Cytochrome Oxidase-I Gene Sequencing Approaches to Identification of Culex pipiens Complex Collected in Baljurashi Province, Saudi Arabia
American Journal of Zoology
Volume 1, Issue 1, September 2018, Pages: 7-14
Received: May 7, 2018; Accepted: May 28, 2018; Published: Jun. 14, 2018
Views 648      Downloads 95
Authors
Ehab Mohammed Abdella, Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Al Baha University, Al Baha, Saudi Arabia; Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt
Tariq Saeed Alghamdi, Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Al Baha University, Al Baha, Saudi Arabia; Biology Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Khalid Mohammed Alghamdi, Biology Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Jazem Abdullah Mahyoub, Biology Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Some species of mosquitoes such as Culex pipiens complex are survive at different habitat conditions. They are considered of medically important vectors for some diseases, which causes a huge financial and medical problems to humans. From this point of view, species identification is the first step in the control of Culex pipiens complex. Previously identification of Culex pipiens complex is mainly done on the basis of a wide variety of morphological and biological characteristics. This can be difficult because diagnostic morphological features are often varied so little between species. So that in the present work, Culex species identification is performed by using DNA sequencing assay based on the mtDNA cytochrome oxidase-I (COX-I) gene. 56 mosquitoes specimens were collected from different infected areas in Baljurashi province, Al Baha, Saudi Arabia and grown for several generations in lab. COX-I gene amplification was carried out using the universal primers LCO1490 and HCO2198. Only 35 mosquito specimens had good amplified COXI target gene sequenced. These DNA sequences were compared with available sequences using basic alignment search tool in NCBI-Nucleotide database. Most of the examined specimens have high matching result in gene-bank with LC102132. However specimens T6, 8, 9, 15, 21, 45 & 51 have high similarity with JQ958371 Culex pipiens strain cf-3 and also specimen T35 has high similarity with KJ500032 Culex pipiens isolate 2AF. In conclusion, Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial COX-I gene can be used as molecular tool for identification of Culex species.
Keywords
Culex pipiens Complex, Mitochondrial COX-I Gene, Sequence Alignment, Phylogenetic Analysis
To cite this article
Ehab Mohammed Abdella, Tariq Saeed Alghamdi, Khalid Mohammed Alghamdi, Jazem Abdullah Mahyoub, Cytochrome Oxidase-I Gene Sequencing Approaches to Identification of Culex pipiens Complex Collected in Baljurashi Province, Saudi Arabia, American Journal of Zoology. Vol. 1, No. 1, 2018, pp. 7-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20180101.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Fontes, G., E. M. Rocha, A. C. Brito and C. M. Antunes, (1998). Lymphatic filariasis in Brazilian urban area (Maceio, Alagoas). Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 93, 705-710.
[2]
Hubalek, Z. (2000). European experience with the West Nile virus ecology and epidemiology: could it be relevant for the New World?. Viral Immunology 13, 415-426.
[3]
Bortolus, A. (2008). Error cascades in the biological sciences: the unwanted consequences of using bad taxonomy in Ecology. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment 37, 114–118.
[4]
Vesgueiro, F. T., B. Demari-Silva, R. S. Malfronte, M. A. M. Sallum and M. T. Marrelli, (2011). Intragenomic variation in the second internal transcribed spacer of the ribosomal DNA of species of the genera Culex and Lutzia (Diptera: Culicidae). Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 106, 1-8.
[5]
Harbach, R. E., C. L. Culverwell, and I. J. Kitching (2016). Phylogeny of the nominotypical subgenus of Culex (Diptera: Culicidae) insights from analyses of anatomical data into interspecific relationships and species groups in an unresolved tree. Journal of Systematics and Biodiversity 15 (4), 296-306.
[6]
Harbach, R. E. (2011). Classification within the cosmopolitan genus Culex (Diptera: Culicidae): The foundation for molecular systematics and phylogenetic research. Acta tropica 120, 1-14.
[7]
Laurito, M. and W. R. Almiron (2013). Phylogenetic relationships of Culex (Culex) species (Diptera, Culicidae) from Argentina based on morphological characters. Zootaxa 3652, 117-55.
[8]
Hanel, R. and C. Sturmbauer (2000). Multiple recurrent evolution of trophic types in northeastern atlantic and mediterranean seabreams (Sparidae, Percoidei). Journal of Molecular Evolution 50, 276–283.
[9]
Herran, R. de la, C. Rejon, M. Rejon and M. Garrido-Ramos (2001). The molecular phylogeny of the Sparidae (Pisces, perciformes) based on two satellite DNA families. Heredity 87: 691–697.
[10]
Tautz, D. and P. Arctander (2002). DNA points the way ahead in taxonomy. Nature 418 (6897), 479.
[11]
Phuc, H., A. Ball, L. Son, N. Hanh, N. Tu,, et al. (2003). Multiplex PCR assay for malaria vector Anopheles minimus and four related species in the Myzomyia Series from Southeast Asia. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 17, 423–428.
[12]
Gao, Q., N. Beebe and R. Cooper, (2004). Molecular identification of the malaria vectors Anopheles anthropophagus and Anopheles sinensis (Diptera: Culicidae) in central China using polymerase chain reaction and appraisal of their position within the Hyrcanus Group. Journal of Medical Entomology 41, 5–11.
