| Peer-Reviewed

The Politics of Opposition in Post - 2005 Ethiopia: Challenges and Prospects in the Case of National Political Parties

Received: 2 February 2021    Accepted: 29 March 2021    Published: 29 April 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The paper examines the Politics of Opposition in post - 2005 Ethiopia: Challenges and prospects in the case of national opposition political parties. 2005 is selected because opposition parties were able to secure more votes than ever before in this election. To address the objectives of the study, the researcher employed qualitative approach with case study design and used primary and secondary data sources. The primary data was collected through semi-structured interviews and secondary sources such as books newspapers, other scholars’ works and different documents also used. The data collected from the primary and secondary data sources were discussed and analyzed thematically based on the emerged themes from participants response. Hence, this case study aimed to explore the experience of these parties in the politics of opposition by focusing on challenges, and prospects in post- 2005 National elections. National parties were selected purposefully since they were active in Ethiopian politics of opposition in the country. Political parties exhibited weakness internally and faced challenges externally. But most opposition parties externalize their overall weakness. This has its impacts on Ethiopian politics of opposition and political process of the country. The study found that opposition parties do have internal and external challenges which affect their activities and do have impacts on political process of the country. Parties are less institutionalized, fragmented, absence of membership commitment and parties’ leaders’ time limit. They also faced challenges from the incumbent party, media and from other institutions of the country. Given research gaps in the domain, this study will help to improve the political culture, democratic system and politics of opposition of the country.

Published in International and Public Affairs (Volume 5, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ipa.20210501.16
Page(s) 29-39
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

National Political Parties, Politics of Opposition, Challenges and Prospects

References
[1] Schedler, A, (1998). What is Democratic Consolidation? Journal of Democracy, V. 9, Pp 90-105.
[2] Wondwosen Teshome B., & Jan Záhoík. (2008). “Federalism in Africa: The case of ethnic based federalism in Ethiopia”. In: International Journal of Human Sciences, Vol. 5. pp. 1-39.
[3] Lotshwao, K. (2011). The weakness of opposition parties in Botswana: A justification for more internal-party. International Journal of Current Research, 6 (01), Pp. 4798-4799.
[4] Hague; Rod; Martin Harrop and Shaun Bresli. Comparative Government and Politics: An Introduction, 4th edn. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
[5] Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA). (IDEA, 2007). As part of its Global Programmed on Research and Dialogue with Political Parties Stockholm.
[6] Assefa. Eshetie. (2002). Ethiopia: Perspectives for Change and Renewal. Boon Keng Road: Lee Press Pvt. Ltd.
[7] Bahru Zewde. (2002). A history of Modern Ethiopia 1855-1991. Addis Ababa University press.
[8] Andarachew Tiruneh, (1993). The Ethiopian revolution 1974-1987 A transformation from an aristocratic to a totalitarian autocracy. Cambridge University Press.
[9] Kassahun Berhanu. (2007). Electoral Politics, Decentralized Governance, and Constitutionalism in Ethiopia. (Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University, pp: 70-88).
[10] Abbink, J. (2006). Discomfiture of Democracy. The 2005 Election Crisis in Ethiopia and Its Aftermath, African Affairs, 105 (419), Pp. 173-199.
[11] Collier, Diamond. (1973). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven: Yale University Press.
[12] GrzymanA-Busse, A. (2003). Political Competition and the Politicization of the State in East Central Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 36 (10), Pp. 1123-1147.
[13] John Ishiyama. (2007). “Nominations and Party Development in Ethiopia: The Opposition and the 2005 Parliamentary Election”. African and Asian Studies, 6 (1-2), Pp. 81-105.
[14] Levitsky andWay. (2002). The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of democracy, 13 (2), Pp. 51-65.
[15] Lyons, T.(2005). Ethiopia: Implications of the May 2005 elections for future democratization Programs, IFES.
[16] Makara, S. (2007). The Challenge of Building Strong Political Parties for Democratic Governance in Uganda: Does multiparty politics have a future? IFRA Les Cahiers (41), 43-80.
[17] Matthias Canton. (2007). Effective Party Assistance: Stronger Parties for Better Democracy. Policy Paper, IDEA.
[18] National Electoral Board of Ethiopia. (2015). NEBE is organizing data for future studies. Retrieved from http://www.electionethiopia.org/en/ Negarit Gazeta. (1993).
[19] Declaration Political Parties Registration Proclamation, Proclamation No. 46/1993, Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE).
[20] Yohannes Awoke. (2014). The Challenges of Multiparty Democracy in Ethiopia with Particular Emphasis on Electoral Administration. MA thesis, Addis Ababa University.
[21] Vande Walle, N., & Butler, K. S. (2007). Political parties and party systems in Africa’s illiberal democracies. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 13 (1), 14-28.
[22] Shenton, A. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects.
[23] Salih, M & Nordlund, P. (2007). Political Parties in Africa: Challenges for Sustained Multiparty Democracy.
[24] Shedler, A. (2002). The nested game of democratization by elections. International Political Science Review, 23 (1), 103- 122.
[25] Merera Gudina. (2000). Ethiopia: Competing Ethnic Nationalisms and the Quest for Democracy, 1960. Addis Ababa: Chamber Printing Press.
[26] Lyons, T. (2006) Ethiopia in 2005: The Beginning of a Transition Center for Strategic and International Studies, Africa Notes, 25.
[27] Julius Kiiza. (2005). A paper presented at the Regional Conference on Political Parties and Democratisation in East Africa. Makerere University, Arusha.
[28] John W. Harbeson. (September, 1996). “Elections and Democratization in Post-Mengistu Ethiopia.” Report prepared for the United States Agency for International Development project on Elections in War-Torn Societies. PN-ABZ (710).
[29] HRW Report. (2010). Electoral violence report to UN Security council. Immigration and Nationality Directorate Home Office. Country information and policy unit. United Kingdom.
[30] Gentili, A. M. (2005). Party, party systems and democratization in Sub-Saharan Africa. Paper Presented at the Sixth Global Forum on Reinventing Government, Seoul, Republic of Korea, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
[31] Elischer, S. (2013). Political parties in Africa: Ethnicity and party formation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[32] Edmond Keller, (June 2002). Ethnic Federalism, Fiscal Reform, Development and Democracy in Ethiopia. African Journal of Political Science (formerly African Journal of Political Economic).
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Simeneh Bires Belete. (2021). The Politics of Opposition in Post - 2005 Ethiopia: Challenges and Prospects in the Case of National Political Parties. International and Public Affairs, 5(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20210501.16

