Please enter verification code
Confirm
Risk Ratio Differences in the Exposure to Caesarean Section in the Central Area of the Western Highlands of Yemen
American Journal of Health Research
Volume 4, Issue 4, July 2016, Pages: 86-90
Received: Jun. 6, 2016; Accepted: Jun. 16, 2016; Published: Jun. 29, 2016
Views 3721      Downloads 111
Authors
Amat Al-Khaleq O. Mehrass, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Thamar University, Dhamar, Yemen
Abdulelah H. Al-Adhroey, Division of Applied Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Thamar University, Dhamar, Yemen
Abdullatif D. Ali, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Thamar University, Dhamar, Yemen
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Compared to vaginal deliveries, caesarean section (C-section) is a major surgery that could be associated with higher risks of maternal and infant mortality and morbidity. In Yemen, some recent reports indicated overuses of C-section. This was a cross-sectional study aimed to assess the risk ratio difference in C-section exposure between Yemeni mothers according to their demographic variables. A total of 400 participants of reproductive age visiting health centers for obstetric care in the central area of the western highlands of Yemen were randomly interviewed using a pretested questionnaire. The results found that the prevalence of C-section exposure among the study participants was 22%. Mothers’ demographic variables showed significant differences in the risk ratio of C-section exposure. Among these variables, large differences in the risk ratio of C-section exposure were estimated between urban versus rural (RR = 3.9, ER = 2.9, P ˂ 0.001) and literate versus illiterate mothers (RR = 3.8, ER = 2.8, P ˂ 0.001). Relatively moderate differences were revealed by parity and maternal age variables (RR = 2.7; ER = 1.7; P ˂ 0.001, RR = 2.6; ER = 1.6; P ˂ 0.001, respectively). Age at marriage, employment status, and visiting health services practice, however, were associated with low differences in the C-section exposure. To strengthen the mother and infant health programs in Yemen, maternal variables including place of residence and educational status should be considered as predictors for either an unnecessary or additionally needed C-section.
Keywords
Caesarean Section, Demographic Variables, Risk Ratio, Maternal and Infant Health, Obstetric Care, Yemen
To cite this article
Amat Al-Khaleq O. Mehrass, Abdulelah H. Al-Adhroey, Abdullatif D. Ali, Risk Ratio Differences in the Exposure to Caesarean Section in the Central Area of the Western Highlands of Yemen, American Journal of Health Research. Vol. 4, No. 4, 2016, pp. 86-90. doi: 10.11648/j.ajhr.20160404.13
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
P. Lumbiganon, M. Laopaiboon, A. M. Gulmezoglu, et al., "Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08," Lancet, vol. 375, pp. 490–499, 2010.
[2]
J. Villar, G. Carroli, N. Zavaleta, et al., "Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study," BMJ, 2007, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39363.706956.55.
[3]
L. Dosa, "Caesarean section delivery, an increasingly popular option," Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2001, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0042-96862001001200022
[4]
J. P. Vogel, A. P. Betrán, N. Vindevoghel, et al. "Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys," Lancet Global Health, vol. 3, pp. 260–270, 2015.
[5]
F. Althabe, C. Sosa, J. M. Belizán, L. Gibbons, F. Jacquerioz and E. Bergel, "Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low, medium, and high income countries: an ecological study," Birth, vol. 33, pp. 270–277, 2006.
[6]
C. Ronsmans, S. Holtz and C. Stanton, "Socioeconomic differentials in caesarean rates in developing countries: a retrospective analysis," Lancet, vol. 368, pp. 1516–1523. 2006.
[7]
J. Ye, J. Zhang, R. Mikolajczyk, M. R. Torloni, A. M. Gülmezoglu and A. P. Betrán, "Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data BJOG, vol. 123, pp. 745–753, 2016.
[8]
Appropriate technology for birth," Lancet, vol. 326, pp. 436–437, 1985, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736 (85) 92750-3.
[9]
World Health Organization (WHO). The Global Numbers and Costs of Additionally Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Performed per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2010.
[10]
F. El-Zanaty, and W. Ann, "Egypt Demographic and Health Survey 2008," Cairo, Egypt: Ministry of Health, 2009.
[11]
A. P. Betrán, M. Merialdi, J. A. Lauer, W. Bing-Shun, J. Thomas, P. L. Van and M. Wagner, "Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates," Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol. 21, pp. 98–113, 2007.
[12]
World Health Organization (WHO). The world health report 2005, Basic Indicators. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2005.
[13]
Directorate General of Planning [Oman]. Annual Health Report 2009, Sultanate of Oman: Ministry of Health, 2010.
[14]
Central Statistical Organization (CSO) [Yemen] and Macro International Inc. (MI), Yemen Demographic and Maternal and Child Health Survey 1997. Calverton, Maryland: CSO and MI, 1998.
[15]
A. A. Al-Rukeimi, A. Al-Haddad and I. Adam, "Overuse of cesarean delivery at Al-Saudi Hospital, Hajjah, Yemen," Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 8, pp. 185–188, 2013.
[16]
K. N. Ondimu, "Levels and risk factors of operative deliveries in four health facilities in Kisumu District, Kenya," Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 20, pp. 486–491, 2000.
[17]
S. S. Padmadas, S. Kumar, S. B. Nair and A. Kumari, "Caesarean section delivery in Kerala, India: evidence from a National Family Health Survey," Social Science and Medicine, vol. 51, pp. 511–521, 2000.
[18]
S. Tang, X. Li and Z. Wu, "Rising cesarean delivery rate in primiparous women in urban China: Evidence from three nationwide household health surveys," Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 195, pp. 1527–1532, 2006.
[19]
Ministry of Public Health [Sudan]. Sudan Maternal and Child Health Survey: Principal Report. Republic of Sudan and the Pan Arab Project for Child Development (PAPCHILD) of the League of Arab States, 1995.
[20]
A. S. Kumari, "Pregnancy outcome in women with morbid obesity," International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetric, vol. 73, pp. 101–107, 2001.
[21]
P. M. Tebeu, E. Mboudou, G. Halle, E. Kongnyuy, E. Nkwabong, and J. N. "Fomulu, Risk Factors of Delivery by Caesarean Section in Cameroon (2003-2004): A Regional Hospital Report," ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 2011, Article ID 791319, 2011.
[22]
P. M. Tebeu, L. Kouam, M. F. Nghonguia et al., "Historical cohort study of delivery in woman at forty years and above," Revue Medicale de Liege, vol. 62, pp. 509–514, 2007.
[23]
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2015.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186