| Peer-Reviewed

The Belt and Road Initiative and High-tech Enterprise Total Factor Productivity

Received: 30 November 2019    Accepted: 19 February 2020    Published: 3 March 2020
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The Belt and Road initiative is a great achievement and to develop the initiative better, we need to seek impetus from innovation and build "The Road" into a road of innovation. This paper regards the implementation of The Belt and Road initiative as a quasi-natural experiment, using the difference-in-difference model to explore the influence and path of the Belt and Road Initiative on the total factor productivity of high-tech enterprises. Based on the panel data of high-tech enterprises of listed companies from 2009 to 2018, this paper found that the inhibitory effect of The Belt and Road Initiative on total factor productivity of high-tech enterprises changed in an "U" shape and the result of this inhibitory effectwas still valid after the use of placebo test and robustness test. Further research shows that resource curse, environmental uncertainty, lack of tax incentives and lack of motivation are the main reasons to restrain high-tech enterprises from improving their level of technological innovation. However , the increase of innovation output of high-tech enterprises alleviates the restraining effect with the development of The Belt and Road initiative. The findings of this paper are of great significance for China to promote the development of The Belt and Road initiative from the perspective of scientific and technological innovation.

Published in Asia-Pacific Journal of Economics (Volume 1, Issue 3)
Page(s) 18-26
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

The Belt and Road Initiative; DID Model, Total Factor Productivity, Scientific and Technological Innovation

References
[1] 卢锋,李昕,李双双,姜志霄,张杰平,杨业伟.为什么是中国?——“一带一路”的经济逻辑[J].国际经济评论,2015(03):9-34+4.
[2] 申现杰,肖金成.国际区域经济合作新形势与我国“一带一路”合作战略[J].宏观经济研究,2014(11):30-38.
[3] 薛力.中国“一带一路”战略面对的外交风险[J].国际经济评论,2015(02):68-79+5.
[4] 陈高,范莎莎.“一带一路”战略对沿线国家全要素生产率的影响分析[J].统计与决策,2016(23):116-119.
[5] 夏彩云,罗圳.“一带一路”沿线省域高技术产业R&D效率提升研究[J].工业技术经济,2017,36(10):31-37.
[6] 孙焱林,杨彬,覃飞.“一带一路”倡议提升了我国企业创新能力吗——基于上市公司数据的实证研究[J].经济研究参考,2018(20):22-30+60.
[7] 王桂军,卢潇潇.“一带一路”倡议可以促进中国企业创新吗?[J].财经研究,2019,45(01):19-34.
[8] 王桂军,卢潇潇.“一带一路”倡议与中国企业升级[J].中国工业经济,2019(03):43-61.
[9] 赵宸宇,李雪松.对外直接投资与企业技术创新——基于中国上市公司微观数据的实证研究[J].国际贸易问题,2017(06):107-119.
[10] 苏方国,卢宁,罗旖颀,et al.“资源福音”还是“资源诅咒”——政治关联、税收优惠对企业研发投入的影响[J].广西社会科学, 2017(10):132-137.
[11] 毛其淋,许家云.中国企业对外直接投资是否促进了企业创新[J].世界经济,2014(08):100-127.
[12] 孙焱林,覃飞.“一带一路”倡议降低了企业对外直接投资风险吗[J].国际贸易问题,2018,No.428(08):70-83.
[13] 易纲,樊纲,李岩.关于中国经济增长与全要素生产率的理论思考[J].经济研究,2003(8):13-20.
[14] 张晓阳,陆欣怡.政策工具视角下推进“一带一路”科技创新合作专项规划政策文本研究[J].图书情报研究,2019,12(03):96-103.
[15] 尹恒,柳荻,李世刚.企业全要素生产率估计方法比较[J].世界经济文汇,2015(04):5-25.
[16] 赵伟,古广东,何元庆.外向FDI与中国技术进步:机理分析与尝试性实证[J].管理世界,2006(07):59-66.
[17] 袁建国.企业政治资源的诅咒效应——基于政治关联与企业技术创新的考察[J].管理世界,No.256(01):139-155.
[18] 刘瑞明,赵仁杰.西部大开发:增长驱动还是政策陷阱——基于PSM-DID方法的研究[J].中国工业经济,2015(06):32-43.
[19] 钱雪松,康瑾,唐英,et al.产业政策、资本配置效率与企业全要素生产率——基于中国2009年十大产业振兴规划自然实验的经验研究[J].中国工业经济,2018,No.365(08):44-61.
[20] 文东伟.资源错配、全要素生产率与中国制造业的增长潜力[J].经济学(季刊),2019,18(02):208-229.
[21] 徐思,何晓怡,钟凯.“一带一路”倡议与中国企业融资约束[J].中国工业经济,2019(7):155-173.
[22] 陈胜蓝,刘晓玲.公司投资如何响应“一带一路”倡议?—基于准自然实验的经验研究[J].财经研究,2018,44(04):20-33.
[23] 余明桂,范蕊,钟慧洁.中国产业政策与企业技术创新[J].中国工业经济, 2016 (12): 5-22.
[24] Du, J. L.,and Y. F. Zhang. Does One Belt One Road Initiative Promote Chinese Overseas Direct Investment [J].China Economic Review, 2018, 47 (2): 189-205.
[25] Auty RM.Sustaining Development in Mineral Economics:The Resource Curse Thesis [M]. London Routledge, 1993.
[26] Herrero,A. G.,and J. W. Xu. China`s Belt and Road Initiative: Can Europe Expect Trade Gains [J]. China& World Economy, 2017, 25 (6): 84-99.
[27] Andrea Caggese. Entrepreneurial risk, investment, and innovation [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2012, 106 (2).
[28] Farrell R, Grosskopf S, Lovell C A K. Production Frontiers [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 98-102.
[29] Melitz MJ. The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity [J]. Econometrica, 2003, 71 (6): 1695-1725.
[30] Po-Hsuan Hsu,Xuan Tian,Yan Xu. Financial development and innovation: Cross-country evidence [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2014, 112 (1).
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Yue Zhang, Zhilin Huang, Haoyang Shi, Zixing Zeng, Yingjie Chen, et al. (2020). The Belt and Road Initiative and High-tech Enterprise Total Factor Productivity. Asia-Pacific Journal of Economics, 1(3), 18-26.