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Simeneh Bires Belete. The Politics of Opposition in Post - 2005 Ethiopia: Challenges and Prospects in the Case of National Political Parties. Int. Public Aff. 2021, 5(1), 29-39. doi: 10.11648/j.ipa.20210501.16

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Simeneh Bires Belete. The Politics of Opposition in Post - 2005 Ethiopia: Challenges and Prospects in the Case of National Political Parties. Int Public Aff. 2021;5(1):29-39. doi: 10.11648/j.ipa.20210501.16

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ipa.20210501.16,
      author = {Simeneh Bires Belete},
      title = {The Politics of Opposition in Post - 2005 Ethiopia: Challenges and Prospects in the Case of National Political Parties},
      journal = {International and Public Affairs},
      volume = {5},
      number = {1},
      pages = {29-39},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ipa.20210501.16},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20210501.16},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ipa.20210501.16},
      abstract = {The paper examines the Politics of Opposition in post - 2005 Ethiopia: Challenges and prospects in the case of national opposition political parties. 2005 is selected because opposition parties were able to secure more votes than ever before in this election. To address the objectives of the study, the researcher employed qualitative approach with case study design and used primary and secondary data sources. The primary data was collected through semi-structured interviews and secondary sources such as books newspapers, other scholars’ works and different documents also used. The data collected from the primary and secondary data sources were discussed and analyzed thematically based on the emerged themes from participants response. Hence, this case study aimed to explore the experience of these parties in the politics of opposition by focusing on challenges, and prospects in post- 2005 National elections. National parties were selected purposefully since they were active in Ethiopian politics of opposition in the country. Political parties exhibited weakness internally and faced challenges externally. But most opposition parties externalize their overall weakness. This has its impacts on Ethiopian politics of opposition and political process of the country. The study found that opposition parties do have internal and external challenges which affect their activities and do have impacts on political process of the country. Parties are less institutionalized, fragmented, absence of membership commitment and parties’ leaders’ time limit. They also faced challenges from the incumbent party, media and from other institutions of the country. Given research gaps in the domain, this study will help to improve the political culture, democratic system and politics of opposition of the country.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Politics of Opposition in Post - 2005 Ethiopia: Challenges and Prospects in the Case of National Political Parties
    AU  - Simeneh Bires Belete
    Y1  - 2021/04/29
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20210501.16
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ipa.20210501.16
    T2  - International and Public Affairs
    JF  - International and Public Affairs
    JO  - International and Public Affairs
    SP  - 29
    EP  - 39
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-4192
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20210501.16
    AB  - The paper examines the Politics of Opposition in post - 2005 Ethiopia: Challenges and prospects in the case of national opposition political parties. 2005 is selected because opposition parties were able to secure more votes than ever before in this election. To address the objectives of the study, the researcher employed qualitative approach with case study design and used primary and secondary data sources. The primary data was collected through semi-structured interviews and secondary sources such as books newspapers, other scholars’ works and different documents also used. The data collected from the primary and secondary data sources were discussed and analyzed thematically based on the emerged themes from participants response. Hence, this case study aimed to explore the experience of these parties in the politics of opposition by focusing on challenges, and prospects in post- 2005 National elections. National parties were selected purposefully since they were active in Ethiopian politics of opposition in the country. Political parties exhibited weakness internally and faced challenges externally. But most opposition parties externalize their overall weakness. This has its impacts on Ethiopian politics of opposition and political process of the country. The study found that opposition parties do have internal and external challenges which affect their activities and do have impacts on political process of the country. Parties are less institutionalized, fragmented, absence of membership commitment and parties’ leaders’ time limit. They also faced challenges from the incumbent party, media and from other institutions of the country. Given research gaps in the domain, this study will help to improve the political culture, democratic system and politics of opposition of the country.
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Civics and Ethical Studies, College of Social Science and Humanities, Dambi Dollo University, Dambi Dollo Town, Ethiopia

  • Sections