| Peer-Reviewed

The Complete Decongestive Therapy to Treat Lymphedema in Post-Breast Cancer Surgery and Its Relationships with Patients Psychological and Physical Characteristics: A Pilot Study

Received: 10 November 2014    Accepted: 6 January 2015    Published: 30 April 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Background. More than 20% of women treated for breast cancer are at risk for developing lymphedema, a chronic condition that causes swelling, pain, altered appearance and reduced mobility. Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT) is considered the gold standard to treat lymphedema. Objective. To measure lymphedema features and psychological variables in 10 post-breast cancer surgery patients at baseline, and 1, 6, and 12 months after CDT. Results. Lymphedema appeared between 0 and 6 years after breast cancer surgery. After 4 weeks in CDT treatment, the median degree of reduction was 38.73% (range, 7.45-58.39), and six months after, 49.57% (range, 11.91-82.50). Comparing patients that have had an extra reduction in arm circumferences at T3 (group 1) and patients that did not (group 2), we found: patients in group 1 showed at baseline a better psychological functioning (health-related quality of life domains, anxiety, depression, body-image vulnerability, appearance stereotyping), and higher scores in curability and severity respect to the comparison group. 12 months after the CDT, among patients of the group 1, the lymphedema is perceived as less severe and more curable compared to their perception at baseline, and dysfunctional investment in one’s appearance and anxiety scores decreased, emotional wellbeing improved. Patients in the group 2 perceived lymphedema as much more curable, but also much more severe that at baseline. Both, anxiety and dysfunctional investment in one’s appearance scores increased. Conclusions. Too often, conventional rehabilitation may not optimally match clinical resources to patients’ needs, and if our results will be confirmed, screening and independent treatment for psychological distress will be required in patients to prevent poor CDT responses.

Published in Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research (Volume 3, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.jctr.20150303.13
Page(s) 37-41
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Breast Cancer, Complete Decongestive Therapy, Lymphedema, Follow up Study, Post-Breast Cancer Surgery Effect

