American Journal of Entomology

| Peer-Reviewed |

Effect of Host Plant on Biology and Life Table Parameters of Sipha maydis (Pass.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

Received: 22 May 2017    Accepted: 13 June 2017    Published: 26 July 2017
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Sipha (Rugsia) maydis (Pass.) is an important pest of wheat and it has been reported throughout the Mediterranean region, into Central and South Asia, South Africa, South America and North America The development, survivorship, and life table parameters of R. padi were evaluated in a growth chamber on seven wheat cultivars as follows: ACA 315, Baguette 12 P, BioINTA 1002, BioINTA 2004, Buck Meteoro, Klein Yarará and LE 2330 at controlled conditions (20±1°C; about 70% RH; 14 h photophase). The development time of immature stage was ca. 8-9 d on cv. ACA 315, BioINTA 1002, Buck Meteoro, Klein Yarará and LE 2330, while those on cvs BioINTA 2004 and Baguette 12 P was ca. 11-12 d. The immature survival ranged from 90 to 100%. The intrinsic rate of increase (rm) for ACA 315 and BioINTA 2004 were the highest. Jackknife estimates of rm on all cultivars ranged from 0.199 to 0.093 females/female/day on ACA 315 and LE 2330, respectively. The mean generation times (T) ranged from 22.82 d on Baguette 12 P to 15.09 d on Klein Yarará. The highest net reproductive rate (R0) were on ACA 315 and Baguette 12 P (59.80 and 53.25 females/female/generation, respectively). Because of the high coefficient of determination (pseudo-R2) values in Gompertz and Weibull models, survival data from different cultivars had a good fit to both models. The results pointed LE 2330, Klein Yarará and partially BioINTA 1002 as the least suitable host plants, indicating that they were the most resistant to S. maydis among the cultivars tested.

DOI 10.11648/j.aje.20170101.15
Published in American Journal of Entomology (Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2017)
Page(s) 19-26
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Host Suitability, Life History, Intrinsic Rate of Increase