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Yue Zhang; Zhilin Huang; Haoyang Shi; Zixing Zeng; Yingjie Chen, et al. The Belt and Road Initiative and High-tech Enterprise Total Factor Productivity. Asia-Pac. J. Econ. 2020, 1(3), 18-26.

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Yue Zhang, Zhilin Huang, Haoyang Shi, Zixing Zeng, Yingjie Chen, et al. The Belt and Road Initiative and High-tech Enterprise Total Factor Productivity. Asia-Pac J Econ. 2020;1(3):18-26.

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10045231,
      author = {Yue Zhang and Zhilin Huang and Haoyang Shi and Zixing Zeng and Yingjie Chen and Xiran Li and Fei Ji},
      title = {The Belt and Road Initiative and High-tech Enterprise Total Factor Productivity},
      journal = {Asia-Pacific Journal of Economics},
      volume = {1},
      number = {3},
      pages = {18-26},
      url = {https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/article/10045231},
      abstract = {The Belt and Road initiative is a great achievement and to develop the initiative better, we need to seek impetus from innovation and build "The Road" into a road of innovation. This paper regards the implementation of The Belt and Road initiative as a quasi-natural experiment, using the difference-in-difference model to explore the influence and path of the Belt and Road Initiative on the total factor productivity of high-tech enterprises. Based on the panel data of high-tech enterprises of listed companies from 2009 to 2018, this paper found that the inhibitory effect of The Belt and Road Initiative on total factor productivity of high-tech enterprises changed in an "U" shape and the result of this inhibitory effectwas still valid after the use of placebo test and robustness test. Further research shows that resource curse, environmental uncertainty, lack of tax incentives and lack of motivation are the main reasons to restrain high-tech enterprises from improving their level of technological innovation. However , the increase of innovation output of high-tech enterprises alleviates the restraining effect with the development of The Belt and Road initiative. The findings of this paper are of great significance for China to promote the development of The Belt and Road initiative from the perspective of scientific and technological innovation.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Belt and Road Initiative and High-tech Enterprise Total Factor Productivity
    AU  - Yue Zhang
    AU  - Zhilin Huang
    AU  - Haoyang Shi
    AU  - Zixing Zeng
    AU  - Yingjie Chen
    AU  - Xiran Li
    AU  - Fei Ji
    Y1  - 2020/03/03
    PY  - 2020
    T2  - Asia-Pacific Journal of Economics
    JF  - Asia-Pacific Journal of Economics
    JO  - Asia-Pacific Journal of Economics
    SP  - 18
    EP  - 26
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    UR  - http://www.sciencepg.com/article/10045231
    AB  - The Belt and Road initiative is a great achievement and to develop the initiative better, we need to seek impetus from innovation and build "The Road" into a road of innovation. This paper regards the implementation of The Belt and Road initiative as a quasi-natural experiment, using the difference-in-difference model to explore the influence and path of the Belt and Road Initiative on the total factor productivity of high-tech enterprises. Based on the panel data of high-tech enterprises of listed companies from 2009 to 2018, this paper found that the inhibitory effect of The Belt and Road Initiative on total factor productivity of high-tech enterprises changed in an "U" shape and the result of this inhibitory effectwas still valid after the use of placebo test and robustness test. Further research shows that resource curse, environmental uncertainty, lack of tax incentives and lack of motivation are the main reasons to restrain high-tech enterprises from improving their level of technological innovation. However , the increase of innovation output of high-tech enterprises alleviates the restraining effect with the development of The Belt and Road initiative. The findings of this paper are of great significance for China to promote the development of The Belt and Road initiative from the perspective of scientific and technological innovation.
    VL  - 1
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Economics and Trade, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China

  • School of Economics and Trade, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China

  • School of Economics and Trade, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China

  • School of Economics and Trade, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China

  • School of Economics and Trade, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China

  • School of Economics and Trade, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China

  • International Research Center for the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road and Regional Innovation, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China

  • Sections