American Journal of Physics and Applications
Volume 2, Issue 5, September 2014, Pages: 108-112
Received: Sep. 23, 2014;
Accepted: Oct. 21, 2014;
Published: Oct. 30, 2014
Views 2928 Downloads 184
Oleg Olkhov, Institute of Chemical Physics, Moscow, Russia
The hypothesis was earlier suggested by the author where all micro-objects are considered as specific distortions of the physical space-time pseudo-Euclidean geometry, namely, as closed topological 4-manifolds. The foundation of the hypothesis is a geometrical interpretation of the basic equation of quantum mechanics for classical (not quantized) wave fields -- the Dirac equation for free particle. Such hypothesis does not contradict to any physical laws and experimental facts and gives firstly an opportunity to explain qualitatively within classical notions (geometrical) the so called “paradoxical” properties of quantum particles such as wave-corpuscular duality, appearance of probabilities in the quantum mechanics formalism, spin, EPR-paradox.To demonstrate prospects for suggested geometrical approach the author early attempted to find new dynamic equations other than known quantum-mechanical ones for atomic spectra calculations. In this work above investigation is being continued on a more rigorous basis, representing a new geometrical interpretation of the equation for hydrogen atoms. Results of calculations of ionization potentials for helium atom are in agreement with experimental data.
Geometrical Approach in Atomic Physics: Atoms of Hydrogen and Helium, American Journal of Physics and Applications.
Vol. 2, No. 5,
2014, pp. 108-112.
O. A. Olkhov, “Geometrical approach to the atomic spectra theory. The helium atom,” Russian J.of Phys.Chemistry B, vol. 8, pp.30—42, February 2014 [Chim.Fis., p.36, vol.33, №2, 2014].
O. A. Olkhov, “Geometrization of Quantum Mechanics,” Journal of Rhys.:Conf.Ser. vol. 67, p.012037. 2007.
O. A. Olkhov, “Geometrization of Classical Wave fields,” Mellwill, Ney York, AIP Conference Proceedings p. 316, vol.962,2008(Proc.Int.Conf,“Quantum theory: Reconsideration of Foundations, Vaxjo, Sweden, 11-16 June, 2007, 2007); arXiv: 802.2269
L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Course of Theoretical Physics. vol.4: V. B. Berestetzki, E. M. Lifshitz, L. P. Pitaevski, Quantum Electrodynamics, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1982.
B. A. Dubrovin, A. T. Fomenko, S. P. Novikov, Modern geometry—Methods and Applications, Part 2: The Geometry and Topology of Manifolds, Springer, 1985.
A. S. Schwartz, Quantum field theory and topology. Grundlehren der Math. Wissen.307, Springer, 1993.
H. S. M. Coxeter, Introduction to geometry. New York, London: John Wiley&Sons, 1961.
P. K. Rashevski, Riemann geometry and tensor analysis (in Russian). Moscow, Nauka, 1966.
V. A. Zelnorovich, Theory of spinors and its applications (in Russian). Moscow, August-Print, 2001.
Ta-Pei Cheng, Ling-Fong Li, Gauge theory of elementary particle physics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984.
V. Popov, N. Konopleva, Gauge fields. Gordon and Breach Publishing Group, 1982.
H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Quantum mechanics of one- and two-electron atoms. Berlin-Gottingen-Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 1957.
V. Heine, Group theory in quantum mechanics. London-Oxford-New York-Paris, Pergamon Press, 1960.
L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Course of Theoretical Physics, vol.2, L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, Butterworth—Heinemann, 1975.