Development of Mathematical Model to Predict Micrococcus Influenced by Diffusion in High Heterogeneous Permeable Gravel Formation, Warri Delta State of Nigeria
Engineering Science
Volume 2, Issue 2, June 2017, Pages: 45-52
Received: Oct. 26, 2016; Accepted: Feb. 24, 2017; Published: Mar. 28, 2017
Views 1061      Downloads 63
Author
Eluozo S. N., Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Subaka Nigeria Limited Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
This paper examined the behaviour of micrococcus deposition in higher heterogeneous permeable gravel formation in the study area, diffusion was observed to pressurize the behaviour of the contaminant in terms of inhibition from other deposited mineral in the formation, such development was experienced in the study, the transport processes were observed to reduce the concentration at different soil formation, despite the fluctuation deposition of the contaminant, the concentration was very low due to an inhibition from diffusion of micrococcus concentration in the study area, fluctuation were also observed in the transport process, the pressure were from diffusion influences through some other deposited minerals that were also observed to cause more inhibition in the study location. Such condition express fluctuation from the simulation values, the study is imperative because the rate of micrococcus diffusion of contaminant has been expressed in various dimension, experts will definitely apply this techniques as another breakthrough in monitoring transport system of micrococcus in the study location.
Keywords
Mathematical Model, Micrococcus, High Permeable, Gravel Formation
To cite this article
Eluozo S. N., Development of Mathematical Model to Predict Micrococcus Influenced by Diffusion in High Heterogeneous Permeable Gravel Formation, Warri Delta State of Nigeria, Engineering Science. Vol. 2, No. 2, 2017, pp. 45-52. doi: 10.11648/j.es.20170202.13
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Albrechtsen H-J (1994) Distribution of bacteria, estimated by a viable count method, and heterotrophic activityin different size fractions of aquifer sediment. Geomicrobiol J 12:253–264.
[2]
Ellyn M. Murphy and Timothy R. Ginn (2000) Modelling microbial processes in porous media Hydrogeology Journal 8:142–158.
[3]
Bales RC, Li S, Maguire KM, Yahya MT, Gerba CP, Harvey RW (1995) Virus and bacteria transport in a sandyaquifer, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Ground Water 33:653–661.
[4]
Harvey RW, Smith RL, George L (1984) Effect of organic contamination upon microbial distributions andheterotrophic uptake in a Cape Cod, Mass., aquifer. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:1197–1202.
[5]
Harvey RW, George LH, Smith RL, LeBlanc DR (1989) Transport of microspheres and indigenous bacteriathrough a sandy aquifer: results of natural- and forced-gradient tracer experiments. Environ SciTechnol 23:51–56.
[6]
Harvey RW, Kinner NE, MacDonald D, Metge DW, Bunn A (1993) Role of physical heterogeneity in theinterpretation of small-scale laboratory and field observations of bacteria, microbial-sized microsphere, and bromidetransport through aquifer sediments. Water Resour Res 29:2713–2721.
[7]
Harvey RW, Kinner NE, Bunn A, MacDonald D, Metge D (1995) Transport behavior of groundwater protozoaand protozoan-sized microspheres in sandy aquifer sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol61:209–217.
[8]
Hornberger GM, Mills AL, Herman JS (1992) Bacterial transport in porous media: evaluation of a model usinglaboratory observations. Water Resour Res 28:915–938
[9]
Jenneman GE, McInerney MJ, Knapp RM (1985) Microbial penetration through nutrient-saturated Bereasandstone. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:383–391.
[10]
Jenneman GE, McInerney MJ, Crocker MF, Knapp RM (1986) Effect of sterilization by dry heat or autoclavingon bacterial penetration through Berea sandstone. Appl Environ Microbiol 51:39–43.
[11]
Godsy EM, Goerlitz DF, Grbic-Galic D (1992) Methanogenic biodegradation of creosote contaminants innatural and simulated ground-water ecosystems. Ground Water 30:232–242.
[12]
Champ DR, Schroeter J (1988) Bacterial transport in fractured rock: a field-scale tracer test at the Chalk RiverNuclear Laboratories. Water Sci Technol 20:81–87.
[13]
Hirsch P, Rades-Rohkohl E (1988) Die Vielfalt mikrobieller Mosrphotypen im Grundwasservereich des Segeberger Forstes. Z Dtsch Geol Ges 139:343–353.
[14]
Kölbel-Boelke J, Anders E, Nehrkorn A (1988) Microbial communities in the saturated groundwaterenvironment II: diversity of bacterial communities in a Pleistocene sand aquifer and there in vitro activities. MicrobEcol16:31–48.
[15]
Reynolds PJ, Sharma P, Jenneman GE, McInerney MJ (1989) Mechanisms of microbial movement insubsurface materials. Appl Environ Microbiol55:2280–2286.
[16]
Sharma PK, McInerney MJ, Knapp RM (1993) In situ growth and activity and modes of penetration ofEscherichia coli in unconsolidated porous materials. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3686–3694.
[17]
Tan Y, Gannon JT, Baveye P, Alexander M (1994) Transport of bacteria in aquifer sand: experiments andmodel simulations. Water Resour Res 30:3243–3252.
[18]
USDOE (U.S. Department of Energy) (1993) Cleanup of VOCs in non-arid soils – the Savannah Riverintegrated demonstration. US Department of Energy, Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Office of Technology Development, Washington, DC.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
548 FASHION AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10018
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-688-8931