| Peer-Reviewed

Investigating the Effectiveness of Allion (Indaziflam) on Control of Purple Nutsedge in Sugarcane

Received: 26 June 2023    Accepted: 13 July 2023    Published: 27 July 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The objective of this research was to evaluation the efficacy of indaziflam on control of purple nutsedge in sugarcane fields in Khouzestan, Iran. Trial was randomized complete block design with four replications per treatments. Variety and type of culture were Cp69-102 and plant, respectively. Treatments were 1-indaziflam (75 g ai ha-1, as preemergence); 2-indaziflam (50 g ai ha-1 as preemergence); 3- Trifloxysulfuron sodium+ametryn (1875 g ai ha-1, as postemergence); 4-2,4-D+MCPA (1687.5 g ai ha-1); 5-2,4-D+MCPA+metribuzin (1350 g ai ha-1+1400 g ai ha-1); 6- weeding and 7- weed infested. The herbicides were applied with backpack sprayer equipped with flooding and teejet nozzles calibrated to deliver 300 L ha-1. Measuring quantitative traits were dry weight and density reduction percentage of purple nutsedge, and stem length, stem weight, the middle internode diameter and length of sugarcane. Measuring qualitative traits were purity, pol and recoverable sugar of sugarcane. Statistical calculations were accomplished through the SAS9.2 software and graphs were drawn by the Excel software. The results showed that purple nutsedge responses varied in response to experimental herbicides. Across all herbicides, indaziflam as 75 g ai ha-1 affected purpule nutsedge growth as dry weight and density reduction percentage of purple nutsedge was reduced 100% until 30 day after treatment (DAT). However, indaziflam efficacy was reduced over time. Other herbicides such as indaziflam as 50 g ai ha-1 and trifloxysulfuron sodium+ametryn indicated good effect in purple nutsedge control compared with 4-2,4-D+MCPA and 2,4-D+MCPA+metribuzin. Poor efficacy of post emergence herbicides may be due to high amont of wax present on the surface of nutsedge leaves that may be a factor limiting these herbicides absorption relative to other weeds lacking similar epicuticular wax. Measurment of quantitative traits indicated indaziflam (75 g ai ha-1) was the greatest in stem length (241.44 cm), stem weight (120 t ha-1), the middle internode diameter (1.83 cm) and length (14.5 cm) of sugarcane. Indaziflam (50 g ai ha-1) showed no significant difference with indaziflam (75 g ai ha-1) in stem length, stem weight, the middle internode diameter and length. trifloxysulfuron+ametryn exception stem length and the middle internode length showed significant difference with indaziflam (50 g ai ha-1). 2, 4-D+MCPA exception the middle internode diameter showed no significant difference with weed infested treatment. Purity, pol and recoverable sugar of sugarcane were greatest in application of indaziflam (75 g ai ha-1). Other herbicides such as indaziflam (50 g ai ha-1) and trifloxysulfuron sodium+ametryn were better than the other herbicides. Present research indicated indaziflam could control purpule nutsedge in sugarcane field; although indaziflam efficacy was reduced over time. However, there were no adverse effects of indaziflam rates on sugarcane observed, therefore, this herbicide could be used in sugarcane fields.

Published in Journal of Diseases and Medicinal Plants (Volume 9, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.jdmp.20230903.13
Page(s) 82-88
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Purity, Pol and Recoverable Sugar, The Middle Internode Length and Diameer

References
[1] Bennett, A. C., Ferrel, J. A., and Dusky, J. A. 2004. Weed management in sugarcane. PP 1-7 in R. A. Gilbert eds. The Sugarcane Handbook. Electronic publication, Agronomy Department, University of Florida, USA.
[2] Brabham, C., Lie, L., Gu, Y., Stork, J., Barrett, M. and DeBolt, S. 2014. Indaziflam herbicidal action: A potent cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor. Plant Physiology 166 (3): 1177-1185.
[3] Brosnan, J. T., McCullough, P. E. and Breeden, G. K. 2011. Smooth crabgrass control with indaziflam at various spring timings. Weed Technology 25 (3): 363-366.
[4] Dayan, F. E., Green, H. M., Weete, J. D. and Hancock, H. G. 1996. Postemergence activity of sulfentrazone: effect of surfactants and leaf surfaces. Weed Science 44 (4): 797-803.
[5] De Barreda, D. G., Reed, T. V., Yu, J. and McCullough, P. E. 2013. Spring establishment of four warm-season turfgrasses after fall indaziflam applications. Weed Technology 27 (3): 448-453.
[6] Elahifard E., Ghanbari A., Rashed Mohassel M. H., Zand E., Mirshamsi Kakhki A. and Mohkami A. 2013. Characterization of triazine resistant biotypes of junglerice (Echinochloa colona (L.) Link.) found in Iran. Australian Journal of Crop Science 7 (9): 1302-1308.
[7] Etheredge, L. M., Griffin, J. L. and Boudreaux. 2010. Nutsedge control programs in sugarcane. Journal American Society of Sugarcane Technologist. 30 (1): 67-80.
[8] Grey, T. L., Rucker, K., Webster, T. M. and Luo, X. 2016. High-density plantings of olive trees are tolerant to repeated application of indazilflam. Weed Science 64 (4): 766-771.
[9] Gilreath, J. P. and Santos, B. M. 2005. Efficacy of 1,3-dichloropropene plus chloropicrin in combination with herbicides on purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) Control in tomato. Weed Technology 19 (1): 137-140.
[10] Guerra, N., Oliveira Neto, A. M., Oliveira JR, R. S., Constantin, J. and Takano, H. K. 2014. Sensibility of plant species to herbicides aminocyclopyrachlor and indaziflam. Plant Daninha 32 (3): 609-617.
[11] Jeffries, M. D., Mahoney, D. J. and Gannon, T. W. 2014. Effect of simulated indaziflam drift rates on various plant species. Weed Technology 28 (4): 608-616.
[12] Karmollachaab, A., Bakhshandeh, A. M., Moradi Telavat, M. R., Moradi, F. and Shomeili, M. 2015. Effect of chemical ripeners application on yield, quality and technological ripening of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Science 17 (1): 63-73.
[13] Leon, R. G., Unruh, J. B. and Brecke, B. J. 2016. Relative lateral movement in surface soil of amicarbazone and indaziflam compared with other preemergence herbicides for turfgrass. Weed Technology 30 (1): 229-237.
[14] Lorzadeh, S. 2011. Investigation efficacy of Krismat (75WG) herbicide on purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) var CP69-1062 fields of Khuzestan, Iran. Advances in Environmental Biology 5 (10): 3369-3373.
[15] Peng, S. Y. 1984. Development in crop science: The biology and control of weeds in sugarcane (4). Elsevior Science Publisher. B. V. Amesterdam.
[16] Perry, D. H., J. S. McElroy, M. C. Doroh, and R. H. Walker. 2011. Indaziflam utilization for controlling problematic turfgrass weeds. Applied Turf. Sci. DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2011-0428-01-RS.
[17] Schneider, J. G., Haguewood, J. B., Song, E., Pan, X., Rutledge, J. M., Monke, B. J., Myers, D. F., Anderson, S. H., Ellersieck, M. R. and Xiong, X. 2011. Indaziflam effect on bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L. Pers.) shoot growth and root initiation as influenced by soil texture and organic matter. Available from: https://scisoc.confex.com/scisoc/2015am/webprogram/Paper94253.html. Accessed 15 December 2016.
[18] Viator, B. J., Griffin, J. L., and Ellis, J. M. 2002. Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) response to azafeniden applied preemergence and postemergence. Weed Technology 16 (2): 444-451.
[19] Troxler, S. C., Wilcot, J. W., Smith, W. D. and Burton, J. 2003. Absorbtion, translocation, and metabolism of foliar-applied CGA-362622 in purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Science 51 (1): 13-18.
