In most countries of the world, the rural areas is that which is essentially covered of poor. This fact, the fight against poverty in the rural areas is a major challenge for development actors. One of the ways to improve the living conditions of rural people is to further promote the commercial transformation of agriculture, the source of their livelihood, by encouraging them to participate in the markets for agricultural goods. To this end, the adoption of improved agricultural technologies is a lever on which this struggle can be based. This paper assesses the impact of improved maize seed adoption on market participation of Cameroonian Small Farmers. The data are from a sample of 160 adopters and 99 non-adopters of improved maize seed, result from an investigation carried out within the framework of the project of Reinforcement of the Partnerships of the Agronomic research in Cameroon and prepared by the Agricultural Institute of Research for the Development. We use the comparison of means test for the quantities of maize sold and the gamma generalized linear regression model. The result of the test reveals that adopters of improved maize seed have on average 0.065 ton of maize quantity sold moreover than non-adopters. As for the result of the model, it shows that improved maize seeds have a positive and significant impact on market participation. In other words, the results show that the quantity of maize for sale increases by 90.3% for the Farmers that adopt improved maize seed and 89.2% for those do not adopt it. The Cameroonian government must implement policies that make improved maize seeds available to farmers, followed by training in the new agricultural practices and policies for the actual development of road infrastructures to serve the markets.
| Published in | International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 8, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220801.12 |
| Page(s) | 9-19 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Adoption of Improved Seeds, Maize, Market Participation, Gamma Generalized Linear Regression Model
| [1] | FAO (2018): «le travail de la fao dans le domaine de l’agriculture familiale: se préparer pour la décennie de l’agriculture familiale (2019-2028) pour atteindre les ODD». www.fao.org. |
| [2] | Ravallion, M.; Chen, S. and Sangraula, P. (2007): «New evidence on the urbaniza tion of global poverty». Population and Development Review, 33 (4), pp. 667–701. |
| [3] | FIDA, (2018): «Investir dans les populations rurales au Cameroun». p. 4. |
| [4] | Institut National de la Statistique (2015): «Quatrième enquête camerounaise auprès des ménages (ECAM 4): tendances, profil et déterminants de la pauvreté au Cameroun entre 2001–2014». Rapport, p. 72. |
| [5] | Manirakiza, D. (2021): «Impact des coopératives agricoles des cultures vivrières sur les conditions de vie des ménages ruraux au Burundi: Cas des coopératives de la province de Ngozi». Dissertation originale présentée en vue de l’obtention du grade de docteur en sciences agronomiques et ingénierie biologique, communauté française de Belgique université de Liège – Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, p. 258. |
| [6] | Djoumessi, F. Y. (2020): «Essais sur la Productivité Agricole en Afrique Sub-Saharienne». Thèse de Doctorat, Ecole Doctorale Economie et Gestion, Université de Dschang (Cameroun), p. 307. |
| [7] | Otekunrin, O. A.; Momoh, S. and Ayinde, I. A. (2019): «Smallholder Farmers’ Market Participation: Concepts and Methodological Approaches from Sub-Saharan Africa». Current Agriculture Research Journal, 7 (2), pp. 139-157. |
| [8] | Groupe de la Banque mondiale (GBM) et Organisation mondiale du commerce (OMC) (2018): «Commerce et reduction de la pauvreté: Nouvelles preuves de l’impact sur les pays en développement», Organisation mondiale du commerce: Genève. |
| [9] | Pingali, P. L. (1997): «From subsistence to commercial production systems: The transformation of asian agriculture». American Journal of Agricultural Economics, pp. 628–634. |
| [10] | Koppmair, S., Kassie, M., and Qaim, M. (2017): «Farm production, market access and dietary diversity in Malawi». Public Health Nutrition, volume 20, numéro 2, page 325–335. |
| [11] | Barrett, C. B. (2008): «Smallholder market participation: Concepts and evidence from eastern and southern Africa». Food Policy, 33 (4), pp. 299–317. |
| [12] | Duncan, B.; Mather, D.; Barrett, C. B.; Benfica, R.; Abdula, D.; Tschirley, D. and Cunguara, B. (2007): «Market Participation by Rural Households in a Low-Income Country: An Asset-Based Approach Applied to Mozambique». Faith and Economics Journal, 50, pp. 64-101. |
| [13] | Pingali, P. L. and Rosegrant, M. W. (1995): «Agricultural commercialization and diversification: processes and policies». Food policy, 20 (3), pp. 171–185. |
| [14] | Sibhatu, K. T. and Qaim, M. (2018): «Review: Meta-analysis of the association between production diversity, diets, and nutrition in smallholder farm households». Food Policy, 77, pp. 1–18. |
| [15] | Montalbano, P.; Pietrelli, R. and Salvatici, L. (2018): «Participation in the market chain and food security: The case of the Ugandan maize farmers». Food Policy, 76, pp. 81–98. |
| [16] | Mmbando, F. E., Wale, E. Z., and Baiyegunhi, L. J. S. (2015): «Welfare impacts of smallholder farmers’ participation in maize and pigeonpea markets in Tanzania». Food Security, 7 (6), pp. 1211–1224. |
| [17] | Achterbosch, T. J.; van Berkum, S. and Meijerink, G. W. (2014): «Cash crops and food security; Contributions to income, livelihood risk and agricultural innovation». Wageningen, LEI Wageningen UR (University & Research centre). |
| [18] | Braun, J. v.; Kennedy, E. and al. (1994): «Agricultural commercialization, economic development, and nutrition». Johns Hopkins University Press. |
| [19] | Mekonnen, T. (2017): «Impact of agricultural technology adoption on market participation in the rural social network system». MERIT Working Papers 2017-008, United Nations University-Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT). |
| [20] | Barry, S. (2016): «Déterminants socioéconomiques et institutionnels de l’adoption des variétés améliorées de maïs dans le Centre-Sud du Burkina Faso». Revue d’Economie Théorique et Appliquée, 6 (2), pp. 221-238. |
| [21] | De Janvry, A.; Emerick, K.; Sadoulet, E. and Dar, M. (2015): «L’adoption des technologies agricoles: quelles leçons tirer des expérimentations de terrain?». Revue d'économie du développement, 23 (4), pp. 129–153. |
| [22] | Kelsey, J. (2011): «Market inefficiencies and the adoption of agricultural tech nologies in developing countries». |
| [23] | Besley, T. and Case, A. (1993): «Modeling technology adoption in developing countries». The American Economic Review, pp. 396–402. |
| [24] | Akter, S.; Chindarkar, N.; Erskine, W.; Spyckerelle, L.; Imron, J. and Branco, L. V. (2021): «Increasing smallholder farmers’ market participation through technology adoption in rural Timor-Lest». Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, pp. 1–19. |
| [25] | Ntsama, E. and Kamgnia, D. S. M. (2008): «Les déterminants de l’adoption des variétés améliorées de maïs: adoption et impact de la CMS 8704». Université de Yaoundé II: Soa, Cameroun. |
| [26] | Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (2006), «Stratégie de Développement du Secteur Rural». Synthèse du volet agriculture et développement rural, Document de travail, République du Cameroun. |
| [27] | Seutchueng T., T. G. and Saha, F. (2017): «Le maïs: une céréale à multiples usages au Cameroun sous la menace des contraintes climatiques et de ravageurs». Afrique SCIENCE, 13 (6), pp. 177–188. |
| [28] | FAO (2020): «Perspectives de récolte et situation alimentair». Rapport mondial trimestriel n°4, Rome. Disponible sur https://doi.org/10.4060/cb2334fr. |
| [29] | Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Developement (2018): «Bilans alimentaires de 2011 à 2015 du Cameroun: analyser l’information statistique pour renforcer la production et la distribution des produits alimentaires et agricoles au Cameroun». Bilan annuel élaboré par la Direction des Enquêtes et des Statistiques Agricoles (DESA), p. 116. |
| [30] | Fouepe F., G. H.; Folefack, D. P. and Ngon Pissie J., E. (2016): «Engagements contractuels et performances des organisations de producteurs de maïs à l’Ouest Cameroun». International Journal of Biological Chemical Sciences, 10 (2), pp. 793-807. |
| [31] | Abadi, T. A. (2014): «impact of improved maize varieties adoption on smallholder farmers’ marketed maize surplus in oromia regional state, ethiopia». A dissertation submitted for the degree of master of science in agricultural and applied economics of Sokoine University Of Agriculture. Morogoro, Tanzania, p. 96. |
| [32] | Gergely, N. (2002): «Étude sur l'amélioration de la commercialisation et de la compétitivité des produits agricoles au Cameroun». FAO. |
| [33] | Macauley, H. and Ramadjita, T. (2015): «Les cultures céréalières: riz, maïs, millet, sorgho et blé». Document de référence, Conférence sur le thème «nourrir l’Afrique 21-23 octobre 2015», Centre International de conférence Abdou Diouf, Dakar, Sénégal, p. 38. |
| [34] | Caswell, M. F. Fuglie, K, Ingram, C., Jans. And S., Kascak, C (2001): Adoption of agricultural production practices: Lessons learned from the US Department of Agriculture area studies project. US Department of agriculture. Economic Research Service. Washington. D.C. |
| [35] | Abadi, T. A.; Alem, M. H. and Teklay, S. K. (2021): «Adoption of maize varieties on smallholder farmers’ market participation in Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia». African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 13 (2), pp. 185-192. |
| [36] | Solomon, A.; Shiferaw, B.; Simtowe, F. and Haile, M. G. (2011): «Agricultural technology adoption, seed access constraints and commercialization in Ethiopia». Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 3 (9), pp. 436-447. |
| [37] | Fagbemissi, C. R. (2001): «Rôle des femmes rurales dans l’adoption des innovations technologiques en milieu rural. Cas des technologies de protection durable des cultures vivrières au Bénin». Mémoire de DEA, Université de Lomé, Togo, p. 94. |
| [38] | Mendola, M. (2007): «Agricultural technology adoption and poverty reduction: a propensity-score matching analysis for Rural Bangladesh». Food Policy, 32, pp. 372–393. |
| [39] | Taher, S. (1996): «Factors influencing smallholder cocoa production: a management analysis of behavioural decision-making processes of technology adoption and application». Dissertation for Award of PhD Degree at Wageningen University, Wageningen, Holland, p. 250. |
| [40] | Dunn, D. W. (1984): «Applied Decision Analysis». McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. |
| [41] | Shiferaw, B. A.; Kebede, T. A. and You, L. (2008): «Technology adoption under seed access constraints and the economic impacts of improved pigeonpea varieties in tanzania». Agricultural Economics, 39 (3), pp. 309–323. |
| [42] | Diao, X. and Hazell, P. (2004): «Exploring market opportunities for african smallholders». Technical report, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). |
| [43] | Minten, B. and Barrett, C. B. (2005): «Agricultural technology, productivity, poverty and food security in madagascar». Productivity, Poverty and Food Security in Madagascar (January 2005). |
| [44] | Balagtas, V. J.; Coulibaly, Y. J.; Jabbar, M. and Negassa, A. (2007): «Dairy market participation with endogenous livestock ownership: evidence from Côte d'Ivoire». In: Proceedings of AAEC annual meeting. P July 29-August 1, 2007, Portland, Oregon TN. |
| [45] | Edmeades, S. (2006) «Varieties, Attributes and Marketed Surplus of a Subsistence Crop: Bananas in Uganda». IAAE annual conference, Gold Coast, Australia, August 12-18, 2006. |
| [46] | Bellemare, M. and Barrett, C. (2006): «An ordered tobit model of market participation: Evidence from Kenya and Ethiopia». Am. J. Agric. Econ., 88 (2), pp. 324-337. |
| [47] | Wu, H., Ding, S., Pandey, S. and Tao, D. (2010): «Assessing the Impact of Agricultural Technology Adoption on Farmers’ Well-Being in Rural China». Asian Economic Journal, 24 (2), pp. 141–160. |
| [48] | Hagos, A.; Dibaba, R.; Bekele, A. and Alemu, D. (2020): «Determinants of Market Participation among Smallholder Mango Producers in Assosa Zone of Benishangul Gumuz Region in Ethiopia». International Journal of Fruit Science, 20 (3), pp. 323-349. Disponible sur https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2019.1640167. |
| [49] | Makhura, M., Kirsten, J., and Delgado, C. (2001): «Transaction costs and small holder participation in the maize market in the Northern Province of South Africa». Seventh Eastern and Southern African Regional Maize Conference, pp. 463–462. |
| [50] | Arega, D. A, Manyong, V. M., Omanya, G., Mignouna, H. D., Bokanga, M. and Odhiambo, G. D. (2007): «Smallholder marketed surplus and input use under transactions costs: Maize supply and fertilizer demand in Kenya». In AAAE Ghana Conference Proceedings, pp. 125–130. |
| [51] | Oluwasola, O. (2012): «Integrating Small Holder Food Crop Farmers into the National Policyfor Commercialization and Large Scale Agriculture in Nigeria: a Case Study of Ekiti State». International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 2 (5), pp. 247-256. |
| [52] | Lapar, M. L., Holloway, G. and Ehui, S. (2003): «Policy options promoting market participation among smallholder livestock producers: A case study from the Phillipines». Food Policy, 28, pp. 187–211. |
| [53] | Pingali, P., Khwaja, Y. and Meijer, M. (2005): «Commercializing small farms: Reducing transaction costs». ESA Working paper No. 05-08. Agricultural and Development Economics Division, FAO. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/es/esa. |
| [54] | Bwala, M. A and Tiamiyu, S. A. (2015): «Determinants of rural household marketed surplus for cereal crops in North Central Nigeria». IBB University Lapai, Niger State, Nigeria, p. 6. |
| [55] | Okoye, B. C.; Abass, A.; Bachwenkizi, B.; Asumugha, G.; Alenkhe, B.; Ranaivoson, R.; Randrianarivelo, R.; Rabemanantsoa, N. and Ralimanana, I. (2016): «Effect of transaction costs on market participation among smallholder cassava farmers in Central Madagascar». Cogent Economics & Finance, volume 4, numéro 1. Disponible sur https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2016.1143597. |
| [56] | Key, N., Sadoulet, E. and de Janvry, A., (2000), «Transaction Costs and Agricultural Household Supply». AJAE, 82 (2), pp. 245-259. |
| [57] | Heltberg, R. and Tarp, F., (2002), «Agricultural Supply Response and Poverty in Mozambique», Food Policy, 27, pp. 103-124. |
| [58] | Komarek, A. M. and Ahmadi-Esfatar, F. (2006), «An Economic Analysis of Uganda Agricultural Constraints», Contributed paper presented to the 50th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resources Economics Society, 8-10th February. |
| [59] | Senyolo, G. M.; Chaminuka, P.; Makhura, M. N. and Belete, A. (2009): «Patterns of access and utilization of output markets by emerging farmers in South Africa: Factor analysis approach». African Journal of Agricultural Research 4 (3), pp. 208-214. |
| [60] | Minkoua, N. J.-R. (2009), «Effets de l’instabilité des prix sur les comportements des offreurs: cas des produits vivriers non stockables au Cameroun», thèse en Sciences Economiques, Université de Yaoundé II-Soa, p. 277. |
| [61] | De Janvry, A., Fafchamps, M. and Sadoulet, E. (1991), «Peasant Household Behavior with Missing Markets: Some Paradoxes Explained», The Economic Journal, 101 (409), pp. 1400-1417. |
| [62] | Ehui, S., Benin, S. and Paulos, Z (2009), «Policy Options for Improving Market Participation and Sales of Smallholder Livestock Producers: A case study of Ethiopia», Draft prepared for presentation at the 27th Conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE), 16-22 August 2009, Beijing, China. |
| [63] | Asfaw, S.; Shiferaw, B. and F. Simtowe (2010): «Does technology adoption promote commercialization? Evidence from chickpea technologies in ethiopia». In CSAE 2010 Conference on Economic Development in Africa, University of Oxford, UK, pp. 21–23. |
APA Style
Jean Marie Abega Ngono, Christelle Tchamou Meughoyi. (2022). Adoption of Improved Seeds and Market Participation of Family Farms: The Case of Maize Cultivation in Cameroon. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 8(1), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220801.12
ACS Style
Jean Marie Abega Ngono; Christelle Tchamou Meughoyi. Adoption of Improved Seeds and Market Participation of Family Farms: The Case of Maize Cultivation in Cameroon. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2022, 8(1), 9-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220801.12
AMA Style
Jean Marie Abega Ngono, Christelle Tchamou Meughoyi. Adoption of Improved Seeds and Market Participation of Family Farms: The Case of Maize Cultivation in Cameroon. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2022;8(1):9-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220801.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20220801.12,
author = {Jean Marie Abega Ngono and Christelle Tchamou Meughoyi},
title = {Adoption of Improved Seeds and Market Participation of Family Farms: The Case of Maize Cultivation in Cameroon},
journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
pages = {9-19},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20220801.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220801.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20220801.12},
