| Peer-Reviewed

A Critical Evaluation of the Public Procurement Act in Its Capacity to Defeat Corruption in Ghana

Received: 1 October 2022    Accepted: 25 October 2022    Published: 10 November 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In addition to the standards applicable in the whole public service, specific standards for procurement officials may mitigate the specific risks related to the complexity and characteristics of the public procurement process. The standards for procurement officials - in particular specific restrictions and prohibitions - aim to ensure that officials’ private interests do not improperly influence the performance of their public duties and responsibilities. Transparency in public procurement not only promotes accountability and ensures access to information, it also serves an important role in levelling the playing field for businesses and allowing small and medium enterprises to participate on a more equal footing. The purpose of the study was to critically evaluate the public procurement act in its capacity to defeat corruption. A descriptive survey was used for the study based on mixed method of research-qualitative and quantitative. A purposive sampling method was adopted in the collection of data. A 16-item interview guide was developed -made up of 15 closed ended items with 3 follow up questions and 1 open-ended item. The study revealed that there was not much weaknesses in public procurement activities, practices that seems to encourage corruption were minimal due to the use of the public procurement Act, due diligence was followed during procurement. The study recommended that, even though the Act seems to have defeated corruption, there should be continues capacity building for procurement officers to improve on their efficiency.

Published in Research & Development (Volume 3, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.rd.20220304.14
Page(s) 224-231
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Corruption, Public Contract, Public Procurement, Procurement-Proficient, Sustainability

