Analysis of Stress- Strain and Deflection of Flexible Pavements Using Finite Element Method Case Study on Bako-Nekemte Road
Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering
Volume 2, Issue 4, August 2017, Pages: 100-111
Received: Jun. 19, 2017;
Accepted: Jun. 30, 2017;
Published: Sep. 7, 2017
Views 2540 Downloads 260
Shiferaw Garoma Wayessa, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
Emer Tucay Quezon, Construction and Engineering Management Stream, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
Tarekegn Kumela, Construction and Engineering Management Stream, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
Follow on us
In Ethiopia the failure of roads are before handover period. Most roads found in Ethiopia are flexible pavements. Nowadays, the failure of surface of flexible pavement roads are common before the expected design period. For the example Bako-Nekemte road/ has become a critical issue in our country. The most common parameters that cause stress, strain and deflection of the roads are loads and pressures that come from vehicles. Moreover, modulus of elasticity, Poisson’s ratio and thickness of each layer needs to be characterized. Further, the load magnitude, contact pressure (or load radius) and location are defined for each load (wheel) considered. Finite element method (FEM) is a numerical analysis technique to obtain the stress-strain and deflection of each pavement layers. Analytical method usually uses layers thickness, loads, elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio of the pavement materials as design parameters. The objective of this research was to study the sensitivity of the road parameters in analyzing the major causes of failure in asphalt pavement layers fatigue cracking and rutting deformation which came due to the critical tensile strains at the bottom of the asphalt layer and the critical compressive strains on the top of subgrade using the finite element method by relating the standard specification of ERA and laboratory test result. This thesis studied the analysis of stress-strain and deflection of flexible pavements using Everstress finite element method. The Ever stress program will take into account any stress dependent stiffness characteristics. This thesis dealt with ways to reduce deflections by varying the design configuration, such as increasing the HMA modulus, the base modulus, sub base modulus, the subgrade modulus and increasing thickness of each layers. Based on type of materials to use the value of elastic modulus and poison’s ratio are various in each layers, in layer 1 is varied from 1500 to 3500 MPa, in layer 2 is varied from 200 to 1000MPa, in layer 3 is varied from 100 to 250 MPa and in layer 4 is varied from 20MPa to 150MPa.
Finite Element Analysis, Flexible Pavement, Layers Thickness, Modulus and Vertical Surface Deflections
To cite this article
Shiferaw Garoma Wayessa,
Emer Tucay Quezon,
Analysis of Stress- Strain and Deflection of Flexible Pavements Using Finite Element Method Case Study on Bako-Nekemte Road, Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering.
Vol. 2, No. 4,
2017, pp. 100-111.
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Burmister, D. (1945). The general theory of stresses and displacements in layered soil system. journal of applied physics,, vol. 16, pp. 84-94, 126-126-127, 296-302.
De Beer M; Fisher C & Jooste F. (1997). Determination of Pneumatic Tire Pavement Interface Contact Stresses Under Moving Loads and Some Effects on Pavements with Thin Asphalt Surfacing Layers. Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements (Volume I), Seattle, Washington, pp. 179-227.
Emmanuel O, E. a. (2009). Fatigue and rutting strain analysis of flexible pavements designed using CBR methods. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 3 (1 2), pp. 41 2-421.
Garba, R. (2002). A Thesis on Permanent Deformation properties of Asphalt Concrete mixtures. Department of Road and Railway Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Gupta. (2014). COMPARATIVE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD. The International Journal of Pavement Engineering and Asphalt Technology,, Volume: 15, pp.11-19.
Huang Y. H. (1993). Pavement Analysis and Design. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
Institute Asphalt. (1982). Research and Development of Asphalt Institute’s Thickness Design Manual. 9th Ed, Research Report 82-2.
Lanham. (1996). National Asphalt Pavement Association Research and Education Foundation. Maryland.
Machemehl R, Wang F & Prozzi J. (2005). Analytical study of effects of truck tire pressure on pavements with measured tire-pavement contact stress data. Transportation Research Record: J. Transp. Res. Board, 1919: 111-119.
Markshek, K, Chen, H, & Hudso, R. C. (1986). Experimental Determination of Pressure Distribution of Truck Tire Pavement Contact, in Transportation Research Record 1070. pp.197-206.
Ralph H.; Susan T.; Guy D.& David H. (2007). Mechanistic-Empirical pavement design. Evolution and future challenges. Canada.: Saskatoon.
Shane Buchanan, (2007). Vulcan Materials Company, RESILIENT MODULUS: WHAT, WHY, AND HOW?Taneerananon, Somchainuek, Thongchim, & Yandell. (2014). ANALYSIS OF STRESS, STRAIN AND DEFLECTION OF PAVEMENTS USING FINITE ELEMENT. Journal of Society for Transportation and Traffic Studies, Vol. 1 No. 4.
Yang, H. (1973). Asphalt Pavement Design – The Shell Method, Proceedings. 4th International Conference on Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements.
Zaghloul S and White, T. (1993). Use of a ThreeDimensional, Dynamic Finite Element Program for Analysis of Flexible Pavement. In Transportation Research Record 1388, TRB, Washington D. C, pp. 6069.