American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Morphological and Molecular Analysis Using RAPD in Biofield Treated Sponge and Bitter Gourd

Plants are known to have sense and can respond to touch, electric and magnetic field. The present study was designed on the sponge gourd (Luffa cylindrical) and bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) seeds with respect to biofield energy treatment. The seeds of each crop were divided into two groups, one was kept control, while the other group was subjected to Mr. Trivedi’ biofield energy treatment. The variabilities in growth contributing parameters were studied and compared with their control. To study the genetic variability after biofield energy treatment, both the seeds were analyzed for DNA fingerprinting using RAPD method. After germination, the plants of sponge gourd were reported to have uniform colored leaves and strong stem. The leaves and fruits of sponge gourd showed no infection, with anti-gravity properties during early stage of fruiting as compared with the control group. Similarly, treated bitter gourd showed uniform color of leaves, strong stem, with disease free fruits in biofield treated seeds as compared with the control. The true polymorphism (%) observed between control and treated samples of sponge and bottle gourd seed sample was an average value of 7.8% and 66% respectively. In conclusion, Mr. Trivedi’s biofield energy treatment has the ability to alter the plant growth rate that may by interacting with plant genome, which resulted in high yield of crops.

Luffa cylindrical, Momordica charantia, Biofield energy, Growth Attributes, DNA Fingerprinting, Polymorphism

Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Dahryn Trivedi, Gopal Nayak, Mayank Gangwar, et al. (2015). Morphological and Molecular Analysis Using RAPD in Biofield Treated Sponge and Bitter Gourd. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 3(6), 264-270.