References
[1] FAO. (2014) Statistical databases. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). [Online]. http://faostat.fao.org
[2] R. L. Blackman and V. F. Eastop. Aphids on the world's herbaceous plants and shrubs. Chichester.: Wiley., 2006.
[3] C. Corrales, A. M. Castro, M. Ricci and A. F. G. Dixon. "Sipha maydis: Distribution and host range of a new aphid pest of winter cereals in Argentina" Journal of Economic Entomology, vol. 100, pp. 1781-1788, 2007.
[4] J. T. Sorensen. (2007) Sipha maydis Passerini: A new grass/cereal aphid in North America. Plant Pest Diagnostic Center. California Department of Food and Agriculture.
[5] S. E. Halbert, G. L. Miller and L. M. Ames. "The genus Sipha Passerini (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in North America.," Inseta Mundi, vol. 326, pp. 1-6, 2013.
[6] M. El Yamani and J. H. Hill. "Aphid vectors of barley yellow dwarf virus in west central Morocco" Journal of Phytopathology, vol. 133, pp. 105–111, 1991.
[7] D. Dent, "Host plant resistance." in Insect pest management, 2nd ed., D. Dent, Ed. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: CAB Publishing, 2000, p. 410.
[8] N. Doryanizadeh, S. Moharramipour, V. Hosseininaveh, and M. Mehrabadi, "Effect of Eight Cucumis Genotypes on Life Table and Population Growth Parameters of Melon Aphid: An Approach to Assess Antibiosis Resistance.," Journal of Agriculture Science and Technology, vol. 18, pp. 1819-1832, 2016.
[9] F. Meradsi and M. Laamari, "Population dynamics and biological parameters of Aphis fabae Scopoli on five broad bean cultivars," International Journal of Biosciences 9(2): 58-68, 2016, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 58-68, 2016.
[10] M. A. C. Araujo, E. S., Benatto, A., Mógor, Á. F., Penteado, S. C., & Zawadneak. "Biological parameters and fertility life table of Aphis forbesi Weed, 1889 (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on strawberry" Brazilian Journal of Biology, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 937-941, 2016.
[11] M. Ricci and A. E. Kahan. "Aspectos biológicos y poblacionales de Sipha Maydis (Passerini) y Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) en cebada," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCUYO, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 25-32, 2005.
[12] V. I. Saldúa and A. M. Castro. "Expresión de la antibiosis y de la antixenosis contra el pulgón negro de los cereales (Sipha maydis) en cultivares comerciales de trigo" Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2011.
[13] O. D. Dhingra and J. B. Sinclair, Basic Plant Pathology Methods. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 1985.
[14] M. D. Noble. "A simplified clip cage for aphid investigations" Canadian Entomologist, vol. 90, p. 760, 1958.
[15] F. R. La Rossa and N. Kahn, "Dos programas de computadora para confeccionar tablas de vida de fertilidad y calcular parámetros biológicos y demográficos en áfidos (Homoptera: Aphidodea)," Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 127-142, 2003.
[16] J. S. Meyer, C. G. Ingersoli, L. L. Mc Donalds and M. S. Boyce. "Estimating uncertainty in population growth rates: Jackknife vs. Bootstrap techniques" Ecology, vol. 67, pp. 1156-1166, 1986.
[17] R. R. Sokal and F. J. Rohlf, Biometry, 3rd ed. New York, USA: W. H. Freeman, 1995.
[18] L. C. Birch, "The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population" Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 17, pp. 15-26, 1948.
[19] J. R. Carey, "Insect biodemography," Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 46, pp. 79.-100, 2000.
[20] R. R. E. Southwood and P. A. Henderson, Ecological Methods, 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science, 2000.
[21] SAS (®) Institute Inc., Help and Documentation. Cary, NC, USA, 2002.
[22] A. C. Elliott and L. S. Hynan. "A SAS (®) macro implementation of a multiple comparison post hoc test for a Kruskal – Wallis analysis.," Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 75-80, 2011.
[23] A. C. Elliott and J. S. Reisch. "Implementing a multiple comparison test for proportions in a 2xc crosstabulation in SAS®," in SAS Users Group International Conference, San Francisco, CA, 2006, pp. 204-231.
[24] E. S. Deevey. "Life tables for natural populations of animals" The Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 22, pp. 283–314, 1947.
[25] J. E. Pinder III, J. G. Wiener and M. H. Smith. "The Weibull distribution: a new method of summarizing survivorship data" Ecology, vol. 59, pp. 175–179, 1978.
[26] J. C. Van Lenteren and L. P. J. J. Noldus. "Whitefly-Plant Relationships: Behavioral and Ecological Aspects," in Whitefly: Their Bionomics, Pest Status and Management, D. Gerling, Ed. Andover, Hampshire, UK: Intercept, 1990, pp. 47-89.
[27] L. E. Jackai, C. Gaudon, A. Asiwe and B. O. Tayo. "Integrated control of the cowpea aphid using seed dressing and varietal resistance" Samaru Journal of Agriculture Research, vol. 17, pp. 13-23, 2001.
[28] N. J. Gotelli. A primer of Ecology. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA: Sinauer Associates Inc, 1998.
[29] G. G. Kennedy and M. F. Abou-Ghadir. "Bionomics of the turnip aphid on two turnip cultivars" Journal of Economic Entomology, vol. 72, pp. 754-757, 1979.
[30] A. P. D. Gutierrez, J. Morgan and D. E. Havenstein. "The ecology of Aphis craccivora Koch and subterranean clover stunt Virus. I. The phenology of aphid populations and the epidemiology of virus in pastures in South-East Australia" Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 8, pp. 699–7210, 1971.
[31] A. P. G. Dixon, "Parthenogenetic reproduction and the rate of increase in aphids" in Aphids their biology, natural enemies and control, A. K. Minks and P. Harrewijn, Ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1987, vol. A, p. 450.
[32] P. Ruglie and A. P. Gutierrez. "Use of life tables to assess host plant resistance in alfalfa to Therioaphis trifolii f. maculata (Homoptera: Aphididae): hypothesis for maintenance of resistance" Environmental Ecology, vol. 24, pp. 313-325, 1995.
[33] Z. Tazerouni and A. A. Talebi. "Temperature-dependent life history of Sipha maydis" Journal of Plant Protection Research, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 374-382, 2014.
[34] S. Gholami Moghadam, M. Hosseini and M. Modares Awal "Does leaf pubescence of wheat affect host selection and life tableparameters of Sipha maydis (Hemiptera: Aphididae)?" Jounal of Crop Protection, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 81-92, 2013.
[35] A. Vasicek, F. La Rossa A. Paglioni and M. C. López. "Estadísticos biológicos y demográficos de Diuraphis noxia (Mordv.), Metopolophium dirhodum (Wlk.), Rhopalosiphum padi (L.), Schizaphis graminum (Rond.) y Sipha maydis (Pass.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) sobre diferentes cultivares de Avena sativa L." Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, vol. 46, p. 591−596, 2010.
