| Peer-Reviewed

Efficacy of Filter Cake and Triplex Powders Against Three Internally Developing Stored-product Insect Species

Received: 10 January 2019    Accepted: 22 February 2019    Published: 11 March 2019
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Filter cake and Triplex powders from Ethiopia were applied to maize and wheat in the laboratory to determine efficacy against the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae); maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae); and rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (Linnaeus) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). These species are major insect pests associated with stored grain in Ethiopia. Efficacy of the two powders was determined by exposing 20 adults of each species to 100 g of maize and wheat treated with 0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 g/kg of filter cake, and 0, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8 and 10 g/kg of Triplex. Adult mortality was determined 14 d after exposure to untreated and treated grain. Adult progeny production at each species-powder-concentration combination was determined at 42 d. Complete mortality (100%) of R. dominica was achieved on maize treated with 3–5 g/kg of filter cake; however, on maize 100% mortality of S. zeamais, and S. oryzae was not achieved at any of filter cake concentrations. Complete mortality of R. dominica adults was observed on wheat treated with 2–3 g/kg of the filter cake. Complete mortality of S. zeamais and S. oryzae was achieved when adults were exposed to wheat treated with 0.7–3 g/kg of filter cake. Mortality was less than 100% at all Triplex concentrations on maize and wheat for all three species. Adult progeny production of R. dominica was wholly suppressed at filter cake concentrations of 1–5 g/kg on maize, whereas progeny production of S. zeamais and S. oryzae on maize was not entirely suppressed at any of the filter cake concentrations. No progeny of R. dominica was observed on wheat treated with 2–3 g/kg of filter cake. Similarly, progeny production of S. zeamais and S. oryzae was completely suppressed on wheat treated with 3 g/kg of a filter cake. Complete suppression of progeny production of the three species was not achieved at any concentration of Triplex on both maize and wheat. These powders have potential in managing R. dominica, S. zeamais, and S. oryzae infesting maize and wheat.

Published in American Journal of Entomology (Volume 3, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.aje.20190301.13
Page(s) 15-23
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Filter Cake, Triplex, Maize, Wheat, Rhyzopertha dominica, Sitophilus Species, Efficacy Assessment

References
[1] Abraham T., Amare A., Emana G., Tadele T. (2008). Review of research on post-harvest pests, In: Abraham T., (Ed), Increasing Crop Production through Improved Plant Protection-Volume I. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Plant Protection Society of Ethiopia (PPSE), 19-22 December 2006. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Plant Protection Society of Ethiopia (PPSE) and Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2008, pp. 475-593.
[2] Nukenine, E., 2010. Stored product protection in Africa: Past, present and future. In: Carvalho, M. O., P. G. Fields, C. S. Adler, F. H. Arthur, C. G. Athanassiou, J. F. Campbell, F. Fleurat-Lessard, P. W. Flinn, R. J. Hodges, A. A. Isikber, S. Navarro, R. T. Noyes, J. Riudavets, K. K. Sinha, G. R. Thorpe, B. H. Timlick, P. Trematerra, and N. D. G. White (Eds), proceedings of the 10th International Working Conference on Stored-Product Protection, June 27-July 2, 2010, Estoril, Portugal. Julius-Kuhn-Archiv, 425, 2010, 26-41.
[3] Zorya, S., Morgan, N., Diaz Rios, L., Hodges, R., Bennett, B., Stathers, T., Mwebaze, P., Lamb, J., 2011. Missing food: the case of postharvest grain losses in sub-Saharan Africa. Joint publication of the Natural Resource Institute, Greenwich University, UK; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy; and The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank, Washington D. C., USA, Report Number 60371-AFR, pp. 96.
[4] Tefera T., Kanampiu F., De Groote H., Hellin J., Mugo S., Kimenju S., Beyene Y., Boddupalli P. M., Shiferaw B., Banziger M. (2011). The metal silo: an effective grain storage technology for reducing post-harvest insect and pathogen losses in maize while improving smallholder farmers’ food security in developing countries, Crop Prot. 30: 240-245.
[5] Hill D. S. (2008). Pests of Crops in Warmer Climates and their Control, Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin, Germany.
[6] Befikadu D. (2018). Postharvest losses in Ethiopia and opportunities for reduction, Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res. 38: 249-262.
[7] Williamson S., Ball A., Pretty J. (2008). Trends in pesticide use and drivers for safer pest management in four African countries, Crop Prot. 27: 1327-1334.
[8] Mengistie B. T., Mol A. P., Oosterveer P. (2017). Pesticide use practices among smallholder vegetable farmers in Ethiopian Central Rift Valley, Environ. Dev. Sust. 19: 301-324.
[9] Obeng-Ofori, D. (2011). Protecting grain from insect pest infestations in Africa: producer perceptions and practices. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 3|9, 1– 5.
[10] Murdock L., Baoua I. (2014). On Purdue Improved Cowpea Storage (PICS) technology: background, mode of action, future prospects, J. Stored Prod. Res. 58: 3-11.
[11] Chigoverah A. A., Mvumi B. M. (2016). Efficacy of metal silos and hermetic bags against stored-maize insect pests under simulated smallholder farmer conditions, J. Stored Prod. Res. 69: 179-189.
[12] Headlee T. J. (1924). Certain dusts as agents for the protection of stored seeds from insect infestation, J. Econ. Entomol. 17: 298-307.
[13] Ebeling W. (1971). Sorptive dusts for pest control, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 16: 123-158.
[14] Subramanyam, Bh., Roesli, R. (2000). Inert dusts. In: Alternatives to Pesticides in Stored-Product IPM, Subramanyam, Bh., and Hagstrum, D. W. (Eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 321-380.
[15] Liška, A., Korunić, Z., Rozman, V., Halamić, J., Galović, I., Lucić, P., Baličević, R., 2017. Efficacy of nine Croatian inert dusts against rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on wheat. Emirates J. Food Agri., 29: 485-494.
[16] Bohinc T., Horvat A., Andrić G., Golić M. P., Kljajić P., Trdan S. (2018). Comparison of three different wood ashes and diatomaceous earth in controlling the maize weevil under laboratory conditions, J. Stored Prod. Res. 79: 1-8.
[17] Stadler T., Buteler M., Weaver D. K., Sofie S. (2012). Comparative toxicity of nanostructured alumina and a commercial inert dust for Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) at varying ambient humidity levels, J. Stored Prod. Res. 48: 81-90.
[18] Malia H. A. E., Rosi-Denadai C. A., Cardoso D. G., Guedes R. N. C. (2016). Dust to weevils, weevils to dust: maize weevil personality and susceptibility to diatomaceous earth, J. Pest Sci. 89: 469-478.
[19] Girma D., Addis T., Demissew A., Abraham T. (2008). Cooking oils and “Triplex” in the control of Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in farm-stored maize. J. Stored Prod. Res. 44: 173-178.
[20] Girma D., Tadele T., Abraham T. (2008). Efficacy of Silicosec, filter cake and wood ash against the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on three maize genotypes. J. Stored Prod. Res. 44: 227-231.
[21] Tadesse T. M., Subramanyam Bh. (2018). Efficacy of filter cake and Triplex powders from Ethiopia applied to wheat against Sitophilus zeamais and Sitophilus oryzae, J. Stored Prod. Res. 79: 40-52.
[22] Tadesse T. M., Subramanyam Bh. (2018). Efficacy of filter cake and Triplex powders from Ethiopia applied to concrete arenas against Sitophilus zeamais, J. Stored Prod. Res. 76: 140-150.
[23] Tadesse T. M., Subramanyam Bh., Zhu K. Y., Campbell J. F. (2019): Contact toxicity of filter cake and Triplex powders from Ethiopia against adults of Sitophilus oryzae (Linnaeus) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), J. Stored Prod. Res. 80: 34-40.
[24] Abbott W. S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide, J. Econ. Entomol. 18: 265-267.
[25] Zar, J. H., 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.
[26] Bartlett M. S. (1947). The use of transformations, Biometrics 3: 39-52.
[27] SAS Institute, 2012. SAS/STAT 9.4 user's guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.
[28] Le Patourel G., Shawir M., Moustafa F. (1989). Accumulation of mineral dusts from wheat by Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), J. Stored Prod. Res. 25: 65-72.
[29] Malia, H. A. E., Rosi-Denadai, C. A., Guedes, N. M. P., Martins, G. F., Guedes, R. N. C. (2016). Diatomaceous earth impairment of water balance in the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais. J. Pest Sci. 89: 945–954.
[30] Filipović R., Lazić D., Perušić M., Stijepović I. (2010). Oil absorption in mesoporous silica particles, Process Appl. Ceramics 4: 265-269.
[31] Arthur F. H. (2002). Survival of Sitophilus oryzae (L.) on wheat treated with diatomaceous earth: impact of biological and environmental parameters on product efficacy, J. Stored Prod. Res. 38: 305-313.
[32] Athanassiou C. G., Kavallieratos N. G., Tsaganou F. C., Vayias B. J., Dimizas C. B., Buchelos C. T. (2003). Effect of grain type on the insecticidal efficacy of SilicoSec against Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Crop Prot. 22: 1141-1147.
[33] Athanassiou C. G., Kavallieratos N. G., Vayias B. J., Panoussakis E. C. (2008). Influence of grain type on the susceptibility of different Sitophilus oryzae (L.) populations, obtained from different rearing media, to three diatomaceous earth formulations, J. Stored Prod. Res. 44 279-284.
[34] Kljajić P., Andrić G., Adamović M., Bodroža-Solarov M., Marković M., Perić I. (2010). Laboratory assessment of insecticidal effectiveness of natural zeolite and diatomaceous earth formulations against three stored-product beetle pests, J. Stored Prod. Res. 46: 1-6.
[35] Nukenine, E., Goudoungou, J., Adler, C., Reichmuth, C. (2010). Efficacy of diatomaceous earth and botanical powders against the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on maize. In: Carvalho, M. O., P. G. Fields, C. S. Adler, F. H. Arthur, C. G. Athanassiou, J. F. Campbell, F. Fleurat-Lessard, P. W. Flinn, R. J. Hodges, A. A. Isikber, S. Navarro, R. T. Noyes, J. Riudavets, K. K. Sinha, G. R. Thorpe, B. H. Timlick, P. Trematerra, and N. D. G. White (Eds), proceedings of the 10th international working conference on stored-product protection, June 27-July 2, 2010, Estoril, Portugal. Julius-Kuhn-Archiv, 425, 2010, 881-887.
[36] Jean W. G., Nchiwan N. E., Dieudonné N., Adler C. (2015). Efficacy of diatomaceous earth and wood ash for the control of Sitophilus zeamais in stored maize, J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 3: 390-397.
[37] Athanassiou C., Kavallieratos N. (2005). Insecticidal effect and adherence of PyriSec® in different grain commodities, Crop Prot. 24: 703-710.
[38] Kavallieratos N. G., Athanassiou C. G., Pashalidou F. G., Andris N. S., Tomanović Ž. (2005). Influence of grain type on the insecticidal efficacy of two diatomaceous earth formulations against Rhyzopertha dominica (F) (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae), Pest Manag. Sci. 61: 660-666.
[39] Vassilakos T. N., Athanassiou C. G. (2015). Tsiropoulos N. G., Influence of grain type on the efficacy of spinetoram for the control of Rhyzopertha dominica, Sitophilus granarius and Sitophilus oryzae, J Stored Prod. Res. 64: 1-7.
