Defense Proteins from Sugarcane Studied by Conventional Biochemical Techniques, Genomics and Proteomics: An Overview

Elena Sánchez-Elordi; Roberto Contreras; Roberto de Armas; Mario César Benito; Rocío Santiago; Carlos Vicente; María Estrella Legaz

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11

Defense Proteins from Sugarcane Studied by Conventional Biochemical Techniques, Genomics and Proteomics: An Overview

Elena Sánchez-Elordi, Roberto Contreras, Roberto de Armas, Mario César Benito, Rocío Santiago, Carlos Vicente, María Estrella Legaz

Published in American Journal of Plant Biology (Volume 5, Issue 3)

Received: 6 June 2020 Accepted: 22 June 2020 Published: 13 July 2020

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Sugarcane is a C4 plant from the NADP-ME family, which performs a double photosynthetic carboxylation. It is a plant specialized in accumulating and storing large amounts of sucrose in the parenchymatous cells of its stalks. Perhaps because of these characteristics, this species shows to be extremely sensitive to a large number of diseases caused by viruses, bacteria, phytoplasmas, fungi, insects and nematodes, as well as to various abiotic stresses. A large number of varieties and cultivars resistant to many of these diseases have been achieved through conventional plant breeding techniques and also through biotechnological applications. In addition to this, the ability of the plant itself to produce pathogen resistance factors has been a field of research that has provided excellent weapons to combat crop-destroying pests This review describes those proteins that are synthesized by the plant as resistance factors against different diseases from the point of view of conventional biochemistry and also with the tools that modern genomics and proteomics provide. Special emphasis has been placed on the study of those proteins aimed at increasing the physical resistance of the plant that hinders the entry of the pathogen as well as those proteins related to the synthesis of bioactive phenols, polysaccharide hydrolysis enzymes, bacteriocins, oxygenases, oxidases and oxido-reductases.

Published in	American Journal of Plant Biology (Volume 5, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11
Page(s)	30-37
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Defense Proteins, Disease, Genomics, Proteomics, Sugarcane

