Therefore, it is recommended alternate furrow irrigation method with appropriate irrigation interval is suitable irrigation method; for humid climate where soil is dominated by clay soil and water is liming factor for potato crop production.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Impact of Alternate Furrow Irrigation on Water Productivity and Yield of Potato at Small Scale Irrigation, Ejere District, West Shoa, Ethiopia
AU  - Adisu Tadese Eba
AU  - Teshome Seyoum
Y1  - 2018/08/01
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11
T2  - Applied Engineering
JF  - Applied Engineering
JO  - Applied Engineering
SP  - 1
EP  - 18
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2994-7456
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11
AB  - As a result of water resource shortage and the need for food self-sufficiency in Ethiopia, it has become essential to improve the productivity. In this study, an attempt was made to evaluate the impact of alternate furrow irrigation technique on yield and water productivity. Alternate furrow irrigation versus every furrow, fixed furrow and farmer practice (open-ended and unstructured furrow) were evaluated at full crop water requirement. The experimental design used was randomized complete block design with four treatment replicated five times. Results obtained revealed that average water application efficiency of alternate furrow irrigation was 67% which was high as compared to other irrigation methods at all irrigation events. Average application efficiencies of ever furrow irrigation, fixed furrow irrigation and farmer practice were 52%, 61% and 34.4% respectively. The average distribution uniformity of alternate furrow irrigation and every furrow irrigation methods were 89.3% and 85.3% respectively, which showed no significant difference between the two methods. However, average distribution uniformity of fixed furrow irrigation was 75.4%, which showed significant difference between alternate furrow and fixed furrow irrigation methods. Alternate furrow irrigation method produced total tuber yield of 33198 kg/ha which showed insignificant difference as compared with that obtained under every furrow irrigation (33369 kg/ha). Total tuber yield harvested from fixed furrow irrigation and farmer practice were 30177 kg/ha and 30098 kg/ha respectively, which showed insignificant difference between the two methods. High marketable yield of 32667.8 kg/ha was recorded from alternate furrow irrigation. Water productivity of 11.2 kg/m3, 10.7 kg/m3, 6.1 kg/m3 and 4.1 kg/m3 were produced under alternate furrow, fixed furrow, and every furrow and farmer practice respectively. It was found that alternate furrow irrigation method saved 50% of water as compared with every furrow and 68.4% as compared with farmer practice. Therefore, it is recommended alternate furrow irrigation method with appropriate irrigation interval is suitable irrigation method; for humid climate where soil is dominated by clay soil and water is liming factor for potato crop production.
VL  - 2
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Adisu Tadese Eba

Department of Irrigation Enginering, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia
Teshome Seyoum

Department of Irrigation Enginering, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Adisu Tadese Eba, Teshome Seyoum. (2018). The Impact of Alternate Furrow Irrigation on Water Productivity and Yield of Potato at Small Scale Irrigation, Ejere District, West Shoa, Ethiopia. Applied Engineering, 2(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Adisu Tadese Eba; Teshome Seyoum. The Impact of Alternate Furrow Irrigation on Water Productivity and Yield of Potato at Small Scale Irrigation, Ejere District, West Shoa, Ethiopia. Appl. Eng. 2018, 2(1), 1-18. doi: 10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Adisu Tadese Eba, Teshome Seyoum. The Impact of Alternate Furrow Irrigation on Water Productivity and Yield of Potato at Small Scale Irrigation, Ejere District, West Shoa, Ethiopia. Appl Eng. 2018;2(1):1-18. doi: 10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11,
  author = {Adisu Tadese Eba and Teshome Seyoum},
  title = {The Impact of Alternate Furrow Irrigation on Water Productivity and Yield of Potato at Small Scale Irrigation, Ejere District, West Shoa, Ethiopia},
  journal = {Applied Engineering},
  volume = {2},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-18},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ae.20180201.11},