References
[1] Burt J, White G. Lymphedema: a breast cancer patient’s guide to prevention and healing. Hunter House. p. 9. 2005. ISBN 978-0-89793-458-9
[2] Brorson H, Ohlin K, Olsson G, Svensson B, Svensson H. Controlled compression and liposuction treatment for lower extremity lymphedema. Lymphology 2008; 41(2):52–63. PMID 18720912
[3] Kissin MW, Querci della Rovere G, Easton D, Westbury G. Risk of lymphoedema following the treatment of breast cancer. Br J Surg 1986;73(7):580–584. doi: 10.102/bjs.1800730723. PMID 3730795
[4] Segerström K, Bjerle P, Graffman S, Nyström A. Factors that influence the incidence of brachial oedema after treatment of breast cancer. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1992;26(2):223–227. doi:10.3109/02844319209016016. PMID 1411352
[5] Hayes SC, Johansson K, Stout NL, et al. Upper-body morbidity after breast cancer: incidence and evidence for evaluation, prevention, and management within a prospective surveillance model of care. Cancer 2012;118:2237-22doi: 10.1002/cncr27467
[6] Tasj RJ, Dennis LK, Lynch CF, Snetselaar LG, Zamba GK, Scott-Conner C. The Risk of developing arm lymphedema among breast cancer survivors: a meta-analysis of treatment factors. Ann Surg Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1959-1972
[7] Di Sipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(6):500-5doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70076-7
[8] Hayes S, Di Sipio T, Rye S, et al. Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Secondary Lymphedema Following Breast Cancer. Lymphatic Research and Biology 2011;9(3):135-1doi:10.1089/lrb.2011.0007
[9] Ahmed RL, Prizment A, Lazovich D, Schmitz KH, Folsom AR. Lymphedema and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: the Iowa Women's Health Study. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(35):5689-5696
[10] Kwan W, Jackson J, Weir LM, Dingee C, McGregor G, Olivotto IA. Chronic arm morbidity after curative breast cancer treatment: prevalence and impact on quality of life. J Clin Oncol 2002;20(20):4242-4248
[11] Norman SA, Localio AR , Potashnik SL et al. Lymphedema in breast cancer survivors: incidence, degree, time course, treatment, and symptoms. J Clin Oncol 2009;27( 3):390-397
[12] Lawenda BD, Mondry TE, Johnstone Peter AS. Lymphedema: a primer on the identification and management of a chronic condition in oncologic treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:8-24
[13] International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema. Consensus document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology 2003;36:84–91
[14] Armer JM, Stewart BR, Shook RP. 30-month post Breast cancer Treatment Lymphedema. Journal of Lymphology 2009;4(1):14-18
[15] Hayes SC, Janda M, Cornish B, Battistutta D, Newman B. Lymphedema After Breast Cancer: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Effect on Upper Body Function. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3536-3542
[16] Huang TW, Tseng SH, Lin CC, et al. Effects of manual lymphatic drainage on breast cancer-related lymph edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controllated trials. World J Surgical Oncology 2013;11:15
[17] Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scale: Development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:570-579
[18] Coster S, Poole K, Fallowfield L. The validation of a quality of life scale to assess the impact of arm morbidity in breast cancer patients post-operatively. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2001;68:273-282
[19] Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An update literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002;52:69-77
[20] Cash TF, Labarge AS. Development of the Appearance Schemas Inventory: A new cognitive body-image assessment. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1996;20:37-50
[21] Mazzotti E, Sebastiani C, Marchetti P. Patient-perception of the disease control and relationship with psychosocial variables. Cancer Management and Research 2012;4:335-3doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S35060
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Eva Mazzotti, Roberto Bartoletti, Claudia Sebastiani, Alessandro Scoppola, Paolo Marchetti. (2015). The Complete Decongestive Therapy to Treat Lymphedema in Post-Breast Cancer Surgery and Its Relationships with Patients Psychological and Physical Characteristics: A Pilot Study. Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research, 3(3), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20150303.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Eva Mazzotti; Roberto Bartoletti; Claudia Sebastiani; Alessandro Scoppola; Paolo Marchetti. The Complete Decongestive Therapy to Treat Lymphedema in Post-Breast Cancer Surgery and Its Relationships with Patients Psychological and Physical Characteristics: A Pilot Study. J. Cancer Treat. Res. 2015, 3(3), 37-41. doi: 10.11648/j.jctr.20150303.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Eva Mazzotti, Roberto Bartoletti, Claudia Sebastiani, Alessandro Scoppola, Paolo Marchetti. The Complete Decongestive Therapy to Treat Lymphedema in Post-Breast Cancer Surgery and Its Relationships with Patients Psychological and Physical Characteristics: A Pilot Study. J Cancer Treat Res. 2015;3(3):37-41. doi: 10.11648/j.jctr.20150303.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jctr.20150303.13,
      author = {Eva Mazzotti and Roberto Bartoletti and Claudia Sebastiani and Alessandro Scoppola and Paolo Marchetti},
      title = {The Complete Decongestive Therapy to Treat Lymphedema in Post-Breast Cancer Surgery and Its Relationships with Patients Psychological and Physical Characteristics: A Pilot Study},
      journal = {Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research},
      volume = {3},
      number = {3},
      pages = {37-41},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jctr.20150303.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20150303.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jctr.20150303.13},
      abstract = {Background. More than 20% of women treated for breast cancer are at risk for developing lymphedema, a chronic condition that causes swelling, pain, altered appearance and reduced mobility. Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT) is considered the gold standard to treat lymphedema. Objective. To measure lymphedema features and psychological variables in 10 post-breast cancer surgery patients at baseline, and 1, 6, and 12 months after CDT. Results. Lymphedema appeared between 0 and 6 years after breast cancer surgery. After 4 weeks in CDT treatment, the median degree of reduction was 38.73% (range, 7.45-58.39), and six months after, 49.57% (range, 11.91-82.50). Comparing patients that have had an extra reduction in arm circumferences at T3 (group 1) and patients that did not (group 2), we found: patients in group 1 showed at baseline a better psychological functioning (health-related quality of life domains, anxiety, depression, body-image vulnerability, appearance stereotyping), and higher scores in curability and severity respect to the comparison group.  12 months after the CDT, among patients of the group 1, the lymphedema is perceived as less severe and more curable compared to their perception at baseline, and dysfunctional investment in one’s appearance and anxiety scores decreased, emotional wellbeing improved. Patients in the group 2 perceived lymphedema as much more curable, but also much more severe that at baseline. Both, anxiety and dysfunctional investment in one’s appearance scores increased. Conclusions. Too often, conventional rehabilitation may not optimally match clinical resources to patients’ needs, and if our results will be confirmed, screening and independent treatment for psychological distress will be required in patients to prevent poor CDT responses.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Complete Decongestive Therapy to Treat Lymphedema in Post-Breast Cancer Surgery and Its Relationships with Patients Psychological and Physical Characteristics: A Pilot Study
    AU  - Eva Mazzotti
    AU  - Roberto Bartoletti
    AU  - Claudia Sebastiani
    AU  - Alessandro Scoppola
    AU  - Paolo Marchetti
    Y1  - 2015/04/30
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20150303.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jctr.20150303.13
    T2  - Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research
    JF  - Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research
    JO  - Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research
    SP  - 37
    EP  - 41
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7790
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20150303.13
    AB  - Background. More than 20% of women treated for breast cancer are at risk for developing lymphedema, a chronic condition that causes swelling, pain, altered appearance and reduced mobility. Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT) is considered the gold standard to treat lymphedema. Objective. To measure lymphedema features and psychological variables in 10 post-breast cancer surgery patients at baseline, and 1, 6, and 12 months after CDT. Results. Lymphedema appeared between 0 and 6 years after breast cancer surgery. After 4 weeks in CDT treatment, the median degree of reduction was 38.73% (range, 7.45-58.39), and six months after, 49.57% (range, 11.91-82.50). Comparing patients that have had an extra reduction in arm circumferences at T3 (group 1) and patients that did not (group 2), we found: patients in group 1 showed at baseline a better psychological functioning (health-related quality of life domains, anxiety, depression, body-image vulnerability, appearance stereotyping), and higher scores in curability and severity respect to the comparison group.  12 months after the CDT, among patients of the group 1, the lymphedema is perceived as less severe and more curable compared to their perception at baseline, and dysfunctional investment in one’s appearance and anxiety scores decreased, emotional wellbeing improved. Patients in the group 2 perceived lymphedema as much more curable, but also much more severe that at baseline. Both, anxiety and dysfunctional investment in one’s appearance scores increased. Conclusions. Too often, conventional rehabilitation may not optimally match clinical resources to patients’ needs, and if our results will be confirmed, screening and independent treatment for psychological distress will be required in patients to prevent poor CDT responses.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, School of Medicine and Psychology, University “La Sapienza” Rome, Italy

  • Division of Oncology and Oncological Dermatology- IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy

  • Division of Oncology and Oncological Dermatology- IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy

  • Division of Oncology and Oncological Dermatology- IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy

  • Division of Oncology and Oncological Dermatology- IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Clinical Oncology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, School of Medicine and Psychology, University “La Sapienza” Rome, Italy

  • Sections