Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Proposal of the Theory of Anti-Lethargy of Small Farmers Based on the Analysis of Sustainable Governance Peru 2022

Received: 16 January 2024    Accepted: 2 February 2024    Published: 20 February 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This research aimed to examine the sustainable governance applicable to small organic agriculture in Peru by 2022. The qualitative methodology was employed in the case study, enabling the acquisition of concrete, contextual, and comprehensive knowledge regarding the environmental governance that Peru has been experiencing. The study subjects comprised 15 representatives of producer organizations from the coast, the Andes, and the Amazon, as well as 5 representatives of institutions associated with the agrarian and environmental governance of Peru. The semi-structured interview was conducted with them, complemented by a documentary analysis of the primary agricultural and environmental public policies. The results indicate an enormous gap in environmental governance between the three levels of government (national government, regional governments and municipalities) and between multisectors (the ministries dedicated to the themes are given: agrarian, environmental, social, and production) It has been concluded that there is no comprehensive vision for organic agriculture as an environmental sustainability strategy. The 'Theory of Anti-Lethargy of Small Farmers in the Face of Sustainable Governance' is proposed, which encompasses strategies to encourage agrarian participation, given that more than two million farmers are awaiting the government's intervention, i.e. citizens who have not comprehended the importance of being involved, active, and committed. This approach has the potential to generate economies of scale, enhance opportunities, and elevate living standards for the next generation.

Published in World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology (Volume 2, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.15
Page(s) 21-31
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Governance, Sustainability, Associativity, Small Agriculture

References
[1] United Nations (2019). Informe de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. Organización de las Naciones Unidas. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2019_Spanish.pdf
[2] Acuerdo Nacional (2002). Políticas de Estado del Acuerdo Nacional. https://www.acuerdonacional.pe/politicas-de-estado-del-acuerdo-nacional/politicas-de-estado%E2%80%8B/politicas-de-estado-castellano/iii-competitividad-del-pais/19-desarrollo-sostenible-y-gestion-ambiental/
[3] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2019). United Nations Decade of Family Farming 2019-2028. Global Action Plan. 78 pp. Obtenido de http://www.fao.org/3/ca4672en/ca4672en.pdf
[4] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2018). 17 Goals to Transform Our World. FAO. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/development-agenda/
[5] Servicio Nacional de Sanidad Agraria (2021). Producción Orgánica en Perú. Servicio Nacional de Sanidad Agraria. https://www.senasa.gob.pe/senasacontigo/con-mas-de-460-mil-hectareas-certificadas-peru-crece-en-produccion-organica/
[6] Servicio Nacional de Sanidad Agraria (2020). Informe Anual. Lima, Peru: SENASA. https://www.senasa.gob.pe/senasa/
[7] Savage, S. (2018). The Truth About Pesticide Residues On Produce: All Encouragalleging, Some Inconvenien. Forbes (Abril 2018). https://bit.ly/2MixCHO
[8] MIDAGRI (2021). Política Nacional Agraria 2021- 2030. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agrario y Riego. https://busquedas.elperuano.pe/normaslegales/decreto-supremo-que-aprueba-la-politica-nacional-agraria-202-decreto-supremo-no-017-2021-midagri-1975873-14/
[9] United Nations - Environment (2018). Gobernanza Ambiental y la Agenda 2030. Avances y buenas prácticas en América Latina y el Caribe. 47 pp. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/26756/Gobernanza_Ambiental_ALC.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
[10] Ministerio del Ambiente (2018). Política Nacional del Ambiente. Ministerio de Ambiente. MINAM. https://www.gob.pe/institucion/minam/campa%C3%B1as/2041-politica-nacional-del-ambiente
[11] León, G. (2020). Gobernanza ambiental y conservación: las gestiones del SERNANP y PROHVILLA en el Refugio de Vida Silvestre Los Pantanos de Villa. Revista Argumentos, 1(1), 119-124. https://revistaargumentos.iep.org.pe/index.php/arg/article/view/20
[12] Lanegra (2020). El camino ambiental hacia la OCDE El Perú y la implementación de las recomendaciones en materia ambiental. Grupo de Justicia Fiscal. http://cooperaccion.org.pe/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/17070-El-camino-ambiental-hacia-la-OCDE-CORR-web.pdf