Copyright © 2015 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Henriques F, Guine R, Barroca MJ (2012) Chemical properties of pumpkin dried by different methods Croat. J Food Technol Biotechnol Nutr 7, 98-105.
2. Oboh IO, Aluyor EO (2009) Luffa cylindrica - an emerging cash crop. Afr J Agric Res 4: 684-688.
3. Leung L, Birtwhistle R, Kotecha J, Hannah S, Cuthbertson S (2009) Anti-diabetic and hypoglycaemic effects of Momordica charantia (bitter melon): A mini review. Br J Nutr 102: 1703-1708.
4. Miniraj N, Prasanna KP, Peter KV (1993) Bitter gourd Momordica spp. In: Kalloo G, Bergh BO (edns) Genetic improvement of vegetable plants. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
5. Singh AK (1990) Cytogenetics and evolution in the Cucurbitaceae. In: Bates DM, Robinson RW Jeffrey C (eds) Biology and utilization of Cucurbitaceae. Cornell Univ Press, Ithaca, New York.
6. Welihinda J, Karunanayake EH, Sheriff MHH, Jayasinghe KSA (1986) Effect of Momordica charantia on the glucose tolerance in maturity onset diabetes. J Ethnopharmacol 17: 277-282.
7. Raman A, Lau C (1996) Anti-diabetic properties and phytochemistry of Momordica charantia L. (Cucurbitaceae). Phytomedicine 2: 349-362.
8. Dey SS, Singh AK, Chandel D, Behera TK (2006) Genetic diversity of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) genotypes revealed by RAPD markers and agronomic traits. Sci Hort 109: 21-28.
9. Thormann CE, Ferreira ME, Camargo LEA, Tivang JG, Osborn TC (1994) Comparison of RFLP and RAPD markers to estimating genetic relationships within and among Cruciferous species. Theor Appl Genet 88: 973-980.
10. Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1993) Genetic diagnosis in plant breeding: RAPDs, microsatellites and machines. Trends Genet 9: 275-280.
11. Tuteja N, Gill SS, Tuteja R (2012) Improving crop productivity in sustainable agriculture. Wiley VCH.
12. Maffei ME (2014) Magnetic field effects on plant growth, development, and evolution. Front Plant Sci 5: 445.
13. Mahajan TS, Pandey OP (2015) Effect of electric and magnetic treatments on germination of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) seed. Int J Agric Biol 17: 351-356.
14. Alexander MP, Doijode SD (1995) Electromagnetic field, a novel tool to increase germination and seedling vigour of conserved onion (Allium cepa L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) seeds with low viability. Plant Genet Resour Newslett 104: 1-5.
15. NIH, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. CAM Basics. Publication 347. [October 2, 2008]. Available at:
16. Lenssen AW (2013) Biofield and fungicide seed treatment influences on soybean productivity, seed quality and weed community. Agricultural Journal 8: 138-143.
17. Nayak G, Altekar N (2015) Effect of biofield treatment on plant growth and adaptation. J Environ Health Sci 1: 1-9.
18. Trivedi MK, Patil S, Shettigar H, Bairwa K, Jana S (2015) Phenotypic and biotypic characterization of Klebsiella oxytoca: An impact of biofield treatment. J Microb Biochem Technol 7: 203-206.
19. Trivedi MK, Patil S, Nayak G, Jana S, Latiyal O (2015) Influence of biofield treatment on physical, structural and spectral properties of boron nitride. J Material Sci Eng 4: 181.
20. Shinde VD, Trivedi MK, Patil S (2015) Impact of biofield treatment on yield, quality and control of nematode in carrots. J Horticulture 2: 150.
21. Green MR, Sambrook J (2012) Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. (3rdedn), Cold Spring Harbor, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY.
22. Borges A, Rosa MS, Recchia GH, QueirozSilva JRD, Bressan EDA, et al. (2009) CTAB methods for DNA extraction of sweet potato for microsatellite analysis. Sci Agric (Piracicaba Braz) 66: 529-534.
23. Welsh J, McClelland M (1990) Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res 18: 7213-7218.
24. Zalapa JE, Staub JE, McCreight JD (2006) Generation means analysis of plant architectural traits and fruit yield in melon. Plant Breeding 125: 482-487.
25. Sun Z, Lower RL, Staub JE (2006) Analysis of generation means and components of variance for parthenocarpy in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) Plant Breeding 125: 277-280.
26. Ye ZH, Lu ZZ, Zhu J (2003) Genetic analysis for developmental behavior of some seed quality traits in Upland cotton (Gossypum hirsutum L.) Euphytica 129: 183-191.
27. Florez M, Carbonell MV, Martinez E (2007) Exposure of maize seeds to stationary magnetic fields: Effects on germination and early growth. Environ Exp Bot 59: 68-75.
28. Xu C, Wei S, Lu Y, Zhang Y, Chen C, et al. (2013) Removal of the local geomagnetic field affects reproductive growth in Arabidopsis. Bioelectromagnetics 34: 437-442.
29. Anand A, Nagarajan S, Verma AP, Joshi DK, Pathak PC, et al. (2012) Pre-treatment of seeds with static magnetic field ameliorates soil water stress in seedlings of maize (Zea mays L.). Indian J Biochem Biophys 49: 63-70.
30. Raj M, Prasanna NKP, Peter KB (1993) Bitter gourd Momordica ssp. In: Berg BO, Kalo G (eds) Genetic improvement of vegetable crops. Pergmon Press, Oxford.
31. Archak S, Karihaloo JL, Jain A (2002) RAPD markers reveal narrowing genetic base of Indian tomato cultivars. Curr Sci 82: 1139-1143.
32. Sances F, Flora E, Patil S, Spence A, Shinde V (2013) Impact of biofield treatment on ginseng and organic blueberry yield. Agrivita J Agric Sci 35: 22-29.
33. Shinde V, Sances F, Patil S, Spence A (2012) Impact of biofield treatment on growth and yield of lettuce and tomato. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 6: 100-105.
34. Dalamu, Behera TK, Gaikwad A, Saxena S, Bharadwaj C, et al. (2012) Morphological and molecular analyses define the genetic diversity of Asian bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). AJCS 6: 261-267.