| Peer-Reviewed

Performance of Tuned Mass Dampers in Vibration Response Control of Base-Excited Structures

Received: 7 March 2017    Accepted: 29 March 2017    Published: 3 May 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The behavior of structures in recent years indicates that moderate and severe earthquakes lead to substantial damages, extensively higher than what is expected. One solution in order to reduce the seismic response of the structures, especially in relative story displacements is usage of tuned mass dampers (TMD). In this study, comparisons between uncontrolled and controlled cases have been evaluated. Results for an 8-story shear building under specified records show that active tuned mass dampers (ATMD) have more appropriate efficiency in structural displacement response reduction compared to passive tuned mass dampers (PTMD) in spite of high cost of installation. In addition, implementation of PTMD would lead to more desirable results in comparison with uncontrolled case regarding acceleration and displacement time history responses, especially when the natural structures’ frequency is different from the dominant frequency of the records. In addition, usage of ATMD results in significant reduction in the story shear response, whereas PTMD equipped system decreases story shear with a limited margin.

Published in Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering (Volume 2, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.jccee.20170203.11
Page(s) 87-94
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Tuned Mass Damper (TMD), Structural Control, Time-History Analysis, Shear Building

References
[1] Farzampour A. and Kamali Asl A. (2015) Seismic hazard assessment for two cities in Eastern Iran. Earthquake and Structures, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 681-697.
[2] Mehboob, S. S., Zaman Khan, Q., Tahir, F. and Ahmad, M. J. (2013) Investigation of water tank as TLD for vibration control of frame structures under seismic excitations. Life Science Journal, Vol. 100, No. 7s, pp. 1182-1189.
[3] Bishop, R. E. D. and Gladwell, G. M. L. (1963) An investigation into the theory of resonance testing, Philosophical Transactions for the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol. 255, No. 1055, pp. 241-280.
[4] Kobori, T., Koshika, N., Yamada, K. and Ikeda, Y. (1991) Seismic-response-controlled structure with active tuned mass driver system. Part I: Design. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 133-149.
[5] Kobori, T., Koshika, N., Yamada, K. and Ikeda, Y. (1991). Seismic-response-controlled structure with active tuned mass driver system. Part II: Verification. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 151-166.
[6] Bonello, P., Brennan, M. J., Elliott, S. J., Vincent, J. F. V. and Jeronimidis, G. (2005) Designs for an adaptive tuned vibration absorber with variable shape stiffness element, Proceeding of Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol. 461, No. 2064, pp. 3955-3976.
[7] Jangid, R. S. and Datta, T. K. (1997) Performance of multiple tuned mass dampers for torsionally coupled system. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 307-317.
[8] Kareem, A. and Kline, S. (1995) Performance of multiple mass dampers under random loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 121, No. 2, pp. 348-361.
[9] Varadarjan, N. (2005) Novel smart variable stiffness tuned mass damper and its real time identification and control using time-frequency techniques. PhD Thesis, Rice University, Houston, USA.
[10] Farzampour A., Kamali-Asl A. (2014) On the study of an eight-story building seismic response, controlled passively and actively by tuned mass damper (TMD) and comparison with uncontrolled case. Second National Conference on New Material and Structures.
[11] Chey, M. H., Rodgers, G. W., Chase, J. G. and Mander, J. B. (2010) Using upper storeys as semi-active tuned mass damper building systems – a case study analysis. Bulletin New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 126-133.
[12] Shariatmadar, H. and Meshkat Razavai, H (2010). Multi-tuned mass dampers for seismic response of mid and high-rise buildings. 5th National Conference on Civil Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran, May.
[13] Khante, S. N. and Nirwan, B. P. (2013) Mitigation of response of asymmetric building using passive tuned mass damper. International Journal of Science & Engineering Research, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 1721-1728.
[14] Zemp, R., De La Llera, J. C. and Breschi, L. (2008) Pendular tuned mass dampers in free-plan Chilean tall buildings. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
[15] Den Hartog, J. P. (1956) Mechanical Vibrations, 4th edn., McGraw Hill.
[16] Soong, T. T. and Spencer, Jr. B. F (2002) Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice. Engineering Structures, Vol. 24, No. 3, 243–259.
[17] Sadek, F., Mohraz, B., Taylor, A. W. and Chung, R. M. (1997) A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 617-635.
[18] Spencer, Jr. B. F. and Nagarajaiah, S. (2003) State of the art of structural control. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 7, pp. 845–856.
[19] Khante, S. N. and Nirwan, B. P. (2013) Mitigation of response of asymmetric building using passive tuned mass damper. International Journal of Science & Engineering Research, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 1721-1728.
[20] Soong, T. T. (1990) Active Structural Control: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn., John Wiley.
[21] Rasouli, S. K. and Yahyai, M. (2002) Control of response of structures with passive and active tuned mass dampers. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-14.