References

[1]	A. R. Sundar, N. M. R. Ashwin, E. L. Barnabas, P. Malathi, and R. Viswanathan, “Disease resistance in sugarcane-an overview,” Sci. Agr. Paranae., vol. 4, pp. 200–212, 2015.
[2]	R. Santiago, R. de Armas, M. E. Legaz, and C. Vicente, “Changes in phenolic acids content, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and peroxidase activities in sugarcane leaves induced by elicitors isolated from Xanthomonas albilineans,” Austral. Plant Pathol., vol. 38, pp. 357–365, 2009.
[3]	B. Alarcón, R. Santiago, C. Vicente, and M. E. Legaz, “Structural changes of lignified tissues from sugarcane leaves induced by a smut (Sporisorium scitamineum) elicitor,” J. Life Sci., vol. 6, pp. 287–300, 2012.
[4]	A. R. Sundar, R. Viswanathan, P. Malathi, and P. Padmanaban, “Mechanism of resistance induced by plant activators against Colletotrichum falcatum in sugarcane,” Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Protect., vol. 39, pp. 259–272. 2006.
[5]	B. Asthir, K. Preet, S. K. Batta, and B. Sharma, “Role of antioxidative enzymes in red rot resistance in sugarcane,” Sugar Tech., vol. 11, pp. 282–287, 2009.
[6]	A. M. H. Esh, A. A. Guirgis, M. M. A. El–Kholi, E. A. El–Absawy, M. I. Nasr, and E. H. Hassanien, “The activity of pathogenesis related proteins in smut resistant and susceptible sugarcane (GT54–9) mutants induced by gamma radiation,” Adv. Plants Agric. Res., vol. 1, pp. 146‒156, 2014.
[7]	J. P. R. Marques, J. W. Hoy, B. Appezzato-da-Glória, A. F. G. Viveros, M. L. C. Vieira, and N. Baisakh, “Sugarcane cell wall-associated defense responses to infection by Sporisorium scitamineum,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 9, doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00698, 2018.
[8]	R. Santiago, B. Alarcón, R. de Armas, C. Vicente, and M. E. Legaz, “Changes in cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase activities from sugarcanre cultivars inoculated with Sporisorium scitamineum sporidia,” Physiol. Plant., vol. 145, pp. 245–259, 2012.
[9]	B. Alarcón, R. de Armas, C. Vicente, and M. E. Legaz, “Inhibition by substrates of a coniferyl alcohol dehydrogenase purified from sugarcane stalks,” Current Enz. Inhib., vol. 15, pp. 1–9, 2019.
[10]	D. M. Guo, J. H. Ran, and X. Q. Wang, “Evolution of the cinnamyl/sinapyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD/SAD) gene family: the emergence of real lignin is associated with the origin of bona fide CAD,” J. Mol. Evol., vol. 71, pp. 202–218, 2010.
[11]	R. E. Casu, C. M. Dimmock, S. C. Chapman, C. P. L. Grof, C. L. McIntyre, G. D. Bonnett, and J. M. Manners, “Identification of differentially expressed transcripts from maturing stem of sugar cane by in silico analysis of stem expressed sequence tags and gene expression profiling,” Plant Mol. Biol., vol. 54, pp. 503–517, 2004.
[12]	P. M. Nobile, A. Bottcher, J. L. S. Mayer, M. S. Brito, I. A. dos Anjos, M. G. de Andrade-Landell, R. Vicentini, S., Creste,•D. M. Riaño-Pachón, and P. Mazzafera, “Identification, classification and transcriptional profiles of dirigent domain-containing proteins in sugarcane,” Mol. Genet. Genom., vol. 292, pp. 1323–1340, 2017.
[13]	P. Sharma, A. B. Jha, R. S. Dubey, and M. Pessarakli, “Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions,” J. Bot., vol. 2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/217037, 2012.
[14]	A. R. Sundar, and P. Vidhyasekaran, “Differential induction of phenylpropanoid metabolites in suspension-cultured cells of sugarcane by fungal elicitors,” Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung., vol. 38, pp. 29-42, 2003.
