Department of Dental Nurse, Polytechnic of Health of Tasikmalaya,
Tasikmalaya, West Java, Indonesia
Meltem Mert Eren
Department of Dentistry, Istanbul Kemerburgaz University,
Orion Haas Junior
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS),
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Department of Periodontology, Albanian University,
Guidelines for Submission
Manuscripts can be submitted until the expiry of the deadline. Submissions must be previously unpublished and may not be under consideration elsewhere.
Papers should be formatted according to the guidelines for authors (see: http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/guideforauthors?journalid=334). By submitting your manuscripts to the special issue, you are acknowledging that you accept the rules established for publication of manuscripts, including agreement to pay the Article Processing Charges for the manuscripts. Manuscripts should be submitted electronically through the online manuscript submission system at http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/login. All papers will be peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal and will be listed together on the special issue website.
The special issue currently is open for paper submission. Potential authors are humbly requested to submit an electronic copy of their complete manuscript by clicking here.
Theoretical Hypothesis for Dental Clinical Practice will include coverage with the latest of the theoretical new ones in the field of dentistry, applied in small samples of patients to prove the clinical results shown in the report that valuable data advantage / disadvantage of clinical outcomes.
The goal of Theoretical Hypothesis for Dental Clinical Practice is to opposite two authors, in the relevant field, that will write about the same topic, without communicating with one another. They will right on perspective about how they see the technical application dental clinic, which is included in the default theme, will be accompanied by counseling and theoretical hypothesis, to achieve improvements in the direction of the item selected.
Aims and Scope: Two different points of view on the same working procedure Facing the results on the same procedure working, by two clinicians who work at the same time the same procedure dental clinic, but have different outcomes clinical Collection of data from the literature, for the same topic, but seen from two different authors, in different angles Conclusions based on both clinical practice clinicians who speak different for different reports advantage/disadvantage Auxiliary for dental clinicians and others, who rely on practical grounds proven by two different authors