[22] Ung, S. S. and Yao, J. P. (1978) Action control of building structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol. 104, No. 2, pp. 335-350.
[23] James Chang, C. H. and Soong, T. T. (1980) Structural control using active tuned mass dampers. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol. 106, No. 6, pp. 1091-1098.
[24] Yang, J. N., Li, Z. and Liu, S. C. (1992) Stable controllers for instantaneous optimal control, Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol. 118, No. 8, pp. 1612-1630.
[25] Yang, J. N., Akbarpour, A. and Ghaemmaghami, P. (1987) New optimal control algorithms for structural control. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol. 113, No. 9, pp. 1369-1386.
[26] Farzampour A. and Eatherton M. (2017) Lateral Torsional Buckling of Butterfly-Shaped Shear Links. Proceedings of the Annual Stability Conference Structural Stability Research Council San Antonio, Texas, 2017.
[27] Farzampour A., Laman J. Mofid M. (2015) Behavior prediction of corrugated steel plate shear walls with openings, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 114 258–268.
[28] Farzampour A. and Yekrangnia M. (2014) On the behavior of corrugated steel shear walls with and without openings;. Second European conference on earthquake Eng, 2014.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Alireza Farzampour, Arash Kamali Asl. (2017). Performance of Tuned Mass Dampers in Vibration Response Control of Base-Excited Structures. Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, 2(3), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20170203.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Alireza Farzampour; Arash Kamali Asl. Performance of Tuned Mass Dampers in Vibration Response Control of Base-Excited Structures. J. Civ. Constr. Environ. Eng. 2017, 2(3), 87-94. doi: 10.11648/j.jccee.20170203.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Alireza Farzampour, Arash Kamali Asl. Performance of Tuned Mass Dampers in Vibration Response Control of Base-Excited Structures. J Civ Constr Environ Eng. 2017;2(3):87-94. doi: 10.11648/j.jccee.20170203.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jccee.20170203.11,
      author = {Alireza Farzampour and Arash Kamali Asl},
      title = {Performance of Tuned Mass Dampers in Vibration Response Control of Base-Excited Structures},
      journal = {Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering},
      volume = {2},
      number = {3},
      pages = {87-94},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jccee.20170203.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20170203.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jccee.20170203.11},
      abstract = {The behavior of structures in recent years indicates that moderate and severe earthquakes lead to substantial damages, extensively higher than what is expected. One solution in order to reduce the seismic response of the structures, especially in relative story displacements is usage of tuned mass dampers (TMD). In this study, comparisons between uncontrolled and controlled cases have been evaluated. Results for an 8-story shear building under specified records show that active tuned mass dampers (ATMD) have more appropriate efficiency in structural displacement response reduction compared to passive tuned mass dampers (PTMD) in spite of high cost of installation. In addition, implementation of PTMD would lead to more desirable results in comparison with uncontrolled case regarding acceleration and displacement time history responses, especially when the natural structures’ frequency is different from the dominant frequency of the records. In addition, usage of ATMD results in significant reduction in the story shear response, whereas PTMD equipped system decreases story shear with a limited margin.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Performance of Tuned Mass Dampers in Vibration Response Control of Base-Excited Structures
    AU  - Alireza Farzampour
    AU  - Arash Kamali Asl
    Y1  - 2017/05/03
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20170203.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jccee.20170203.11
    T2  - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering
    JF  - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering
    JO  - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering
    SP  - 87
    EP  - 94
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2637-3890
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20170203.11
    AB  - The behavior of structures in recent years indicates that moderate and severe earthquakes lead to substantial damages, extensively higher than what is expected. One solution in order to reduce the seismic response of the structures, especially in relative story displacements is usage of tuned mass dampers (TMD). In this study, comparisons between uncontrolled and controlled cases have been evaluated. Results for an 8-story shear building under specified records show that active tuned mass dampers (ATMD) have more appropriate efficiency in structural displacement response reduction compared to passive tuned mass dampers (PTMD) in spite of high cost of installation. In addition, implementation of PTMD would lead to more desirable results in comparison with uncontrolled case regarding acceleration and displacement time history responses, especially when the natural structures’ frequency is different from the dominant frequency of the records. In addition, usage of ATMD results in significant reduction in the story shear response, whereas PTMD equipped system decreases story shear with a limited margin.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA

  • Department of Civil Engineering, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA

  • Sections