[13] Cassio, E., y Sánchez, E. (2018). Gobernanza ambiental para el desarrollo sostenible de la cuenca de Santiaguillo, Durango. Espiral Estudios Sobre Estado Y Sociedad (eISSN: 2594-021X), 25(72), 183-208. https://doi.org/10.32870/espiral.v25i72.6038
[14] Escobar, C. (2017). La gobernanza ambiental y la gestión integral de residuos sólidos en el distrito de Comas año 2017 de la Universidad César Vallejo. [Tesis de Maestría]. Repositorio institucional de la Universidad César Vallejo. https://repositorio.ucv.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12692/14557
[15] Gallego, C. O. (2016). Desarrollo de un modelo de gobernanza operativa de la estrategia (MGOE) paral consejo de administración: indicadores desde la perspectiva de la función de auditoría interna. https://repositorio.comillas.edu/xmlui/handle/11531/9888
[16] Andrade (2015). El Gobierno de la Naturaleza. La gobernanza ambiental posneoliberal en Bolivia y Ecuador. Gobernanza Ambiental en América Latina. CLACSO; ENGOV. http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/se/20150318053457/GobernanzaAmbiental.pdf
[17] Biermann, F., Norichika, K., Rakhyun, E. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Volumes 26–27. Pages 26-31. ISSN 1877-3435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343517300209
[18] Brower, J. (2016). Around the sense of governability and governance: Definition and scope. Daimon, (67) 149-162.
[19] Dalla-Torre, M. (2017). Territorial governance and the Territorial Planning Plans, Bitácora 27, 47-54, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá.
[20] Knudsen, J. S., Moon, J. (2017). Visible hands: Government regulation and international business responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com.pe/books?hl=en&lr=&id=2ek4DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&ots=8vysDs9lQ-&sig=w72AxdMc1lxk0mizwZAzZ-G9k0U&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
[21] World Bank (2017). Improving Governance Is Key to Ensuring Equitable Growth in Developing Countries. https://www.bancomundial.org/es/news/press-release/2017/01/30/improving-governance-is-key-to-ensuring-equitable-growth-in-developing-countries
[22] Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (2019). La Integridad Pública en América Latina y el Caribe 2018-2019. De Gobiernos Reactivos a Estados Proactivos. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos. 127pp. https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/integridad-publica-america-latina-caribe-2018-2019.pdf
[23] Cooperación Alemana al Desarrollo (2012). Guía metodológica para diálogos multiactor en el contexto de actividades extractivas. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. https://prodialogo.org.pe/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/gm_dial_multi.pdf
[24] Coppock, A. (2019). Generalizing from survey experiments conducted on Mechanical Turk: A replication approach. Political Science Research and Methods7 (3): 613–628. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods/article/generalizing-from-survey-experiments-conducted-on-mechanical-turk-a-replication-approach/7A0A1B2F63320A832C17CE1A8908F137
[25] Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357, eaan1114. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/357/6352/eaan1114.abstract
[26] Bennett, N., and Satterfield, T. (2018). Environmental governance: a practical framework to guide design, evaluation, and analysis. Conservation Letters 11(6): e12600. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12600
[27] Chaffin, B., and Gunderson, L. (2016). Emergence, institutionalization and renewal: rhythms of adaptive governance in complex social-ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Management 165: 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.003
[28] Fletcher, R. (2017). Geoforum environmentality unbound: multiple governmentalities in environmental politics. Geoforum 85: 311-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.009
[29] Carlisle, K., and Gruby, R. (2019). Polycentric systems of governance: a theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal 47(4): 927-952. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12212
[30] Van, K., Beunen, R., Duineveld, M., and Gruezmacher, M. (2017). Power/knowledge and natural resource management: Foucaultian foundations in the analysis of adaptive governance. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 19(3): 308-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1338560
[31] World Bank (2020). Annual Report 2020. Supporting Countries in Unprecedented Times. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/about/annual-report
[32] Sen, A. (2019). Integral Human Development: A Characterisation from the Catholic Social Tradition and Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach. Revista de Estudios Sociales, N° 67 (2019) 74-86. https://doi.org/10.7440/res67.2019.06
