American Journal of Health Research
Volume 2, Issue 3, May 2014, Pages: 89-92
Received: Mar. 10, 2014;
Accepted: Apr. 16, 2014;
Published: Apr. 30, 2014
Views 2712 Downloads 119
Gehan Abdelhaleim Abdelhaleim Ahmed, Radiology Department, Sudan University of Science and Technology, College of Medical Radiological Science, Khartoum, Sudan
Elsafi Ahmed Abdalla, Radiology Department, Sudan University of Science and Technology, College of Medical Radiological Science, Khartoum, Sudan
Caroline Edward Ayad, Radiology Department, Sudan University of Science and Technology, College of Medical Radiological Science, Khartoum, Sudan
This Study aimed to assess the Doppler indices for ophthalmic artery in type 1diabetic pregnant ladies. Inclusion criteria were 15diabetic pregnant ladies, their ages were (30-39), 14 healthy pregnant non diabetic ladies aged (30-37), and 15 healthy non pregnant non diabetic subjects aged (30-41) were selected as control group. Pregnant ladies with eye disease or pregnancy abnormality or preeclampsia were excluded. Ultrasound examination for both eyes were obtained using 7.5MHZ high resolution ultrasound machine. Readings of Ophthalmic artery Doppler indices (resistive index (RI), pulsatility index (PI)) for type 1 diabetes ladies were found to be greater when compared with the control group values and Mean Velocity (MV) was of lower values. The mean values ± SD were as follows: for right eye: resistive index, 1.3 ± 0.2 (P < .005 Control0.8 ± 0.1); pulsatility index, (3.6 ± 0.4 (P < .005Control1.6 ± 0.4); Mean Velocity (MV) 5.2 ± 1.1(P < .005 Control 8.4 ± 3.2). For left eye resistive index, 1.4 ± 0.2 (P < .005 Control 0.7 ± 0.1); pulsatility index, 3.3 ± 0.5 (P < .005Control 1.6 ± 0.3); Mean Velocity (MV) 5.7 ± 0.8 (P < .005 Control 8.5 ± 3.2). The correlations between the variables and gestational age in the two pregnant groups were studied and were compared with the control group and maternal treatment. The study revealed that the Doppler indices for right and left eyes differed significantly within the three trimesters for pregnant diabetic and pregnant non diabetic ladies and when compared with the control group at p-value ˂0.05. No significant difference was detected between the Doppler indices and the treatment taken as Diet Control, or insulin for type 1 diabetic pregnant ladies. Color Doppler Ultrasonography is useful for assessing blood flow. Ophthalmic arteries Doppler Indices were affected significantly in pregnant ladies with or without type 1diabetes.
Gehan Abdelhaleim Abdelhaleim Ahmed,
Elsafi Ahmed Abdalla,
Caroline Edward Ayad,
Maternal Ophthalmic Artery Doppler Indices in Type 1 Diabetes during Pregnancy, American Journal of Health Research.
Vol. 2, No. 3,
2014, pp. 89-92.
S.J. Erickson, L.E. Hendrix, B.M .Massaro, et al. Color Doppler flow imaging of the normal and abnormal orbit. Radiology 1989; 173:511–516
MMWR. Blindness caused by di-abetes-Massachusetts, 1987- 1994. MMWR-Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report 45: 937-941; 1996
C, Bruttomesso D, Fedele D. Pregnancy does not induce or worsen retinal and pe-ripheral nerve dysfunction in insulindependent diabetic women. J Diabetes Complications 12: 74-80;1998
M .Lovestam-Adrian, C. D. Agardh, A. Aberg, E .Agardh. Preeclampsia is a potent risk factor for deterioration of retinopathy during pregnancy in type I diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 14: 1059-1065; 1997.
R.C .Temple, V.A .Aldridge, M.J .Sampson, R.H. Greenwood, P.J .Heyburn, A. Glenn. Impact of pregnancy on the progression of diabetic retino-pathy in type I diabetes. Diabetic Medicine 18:573-577; 2001
R.S .Carneiro, N. Sass, A.L. Diniz, E.V. Souza, M.R. Torloni, A.F. Moron. Ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetry in health pregnancy. In J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 100:211–215
F .Mackenzie, R. De Vermette, C .Nimrod, D .Boisvert, B .Jackson. Doppler sonographic studies on the ophthalmic and central retinal arteries in the gravid woman. J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14:643–647 (references)
Y. Ohno, M. Kawai, Y .Wakahara, T .Kitagawa, M .Kakihara, Y. Arii. Ophthalmic artery velocimetry in normotensive and preeclamptic women with or without photophobia. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94:361–363.
R.S .Tompson, B.J .Trudinger, C.M. Cook. Doppler ultrasound waveform in-dices: A/B ratio, pulsatility index and Porcelot ratio. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95:581–588
A.L. Diniz, A.F .Moron, M.C .Santos, C.R. Pires. Doppler velocimetria das artérias oftálmica e central da retina em gestantes normais. Rev Bras GinecolObstet 2005; 27: 168–173.
F .Mackenzie, R .De Vermette, C. Nimrod, D. Boisvert, B. Jackson. Doppler so-nographic studies on the ophthalmic and central retinal arteries in the gravid woman. J Ultra-sound Med 1995; 14:643–647
J. Cai, M. Boulton. The pathogenesis of diabetic retinopa-thy: old concepts and new questions. Eye 2002;16:242–260
L .Schmetterer, M. Wolzt. Ocular blood flow and associated functional deviations in diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia 1999;42:387–405
T .Kawagishi, Y .Nishizawa, M .Emoto, T .Konishi, K .Maekawa, S .Hagiwara, Y .Okuno, H .Inada, G .Isshiki, H. Morii. Impaired retinal artery blood flow in IDDM patients before clinical manifestations of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 1995;18:1544–1549
G.T .Feke, S.M .Buzney, H. Ogasawara, N.Fujio, D.G. Goger, N.P. Spack, K.H .Gabbay. Retinal circulatory abnormalities in type 1 diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 2968–2975
K.L .Thornburg, S-L .Jacobson, G.D .Giraud, M.J. Morton. Hemodynamic changes in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol. 2000; 24:11–14.
G .Soubrane, J .Canivet, G .Coscas. Influence of pregnancy on the evolution of background retinopathy: preliminary results of a prospective fluorescein angiography study. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1985; 8: 249–255
T. Hellstedt, R. Kaaja, K .Teramo, I. Immonen. Macular blood flow during preg-nancy in patients with early diabetic retinopathy measured by blue-field entoptic simulation. Graefes Arch Clin ExpOphthalmol. 1996; 234: 659–663.
Sirpa Loukovaara, Mika Harju, Risto Kaaja, and Ilkka Immonen. Retinal Capillary Blood Flow in Diabetic and Non diabetic Women during Pregnancy and Postpartum Period IOVS, April 2003, Vol. 44, No. 4,1486-1491
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Effect of pregnancy on micro vascular complications in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care 23:1084-1091; 2000.
Jeff Van Impe, Pregnancy and Its Effect on the Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy 2005 8(2): 142-8
L. S .Schocket, J.E. Grunwald, A.F. Tsang, J .DuPont. The effect of pregnancy on retinal hemo dynamics in diabetic versus non diabetic mothers. Am J Ophthalmol. 128(4): 477-484; 1999
L.P. Aiello, T.W .Gardner, G.L. King, Blankenship G, J.D. Cavallerano, Ferris FL 3rd, Klein R. Diabetic retinopathy. American Diabetes Association: Position Statement. Diabetes Care 23:S73-S76; 2000.