[13]
Hebert, P. D. N., A. Cywinska, S. L. Ball and J. R. de Waard (2003a). Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings Biological sciences / The Royal Society 270: 313-321.
[14]
Remigio, E. and P. Hebert (2003). Testing the utility of partial COI sequences for phylogenetic estimates of gastropod relationships. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29, 641–647.
[15]
Boore, J. L. (1999). Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 27 (8), 1767-1780.
[16]
Kumar, N. P., A. R. Rajavel, R. Natarajan and P. Jambulingam, (2007). DNA Barcodes can distinguish species of Indian mosquitoes (Diptera:Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 44 (1), 1–7.
[17]
Monaghan, M., M. Balke, T. Gregory and A. Vogler, (2005). DNA-based species delineation in tropical beetles using mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Phil Trams R Soc B 360, 925–933.
[18]
Wang, G., C. Li, X. Guo, D. Xing, Y. Dong, Z. Wang, Y. Zhang, W. J. Kress and D. L. Erickson (2012). DNA barcodes: methods and protocols. Methods of Molecular Biology 858, 3-8.
[19]
Alghamdi, T. S., K. M. Alghamdi and J. A. Mahyoub (2017). Molting inhibitory and lethal effect of two Juvenile Hormone Analogues on Culex pipiens L. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 5 (3), 217-220.
[20]
Kress, W. J. and D. L. Erickson (2012). DNA barcodes: methods and protocols. Methods of Molecular Biology, 858, 3-8.
[21]
Shaikevich, E. V. (2007). PCR-RFLP of the COI gene reliably differentiates Cx. pipiens, Cx. pipiens f. molestus and Cx. torrentium of the Pipiens Complex. European Mosquito Bulletin 23, 25–30.
[22]
Ajamma, Y. U., E. Mararo, D. Omondi, T. Onchuru, A. W. T. Muigai, D. Masiga and J. Villinger (2016). Rapid and high throughput molecular identification of diverse mosquito species by high resolution melting analysis. F1000Research 5, 1949-1963.
[23]
Laurito, M., T. M. P. de Oliveira, W. R. Almiron and M. A. M. Sallum (2013). COI barcode versus morphological identification of Culex (Culex) (Diptera: Culicidae) species: a case study using samples from Argentina and Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 108, 110-122.
[24]
Laurito, M. and W. R. Almiron (2015). Morphological variants of diagnostic features of two subgenus Culex L. (Diptera: Culicidae) species from the Neotropical region. Zootaxa 4052, 573-576.
[25]
McDowell, J. R. and J. E. Graves (2002). Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers for specific identification of istiophorid and xiphiid billfishes. Fish Bull 100: 537-544.
[26]
Tahir, H. M., N. Mehwish, Kanwal, et al. (2015). Genetic diversity in cytochrome c oxidase I gene of Anopheles mosquitoes. Mitochondrial DNA 12: 4298-4301.
[27]
McGee, M. D., R. Y. Neches and O. Seehausen (2016). Evaluating genomic divergence and parallelism in replicate ecomorphs from young and old cichlid adaptive radiations. Molecular Ecology 25 (1), 260–268.
[28]
Murugan, K., C. Vadivalagan, P. Karthika, et al. (2016). DNA barcoding and molecular evolution of mosquito vectors of medical and veterinary importance. Parasitology Research 115 (1): 107–121.
[29]
Alahmed A. M., M. A. Al Kuriji, S. M. Kheir, S. A. Al ahmedi, M. J. Al Hatabbi and M. A. Al Gashmari (2009). Mosquito fauna (Diptera: Culicidae) and seasonal activity in Makka Al-Mukarramah Region, Saudi Arabia. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology 39 (3), 991-1013.
[30]
Kheir, S. M., A. M. Al ahmed, M. A. Al Kuriji and S. F. Al Zubyani, (2010). Distribution and seasonal activity of mosquitoes in al Madinah Al Munwwrah, Saudi Arabia. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology 40 (1), 215-223.
[31]
Mahyoub, J. A., K. M. Al-Ghamdi, M. S. Saleh and S. K. Alhag (2013). Seasonal Abundance of Mosquitoes in Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Abdulaziz University 25 (1), 125-143.
[32]
Hebert, P. D. N., S. Ratnasingham, and J. R. de Waard (2003b). Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit-1 divergences among closely related species. Proceedings Biological sciences / The Royal Society 270: S96-S99.
[33]
Cywinska, A., F. F. Hunter and P. D. N. Hebert, (2006). Identifying Canadian mosquito species through DNA barcodes. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 20: 413-424.
[34]
Ruiz-Lopez, F., R. C. Wilkerson, J. E. Conn, S. N. McKeon, D. M. Levin, M. L. Quiñones, et al. (2012). DNA barcoding reveals both known and novel taxa in the Albitarsis Group (Anopheles: Nyssorhynchus) of Neotropical malaria vectors. Parasites and Vectors 5, 44-55.
[35]
Bourke, B. P., T. P. Oliveira, L. Suesdek, E. S. Bergo and M. A. Sallum (2013): A multi-locus approach to barcoding in the Anopheles strodei subgroup (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasit Vectors 6: 111-127.
[36]
Rozas, J., J. C. Sanchez-DelBarrio, M. Xavier and R. Rozas (2003). DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19, 2496-2497.
[37]
Lanfear, R., B. Calcott, S. Y. W. Ho and S. Guindon, (2012). Partition Finder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29, 1695-1701.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186