Introduction: Nowadays, CAD/CAM is used to treat facial substance loss as part of surgical treatment or prosthetic rehabilitation. The aim of our work is to review the literature in order to compare digital manufacturing technology with other conventional methods. Materials and methods: This is a literature review based on a search carried out at the beginning of 2022 on publications from the last ten years. A keyword-based search algorithm was used to highlight the most relevant articles on the topic in question. Results and discussion: After reading the 29 articles selected in their entirety, we make a critical comparison between the manufacture of facial prostheses by the digital method and the conventional method in all its aspects, to determine the contribution of CAD/CAM to the rehabilitation of facial substance loss both surgically and prosthetically. Conclusion: Our review concluded that digital technology and 3D printing have facilitated the fabrication of facial prostheses with maximum comfort for both patient and practitioner. The combination of these techniques with conventional techniques is sometimes essential for better results.
| Published in | American Journal of Health Research (Volume 14, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajhr.20261401.15 |
| Page(s) | 33-39 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Facial Sustance Loss, Facial Prostheses, 3D Printing
| [1] | van der Meer, Wicher Jurjen “3D workflows in orthodontics, maxillofacial surgery and prosthodontics” |
| [2] | Cyndi Celica “Reconstructions maxillo-faciales: apport de la CFAO à la qualité de vie des patients” |
| [3] | I. van Heerden, A. Fossey “CHANGING WORLD OF EXTERNAL MAXILLOFACIAL PROSTHESIS MANUFACTURING” |
| [4] | Nafij B Jamayet, Yap J Abdullah, Zainul A Rajion, Adam Husein and Mohammad K Alam 'New Approach to 3D Printing of Facial Prostheses Using Combination of Open Source Software and Conventional Techniques: A Case Report” |
| [5] | Ernesto H. Weisson, BS, Mauro Fittipaldi, PhD, Carlos A. Concepcion, Daniel Pelaez, Landon Grace, David T. Tse. “Automated Non-Contact Facial Topography Mapping, 3Dimensional Printing and Silicone Casting of Orbital Prosthesis” |
| [6] | Hugo I. Medellín-Castillo “Design and Rapid Fabrication of Customised Ear Prosthesis: A Case Study in Biomedical Engineering” |
| [7] | Waqas Tanveer, Angela Ridwan-Pramana, Pedro Molinero-Mourelle, Jan Harm Koolstra and Tymour Forouzanfar "Systematic Review of Clinical Applications of CAD/CAM Technology for Craniofacial Implants Placement and Manufacturing of Nasal Prostheses” |
| [8] | Leanne Sykes, C. Peter Owen “Application of rapid prototyping technology in maxillofacial prosthetics” |
| [9] | Nina Ariani, Anita Visser, Robert P van Oort et Lindawati Kusdhany “Current State of Craniofacial Prosthetic Rehabilitation” |
| [10] | Raghavendra Adaki, Sarvesh Raikar, Kamal Shigli, Sivaranjani Gali "Prosthetic rehabilitation of a geriatric patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: A report of clinical challenge” |
| [11] | Balu K. An Innovative Three Part Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Class1V Facial Defect. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. déc 2013; 13(4): 621?6. 77. |
| [12] | Aurora Vincent, MD Scott Kohlert, MD Sameep Kadakia, MD Raja Sawhney, MD MFA, FACS Yadranko Ducic, MD, FRCS(C), FACS 'Prosthetic Reconstruction of Orbital Defects” |
| [13] | Rena L. J. Cruz, Maureen T. Ross, Sean K. Powell* and Maria A. Woodruff “Advancements in Soft-Tissue Prosthetics Part A: The Art of Imitating Life” |
| [14] | Gayatri Shankaran, Suryakant Chhagan Deogade, Rajesh Dhirawani “Fabrication of a Cranial Prosthesis Combined with an Ocular Prosthesis Using Rapid Prototyping: A Case Report” |
| [15] | Theodoros Tasopoulos, Georgios Kouveliotis, Grigoris Polyzois, Vasiliki Karathanasi “Fabrication of a 3D Printing Definitive Obturator Prosthesis: a Clinical Report” |
| [16] | Mi Young Eo, Yun Ju Cho, Truc Thi Hoang Nguyen, Mi Hyun Seo and Soung Min Kim "Implant-supported orbital prosthesis: a technical innovation of silicone fabrication” |
| [17] | Trevor D. Crafts, BA, Susan E. Ellsperman, BS, Todd J. Wannemuehler, MD, Travis D. Bellicchi, DMD, Taha Z. Shipchandler, MD, Avinash V. Mantravadi “Three-Dimensional Printing and Its Applications in Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery” |
| [18] | Ciocca L, Fantini M, Crescenzio FD, Persiani F, Scotti R. New protocol for construction of eyeglasses-supported provisional nasal prosthesis using CAD/CAM techniques. JRRD. 2010; 47(7): 595. |
| [19] | Nyberg EL, Farris AL, Hung BP, Dias M, Garcia JR, Dorafshar AH, et al. 3D-Printing Technologies for Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Reconstruction, and Regeneration. Ann Biomed Eng. janv 2017; 45(1): 45?57. |
| [20] | David A. Zopf, MD MS, Anna G. Mitsak, PhD, Colleen L. Flanagan, MSE, Matthew Wheeler, PhD, Glenn E. Green, MD, and Scott J. Hollister “Computer-Aided Designed, 3-Dimensionally Printed Porous Tissue Bioscaffolds For Craniofacial Soft Tissue Reconstruction” |
| [21] | Li R, Zhang X, Lu Z, Liu C, Li H, Sheng W, et al. An Approach for Brain-Controlled Prostheses Based on a Facial Expression Paradigm. Front Neurosci. 18 déc 2018; 12: 943. |