Author Information
  • Department of Diagnosis and Biology of Pests, Institute of Agricultural Microbiology and Zoology, Veterinary and Agronomic Sciences Research Center, National Institute of Agricultural Technology, Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Department of Diagnosis and Biology of Pests, Institute of Agricultural Microbiology and Zoology, Veterinary and Agronomic Sciences Research Center, National Institute of Agricultural Technology, Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Department of Agricultural Zoology, Faculty of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, National University of La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Department of Agricultural Zoology, Faculty of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, National University of La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Department of Plan Breeding, Marcos Juárez Experimental Agricultural Station, National Institute of Agricultural Technology, Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Francisco La Rossa, Albano Giudici, Araceli Vasicek, María Carolina López, Carlos Bainotti. (2017). Effect of Host Plant on Biology and Life Table Parameters of Sipha maydis (Pass.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). American Journal of Entomology, 1(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20170101.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Francisco La Rossa; Albano Giudici; Araceli Vasicek; María Carolina López; Carlos Bainotti. Effect of Host Plant on Biology and Life Table Parameters of Sipha maydis (Pass.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Am. J. Entomol. 2017, 1(1), 19-26. doi: 10.11648/j.aje.20170101.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Francisco La Rossa, Albano Giudici, Araceli Vasicek, María Carolina López, Carlos Bainotti. Effect of Host Plant on Biology and Life Table Parameters of Sipha maydis (Pass.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Am J Entomol. 2017;1(1):19-26. doi: 10.11648/j.aje.20170101.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.aje.20170101.15,
      author = {Francisco La Rossa and Albano Giudici and Araceli Vasicek and María Carolina López and Carlos Bainotti},
      title = {Effect of Host Plant on Biology and Life Table Parameters of Sipha maydis (Pass.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae)},
      journal = {American Journal of Entomology},
      volume = {1},
      number = {1},
      pages = {19-26},
      doi = {10.11648/j.aje.20170101.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20170101.15},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aje.20170101.15},
      abstract = {Sipha (Rugsia) maydis (Pass.) is an important pest of wheat and it has been reported throughout the Mediterranean region, into Central and South Asia, South Africa, South America and North America The development, survivorship, and life table parameters of R. padi were evaluated in a growth chamber on seven wheat cultivars as follows: ACA 315, Baguette 12 P, BioINTA 1002, BioINTA 2004, Buck Meteoro, Klein Yarará and LE 2330 at controlled conditions (20±1°C; about 70% RH; 14 h photophase). The development time of immature stage was ca. 8-9 d on cv. ACA 315, BioINTA 1002, Buck Meteoro, Klein Yarará and LE 2330, while those on cvs BioINTA 2004 and Baguette 12 P was ca. 11-12 d. The immature survival ranged from 90 to 100%. The intrinsic rate of increase (rm) for ACA 315 and BioINTA 2004 were the highest. Jackknife estimates of rm on all cultivars ranged from 0.199 to 0.093 females/female/day on ACA 315 and LE 2330, respectively. The mean generation times (T) ranged from 22.82 d on Baguette 12 P to 15.09 d on Klein Yarará. The highest net reproductive rate (R0) were on ACA 315 and Baguette 12 P (59.80 and 53.25 females/female/generation, respectively). Because of the high coefficient of determination (pseudo-R2) values in Gompertz and Weibull models, survival data from different cultivars had a good fit to both models. The results pointed LE 2330, Klein Yarará and partially BioINTA 1002 as the least suitable host plants, indicating that they were the most resistant to S. maydis among the cultivars tested.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effect of Host Plant on Biology and Life Table Parameters of Sipha maydis (Pass.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae)
    AU  - Francisco La Rossa
    AU  - Albano Giudici
    AU  - Araceli Vasicek
    AU  - María Carolina López
    AU  - Carlos Bainotti
    Y1  - 2017/07/26
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20170101.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.aje.20170101.15
    T2  - American Journal of Entomology
    JF  - American Journal of Entomology
    JO  - American Journal of Entomology
    SP  - 19
    EP  - 26
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-0537
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20170101.15
    AB  - Sipha (Rugsia) maydis (Pass.) is an important pest of wheat and it has been reported throughout the Mediterranean region, into Central and South Asia, South Africa, South America and North America The development, survivorship, and life table parameters of R. padi were evaluated in a growth chamber on seven wheat cultivars as follows: ACA 315, Baguette 12 P, BioINTA 1002, BioINTA 2004, Buck Meteoro, Klein Yarará and LE 2330 at controlled conditions (20±1°C; about 70% RH; 14 h photophase). The development time of immature stage was ca. 8-9 d on cv. ACA 315, BioINTA 1002, Buck Meteoro, Klein Yarará and LE 2330, while those on cvs BioINTA 2004 and Baguette 12 P was ca. 11-12 d. The immature survival ranged from 90 to 100%. The intrinsic rate of increase (rm) for ACA 315 and BioINTA 2004 were the highest. Jackknife estimates of rm on all cultivars ranged from 0.199 to 0.093 females/female/day on ACA 315 and LE 2330, respectively. The mean generation times (T) ranged from 22.82 d on Baguette 12 P to 15.09 d on Klein Yarará. The highest net reproductive rate (R0) were on ACA 315 and Baguette 12 P (59.80 and 53.25 females/female/generation, respectively). Because of the high coefficient of determination (pseudo-R2) values in Gompertz and Weibull models, survival data from different cultivars had a good fit to both models. The results pointed LE 2330, Klein Yarará and partially BioINTA 1002 as the least suitable host plants, indicating that they were the most resistant to S. maydis among the cultivars tested.
    VL  - 1
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections