Pre-extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Improved Teff Technology in Selected Districts of West Shewa, East and Horro Guduru Wollega Zones of Western Oromia, Ethiopia

Effa Wolteji; Berhanu Soboqa; Bayisa Gedafa; Dubiso Gachano

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Pre-extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Improved Teff Technology in Selected Districts of West Shewa, East and Horro Guduru Wollega Zones of Western Oromia, Ethiopia

Effa Wolteji, Berhanu Soboqa, Bayisa Gedafa, Dubiso Gachano

Published in International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 8, Issue 6)

Received: 17 January 2022 Accepted: 12 October 2022 Published: 23 November 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This activity was conducted in Dano, Jimma Arjo and Horro districts of Western Oromia with the objective of demonstrating the newly released teff variety Dursi against Kena and Guduru to the farming community in these districts. These districts were purposively selected based on accessibility and potentiality for teff production; and one potential PA from each district were selected based on the aforementioned criteria. After selecting and establishing the FRGs training was provided across the districts. Then after, one variety; Dursi (as newly released variety) as well as Kena and Guduru (as standard checks) were planted on 10 m*10 m adjacent plots on 12 farmers’ field. All recommended agronomic practices were equally applied to all the plots and the fields were closely supervised and were managed well. At maturity, the varieties were jointly evaluated with a team composed of researchers, Farmers and DAs. Despite the slight variability in criteria set by farmers at the respective locations yield, disease tolerance, seed color, plant height, pest resistance, tillering capacity, seed size, lodging resistant, early maturity, spike length, were the common selection criteria across all locations. In almost the entire criterion Dursi excel/beat the standard checks and has met the criteria of the farmers. With regard to yield, 18 qt/ha, 15 qt/ha and 13 qt/ha were obtained from Dursi, Guduru and Kena; respectively putting Dursi on the first rank. Besides; Dursi had yield advantage 14.51 % and 19.10 % than Guduru and Kena; respectively. Furthermore; statistically ANOVA table and mean yield comparison (t-test) results of on farm yield performances showed that as there is highly significant difference at (p˂0.05) among the varieties demonstrated. In terms of profitability, financial analysis result of the study also showed that using Dursi variety can make farmers’ more profitable than Guduru and Kena. As the variety has met the intended criteria of the farmers, the pre-scaling up activity should follow the next season.

Published in	International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 8, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14
Page(s)	218-224
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Teff, FRG Unit, Participatory Evaluation and Selection, Yield Advantage, Dursi, Kena, Guduru