| [22] | Li R, Liu D, Li Z, Liu J, Zhou J, Liu W, et al. A novel EEG decoding method for a facial-expression-based BCI system using the combined convolutional neural network and genetic algorithm. Front Neurosci. 13 sept 2022; 16: 988535. |
| [23] | Santos DMD. Expander Eye Prosthesis Assisting Ocular Rehabilitation in Child with Eye Loss. JCDR [Internet]. 2017 [cité 11 oct 2022]; Disponible sur: |
| [24] | Diken Türksayar A, Saglam S, Bulut A. Retention systems used in maxillofacial prostheses: A review. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019; 22(12): 1629. |
| [25] | Çötert HS, Yılmaz M. Bone and Skin-Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides for Cranio-Facial Implant Placement. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. mars 2016; 15(1): 76?81. |
| [26] | Shrestha B, Goveas R, Thaworanunta S. Rapid fabrication of silicone orbital prosthesis using conventional methods. Singapore Dental Journal. déc 2014; 35: 83?6. |
| [27] | Goyal A, Hingrajia D, Chawla N, Shah RJ. Prosthetic Rehabilitation of a Patient with an Orbital Defect: A Simplified Approach. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. sept 2012; 12(3): 187?90. |
| [28] | Malard O, Lanhouet J, Michel G, Dreno B, Espitalier F, Rio E. Fullthickness nasal defect: Place of prosthetic reconstruction. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases. avr 2015; 132(2): 85?9. |
APA Style
Barry, A. A., Mory, K., Ghazi, H., Khella, A., Hatim, A. (2026). Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Facial Prosthetics: A Review of the Literature. American Journal of Health Research, 14(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20261401.15
ACS Style
Barry, A. A.; Mory, K.; Ghazi, H.; Khella, A.; Hatim, A. Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Facial Prosthetics: A Review of the Literature. Am. J. Health Res. 2026, 14(1), 33-39. doi: 10.11648/j.ajhr.20261401.15
@article{10.11648/j.ajhr.20261401.15,
author = {Alpha Amadou Barry and Keita Mory and Hourya Ghazi and Ayyoub Khella and Asmaa Hatim},
title = {Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Facial Prosthetics: A Review of the Literature},
journal = {American Journal of Health Research},
volume = {14},
number = {1},
pages = {33-39},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajhr.20261401.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20261401.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajhr.20261401.15},
abstract = {Introduction: Nowadays, CAD/CAM is used to treat facial substance loss as part of surgical treatment or prosthetic rehabilitation. The aim of our work is to review the literature in order to compare digital manufacturing technology with other conventional methods. Materials and methods: This is a literature review based on a search carried out at the beginning of 2022 on publications from the last ten years. A keyword-based search algorithm was used to highlight the most relevant articles on the topic in question. Results and discussion: After reading the 29 articles selected in their entirety, we make a critical comparison between the manufacture of facial prostheses by the digital method and the conventional method in all its aspects, to determine the contribution of CAD/CAM to the rehabilitation of facial substance loss both surgically and prosthetically. Conclusion: Our review concluded that digital technology and 3D printing have facilitated the fabrication of facial prostheses with maximum comfort for both patient and practitioner. The combination of these techniques with conventional techniques is sometimes essential for better results.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Facial Prosthetics: A Review of the Literature AU - Alpha Amadou Barry AU - Keita Mory AU - Hourya Ghazi AU - Ayyoub Khella AU - Asmaa Hatim Y1 - 2026/01/30 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20261401.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ajhr.20261401.15 T2 - American Journal of Health Research JF - American Journal of Health Research JO - American Journal of Health Research SP - 33 EP - 39 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8796 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20261401.15 AB - Introduction: Nowadays, CAD/CAM is used to treat facial substance loss as part of surgical treatment or prosthetic rehabilitation. The aim of our work is to review the literature in order to compare digital manufacturing technology with other conventional methods. Materials and methods: This is a literature review based on a search carried out at the beginning of 2022 on publications from the last ten years. A keyword-based search algorithm was used to highlight the most relevant articles on the topic in question. Results and discussion: After reading the 29 articles selected in their entirety, we make a critical comparison between the manufacture of facial prostheses by the digital method and the conventional method in all its aspects, to determine the contribution of CAD/CAM to the rehabilitation of facial substance loss both surgically and prosthetically. Conclusion: Our review concluded that digital technology and 3D printing have facilitated the fabrication of facial prostheses with maximum comfort for both patient and practitioner. The combination of these techniques with conventional techniques is sometimes essential for better results. VL - 14 IS - 1 ER -