[20] Zand, E., Baghestani Meybodi, M. A., Nezam Abadi, N. and Shimi, P. 2011. Important Herbicides and Weeds of Iran. Markaz-e Nashr-e Daneshgahi. Tehran.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Iman Ahmadi, Elham Elahifard, Abdul Reza Siyahpoush, Mohammad Farkhari. (2023). Investigating the Effectiveness of Allion (Indaziflam) on Control of Purple Nutsedge in Sugarcane. Journal of Diseases and Medicinal Plants, 9(3), 82-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jdmp.20230903.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Iman Ahmadi; Elham Elahifard; Abdul Reza Siyahpoush; Mohammad Farkhari. Investigating the Effectiveness of Allion (Indaziflam) on Control of Purple Nutsedge in Sugarcane. J. Dis. Med. Plants 2023, 9(3), 82-88. doi: 10.11648/j.jdmp.20230903.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Iman Ahmadi, Elham Elahifard, Abdul Reza Siyahpoush, Mohammad Farkhari. Investigating the Effectiveness of Allion (Indaziflam) on Control of Purple Nutsedge in Sugarcane. J Dis Med Plants. 2023;9(3):82-88. doi: 10.11648/j.jdmp.20230903.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jdmp.20230903.13,
      author = {Iman Ahmadi and Elham Elahifard and Abdul Reza Siyahpoush and Mohammad Farkhari},
      title = {Investigating the Effectiveness of Allion (Indaziflam) on Control of Purple Nutsedge in Sugarcane},
      journal = {Journal of Diseases and Medicinal Plants},
      volume = {9},
      number = {3},
      pages = {82-88},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jdmp.20230903.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jdmp.20230903.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jdmp.20230903.13},
      abstract = {The objective of this research was to evaluation the efficacy of indaziflam on control of purple nutsedge in sugarcane fields in Khouzestan, Iran. Trial was randomized complete block design with four replications per treatments. Variety and type of culture were Cp69-102 and plant, respectively. Treatments were 1-indaziflam (75 g ai ha-1, as preemergence); 2-indaziflam (50 g ai ha-1 as preemergence); 3- Trifloxysulfuron sodium+ametryn (1875 g ai ha-1, as postemergence); 4-2,4-D+MCPA (1687.5 g ai ha-1); 5-2,4-D+MCPA+metribuzin (1350 g ai ha-1+1400 g ai ha-1); 6- weeding and 7- weed infested. The herbicides were applied with backpack sprayer equipped with flooding and teejet nozzles calibrated to deliver 300 L ha-1. Measuring quantitative traits were dry weight and density reduction percentage of purple nutsedge, and stem length, stem weight, the middle internode diameter and length of sugarcane. Measuring qualitative traits were purity, pol and recoverable sugar of sugarcane. Statistical calculations were accomplished through the SAS9.2 software and graphs were drawn by the Excel software. The results showed that purple nutsedge responses varied in response to experimental herbicides. Across all herbicides, indaziflam as 75 g ai ha-1 affected purpule nutsedge growth as dry weight and density reduction percentage of purple nutsedge was reduced 100% until 30 day after treatment (DAT). However, indaziflam efficacy was reduced over time. Other herbicides such as indaziflam as 50 g ai ha-1 and trifloxysulfuron sodium+ametryn indicated good effect in purple nutsedge control compared with 4-2,4-D+MCPA and 2,4-D+MCPA+metribuzin. Poor efficacy of post emergence herbicides may be due to high amont of wax present on the surface of nutsedge leaves that may be a factor limiting these herbicides absorption relative to other weeds lacking similar epicuticular wax. Measurment of quantitative traits indicated indaziflam (75 g ai ha-1) was the greatest in stem length (241.44 cm), stem weight (120 t ha-1), the middle internode diameter (1.83 cm) and length (14.5 cm) of sugarcane. Indaziflam (50 g ai ha-1) showed no significant difference with indaziflam (75 g ai ha-1) in stem length, stem weight, the middle internode diameter and length. trifloxysulfuron+ametryn exception stem length and the middle internode length showed significant difference with indaziflam (50 g ai ha-1). 2, 4-D+MCPA exception the middle internode diameter showed no significant difference with weed infested treatment. Purity, pol and recoverable sugar of sugarcane were greatest in application of indaziflam (75 g ai ha-1). Other herbicides such as indaziflam (50 g ai ha-1) and trifloxysulfuron sodium+ametryn were better than the other herbicides. Present research indicated indaziflam could control purpule nutsedge in sugarcane field; although indaziflam efficacy was reduced over time. However, there were no adverse effects of indaziflam rates on sugarcane observed, therefore, this herbicide could be used in sugarcane fields.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Investigating the Effectiveness of Allion (Indaziflam) on Control of Purple Nutsedge in Sugarcane