[15]	E. Sánchez-Elordi, L. Morales de los Ríos, E. M. Díaz, A., Ávila, M. E. Legaz, and C., Vicente, “Defensive glycoproteins from sugarcane plants induce chemotaxis, cytoagglutination and death of smut teliospores,” J. Plant Pathol., vol. 98, pp. 493–501, 2016.
[16]	Y. C. Su, L. P. Xu, B. T. Xue, Q. B. Wu, J. L. Guo, L. G., Wu, and Y. X. Que, “Molecular cloning and characterization of two pathogenesis-related beta-1,3-glucanase genes ScGluA1 and ScGluD1 from sugarcane infected by Sporisorium scitamineum,” Plant Cell Rep., vol. 32, pp. 1503–1519, 2013.
[17]	R. Santiago, A. M. Millanes, M. E. Legaz, and C. Vicente, “Measurement of β-1,3 glucanase activity in permeabilized discs of leaves of healthy and scald-diseased plants,” J. Life Sci., vol. 6, pp. 175–181, 2012.
[18]	A. M. Millanes, B. Fontaniella, M. E. Legaz, and C. Vicente, “Glycoproteins from sugarcane plants regulate cell polarity of Ustilago scitaminea teliospores,” J. Plant Physiol., vol. 162, pp. 253–265, 2005.
[19]	A. M. Millanes, C. Vicente, and M. E. Legaz, “Sugarcane glycoproteins bind to surface, specific ligands and modify cytoskeleton arrangement of Ustilago scitaminea teliospores,” J. Plant Interact., vol. 3, pp. 95–110, 2008.
[20]	E. Sánchez-Elordi, L. Morales de los Ríos, C. Vicente, and M. E. Legaz, “Sugar cane arginase competes with the same fungal enzyme as a false quorum signal against smut teliospores,” Phytochem. Lett., vol. 14, pp. 115–122, 2015.
[21]	E. Sánchez-Elordi, M. Vicente-Manzanares, E. M. Díaz, M. E. Legaz, and C. Vicente, “Plant–pathogen interactions: Sugarcane glycoproteins induce chemotaxis of smut teliospores by cyclic contraction and relaxation of the cytoskeleton,” South African J. Bot., vol. 105, pp. 66–78, 2016.
[22]	M. Martinez, and I. Diaz, “The origin and evolution of plant cystatins and their target cysteine proteinases indicate a complex functional relationship,” BMC Evol. Biol., vol. 8, pp. 198, 2008.
[23]	N. F. Valadares, R. de Oliveira-Silva, I. A. Cavini, I. A. Marques, H. D. Pereira, A. Soares-Costa, F. Henrique-Silva, H. R. Kalbitzer, C. E. Munte, and R. C. Garratt, “X-Ray crystallography and NMR studies of domain-swapped canecystatin-1,” FEBS J., vol. 280, pp. 1028–1038, 2013.
[24]	L. Ielpi, R. O. Couso, and M. A. Dankert, “Sequential assembly and polymerization of the polyprenol-linked pentasaccharide repeating unit of the xanthan polysaccharide in Xanthomonas campestris,” J. Bacteriol., vol. 175, 2490–2500, 1993.
[25]	M. Blanch, C. Vicente, D. Piñón, and M. E. Legaz, “Sugarcane glycoproteins are required to the production of an active UDP-glucose dehydrogenase by Xanthomonas albilineans,” Ann. Microbiol., vol. 57, pp. 217–221, 2007.
[26]	Y. Blanco, M. Blanch, D. Piñón M. E. Legaz, and C. Vicente, “Antagonism of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus (a sugarcane endosymbiont) against Xanthomonas albilineans (pathogen) studied in alginate-immobilized sugarcane stalk tissues,” J. Biosci. Bioeng., vol. 99, pp. 366–371, 2005.
[27]	Y. Que, L. Xu, J. Lin, M. Ruan, M. Zhang, and R. Chen, “Differential protein expression in sugarcane during sugarcane-Sporisorium scitamineum interaction revealed by 2-DE and MALDI-TOF-TOF/MS,” Comp. Funct. Genom., vol. 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1155/2011/989016, 2011.
[28]	P. Singh, Q. Q. Song, R. K. Singh, H. B. Li, M. K. Solanki, M. K. Malviya, K. K. Verma, L. T. Yang, and Y. R. Li, “Proteomic analysis of the resistance mechanisms in sugarcane during Sporisorium scitamineum infection,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 20, 569; doi: 10.3390/ijms20030569, 2019.