abstract = {In most countries of the world, the rural areas is that which is essentially covered of poor. This fact, the fight against poverty in the rural areas is a major challenge for development actors. One of the ways to improve the living conditions of rural people is to further promote the commercial transformation of agriculture, the source of their livelihood, by encouraging them to participate in the markets for agricultural goods. To this end, the adoption of improved agricultural technologies is a lever on which this struggle can be based. This paper assesses the impact of improved maize seed adoption on market participation of Cameroonian Small Farmers. The data are from a sample of 160 adopters and 99 non-adopters of improved maize seed, result from an investigation carried out within the framework of the project of Reinforcement of the Partnerships of the Agronomic research in Cameroon and prepared by the Agricultural Institute of Research for the Development. We use the comparison of means test for the quantities of maize sold and the gamma generalized linear regression model. The result of the test reveals that adopters of improved maize seed have on average 0.065 ton of maize quantity sold moreover than non-adopters. As for the result of the model, it shows that improved maize seeds have a positive and significant impact on market participation. In other words, the results show that the quantity of maize for sale increases by 90.3% for the Farmers that adopt improved maize seed and 89.2% for those do not adopt it. The Cameroonian government must implement policies that make improved maize seeds available to farmers, followed by training in the new agricultural practices and policies for the actual development of road infrastructures to serve the markets.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Adoption of Improved Seeds and Market Participation of Family Farms: The Case of Maize Cultivation in Cameroon AU - Jean Marie Abega Ngono AU - Christelle Tchamou Meughoyi Y1 - 2022/01/24 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220801.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220801.12 T2 - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JF - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JO - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences SP - 9 EP - 19 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-7885 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220801.12 AB - In most countries of the world, the rural areas is that which is essentially covered of poor. This fact, the fight against poverty in the rural areas is a major challenge for development actors. One of the ways to improve the living conditions of rural people is to further promote the commercial transformation of agriculture, the source of their livelihood, by encouraging them to participate in the markets for agricultural goods. To this end, the adoption of improved agricultural technologies is a lever on which this struggle can be based. This paper assesses the impact of improved maize seed adoption on market participation of Cameroonian Small Farmers. The data are from a sample of 160 adopters and 99 non-adopters of improved maize seed, result from an investigation carried out within the framework of the project of Reinforcement of the Partnerships of the Agronomic research in Cameroon and prepared by the Agricultural Institute of Research for the Development. We use the comparison of means test for the quantities of maize sold and the gamma generalized linear regression model. The result of the test reveals that adopters of improved maize seed have on average 0.065 ton of maize quantity sold moreover than non-adopters. As for the result of the model, it shows that improved maize seeds have a positive and significant impact on market participation. In other words, the results show that the quantity of maize for sale increases by 90.3% for the Farmers that adopt improved maize seed and 89.2% for those do not adopt it. The Cameroonian government must implement policies that make improved maize seeds available to farmers, followed by training in the new agricultural practices and policies for the actual development of road infrastructures to serve the markets. VL - 8 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: