The field experiment was carried out at Hawassa, during the 2020 cropping season with the objectives to evaluate the impact of maize-common bean intercropping and inoculation on physiological response, nodulation and yield of common bean. The treatments consist of two common bean varieties (Hawassa Dume, Nassir), two levels of inoculation (HB-429 inoculated, un-inoculated) and three spatial arrangements (Sole Common bean, Maize one row - Common bean one row, and Maize one row - Common bean two rows). The treatments were laid out in a factorial arrangement in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications and comprising twelve treatments. Data on physiological variables, nodulation, and yield of common bean were recorded. The results revealed that the main effect of spatial arrangements highly significantly (P < 0.001) affected the Chlorophyll A and Chlorophyll B, transpiration rate, and intercellular CO2 concentration which were the highest on sole cropping common bean. The interaction effects of spatial arrangements and inoculation significantly (P < 0.01) affected the total chlorophyll contents, photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence resulted in the maximum value on sole cropping with inoculated (HB-429). The interaction effects of spatial arrangements and inoculation significantly (P < 0.01) affected the number of nodules plant-1, nodule dry weight plant-1, number of pods plant-1, number of seeds pod-1, grain yield and above ground biomass yield. The highest grain yield of 2.54 t ha-1 was recorded from on sole cropping common bean with inoculated (HB-429) can be used at Hawassa, and areas with similar agro-ecology.
| Published in | Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jps.20221005.13 |
| Page(s) | 183-191 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Physiological, Rhizobium, Intercropping, Common Bean, Yield
| [1] | Abbasi, M., Manzoor, M., & Tahir, M. (2010). Efficiency of Rhizobium inoculation and P fertilization in enhancing nodulation, seed yield, and phosphorus use efficiency by field grown soybean under hilly region of Rawalakot Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. J. of Plant Nutrition, 33: 1080–1102. |
| [2] | Abera, G., Wolde-meskel, E., & Bakken, R. (2012). Carbon and nitrogen mineralization dynamics in different soils of the tropics amended with legume residues and contrasting soil moisture contents. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 48 (1): 51-66. |
| [3] | Ahmad, S., Habib, G., Muhammad, Y., Ullah, I., Durrani, Z., Pervaiz, U., & Rahaman, A. (2009). Effect of seed scarification, rhizobium inoculation and phosphorus fertilization on root development of barseem and soil composition. Sarhad J. Agric. 25 (3): 369-374. |
| [4] | Akuda, M. (2001). Intercropping and population density effects on yield component, seed quality and photosynthesis of sorghum and soybean. J. Food Tech. Afri. 6 (3): 170-173. |
| [5] | Anyia, O., & Herzog, H. (2004). Water use efficiency, leaf area and leaf gas exchange of cowpeas under mid-season drought. Europ. J. Agron. 20: 327-339. |
| [6] | Argaw, A. (2012). Evaluation of Co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and phosphate solubilizing pseudomonas Spp effect on soybean (Glycine max L.) in Assosa area Journal of Agricultural Science Technology, (14): 213-224. |
| [7] | Argaw, A. (2014). Symbiotic effectiveness of inoculation with Bradyrhizobium isolates on soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes with different maturities. Springe Plus, 3: 753. |
| [8] | Arnon, I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol; 24: 1-15. |
| [9] | Awal, MAH., Koshi., & Ikeda, T. (2006). Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 139: 74-83. |
| [10] | Bambara, S., & Ndakidemi, A. (2009). Effects of Rhizobium inoculation, lime and molybdenum on photosynthesis and chlorophyll content of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 3 (11): 791- 798. |
| [11] | Bhuiyan, MMH., Rahman, MM., Afroze, F., Sutradhar, GNC., & Bhuiyan, MSI. (2008). Effect of Phosphorus, Molybdenum and Rhizobium Inoculation on Growth and Nodulation of Mung bean. J. Soil Nat. 2 (2): 25-30. |
| [12] | Bradbury, M., & Baker, NR. (1984). A quantitative determination of photochemical and non-photochemical quenching during the slow phase of the chlorophyll fluorescence induction curve of bean leaves. Biochimicaet Biophysica Acta 765, 275–281. |
| [13] | Carruthers, K., Prithiviraj, B., Cloutier, DFeQ., & Martin, RC. (2000). Intercropping of corn with Soybean, Lupine and forages: Silage yield and quality. European Journal of Agronomy 12: 103-115. |
| [14] | Central Statistical Agency (CSA). (2010). Statistical bulletin, Agricultural sample survey for 2010, Volume I. Report on area and production of major crops, private peasant holdings, Meher season. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
| [15] | Chui, N. (2003). Influence of spatial arrangements of maize on performance of an associated soybean intercrop, Fields Crop Research 8: 187-198. |
| [16] | Day, P. (1965). Hydrometer method of particle size analysis. Methods of soil analysis. Agronomy, (9): 562-566. |
| [17] | Evans, J., Mcneill, AM., Unkovich, MJ., Fettell, NA., & Heenan, DP. (2001). Net nitrogen balances for cool-season grain legume intercropping and contributions to wheat nitrogen uptake: a review. Aus. J. Exp. Agric. 41: 347-359. |
| [18] | Getahun, A., & Abady, S. (2016). Effect of Maize (Zea may L.) on Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield and its components in Maize-Bean intercropping. International Journal of Science and Research 5: 126-133. |
| [19] | Ghosh, PK., Manna, MC., Bandyopadhyay, KK., Ajay, AK., Tripathi, RH., Wanjari, KM., Hati, AK., Misra, CL., Acharya, A., & Subba, R. (2006). Inter specific Interaction and Nutrient Use in Soybean/Sorghum Intercropping System. Bioresour. Technol. 98: 25–30. |
| [20] | Havlin, JL., Beaton, JD., Tisdale, SL., & Nelson, WL. (1999). Soil fertility and fertilizers: An introduction to nutrient management. 6thed. New Jersey. Pp. 300–357. |
| [21] | Hikosaka, K., Terashima, I. (1995). A model of the acclimation of photosynthesis in the leaves of C3 plants to sun and shade with respect to nitrogen use. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 605–618. |
| [22] | Jackson, ML. (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis Practice Hall of India. New Delhi. |
| [23] | Judkins, WP., & Wander, IW. (1950). Correlation between leaf color, leaf nitrogen content, and growth of apple, peach, and grape plants Plant Physiol; 25 (1): 78. |
| [24] | Kaschuk, G., Kuyper, TW., Leffelaar, PA., Hungria, M., & Giller, KE. (2009). Are the rates of photosynthesis stimulated by the carbon sink strength of Rhizobial and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses, Soil Biol Biochem; 41 (6): 1233-1244. |
| [25] | Khan, AG., Azim, A., Nadeem, MA., & Ayaz, M. (2000). The effect of formaldehyde treatment of solvent and mechanical extracted cottonseed meal on the performance, digestibility and nitrogen balance in lambs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 13 (6): 785-790. |
| [26] | Larcher, W. (1995). Physiological Plant Ecology, 3rd ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany; p. 506. |
| [27] | Legesse, H., Gobeze, L., & Tenaw, W. (2015). Effect of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) / faba bean (Vicia fabae L.) intercropping on productivity and land use efficiency in highlands of Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare; Vol. 5, No. 14. |
| [28] | Lemlem, A. (2013). The effect of intercropping maize with cowpea and lablab on crop yield, Herald Journal of Agriculture and Food Science Research; 2 (5): 156– 170. |
| [29] | Loomis, S., & Connor, J. (1992). Crop Ecology: Productivity and Management in Agricultural Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 104-128. |
| [30] | Maphosa, M. (2015). Growth, nodulation and yield response of promiscuous and non-promiscuous soybean cultivars to inoculation in different soil types under glasshouse and field conditions. MSc Thesis. |
| [31] | Martinis, S., Kuenzer, C., & Twele, A. (2015). Flood Studies Using Synthetic Aperture Radar Data. Remote Sensing of Water Resources, Disasters and Urban Studies; Taylor and Francis: London, UK. |
| [32] | Muhammad, A. (2002). Production efficiency of chickpea as affected by inoculation, phosphorus levels and intercropping. PhD. (Agriculture) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Faisalabad. pp. 48-79. |
| [33] | Muneer, S., Kim, E., Park, J., & Lee, J. (2014). Influence of green, red and blue light emitting diodes on multiprotein complex proteins and photosynthetic activity under different light intensities in lettuce leaves (Lactuca sativa L.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 15, 4657–4670. |
| [34] | N2Africa. (2014). Better soybean through good agricultural practice. Africa Soil Health. Consortium. http://africasoilhealth.cabi.org/wpcms/wpcontent/uploads/2014/09/292-N2Africa-Ethiopia-common-beans-booklet.pdf |
| [35] | NMA (National Meteorology Agency). (2020). Annual Meteorology data report, Hawassa, Ethiopia. |