[29]	Y. Su, L. Xu, Z. Wang, Q. Peng, Y. Yang, Y. Chen, and Y. Que, “Comparative proteomics reveals that central metabolism changes are associated with resistance against Sporisorium scitamineum in sugarcane,” BMC Genomics, vol. 17, 800, DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-3146-8, 2016.
[30]	Y. Su, Z: Wang, F. Liu, Z. Li, Q. Peng, J. Guo, L. Xu, Y. Que, “Isolation and characterization of ScGluD2, a new sugarcane β-1,3-glucanase D family gene induced by Sporisorium scitamineum, ABA, H₂O₂, NaCl, and CdCl₂ stresses”. Front. Plant Sci., 7, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01348, 2016.
[31]	S. S. Wang, Y. C. Su, Y. T. Yang, J. L. Guo, and L. P. Xu, “Molecular cloning and expression analysis of chitinase gene ScChiVII1 in sugarcane,” Chin. J. Trop. Crop., vol. 35, pp. 289–298, 2014.
[32]	S. Lin, Y. Zhou, G. Chen, Y. Zhang, W. Ning, and D. Pan, “Molecular responses to the fungal pathogen Gibberella fujikuroi in the leaves of chewing cane (Saccharum officinarum L.),” Sugar Tech., vol. 12, pp. 36–46, 2010.
[33]	R. Viswanathan, “Molecular basis of red rot resistance in sugarcane,” Funct. Plant Sci. Biotechnol., vol. 6, 40–50, 2012.
[34]	Y. Que, Y. Su, J. Guo, Q. Wu, and L. Xu, “A global view of transcriptome dynamics during Sporisorium scitamineum challenge in sugarcane by RNA-Seq,” PLoS One, vol. 9, e106476, 2014.
[35]	M. Sathyabhama, R. Viswanathan, P. Malathi, and A. R. Sundar, “Identification of differentially expressed genes in sugarcane during pathogenesis of Colletotrichum falcatum by suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH),” Sugar Tech., vol. 18, pp. 176–183, 2015.
[36]	F. S. Papini-Terzi, F. R. Rocha, R. Z. N. Vêncio, J. M. Felix, D. S. Branco, A. Waclawovsky, L. E. V. Del Bem, C. G. Lembke, M. D. L Costa, M. Y. Nishiyama, R. Vicentini, M. G. A. Vincentz, E. C. Ulian, M. Menossi, and G. M. Souza, “Sugarcane genes associated with sucrose content,” BMC Genomics, vol. 10, 120 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-120, 2009.
[37]	G. Selman-Housein, M. A. López, D. Hernández, L. Civardi, F. Miranda, J. Riga, and P. Puigdomènech, “Molecular cloning of cDNA coding for three sugar cane enzymes involving in lignification,” Plant Sci., vol. 143, pp. 163–171, 1999.
[38]	H. J. Mitchell, J. L. Hall, and M. S. Barber, “Elicitor-induced cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase activity in lignifying wheat (Triticum aestivum) leaves,” Plant Physiol., vol. 104, pp. 551–556, 1994.
[39]	L. Li, X. F. Cheng, J. Leshkevich, T. Umezawa, S. A. Harding, and V. L. Chiang, “The last step of syringyl monolignol biosynthesis in angiosperms is regulated by a novel gene encoding sinapyl alcohol dehydrogenase,” The Plant Cell, vol. 13, pp. 1567–1586, 2001.
[40]	E. Sánchez-Elordi, R. Contreras, R. de Armas, M. C. Benito, B. Alarcón, E. de Oliveira, C. del Mazo, E. M. Díaz-Peña, R. Santiago, C. Vicente, and M. E. Legaz, “Differential expression of SofDIR16 and SofCAD genes in smut resistant and susceptible sugar cane cultivars in response to Sporisorium scitamineum,” J. Plant Physiol., vol. 226, pp. 103–113, 2018.
[41]	G. Jin-Long, X. Li-Ping, F. Jing-Ping, S. Ya-Chun, F. Hua-Ying, Q. You-Xiong, and X. Jing-Sheng, “A novel dirigent protein gene with highly stem-specific expression from sugarcane, response to drought, salt and oxidative stresses,” Plant Cell Rep., vol. 31, pp. 1801–1812, 2012.
[42]	M. B. Damaj, C. KumpatlaEmani, P. D. Beremand, A. S. Reddy, K. S. Rathore, M. T. Buenrostro-Nava, I. S. Curtis, T. L. Thomas, and T. E. Mirkov, “Sugarcane dirigent and o-methyltransferase promoters confer stem-regulated gene expression in diverse monocots,” Planta, vol. 231, pp. 1439–1458, 2010.