[33] Moyer, JD. and Bohl, D. (2019). Alternative pathways to human development: assessing trade-offs and synergies in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Futures 105: 199–210. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016328718302040
[34] Ocampo, J. A. (2019). Spotlight on Sustainable Development 2018 Exploring new policy pathways. How to overcome obstacles and contradictions in the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. 167 pp. https://www.2030spotlight.org/sites/default/files/spot2018/Spotlight Science, 357, eaan1114. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/357/6352/eaan1114.abstract
[35] Vanhulst, J. (2019). Pensar la sustentabilidad desde América Latina. Retrospectiva del discurso académico a partir de un análisis bibliométrico entre 1970 y 2012. Rev. Colomb. Soc., 42(1), 41-71. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rcs/v42n1/0120-159X-rcs-42-01-41.pdf
[36] United Nations (2016). Perspectiva del medio ambiente. Organización de las Naciones Unidas. https://www.un.org/es/
[37] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2021). Agricultura orgánica. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y agricultura. http://www.fao.org/3/ad818s/ad818s03.htm
[38] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2017). Codex Alimentarius. FAO. http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/es/
[39] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015). Marco Estratégico de Mediano Plazo de Cooperación de la FAO en Agricultura Familiar en América Latina y el Caribe. FAO para América Latina y el Caribe (ALC), 40 pp. https://www.sudamericarural.org/images/en_papel/archivos/agri_fam_fao.pdf
[40] Shorrocks, VM (2017). Conventional and Organic Farming. A Comprehensive Review through the Lens of Agricultural Science. Sheffield: 5M Publishing Ltd, 574 pp. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jpln.201870035
[41] Ruíz de Maya, S., López-López, I., and Munuera, J. (2017). The impact of congruence between the CSR activity and the company's core business on consumer response to CSR. Ecological Economics, 21(1), 26-38. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6191022
[42] Maletta, H. (2017). La pequeña agricultura familiar en el Perú. Una tipología microrregionalizada. En IV Censo Nacional Agropecuario 2012: Investigaciones para la toma de decisiones en políticas públicas. Libro V. Lima, FAO.
[43] Blasco, J. y Pérez, J. (2007). Metodologías de investigación en educación física y deporte: Ampliando horizontes. Alicante, España. Editorial Club Universitario.
[44] Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed., 1st ed., 1984; rev. ed., 1989). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[45] Castro, F., Hogenboom, B., & Baud, M. (2015). Gobernanza ambiental en América Latina en la encrucijada. Gobernanza Ambiental en América Látina. http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/se/20150318053457/GobernanzaAmbiental.pdf
[46] Tallberg, J., and Zürn, M. (2019). The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: Introduction and framework. Review of International Organizations 14(4): 581–606. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11558-018-9330-7
[47] Fernández-Martínez, J. L., & Font Fábregas, J. (2018). The devil is in the detail: What do citizens mean when they support stealth or participatory democracy? Politics, 38(4), 458-479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395717741799
[48] Zürn, M. (2016). Opening up Europe: Next steps in politicisation research. West European Politics 39 (1): 164–182. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01402382.2015.1081513
[49] Spalding, M. (2016). The new blue economy: the future of sustainability. Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics 2(2): 8. https://doi.org/10.15351/2373-8456.1052
[50] Schultz, L., Folke, H., Österblom, and Olsson, P. (2015). Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(24): 7369-7374. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1406493112
[51] Guerry A D, Polasky S, Lubchenco J, Chaplin-Kramer R, Daily G C, Griffin R, et al. (2015). Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: from promise to practice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015 Jun 16; 112(24): 7348–7355. pmid: 26082539. https://www.pnas.org/content/112/24/7348.short
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Vela, A. L. M. (2024). Proposal of the Theory of Anti-Lethargy of Small Farmers Based on the Analysis of Sustainable Governance Peru 2022. World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Vela, A. L. M. Proposal of the Theory of Anti-Lethargy of Small Farmers Based on the Analysis of Sustainable Governance Peru 2022. World J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2024, 2(1), 21-31. doi: 10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Vela ALM. Proposal of the Theory of Anti-Lethargy of Small Farmers Based on the Analysis of Sustainable Governance Peru 2022. World J Agric Sci Technol. 2024;2(1):21-31. doi: 10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.15,
      author = {Ana Luisa Mendoza Vela},
      title = {Proposal of the Theory of Anti-Lethargy of Small Farmers Based on the Analysis of Sustainable Governance Peru 2022},
      journal = {World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology},
      volume = {2},
      number = {1},
      pages = {21-31},
      doi = {10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjast.20240201.15},
      abstract = {This research aimed to examine the sustainable governance applicable to small organic agriculture in Peru by 2022. The qualitative methodology was employed in the case study, enabling the acquisition of concrete, contextual, and comprehensive knowledge regarding the environmental governance that Peru has been experiencing. The study subjects comprised 15 representatives of producer organizations from the coast, the Andes, and the Amazon, as well as 5 representatives of institutions associated with the agrarian and environmental governance of Peru. The semi-structured interview was conducted with them, complemented by a documentary analysis of the primary agricultural and environmental public policies. The results indicate an enormous gap in environmental governance between the three levels of government (national government, regional governments and municipalities) and between multisectors (the ministries dedicated to the themes are given: agrarian, environmental, social, and production) It has been concluded that there is no comprehensive vision for organic agriculture as an environmental sustainability strategy. The 'Theory of Anti-Lethargy of Small Farmers in the Face of Sustainable Governance' is proposed, which encompasses strategies to encourage agrarian participation, given that more than two million farmers are awaiting the government's intervention, i.e. citizens who have not comprehended the importance of being involved, active, and committed. This approach has the potential to generate economies of scale, enhance opportunities, and elevate living standards for the next generation.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Proposal of the Theory of Anti-Lethargy of Small Farmers Based on the Analysis of Sustainable Governance Peru 2022
    AU  - Ana Luisa Mendoza Vela
    Y1  - 2024/02/20
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.15
    T2  - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
    JF  - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
    JO  - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
    SP  - 21
    EP  - 31
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2994-7332
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240201.15
    AB  - This research aimed to examine the sustainable governance applicable to small organic agriculture in Peru by 2022. The qualitative methodology was employed in the case study, enabling the acquisition of concrete, contextual, and comprehensive knowledge regarding the environmental governance that Peru has been experiencing. The study subjects comprised 15 representatives of producer organizations from the coast, the Andes, and the Amazon, as well as 5 representatives of institutions associated with the agrarian and environmental governance of Peru. The semi-structured interview was conducted with them, complemented by a documentary analysis of the primary agricultural and environmental public policies. The results indicate an enormous gap in environmental governance between the three levels of government (national government, regional governments and municipalities) and between multisectors (the ministries dedicated to the themes are given: agrarian, environmental, social, and production) It has been concluded that there is no comprehensive vision for organic agriculture as an environmental sustainability strategy. The 'Theory of Anti-Lethargy of Small Farmers in the Face of Sustainable Governance' is proposed, which encompasses strategies to encourage agrarian participation, given that more than two million farmers are awaiting the government's intervention, i.e. citizens who have not comprehended the importance of being involved, active, and committed. This approach has the potential to generate economies of scale, enhance opportunities, and elevate living standards for the next generation.
    
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Public Management and Governance, University Cesar Vallejo, Lima, Peru

  • Sections