    AU  - Iman Ahmadi
    AU  - Elham Elahifard
    AU  - Abdul Reza Siyahpoush
    AU  - Mohammad Farkhari
    Y1  - 2023/07/27
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jdmp.20230903.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jdmp.20230903.13
    T2  - Journal of Diseases and Medicinal Plants
    JF  - Journal of Diseases and Medicinal Plants
    JO  - Journal of Diseases and Medicinal Plants
    SP  - 82
    EP  - 88
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2469-8210
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jdmp.20230903.13
    AB  - The objective of this research was to evaluation the efficacy of indaziflam on control of purple nutsedge in sugarcane fields in Khouzestan, Iran. Trial was randomized complete block design with four replications per treatments. Variety and type of culture were Cp69-102 and plant, respectively. Treatments were 1-indaziflam (75 g ai ha-1, as preemergence); 2-indaziflam (50 g ai ha-1 as preemergence); 3- Trifloxysulfuron sodium+ametryn (1875 g ai ha-1, as postemergence); 4-2,4-D+MCPA (1687.5 g ai ha-1); 5-2,4-D+MCPA+metribuzin (1350 g ai ha-1+1400 g ai ha-1); 6- weeding and 7- weed infested. The herbicides were applied with backpack sprayer equipped with flooding and teejet nozzles calibrated to deliver 300 L ha-1. Measuring quantitative traits were dry weight and density reduction percentage of purple nutsedge, and stem length, stem weight, the middle internode diameter and length of sugarcane. Measuring qualitative traits were purity, pol and recoverable sugar of sugarcane. Statistical calculations were accomplished through the SAS9.2 software and graphs were drawn by the Excel software. The results showed that purple nutsedge responses varied in response to experimental herbicides. Across all herbicides, indaziflam as 75 g ai ha-1 affected purpule nutsedge growth as dry weight and density reduction percentage of purple nutsedge was reduced 100% until 30 day after treatment (DAT). However, indaziflam efficacy was reduced over time. Other herbicides such as indaziflam as 50 g ai ha-1 and trifloxysulfuron sodium+ametryn indicated good effect in purple nutsedge control compared with 4-2,4-D+MCPA and 2,4-D+MCPA+metribuzin. Poor efficacy of post emergence herbicides may be due to high amont of wax present on the surface of nutsedge leaves that may be a factor limiting these herbicides absorption relative to other weeds lacking similar epicuticular wax. Measurment of quantitative traits indicated indaziflam (75 g ai ha-1) was the greatest in stem length (241.44 cm), stem weight (120 t ha-1), the middle internode diameter (1.83 cm) and length (14.5 cm) of sugarcane. Indaziflam (50 g ai ha-1) showed no significant difference with indaziflam (75 g ai ha-1) in stem length, stem weight, the middle internode diameter and length. trifloxysulfuron+ametryn exception stem length and the middle internode length showed significant difference with indaziflam (50 g ai ha-1). 2, 4-D+MCPA exception the middle internode diameter showed no significant difference with weed infested treatment. Purity, pol and recoverable sugar of sugarcane were greatest in application of indaziflam (75 g ai ha-1). Other herbicides such as indaziflam (50 g ai ha-1) and trifloxysulfuron sodium+ametryn were better than the other herbicides. Present research indicated indaziflam could control purpule nutsedge in sugarcane field; although indaziflam efficacy was reduced over time. However, there were no adverse effects of indaziflam rates on sugarcane observed, therefore, this herbicide could be used in sugarcane fields.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Plant Production and Genetic Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Bavi, Iran

  • Plant Production and Genetic Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Bavi, Iran

  • Plant Production and Genetic Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Bavi, Iran

  • Plant Production and Genetic Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Bavi, Iran

  • Sections