[43]	E. Sánchez-Elordi, R. M. Sterling, R. Santiago, R. de Armas, C. Vicente, and M. E. Legaz, “Increase in cytotoxic lignans production after smut infection in sugar cane plants,” J. Plant Physiol., vol. 244, 153087, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2019.153087, 2020.
[44]	M. K. Kim, J. H. Jeon, M. Fujita, L. B. Davin, and N. G. Lewis, “The western red cedar (Thuja plicata) 8–8´ DIRIGENT family displays diverse expression patterns and conserved monolignol coupling specificity,” Plant Mol. Biol., vol. 49, pp. 199–214, 2002.
[45]	S. G. Ralph, S. Jancsik, and J. Bohlmann, “Dirigent proteins in conifer defense. II. Extended gene discovery, phylogeny, and constitutive and stress-induced gene expression in spruce (Picea spp.),” Phytochemistry, vol. 68, pp. 1975–1991, 2007.
[46]	L. B. Davin, H. B. Wang, A. L. Crowell, D. L. Bedgar, D. M. Martin, S. Sarkanen, and N. G. Lewis, “Stereoselective bimolecular phenoxy radical coupling by an auxiliary (dirigent) protein without an active center,” Science, vol. 275, pp. 362–366, 1997.
[47]	D. R. Gang, M. A. Costa, M. Fujita, A. T. Dinkova-Kostova, H. B. Wang, V. Burlat, W. Martin, S. Sarkanen, L. B. Davin, and N. G. Lewis, “Regiochemical control of monolignol radical coupling: a new paradigm for lignin and lignan biosynthesis,” Chem. Biol., vol. 6, pp. 143–151, 1999.
[48]	S. C. Halls, and N. G. Lewis, “Secondary and quaternary structures of the (+)-pinoresinol forming dirigent protein,” Biochemistry, vol. 41, pp. 9455–9461, 2002.
[49]	S. C. Halls, L. B. Davin, D. M. Kramer, and N. G. Lewis, “Kinetic study of coniferyl alcohol radical binding to the (+)-pinoresinol forming dirigent protein,” Biochemistry, vol. 43, pp. 2587–2595, 2004.
[50]	M. K. Kim, S. G. A. Moinuddin, K. M. Atwell, M. A. Costa, L. B. Davin, and N. G. Lewis, “Opposite stereoselectivities of dirigent proteins in Arabidopsis and Schizandra species,” J. Biol. Chem., vol. 287, pp. 33957–33972, 2012.
[51]	N. Saitou, and M. Nei, “The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees,” Mol. Biol. Evol., vol. 4, pp. 406–425, 1987.
[52]	E. Zuckerkandl, and L. Pauling, “Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins.” In: Evolving Genes and Proteins, V. Bryson, and H. J. Vogel, Eds., Academic Press, New York, 1965, pp. 97-166.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Elena Sánchez-Elordi, Roberto Contreras, Roberto de Armas, Mario César Benito, Rocío Santiago, et al. (2020). Defense Proteins from Sugarcane Studied by Conventional Biochemical Techniques, Genomics and Proteomics: An Overview. American Journal of Plant Biology, 5(3), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Elena Sánchez-Elordi; Roberto Contreras; Roberto de Armas; Mario César Benito; Rocío Santiago, et al. Defense Proteins from Sugarcane Studied by Conventional Biochemical Techniques, Genomics and Proteomics: An Overview. Am. J. Plant Biol. 2020, 5(3), 30-37. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Elena Sánchez-Elordi, Roberto Contreras, Roberto de Armas, Mario César Benito, Rocío Santiago, et al. Defense Proteins from Sugarcane Studied by Conventional Biochemical Techniques, Genomics and Proteomics: An Overview. Am J Plant Biol. 2020;5(3):30-37. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11,
  author = {Elena Sánchez-Elordi and Roberto Contreras and Roberto de Armas and Mario César Benito and Rocío Santiago and Carlos Vicente and María Estrella Legaz},
  title = {Defense Proteins from Sugarcane Studied by Conventional Biochemical Techniques, Genomics and Proteomics: An Overview},
  journal = {American Journal of Plant Biology},
  volume = {5},
  number = {3},
