An Analysis of the Precautionary Principles and Its Adaptation in International, Regional and National Laws
International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science
Volume 4, Issue 3, May 2019, Pages: 47-51
Received: May 16, 2019;
Accepted: Jun. 20, 2019;
Published: Aug. 6, 2019
Views 474 Downloads 111
Mark Akunna Eze, Department of Mass Communication, School of Communication Arts, Institute of Management and Technology (IMT), Enugu, Nigeria
Ifeanyi Samson Eze, Department of Pure and Industrial Chemistry, Faculty of Physical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
There is risk in every human activity. Statistics indicate that these risks are earth bound. Arguments as to whether policies meant to check and control these risks based on scientific evidence or on mere suspicion of risks have formed the subject of debate in many international conferences. Some persons agree that decisions to protect/prevent risk must be based on clear evidence of risk, others believe that mere suspicion with or without any clear evidence of risk is enough to warrant such policies. Risk is measured not only by positive knowledge of quantifiable but also by the degree of uncertainty or lack of knowledge about a possible hazard… On the continuum, between, a merely speculative risk and a conclusively demonstrated one lies a vast stretch of undemonstrated, un-quantified but scientifically plausible risk. Within that zone, the risk of harm is real so long as safety is unproven. It is this broad spectrum of potential risk, beyond that which is clearly identifiable and preventable that the precautionary principles, the roots of which lie in the environmental movements of the 1970s, seek to mitigate. This work set out to examine the precautionary principle as an environmental policy, its origin, meaning, importance and adaptation in international, regional, and domestic Laws. This study applied desk approach in generating data for the study. The result indicates that though the principle has become an established principle of environmental law particularly at international level, it is yet to be legitimately invoked and applied by most national laws.
Mark Akunna Eze,
Ifeanyi Samson Eze,
An Analysis of the Precautionary Principles and Its Adaptation in International, Regional and National Laws, International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science.
Vol. 4, No. 3,
2019, pp. 47-51.
S. Mark, “Genetically Modified food, Regulation and free Trade: A Saga for Our Times,” (International Company and Commercial Law Review, 2003) p. 23-37.
S. Naomi, “A European Perspective on the Precautionary Principle, Food Safety and the Free Trade Imperative of the WTO,” (European Law Review, 2002) p. 138-155.
V. R. Walker, “Keeping the WTO from Becoming the World Trans Science Organisation: Scientific Uncertainty, Science policy and Fact Finding in the growth Hormones Dispute”, 1998, (Cornell L. J., 1998) p. 305.
H. Veerle, “Facing the Consequences of the Precautionary Principle in European Community Law,” (European Law Review, 2006) p. 185-206.
L. Maria, EU Environmental Law Challenges, Changes, and Decision-Making, (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002) p. 99-100.
S. Bell and D. McGillivray, Environmental Law, (Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 63.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb et al, “The Precautionary Principle with Application to the Genetic Modification of Organisms, New England Complex Systems Institute”, Institute of Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, C. N. R. S, Paris, School of Philosophy, University of East Anglia, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.5787.pdf.
Andrew Jordan & Timothy O’Riordan, The Precautionary Principle in UK Environmental Law and Policy, https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-349-24237-5_5. Assessed 13/04/18.
P. H. Martin, “If You Don’t Know How to Fix it Please Stop Breaking it; The precautionary Principle and Climate Change,” (Foundation of Science, 1997) p. 263-292.
H. Guldberg, “Challenging the Precautionary Principle: How has the Society come to be Governed by the Maxim “Better Safe than Sorry,” available at http://salascove.com/dioxin2007/organisedparanoia.pdf assessed 13/10/15.
S. O. Nliam, “International Oil and Gas Environmental Legal Framework and the Precautionary Principle: the Implication for Niger Delta”, (African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 2014) p. 22-39.
B. Patricia et al, International Law and the Environment, (Oxford University Press, 2009) p. 154.
Landelijke Vereniging tot Behoud Van de Wadden Zee’s case (2004) E. C. R, 1-7405.
E. Jaye, “Overexploitation of a Valuable Resources; New Literature on the Precautionary Principle,” (European Journal of International Law, 2006) p. 445-462.
Alpharma Inc. V. Council (2002) 11 E. C. R 3305, para. 143.
C. Ilona, “The Precautionary Principles in EC and WTO Law; Searching for a Common Understanding”, (Environmental Law Review, 2006) p. 257-277.
C. Stone, “Is there a Precautionary Principle?” (Environmental Law Reporter, 2001) p. 10790.
E. Noelle, and S. Henrik, “All Talk, Little Action: Precautionary and the European Chemical Regulation,” (Journal of European Public Policy, 2004) p. 78-105.
Pfitzer Animal Health V. Council of the EU, (2002) 11 E. C. R 3305, para. 143.
R. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, (Harvard University Press, 1977) p. 24-26.
L. M. Harewood, “The Importance of Precautionary Principle in International Environmental Law,” (Coventry Law Journal, 2005) p. 1-5.
Rio 7 UNEP Declaration on Environment and Development. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme, 1992. Available from: http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=78&articleid=1163, Accessed April 13, 2018.
Kenisha Garnett, & David J. Parson, “Multi-Case Review of the Application of the Precautionary Principle in European Union Law and Case Law”, available from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/risa.12633. Assessed 13/04/18.
Art. 3 (3) of the 1992 Framework Convention on Climate Change.
S. Manisha, “Be Legal, Be Intelligent; Precautionary Principle of Environmental Law,” http://newindialaw.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/precautionary-principle-of. html. assessed 16/10/15.
B. Start, & M. Donald, Environmental Law, (Oxford University Press, 2006) p. 71.
New Zealand v. France (1995) ICJ Rep 288.
New Zealand v. Japan (2001), ILR 148.
J. Morris, “Redefining the Precautionary Principle,” in Morris, J., (ed) Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle, (Butterworth Heinmann, 2000) p. 7.
John Mugabe, “Precautionary Policies and Biotechnology in Africa”, (Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, 2000), https://www.iatp.org/news/precautionary-policies-and-biotechnology-in-africa.
A. K. Tiwari, Environmental Laws in Indian, 2006, (Deep and Deep Publications PVT Ltd, 2006) p. 216.
Calcutta Tanneries Case (1997) 2 SCC 411.
Badkhal & Surajkund Lakes Case (1997) 3 SCC 715.
S. Philippe et al, Principle of International Environmental Law, (Cambridge University Press, 2012) p. 219.
Re De Brett Investments Pty Ltd and Anor and Australian Fisheries Management Authority (2004) 82 ALD 163 at 207.
Briginshaw v. Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 at 361-362.