References

[1]	Bekabil Fufa, Befekadu Behute, Rupert Simons and Tareke Berhe. 2011. Strengthening the Tef Value Chain in Ethiopia.
[2]	Central Statistical Agency (CSA). 2012. The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. Central Statistical Agency Agricultural Sample Survey 2011/2012 (2005E. C.): Report on Area and Production of Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season), Volume I. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[3]	Central Statistical Agency (CSA). 2016. The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. Central Statistical Agency Agricultural Sample Survey 2015/2016 (2008E. C.): Report on Area and Production of Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season), Volume I. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[4]	Demeke M., Di MarcantonioF., 2013. Analysis of incentives and disincentives for teff in Ethiopia. Technical notes series, MAFAP, FAO, Rome.
[5]	Dekking, L. S, and Koning, K. F. 2005. The Ethiopian Cereal Tef in Celiac Disease. The New England Journal of Medicine 353; 16.
[6]	Girma Chemeda, Chemeda Berhanu and Dagnachew Lule (2017) Grain Yield stability and agronomic performance of tef Genotypes in Western Oromia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Health care. Volume 7. November 24, 2017.
[7]	Effa Wolteji and Dubiso Gacheno (2019). Pre-extension Demonstration of improved Tef Technology in selected AGP-II Districts of East and Horro Guduru Wollega of Zones Western Oromia. Oromia Agricultural Research institute Work shop proceeding on Pre-Extension Demonstration of Agricultural Technologies, 26-29 June 2019, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[8]	Kenea Yadeta, Getachew Ayele.& Workneh Negatu. 2001. Farming Research on Tef: Small Holders Production Practices. In: Hailu Tefera, Getachew Belayand M. Sorrels (eds.). Narrowing the Rift: Tef Research and Development. Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp. 9-23.
[9]	Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resource (MoARD). 2017. Variety Registration Book. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[10]	Mohammed, A. B., Wudil, A. H., Daneji, M. I., Jibrin J. M., Hussaini, M. A. and Mohammed I. B. 2016. Economics of On-Farm Sorghum-Legume Strip Cropping System in Kano state. Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Sustainability, Volume 7, November 1.
[11]	Samui S. K., MaitraS, RoyDK, MondalAK and SahaD. 2000. Evaluation of frontline demonstration of groundnut (ArachishypogealL.) in Sundarbans. J Indian Soc Coastal Agric Res, 18 (2): 180-183.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Effa Wolteji, Berhanu Soboqa, Bayisa Gedafa, Dubiso Gachano. (2022). Pre-extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Improved Teff Technology in Selected Districts of West Shewa, East and Horro Guduru Wollega Zones of Western Oromia, Ethiopia. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 8(6), 218-224. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Effa Wolteji; Berhanu Soboqa; Bayisa Gedafa; Dubiso Gachano. Pre-extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Improved Teff Technology in Selected Districts of West Shewa, East and Horro Guduru Wollega Zones of Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2022, 8(6), 218-224. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Effa Wolteji, Berhanu Soboqa, Bayisa Gedafa, Dubiso Gachano. Pre-extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Improved Teff Technology in Selected Districts of West Shewa, East and Horro Guduru Wollega Zones of Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2022;8(6):218-224. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14,
  author = {Effa Wolteji and Berhanu Soboqa and Bayisa Gedafa and Dubiso Gachano},
  title = {Pre-extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Improved Teff Technology in Selected Districts of West Shewa, East and Horro Guduru Wollega Zones of Western Oromia, Ethiopia},
  journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences},
  volume = {8},
  number = {6},
  pages = {218-224},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20220806.14},
  abstract = {This activity was conducted in Dano, Jimma Arjo and Horro districts of Western Oromia with the objective of demonstrating the newly released teff variety Dursi against Kena and Guduru to the farming community in these districts. These districts were purposively selected based on accessibility and potentiality for teff production; and one potential PA from each district were selected based on the aforementioned criteria. After selecting and establishing the FRGs training was provided across the districts. Then after, one variety; Dursi (as newly released variety) as well as Kena and Guduru (as standard checks) were planted on 10 m*10 m adjacent plots on 12 farmers’ field. All recommended agronomic practices were equally applied to all the plots and the fields were closely supervised and were managed well. At maturity, the varieties were jointly evaluated with a team composed of researchers, Farmers and DAs. Despite the slight variability in criteria set by farmers at the respective locations yield, disease tolerance, seed color, plant height, pest resistance, tillering capacity, seed size, lodging resistant, early maturity, spike length, were the common selection criteria across all locations. In almost the entire criterion Dursi excel/beat the standard checks and has met the criteria of the farmers. With regard to yield, 18 qt/ha, 15 qt/ha and 13 qt/ha were obtained from Dursi, Guduru and Kena; respectively putting Dursi on the first rank. Besides; Dursi had yield advantage 14.51 % and 19.10 % than Guduru and Kena; respectively. Furthermore; statistically ANOVA table and mean yield comparison (t-test) results of on farm yield performances showed that as there is highly significant difference at (p˂0.05) among the varieties demonstrated. In terms of profitability, financial analysis result of the study also showed that using Dursi variety can make farmers’ more profitable than Guduru and Kena. As the variety has met the intended criteria of the farmers, the pre-scaling up activity should follow the next season.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Pre-extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Improved Teff Technology in Selected Districts of West Shewa, East and Horro Guduru Wollega Zones of Western Oromia, Ethiopia
AU  - Effa Wolteji
AU  - Berhanu Soboqa
AU  - Bayisa Gedafa
AU  - Dubiso Gachano
Y1  - 2022/11/23
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14
T2  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
SP  - 218
EP  - 224
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-7885
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14
AB  - This activity was conducted in Dano, Jimma Arjo and Horro districts of Western Oromia with the objective of demonstrating the newly released teff variety Dursi against Kena and Guduru to the farming community in these districts. These districts were purposively selected based on accessibility and potentiality for teff production; and one potential PA from each district were selected based on the aforementioned criteria. After selecting and establishing the FRGs training was provided across the districts. Then after, one variety; Dursi (as newly released variety) as well as Kena and Guduru (as standard checks) were planted on 10 m*10 m adjacent plots on 12 farmers’ field. All recommended agronomic practices were equally applied to all the plots and the fields were closely supervised and were managed well. At maturity, the varieties were jointly evaluated with a team composed of researchers, Farmers and DAs. Despite the slight variability in criteria set by farmers at the respective locations yield, disease tolerance, seed color, plant height, pest resistance, tillering capacity, seed size, lodging resistant, early maturity, spike length, were the common selection criteria across all locations. In almost the entire criterion Dursi excel/beat the standard checks and has met the criteria of the farmers. With regard to yield, 18 qt/ha, 15 qt/ha and 13 qt/ha were obtained from Dursi, Guduru and Kena; respectively putting Dursi on the first rank. Besides; Dursi had yield advantage 14.51 % and 19.10 % than Guduru and Kena; respectively. Furthermore; statistically ANOVA table and mean yield comparison (t-test) results of on farm yield performances showed that as there is highly significant difference at (p˂0.05) among the varieties demonstrated. In terms of profitability, financial analysis result of the study also showed that using Dursi variety can make farmers’ more profitable than Guduru and Kena. As the variety has met the intended criteria of the farmers, the pre-scaling up activity should follow the next season.
VL  - 8
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Effa Wolteji

Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bako Agricultural Research Center, Bako, Ethiopia
Berhanu Soboqa

Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bako Agricultural Research Center, Bako, Ethiopia
Bayisa Gedafa

Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bako Agricultural Research Center, Bako, Ethiopia
Dubiso Gachano

Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bako Agricultural Research Center, Bako, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Effa Wolteji, Berhanu Soboqa, Bayisa Gedafa, Dubiso Gachano. (2022). Pre-extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Improved Teff Technology in Selected Districts of West Shewa, East and Horro Guduru Wollega Zones of Western Oromia, Ethiopia. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 8(6), 218-224. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Effa Wolteji; Berhanu Soboqa; Bayisa Gedafa; Dubiso Gachano. Pre-extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Improved Teff Technology in Selected Districts of West Shewa, East and Horro Guduru Wollega Zones of Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2022, 8(6), 218-224. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Effa Wolteji, Berhanu Soboqa, Bayisa Gedafa, Dubiso Gachano. Pre-extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Improved Teff Technology in Selected Districts of West Shewa, East and Horro Guduru Wollega Zones of Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2022;8(6):218-224. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14,
  author = {Effa Wolteji and Berhanu Soboqa and Bayisa Gedafa and Dubiso Gachano},
  title = {Pre-extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Improved Teff Technology in Selected Districts of West Shewa, East and Horro Guduru Wollega Zones of Western Oromia, Ethiopia},
  journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences},
  volume = {8},
  number = {6},
  pages = {218-224},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20220806.14},
  abstract = {This activity was conducted in Dano, Jimma Arjo and Horro districts of Western Oromia with the objective of demonstrating the newly released teff variety Dursi against Kena and Guduru to the farming community in these districts. These districts were purposively selected based on accessibility and potentiality for teff production; and one potential PA from each district were selected based on the aforementioned criteria. After selecting and establishing the FRGs training was provided across the districts. Then after, one variety; Dursi (as newly released variety) as well as Kena and Guduru (as standard checks) were planted on 10 m*10 m adjacent plots on 12 farmers’ field. All recommended agronomic practices were equally applied to all the plots and the fields were closely supervised and were managed well. At maturity, the varieties were jointly evaluated with a team composed of researchers, Farmers and DAs. Despite the slight variability in criteria set by farmers at the respective locations yield, disease tolerance, seed color, plant height, pest resistance, tillering capacity, seed size, lodging resistant, early maturity, spike length, were the common selection criteria across all locations. In almost the entire criterion Dursi excel/beat the standard checks and has met the criteria of the farmers. With regard to yield, 18 qt/ha, 15 qt/ha and 13 qt/ha were obtained from Dursi, Guduru and Kena; respectively putting Dursi on the first rank. Besides; Dursi had yield advantage 14.51 % and 19.10 % than Guduru and Kena; respectively. Furthermore; statistically ANOVA table and mean yield comparison (t-test) results of on farm yield performances showed that as there is highly significant difference at (p˂0.05) among the varieties demonstrated. In terms of profitability, financial analysis result of the study also showed that using Dursi variety can make farmers’ more profitable than Guduru and Kena. As the variety has met the intended criteria of the farmers, the pre-scaling up activity should follow the next season.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Pre-extension Demonstration and Evaluation of Improved Teff Technology in Selected Districts of West Shewa, East and Horro Guduru Wollega Zones of Western Oromia, Ethiopia
AU  - Effa Wolteji
AU  - Berhanu Soboqa
AU  - Bayisa Gedafa
AU  - Dubiso Gachano
Y1  - 2022/11/23
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14
T2  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
SP  - 218
EP  - 224
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-7885
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220806.14
AB  - This activity was conducted in Dano, Jimma Arjo and Horro districts of Western Oromia with the objective of demonstrating the newly released teff variety Dursi against Kena and Guduru to the farming community in these districts. These districts were purposively selected based on accessibility and potentiality for teff production; and one potential PA from each district were selected based on the aforementioned criteria. After selecting and establishing the FRGs training was provided across the districts. Then after, one variety; Dursi (as newly released variety) as well as Kena and Guduru (as standard checks) were planted on 10 m*10 m adjacent plots on 12 farmers’ field. All recommended agronomic practices were equally applied to all the plots and the fields were closely supervised and were managed well. At maturity, the varieties were jointly evaluated with a team composed of researchers, Farmers and DAs. Despite the slight variability in criteria set by farmers at the respective locations yield, disease tolerance, seed color, plant height, pest resistance, tillering capacity, seed size, lodging resistant, early maturity, spike length, were the common selection criteria across all locations. In almost the entire criterion Dursi excel/beat the standard checks and has met the criteria of the farmers. With regard to yield, 18 qt/ha, 15 qt/ha and 13 qt/ha were obtained from Dursi, Guduru and Kena; respectively putting Dursi on the first rank. Besides; Dursi had yield advantage 14.51 % and 19.10 % than Guduru and Kena; respectively. Furthermore; statistically ANOVA table and mean yield comparison (t-test) results of on farm yield performances showed that as there is highly significant difference at (p˂0.05) among the varieties demonstrated. In terms of profitability, financial analysis result of the study also showed that using Dursi variety can make farmers’ more profitable than Guduru and Kena. As the variety has met the intended criteria of the farmers, the pre-scaling up activity should follow the next season.
VL  - 8
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download