  pages = {30-37},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpb.20200503.11},
  abstract = {Sugarcane is a C4 plant from the NADP-ME family, which performs a double photosynthetic carboxylation. It is a plant specialized in accumulating and storing large amounts of sucrose in the parenchymatous cells of its stalks. Perhaps because of these characteristics, this species shows to be extremely sensitive to a large number of diseases caused by viruses, bacteria, phytoplasmas, fungi, insects and nematodes, as well as to various abiotic stresses. A large number of varieties and cultivars resistant to many of these diseases have been achieved through conventional plant breeding techniques and also through biotechnological applications. In addition to this, the ability of the plant itself to produce pathogen resistance factors has been a field of research that has provided excellent weapons to combat crop-destroying pests This review describes those proteins that are synthesized by the plant as resistance factors against different diseases from the point of view of conventional biochemistry and also with the tools that modern genomics and proteomics provide. Special emphasis has been placed on the study of those proteins aimed at increasing the physical resistance of the plant that hinders the entry of the pathogen as well as those proteins related to the synthesis of bioactive phenols, polysaccharide hydrolysis enzymes, bacteriocins, oxygenases, oxidases and oxido-reductases.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Defense Proteins from Sugarcane Studied by Conventional Biochemical Techniques, Genomics and Proteomics: An Overview
AU  - Elena Sánchez-Elordi
AU  - Roberto Contreras
AU  - Roberto de Armas
AU  - Mario César Benito
AU  - Rocío Santiago
AU  - Carlos Vicente
AU  - María Estrella Legaz
Y1  - 2020/07/13
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11
T2  - American Journal of Plant Biology
JF  - American Journal of Plant Biology
JO  - American Journal of Plant Biology
SP  - 30
EP  - 37
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-8337
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11
AB  - Sugarcane is a C4 plant from the NADP-ME family, which performs a double photosynthetic carboxylation. It is a plant specialized in accumulating and storing large amounts of sucrose in the parenchymatous cells of its stalks. Perhaps because of these characteristics, this species shows to be extremely sensitive to a large number of diseases caused by viruses, bacteria, phytoplasmas, fungi, insects and nematodes, as well as to various abiotic stresses. A large number of varieties and cultivars resistant to many of these diseases have been achieved through conventional plant breeding techniques and also through biotechnological applications. In addition to this, the ability of the plant itself to produce pathogen resistance factors has been a field of research that has provided excellent weapons to combat crop-destroying pests This review describes those proteins that are synthesized by the plant as resistance factors against different diseases from the point of view of conventional biochemistry and also with the tools that modern genomics and proteomics provide. Special emphasis has been placed on the study of those proteins aimed at increasing the physical resistance of the plant that hinders the entry of the pathogen as well as those proteins related to the synthesis of bioactive phenols, polysaccharide hydrolysis enzymes, bacteriocins, oxygenases, oxidases and oxido-reductases.
VL  - 5
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Elena Sánchez-Elordi