[40] Fazlabad M., Badihi M., Khormizi M. (2017). Effect of grain type on the insecticidal efficacy of Paya® against Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), Acta Phyto. Entomol. Hung. 52: 265-274.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tesfaye Melak Tadesse, Bhadriraju Subramanyam. (2019). Efficacy of Filter Cake and Triplex Powders Against Three Internally Developing Stored-product Insect Species. American Journal of Entomology, 3(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20190301.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tesfaye Melak Tadesse; Bhadriraju Subramanyam. Efficacy of Filter Cake and Triplex Powders Against Three Internally Developing Stored-product Insect Species. Am. J. Entomol. 2019, 3(1), 15-23. doi: 10.11648/j.aje.20190301.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tesfaye Melak Tadesse, Bhadriraju Subramanyam. Efficacy of Filter Cake and Triplex Powders Against Three Internally Developing Stored-product Insect Species. Am J Entomol. 2019;3(1):15-23. doi: 10.11648/j.aje.20190301.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.aje.20190301.13,
      author = {Tesfaye Melak Tadesse and Bhadriraju Subramanyam},
      title = {Efficacy of Filter Cake and Triplex Powders Against Three Internally Developing Stored-product Insect Species},
      journal = {American Journal of Entomology},
      volume = {3},
      number = {1},
      pages = {15-23},
      doi = {10.11648/j.aje.20190301.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20190301.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aje.20190301.13},
      abstract = {Filter cake and Triplex powders from Ethiopia were applied to maize and wheat in the laboratory to determine efficacy against the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae); maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae); and rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (Linnaeus) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). These species are major insect pests associated with stored grain in Ethiopia. Efficacy of the two powders was determined by exposing 20 adults of each species to 100 g of maize and wheat treated with 0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 g/kg of filter cake, and 0, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8 and 10 g/kg of Triplex. Adult mortality was determined 14 d after exposure to untreated and treated grain. Adult progeny production at each species-powder-concentration combination was determined at 42 d. Complete mortality (100%) of R. dominica was achieved on maize treated with 3–5 g/kg of filter cake; however, on maize 100% mortality of S. zeamais, and S. oryzae was not achieved at any of filter cake concentrations. Complete mortality of R. dominica adults was observed on wheat treated with 2–3 g/kg of the filter cake. Complete mortality of S. zeamais and S. oryzae was achieved when adults were exposed to wheat treated with 0.7–3 g/kg of filter cake. Mortality was less than 100% at all Triplex concentrations on maize and wheat for all three species. Adult progeny production of R. dominica was wholly suppressed at filter cake concentrations of 1–5 g/kg on maize, whereas progeny production of S. zeamais and S. oryzae on maize was not entirely suppressed at any of the filter cake concentrations. No progeny of R. dominica was observed on wheat treated with 2–3 g/kg of filter cake. Similarly, progeny production of S. zeamais and S. oryzae was completely suppressed on wheat treated with 3 g/kg of a filter cake. Complete suppression of progeny production of the three species was not achieved at any concentration of Triplex on both maize and wheat. These powders have potential in managing R. dominica, S. zeamais, and S. oryzae infesting maize and wheat.},
     year = {2019}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Efficacy of Filter Cake and Triplex Powders Against Three Internally Developing Stored-product Insect Species
    AU  - Tesfaye Melak Tadesse
    AU  - Bhadriraju Subramanyam
    Y1  - 2019/03/11
    PY  - 2019
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20190301.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.aje.20190301.13
    T2  - American Journal of Entomology
    JF  - American Journal of Entomology
    JO  - American Journal of Entomology
    SP  - 15
    EP  - 23
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-0537
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20190301.13
    AB  - Filter cake and Triplex powders from Ethiopia were applied to maize and wheat in the laboratory to determine efficacy against the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae); maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae); and rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (Linnaeus) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). These species are major insect pests associated with stored grain in Ethiopia. Efficacy of the two powders was determined by exposing 20 adults of each species to 100 g of maize and wheat treated with 0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 g/kg of filter cake, and 0, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8 and 10 g/kg of Triplex. Adult mortality was determined 14 d after exposure to untreated and treated grain. Adult progeny production at each species-powder-concentration combination was determined at 42 d. Complete mortality (100%) of R. dominica was achieved on maize treated with 3–5 g/kg of filter cake; however, on maize 100% mortality of S. zeamais, and S. oryzae was not achieved at any of filter cake concentrations. Complete mortality of R. dominica adults was observed on wheat treated with 2–3 g/kg of the filter cake. Complete mortality of S. zeamais and S. oryzae was achieved when adults were exposed to wheat treated with 0.7–3 g/kg of filter cake. Mortality was less than 100% at all Triplex concentrations on maize and wheat for all three species. Adult progeny production of R. dominica was wholly suppressed at filter cake concentrations of 1–5 g/kg on maize, whereas progeny production of S. zeamais and S. oryzae on maize was not entirely suppressed at any of the filter cake concentrations. No progeny of R. dominica was observed on wheat treated with 2–3 g/kg of filter cake. Similarly, progeny production of S. zeamais and S. oryzae was completely suppressed on wheat treated with 3 g/kg of a filter cake. Complete suppression of progeny production of the three species was not achieved at any concentration of Triplex on both maize and wheat. These powders have potential in managing R. dominica, S. zeamais, and S. oryzae infesting maize and wheat.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, USA; Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, USA

  • Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, USA

  • Sections