| Peer-Reviewed

Students' Perception Regarding the Use of Artificial Anatomic Models

Received: 6 October 2022    Accepted: 24 October 2022    Published: 21 March 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Introduction: Historically, the teaching of anatomy uses human cadavers. However, artificial pieces have been gaining ground in the teaching methodology. Objective: To analyze the students' perception regarding anatomy study using artificial anatomical models through a structured instrument. Method: Application of a structured questionnaire to 222 health areas students in two teaching institutions from Juiz de Fora-MG-Brazil. The students should have already taken the discipline of Anatomy. Data collection was carried out at the colleges, tabulated in an Excel spreadsheet, and proceeded with statistical analyses. Results: Students were mainly in the 18-19 age group (42%); they considered that artificial pieces facilitate learning (about 80%); they were confident about the use of anatomic knowledge in clinical practice (80%). Most of them (81%) said that learning with artificial models was excellent or good despite considering a large number of structures to be memorized as a difficulty (83%). Conclusion: Respondents used synthetic parts on a large scale and attributed a superb quality to teaching/learning using these materials. They believed, in general, in their excellent preparation for applying anatomical knowledge in professional life.

Published in American Journal of Life Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajls.20231101.11
Page(s) 1-5
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Anatomy, Medical Education, Artificial Anatomical Models

References
[1] Kerby J, Shukur ZN, Shalhoub J. The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by medical students. Clinical Anatomy. 2011; 24 (4): 489–97.
[2] López Farías B, Sandoval Marchant C, Giménez Mon AM, Rosales Villarroel P. Evaluation of anatomical models activity at development of competentes in university students and its repport with learning, carrier and gender. International Journal of Morphology. 2011; 29 (2): 568–74.
[3] Hopwood N. Artist versus anatomist, models against dissection: Paul Zeiller of Munich and the revolution of 1848. Medical History. 2007; 51 (3): 279–308.
[4] Venâncio DCM. The Use of tecnologics simulators in anatomy disciplins. 2020.
[5] Penha NM, Silveira LM, Goes FDSN, Stabile AM. The use of Cadaveric pieces and sintetic models in anatomy studying at nursing courses. Revista de Enfermagem da UFSM. 2020; 10: 35.
[6] Salbego C, Oliveira EMD de, Silva M de AR da Bugança PR. Academic perceptions about learning and teaching in human anatomy. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica. 2015; 39: 23–31.
[7] Collipal Larre E, Silva Mella H. Anatomy Study in cadaveric models: students perceptions. International Journal of Morphology. 2011; 29 (4): 1181–5.
[8] Montes MA de A, Souza CTV. Strategy in teaching- tearning process in human anatomy for medical students. 2010.
[9] Jones DG, Whitaker MI. Anatomy’s use of unclaimed bodies: reasons against continued dependence on an ethically dubious practice. Clinical Anatomy. 2012; 25 (2): 246–54.
[10] Inzunza O, Salgado G. Practical evaluations in anatomy: proficiency diferences in tests using artificial models and cadaveric models. International Journal of Morphology. 2011; 29 (2): 490.
[11] Reis C, Martins M de M, Mendes RAF, Gonçalves LB, Sampaio Filho HC, Morais MR, et al. Assessment of the medical student’s perceptions about anatomic study. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica. 2013; 37: 350–8.
[12] Martineli A, Hunguer M, Delbin L, Magalhães L, Zavarize SF. Heath area’s student’s perceptions about anatomy and its influence in Professional training. Arch Health Invest. 2019; 8 (7): 336–41.
[13] Costa RM, Kayatt P, Bogoni T. Hardware. In: Tori R, Hounsell MS. Introduction to virtual reality. Porto Alegre: SBC; 2018. cap. 5, p. 112-139.
[14] Biswas R, Bandyopadhyay R. Attitude of first-year medical students towards cadaveric dissection: a cross-sectional study in a medical college of West Bengal, India. Int J Community Med Public Health [Internet]. 2019; 2679–83.
[15] Pina TC, Pelicioni BB, Zidde DH, Luzardo R, Cardozo SV. Utilization of sintetic models in Human anatomy: an efficient and modern methodology. Revista de Educação, Ciências e Matemática. 2019; 9 (3).
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Sergio Murta Maciel, Eduardo Garcia Colelho, Rafael Arantes Soares, Thainara Dorigheto Fernandes. (2023). Students' Perception Regarding the Use of Artificial Anatomic Models. American Journal of Life Sciences, 11(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20231101.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Sergio Murta Maciel; Eduardo Garcia Colelho; Rafael Arantes Soares; Thainara Dorigheto Fernandes. Students' Perception Regarding the Use of Artificial Anatomic Models. Am. J. Life Sci. 2023, 11(1), 1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20231101.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Sergio Murta Maciel, Eduardo Garcia Colelho, Rafael Arantes Soares, Thainara Dorigheto Fernandes. Students' Perception Regarding the Use of Artificial Anatomic Models. Am J Life Sci. 2023;11(1):1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20231101.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajls.20231101.11,
      author = {Sergio Murta Maciel and Eduardo Garcia Colelho and Rafael Arantes Soares and Thainara Dorigheto Fernandes},
      title = {Students' Perception Regarding the Use of Artificial Anatomic Models},
      journal = {American Journal of Life Sciences},
      volume = {11},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-5},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajls.20231101.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20231101.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajls.20231101.11},
      abstract = {Introduction: Historically, the teaching of anatomy uses human cadavers. However, artificial pieces have been gaining ground in the teaching methodology. Objective: To analyze the students' perception regarding anatomy study using artificial anatomical models through a structured instrument. Method: Application of a structured questionnaire to 222 health areas students in two teaching institutions from Juiz de Fora-MG-Brazil. The students should have already taken the discipline of Anatomy. Data collection was carried out at the colleges, tabulated in an Excel spreadsheet, and proceeded with statistical analyses. Results: Students were mainly in the 18-19 age group (42%); they considered that artificial pieces facilitate learning (about 80%); they were confident about the use of anatomic knowledge in clinical practice (80%). Most of them (81%) said that learning with artificial models was excellent or good despite considering a large number of structures to be memorized as a difficulty (83%). Conclusion: Respondents used synthetic parts on a large scale and attributed a superb quality to teaching/learning using these materials. They believed, in general, in their excellent preparation for applying anatomical knowledge in professional life.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Students' Perception Regarding the Use of Artificial Anatomic Models
    AU  - Sergio Murta Maciel
    AU  - Eduardo Garcia Colelho
    AU  - Rafael Arantes Soares
    AU  - Thainara Dorigheto Fernandes
    Y1  - 2023/03/21
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20231101.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajls.20231101.11
    T2  - American Journal of Life Sciences
    JF  - American Journal of Life Sciences
    JO  - American Journal of Life Sciences
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 5
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5737
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20231101.11
    AB  - Introduction: Historically, the teaching of anatomy uses human cadavers. However, artificial pieces have been gaining ground in the teaching methodology. Objective: To analyze the students' perception regarding anatomy study using artificial anatomical models through a structured instrument. Method: Application of a structured questionnaire to 222 health areas students in two teaching institutions from Juiz de Fora-MG-Brazil. The students should have already taken the discipline of Anatomy. Data collection was carried out at the colleges, tabulated in an Excel spreadsheet, and proceeded with statistical analyses. Results: Students were mainly in the 18-19 age group (42%); they considered that artificial pieces facilitate learning (about 80%); they were confident about the use of anatomic knowledge in clinical practice (80%). Most of them (81%) said that learning with artificial models was excellent or good despite considering a large number of structures to be memorized as a difficulty (83%). Conclusion: Respondents used synthetic parts on a large scale and attributed a superb quality to teaching/learning using these materials. They believed, in general, in their excellent preparation for applying anatomical knowledge in professional life.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Anatomy, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, Brazil

  • Department of Anatomy, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, Brazil

  • Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences of Juiz de Fora - Suprema, Juiz de Fora, Brazil

  • Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences of Juiz de Fora - Suprema, Juiz de Fora, Brazil

  • Sections