  abstract = {As a result of water resource shortage and the need for food self-sufficiency in Ethiopia, it has become essential to improve the productivity. In this study, an attempt was made to evaluate the impact of alternate furrow irrigation technique on yield and water productivity. Alternate furrow irrigation versus every furrow, fixed furrow and farmer practice (open-ended and unstructured furrow) were evaluated at full crop water requirement. The experimental design used was randomized complete block design with four treatment replicated five times. Results obtained revealed that average water application efficiency of alternate furrow irrigation was 67% which was high as compared to other irrigation methods at all irrigation events. Average application efficiencies of ever furrow irrigation, fixed furrow irrigation and farmer practice were 52%, 61% and 34.4% respectively. The average distribution uniformity of alternate furrow irrigation and every furrow irrigation methods were 89.3% and 85.3% respectively, which showed no significant difference between the two methods. However, average distribution uniformity of fixed furrow irrigation was 75.4%, which showed significant difference between alternate furrow and fixed furrow irrigation methods. Alternate furrow irrigation method produced total tuber yield of 33198 kg/ha which showed insignificant difference as compared with that obtained under every furrow irrigation (33369 kg/ha). Total tuber yield harvested from fixed furrow irrigation and farmer practice were 30177 kg/ha and 30098 kg/ha respectively, which showed insignificant difference between the two methods. High marketable yield of 32667.8 kg/ha was recorded from alternate furrow irrigation. Water productivity of 11.2 kg/m3, 10.7 kg/m3, 6.1 kg/m3 and 4.1 kg/m3 were produced under alternate furrow, fixed furrow, and every furrow and farmer practice respectively. It was found that alternate furrow irrigation method saved 50% of water as compared with every furrow and 68.4% as compared with farmer practice. Therefore, it is recommended alternate furrow irrigation method with appropriate irrigation interval is suitable irrigation method; for humid climate where soil is dominated by clay soil and water is liming factor for potato crop production.},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Impact of Alternate Furrow Irrigation on Water Productivity and Yield of Potato at Small Scale Irrigation, Ejere District, West Shoa, Ethiopia
AU  - Adisu Tadese Eba
AU  - Teshome Seyoum
Y1  - 2018/08/01
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11
T2  - Applied Engineering
JF  - Applied Engineering
JO  - Applied Engineering
SP  - 1
EP  - 18
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2994-7456
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20180201.11
AB  - As a result of water resource shortage and the need for food self-sufficiency in Ethiopia, it has become essential to improve the productivity. In this study, an attempt was made to evaluate the impact of alternate furrow irrigation technique on yield and water productivity. Alternate furrow irrigation versus every furrow, fixed furrow and farmer practice (open-ended and unstructured furrow) were evaluated at full crop water requirement. The experimental design used was randomized complete block design with four treatment replicated five times. Results obtained revealed that average water application efficiency of alternate furrow irrigation was 67% which was high as compared to other irrigation methods at all irrigation events. Average application efficiencies of ever furrow irrigation, fixed furrow irrigation and farmer practice were 52%, 61% and 34.4% respectively. The average distribution uniformity of alternate furrow irrigation and every furrow irrigation methods were 89.3% and 85.3% respectively, which showed no significant difference between the two methods. However, average distribution uniformity of fixed furrow irrigation was 75.4%, which showed significant difference between alternate furrow and fixed furrow irrigation methods. Alternate furrow irrigation method produced total tuber yield of 33198 kg/ha which showed insignificant difference as compared with that obtained under every furrow irrigation (33369 kg/ha). Total tuber yield harvested from fixed furrow irrigation and farmer practice were 30177 kg/ha and 30098 kg/ha respectively, which showed insignificant difference between the two methods. High marketable yield of 32667.8 kg/ha was recorded from alternate furrow irrigation. Water productivity of 11.2 kg/m3, 10.7 kg/m3, 6.1 kg/m3 and 4.1 kg/m3 were produced under alternate furrow, fixed furrow, and every furrow and farmer practice respectively. It was found that alternate furrow irrigation method saved 50% of water as compared with every furrow and 68.4% as compared with farmer practice. Therefore, it is recommended alternate furrow irrigation method with appropriate irrigation interval is suitable irrigation method; for humid climate where soil is dominated by clay soil and water is liming factor for potato crop production.
VL  - 2
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download