| [36] | Nyoki, D., & Ndakidemi, A. (2014). Effects of phosphorus and Bradyrhizobium japonicum on growth and chlorophyll content of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp). Am. J. Agric. 4: 1120-1136. |
| [37] | Page, L. (1982). Methods of soil analysis. Part II. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. |
| [38] | Pandey, N., & Sinha, K. (1996). Plant Physiology (3rd revised ed.). Vikas publishing house PVT LTD, New Delhi, India. |
| [39] | Porch, T. (2013). Use of Wild Relatives and Closely Related Species to Adapt Common Bean to Climate Change, Agronomy, 3 (2), pp. 433–61. |
| [40] | Roriz, M., Carvalho, SMP., & Vasconcelos, MW. (2014). High relative air humidity influences mineral accumulation and growth in iron deficient soybean plants. Front. Plant Sci: 5-726. |
| [41] | Sairam, RK., Kumutha, D., Ezhilmathi, K., Deshmukh, PS., & Srivastava, GC. (2008). Division of Plant Physiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India. BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM 52 (3): 401-412. |
| [42] | Sajid, MA., Rab, F., Wahid, SNM., Shah, I., Jan, MA., Khan, SA., Hussain, MA., & Iqbal, Z. (2011). Influence of rhizobium inoculation on growth and yield of groundnut cultivars. Sarhad J. Agric. 27 (4): 573-576. |
| [43] | Samago, TY., Anniye, EW., Dakora, FD. (2018). Grain yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties is markedly increased by rhizobial inoculation and phosphorus application in Ethiopia. Symbiosis 75, 245–255. |
| [44] | SAS Institute Inc. (2002). SAS User’s Guide, Statistics Version 9.0 ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA. |
| [45] | Su, B., Song, Y., Song, C., Cui, L., Yong, T., & Yang, W. (2014). Growth and photosynthetic responses of soybean seedlings to maize shading in relay intercropping system in southwest china Photosynthetic 52: 332-340. |
| [46] | Tarekegn, Y., & Walelign, W. (2014). Effect of NP Fertilizer Rate and Bradyrhizobium inoculation on Nodulation, N-Uptake and Crude Protein Content of Soybean (Glycine Max L.) at Jinka, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 4 (6): 49-54. |
| [47] | Walelign, W. (2008). Evaluation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes of diverse growth habit under sole and intercropping with maize (Zea mays L.) in Southern Ethiopia. J. Agron. (7) 4: 306-313. |
| [48] | Wittmann, C., Aschan, G., & Pfanz, H. (2001). Leaf and twig photosynthesis of young beech (Fagus sylvatica) and aspen (Populus tremula) trees grown under different light regime. Basic & Applied Ecology; 2: 145-154. |
| [49] | Wright, C., & Bell, J. (1992). Plant population studies on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in subtropical Australia Growth and water use during a terminal drought stress Aust. J. Exp. Agri. 32 (2): 197-203. |
| [50] | Wu, Y., Gong, W., Wang, Y., Yong, T., Yang, F., Liu, W., Wu, X., Du, J., Shu, K., & Liu, J. (2018). Leaf area and photosynthesis of newly emerged trifoliolate leaves are regulated by mature leaves in soybean. – J. plant res. 131 (4): 671-680. |
| [51] | Yang, F., Fan, Y., Wu, X., Cheng, Y., Liu, Q., Feng, L., Chen, J., Wang, Z., Wang, X., & Yong, T. (2018b). Auxin-to-gibberellin ratio as a signal for light intensity and quality in regulating soybean growth and matter partitioning. Fron. Plant Sci. 9: 56. |
| [52] | Yao, X., Li, C., Li, S., Zhu, Q., Zhang, H., Wang, H., Yu, C., Martin, SKS., & Xie, F. (2017). Effect of shade on leaf photosynthetic capacity light-intercepting, electron transfer and energy distribution of soybeans. Plant Growth Regul. 83: 409-416. |
| [53] | Yesuf, M. (2003). Effects of planting arrangement and population densities of haricot bean on productivity of sorghum/haricot bean additive mixture. M.Sc. Thesis, Alemaya University. Pp. 57. |
| [54] | Zhang, S., Ma, K., & Chen, L. (2003). Response of photosynthetic plasticity of Paeonia suffruticosa to changed light environments. Environ. Exper. Bot; 49: 121-133. |
| [55] | Zhou, XJ., Liang, Y., Chen, H., Shen, SH., & Jing, YX. (2006). Effects of Rhizobia inoculation and nitrogen fertilization on photosynthetic physiology of soybean Photosynthetic; 44: 530-535. |
| [56] | Zlatev, S., & Yordanov, T. (2004). Effects of soil drought on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in bean plants Bulg. J. Plant Physiol; 30: 3-18. |
APA Style
Shemeles Tesfaye Shumet, Hussien Mohammed Beshir, Tewodros Aylawe. (2022). Rhizobium Inoculation and Intercropping Affected on Physiological Response, and Yield Performance of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties. Journal of Plant Sciences, 10(5), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20221005.13