Intercellular Communication in Plant Symbiosis Team, Faculty of Biology, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
Roberto Contreras

Centro Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Sustentable de Atacama, CRIDESAT-UDA, Universidad de Atacama, Atacama, Chile
Roberto de Armas

Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Biology, Havana University, Havana, Cuba
Mario César Benito

Department of Genetics, Physiology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
Rocío Santiago

Intercellular Communication in Plant Symbiosis Team, Faculty of Biology, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
Carlos Vicente

Intercellular Communication in Plant Symbiosis Team, Faculty of Biology, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
María Estrella Legaz

Intercellular Communication in Plant Symbiosis Team, Faculty of Biology, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Elena Sánchez-Elordi, Roberto Contreras, Roberto de Armas, Mario César Benito, Rocío Santiago, et al. (2020). Defense Proteins from Sugarcane Studied by Conventional Biochemical Techniques, Genomics and Proteomics: An Overview. American Journal of Plant Biology, 5(3), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Elena Sánchez-Elordi; Roberto Contreras; Roberto de Armas; Mario César Benito; Rocío Santiago, et al. Defense Proteins from Sugarcane Studied by Conventional Biochemical Techniques, Genomics and Proteomics: An Overview. Am. J. Plant Biol. 2020, 5(3), 30-37. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Elena Sánchez-Elordi, Roberto Contreras, Roberto de Armas, Mario César Benito, Rocío Santiago, et al. Defense Proteins from Sugarcane Studied by Conventional Biochemical Techniques, Genomics and Proteomics: An Overview. Am J Plant Biol. 2020;5(3):30-37. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11,
  author = {Elena Sánchez-Elordi and Roberto Contreras and Roberto de Armas and Mario César Benito and Rocío Santiago and Carlos Vicente and María Estrella Legaz},
  title = {Defense Proteins from Sugarcane Studied by Conventional Biochemical Techniques, Genomics and Proteomics: An Overview},
  journal = {American Journal of Plant Biology},
  volume = {5},
  number = {3},
  pages = {30-37},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpb.20200503.11},
  abstract = {Sugarcane is a C4 plant from the NADP-ME family, which performs a double photosynthetic carboxylation. It is a plant specialized in accumulating and storing large amounts of sucrose in the parenchymatous cells of its stalks. Perhaps because of these characteristics, this species shows to be extremely sensitive to a large number of diseases caused by viruses, bacteria, phytoplasmas, fungi, insects and nematodes, as well as to various abiotic stresses. A large number of varieties and cultivars resistant to many of these diseases have been achieved through conventional plant breeding techniques and also through biotechnological applications. In addition to this, the ability of the plant itself to produce pathogen resistance factors has been a field of research that has provided excellent weapons to combat crop-destroying pests This review describes those proteins that are synthesized by the plant as resistance factors against different diseases from the point of view of conventional biochemistry and also with the tools that modern genomics and proteomics provide. Special emphasis has been placed on the study of those proteins aimed at increasing the physical resistance of the plant that hinders the entry of the pathogen as well as those proteins related to the synthesis of bioactive phenols, polysaccharide hydrolysis enzymes, bacteriocins, oxygenases, oxidases and oxido-reductases.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Defense Proteins from Sugarcane Studied by Conventional Biochemical Techniques, Genomics and Proteomics: An Overview
AU  - Elena Sánchez-Elordi
AU  - Roberto Contreras
AU  - Roberto de Armas
AU  - Mario César Benito
AU  - Rocío Santiago
AU  - Carlos Vicente
AU  - María Estrella Legaz
Y1  - 2020/07/13
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11
T2  - American Journal of Plant Biology
JF  - American Journal of Plant Biology
JO  - American Journal of Plant Biology
SP  - 30
EP  - 37
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-8337
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20200503.11
AB  - Sugarcane is a C4 plant from the NADP-ME family, which performs a double photosynthetic carboxylation. It is a plant specialized in accumulating and storing large amounts of sucrose in the parenchymatous cells of its stalks. Perhaps because of these characteristics, this species shows to be extremely sensitive to a large number of diseases caused by viruses, bacteria, phytoplasmas, fungi, insects and nematodes, as well as to various abiotic stresses. A large number of varieties and cultivars resistant to many of these diseases have been achieved through conventional plant breeding techniques and also through biotechnological applications. In addition to this, the ability of the plant itself to produce pathogen resistance factors has been a field of research that has provided excellent weapons to combat crop-destroying pests This review describes those proteins that are synthesized by the plant as resistance factors against different diseases from the point of view of conventional biochemistry and also with the tools that modern genomics and proteomics provide. Special emphasis has been placed on the study of those proteins aimed at increasing the physical resistance of the plant that hinders the entry of the pathogen as well as those proteins related to the synthesis of bioactive phenols, polysaccharide hydrolysis enzymes, bacteriocins, oxygenases, oxidases and oxido-reductases.
VL  - 5
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download