References
[1] Adjei, A. (2006). Message from the Chief Executive, Public Procurement Board. Accra: www.ppbghana.org/story
[2] Ameyaw, C.; Mensah, S. & Osei-Tutu, E. (2012). Public procurement in Ghana: The implementation challenges to the public procurement law 2003 (Act 663). International Journal of construction supply chain management. Vol. 2 (2); pp. 55-65.
[3] Anvuur, A., Kumaraswamy, M., & Male, S. (2006). Taking forward public procurement reforms in Ghana, CIB W107. Construction in Developing Economies International Symposium, Construction in Developing Economies: New issues and Challenges.
[4] Asamoah-Gyimah, K. & Anane, E. (2013). Research method in Education. Kumasi: Dan-Grapher Prints.
[5] Azeem, V. (2007). Impact of the public procurement act 2003, act 663 in Ghana integrity initiative’s perspective. A forum paper.
[6] Dabaga, J. (2014). Retrieved from http://opinion.myjoyonline.com/pages/feature/201309/112500.php
[7] European Union, (EU), (2014). How the EU works. Brussels: europa.eu.
[8] Forgor, E. S. (2007). Proposal amendments to make procurement flexible: The practical experiences of District Chief Executives with respect to the implementation of the public procurement law, decentralization agenda1-3.
[9] Mauro, P. (1997), "The Effects of Corruption on Growth, Investment, and Government.
[10] Odum Forson, E. (2014). The impact of public procurement act 2003, act 663 on the public financial management system of Ghana. Munich: GRIN Verlag.
[11] Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, (OECD), (2011). Public procurement for sustainable and inclusive growth: Enabling reform through evidence and peer reviews. Paris: France.
[12] Patton, M. Q. & Cochran, M. (2002). A guide using using qualitative research methodology.
[13] MSF UK: Medecins Sans Frontiers.
[14] Soreide, T. (2002). Corruption in public procurement. Causes, consequences and cures. Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute.
[15] Tanzi, V. and H. Davoodi (1998), "Corruption, Public Investment, and Growth", International Monetary Fund. Working Paper, 97/139.
[16] Verhage, R. v. & Boateng, S. (2002). Procurement reform in the Ghana Health Sector. Journal of Public Procurement, 2 (2), 261-268.
[17] World Bank, (1994). Adjusting in Africa: Reforms, results and the road ahead. A World Bank policy research report. Washington DC: The World Bank.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ronald Osei Mensah, Winfred Kanda. (2022). A Critical Evaluation of the Public Procurement Act in Its Capacity to Defeat Corruption in Ghana. Research & Development, 3(4), 224-231. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rd.20220304.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ronald Osei Mensah; Winfred Kanda. A Critical Evaluation of the Public Procurement Act in Its Capacity to Defeat Corruption in Ghana. Res. Dev. 2022, 3(4), 224-231. doi: 10.11648/j.rd.20220304.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ronald Osei Mensah, Winfred Kanda. A Critical Evaluation of the Public Procurement Act in Its Capacity to Defeat Corruption in Ghana. Res Dev. 2022;3(4):224-231. doi: 10.11648/j.rd.20220304.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.rd.20220304.14,
      author = {Ronald Osei Mensah and Winfred Kanda},
      title = {A Critical Evaluation of the Public Procurement Act in Its Capacity to Defeat Corruption in Ghana},
      journal = {Research & Development},
      volume = {3},
      number = {4},
      pages = {224-231},
      doi = {10.11648/j.rd.20220304.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rd.20220304.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.rd.20220304.14},
      abstract = {In addition to the standards applicable in the whole public service, specific standards for procurement officials may mitigate the specific risks related to the complexity and characteristics of the public procurement process. The standards for procurement officials - in particular specific restrictions and prohibitions - aim to ensure that officials’ private interests do not improperly influence the performance of their public duties and responsibilities. Transparency in public procurement not only promotes accountability and ensures access to information, it also serves an important role in levelling the playing field for businesses and allowing small and medium enterprises to participate on a more equal footing. The purpose of the study was to critically evaluate the public procurement act in its capacity to defeat corruption. A descriptive survey was used for the study based on mixed method of research-qualitative and quantitative. A purposive sampling method was adopted in the collection of data. A 16-item interview guide was developed -made up of 15 closed ended items with 3 follow up questions and 1 open-ended item. The study revealed that there was not much weaknesses in public procurement activities, practices that seems to encourage corruption were minimal due to the use of the public procurement Act, due diligence was followed during procurement. The study recommended that, even though the Act seems to have defeated corruption, there should be continues capacity building for procurement officers to improve on their efficiency.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - A Critical Evaluation of the Public Procurement Act in Its Capacity to Defeat Corruption in Ghana
    AU  - Ronald Osei Mensah
    AU  - Winfred Kanda
    Y1  - 2022/11/10
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rd.20220304.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.rd.20220304.14
    T2  - Research & Development
    JF  - Research & Development
    JO  - Research & Development
    SP  - 224
    EP  - 231
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2994-7057
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rd.20220304.14
    AB  - In addition to the standards applicable in the whole public service, specific standards for procurement officials may mitigate the specific risks related to the complexity and characteristics of the public procurement process. The standards for procurement officials - in particular specific restrictions and prohibitions - aim to ensure that officials’ private interests do not improperly influence the performance of their public duties and responsibilities. Transparency in public procurement not only promotes accountability and ensures access to information, it also serves an important role in levelling the playing field for businesses and allowing small and medium enterprises to participate on a more equal footing. The purpose of the study was to critically evaluate the public procurement act in its capacity to defeat corruption. A descriptive survey was used for the study based on mixed method of research-qualitative and quantitative. A purposive sampling method was adopted in the collection of data. A 16-item interview guide was developed -made up of 15 closed ended items with 3 follow up questions and 1 open-ended item. The study revealed that there was not much weaknesses in public procurement activities, practices that seems to encourage corruption were minimal due to the use of the public procurement Act, due diligence was followed during procurement. The study recommended that, even though the Act seems to have defeated corruption, there should be continues capacity building for procurement officers to improve on their efficiency.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Centre for Languages and Liberal Studies, Social Development Department, Takoradi Technical University, Takoradi, Ghana

  • School of Public Service and Governance, Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration, Accra, Ghana

  • Sections