ACS Style
Shemeles Tesfaye Shumet; Hussien Mohammed Beshir; Tewodros Aylawe. Rhizobium Inoculation and Intercropping Affected on Physiological Response, and Yield Performance of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties. J. Plant Sci. 2022, 10(5), 183-191. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20221005.13
AMA Style
Shemeles Tesfaye Shumet, Hussien Mohammed Beshir, Tewodros Aylawe. Rhizobium Inoculation and Intercropping Affected on Physiological Response, and Yield Performance of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties. J Plant Sci. 2022;10(5):183-191. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20221005.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jps.20221005.13,
author = {Shemeles Tesfaye Shumet and Hussien Mohammed Beshir and Tewodros Aylawe},
title = {Rhizobium Inoculation and Intercropping Affected on Physiological Response, and Yield Performance of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties},
journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences},
volume = {10},
number = {5},
pages = {183-191},
doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20221005.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20221005.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20221005.13},
abstract = {The field experiment was carried out at Hawassa, during the 2020 cropping season with the objectives to evaluate the impact of maize-common bean intercropping and inoculation on physiological response, nodulation and yield of common bean. The treatments consist of two common bean varieties (Hawassa Dume, Nassir), two levels of inoculation (HB-429 inoculated, un-inoculated) and three spatial arrangements (Sole Common bean, Maize one row - Common bean one row, and Maize one row - Common bean two rows). The treatments were laid out in a factorial arrangement in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications and comprising twelve treatments. Data on physiological variables, nodulation, and yield of common bean were recorded. The results revealed that the main effect of spatial arrangements highly significantly (P 2 concentration which were the highest on sole cropping common bean. The interaction effects of spatial arrangements and inoculation significantly (P -1, nodule dry weight plant-1, number of pods plant-1, number of seeds pod-1, grain yield and above ground biomass yield. The highest grain yield of 2.54 t ha-1 was recorded from on sole cropping common bean with inoculated (HB-429) can be used at Hawassa, and areas with similar agro-ecology.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Rhizobium Inoculation and Intercropping Affected on Physiological Response, and Yield Performance of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties AU - Shemeles Tesfaye Shumet AU - Hussien Mohammed Beshir AU - Tewodros Aylawe Y1 - 2022/10/30 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20221005.13 DO - 10.11648/j.jps.20221005.13 T2 - Journal of Plant Sciences JF - Journal of Plant Sciences JO - Journal of Plant Sciences SP - 183 EP - 191 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0731 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20221005.13 AB - The field experiment was carried out at Hawassa, during the 2020 cropping season with the objectives to evaluate the impact of maize-common bean intercropping and inoculation on physiological response, nodulation and yield of common bean. The treatments consist of two common bean varieties (Hawassa Dume, Nassir), two levels of inoculation (HB-429 inoculated, un-inoculated) and three spatial arrangements (Sole Common bean, Maize one row - Common bean one row, and Maize one row - Common bean two rows). The treatments were laid out in a factorial arrangement in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications and comprising twelve treatments. Data on physiological variables, nodulation, and yield of common bean were recorded. The results revealed that the main effect of spatial arrangements highly significantly (P 2 concentration which were the highest on sole cropping common bean. The interaction effects of spatial arrangements and inoculation significantly (P -1, nodule dry weight plant-1, number of pods plant-1, number of seeds pod-1, grain yield and above ground biomass yield. The highest grain yield of 2.54 t ha-1 was recorded from on sole cropping common bean with inoculated (HB-429) can be used at Hawassa, and areas with similar agro-ecology. VL - 10 IS - 5 ER -
Information
Email: