Design for manufacture connects the product design process directly with the manufacturing process. The implementation of this system can be basic and done without much care. Companies face common issues when using this system such as large discrepancies between the initial idea for a product and the final product offering. An emphasis of cost savings over all other values is an easy trap to fall into when using design for manufacture. Despite low production costs, a product that tested well with audiences can still fail if the cost cutting initiatives affected the final offering too heavily. The intent of this essay is to introduce strategic decision making systems into the process to illustrate how design for manufacture can be implemented and maintained to create a more fluid product development process without sacrificing other aspects of product development; such as quality of design or consumer value. A multiple criteria decision making system can be introduced to the process to help tighten the reigns on costs while still allowing consideration for other factors. Using these two systems together allows a company to save on costs without sacrificing sales due to low quality or loss of consumer confidence.
Published in | American Journal of Operations Management and Information Systems (Volume 4, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajomis.20190403.14 |
Page(s) | 92-98 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Design for Manufacturing, DFM, Decision Making Systems, Strategic Decision Making, Product Supply Chain, Resource Management, Multiple Criteria Decision Making
[1] | Chang, T.-C., Wysk, R. A., & Wang, H.-P. (1998). Design for Manufacturing - Guidelines. In Computer-Aided Manufacturing, Second Edition (pp. 596-598). Prentice Hall. |
[2] | Clarke, T., & Boersma, M. (2017). The Governance of Global Value Chains: Unresolved Human Rights, Environmental and Ethical Dilemmas in the Apple Supply Chain. Journal of Business Ethics, 143 (1), 111-131. |
[3] | Constance, J. (1992). DFMA: Learning to Design for Manufacture And Assembly. Mechanical Engineering, 114 (5), 70-74. |
[4] | Dayan, M., & Elbanna, S. (2011). Antecedents of Team Intuition and Its Impact on the Success of New Product Development Projects. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (s1), 159-174. |
[5] | Dekkers, R. (2011). Impact of Strategic Decision Making for Outsourcing on Managing Manufacturing. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31 (9), 935-965. Retrieved from ABI/INFORM Global. |
[6] | Dess, G. G., McNamara, G., & Eisner, A. B. (2016). Strategic Management: Creating Competitive Advantages, Eighth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. |
[7] | Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaraki, M. J. (1992). Strategic Decision Making. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 17-37. |
[8] | Hau-Nung, L. (2002). A Research in Manufacturing Strategy and Competitiveness: Models and Practices (Ph.D. Thesis). The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong. |
[9] | Ji Shukla, O., Soni, G., & Anand, G. (n.d.). An Application of Grey Based Decision Making Approach for the Selection of Manufacturing System. Grey Systems, 4 (3), 447-462. Retrieved from ABI/INFORM Global. |
[10] | Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. |
[11] | Lee, W., Rhee, S.-K., & Oh, J. (2014). The Relationships Between Manufacturing Strategy Process, Manufacturing-Marketing Integration, and Plant Performance: An Empirical Study of Korean Manufacturers. Operations Management Research, 7 (3-4), 117-133. |
[12] | Maitlis, S. (2005). The Social Processes of Organizational Sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48 (1), 21-49. |
[13] | Malkooti, B. (2011). Systematic Decision Process for Intelligent Decision Making. Retrieved from ABI/INFORM Global. |
[14] | Mills, J. H., Thurlow, A., & Mills, A. J. (2010). Making Sense of Sensemaking: The Critical Sensemaking Approach. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 5 (2), 182-195. Retrieved from ABI/INFORM Global. |
[15] | Montibeller, G., & Franco, L. (2011). Raising the Bar: Strategice Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62 (5), 855-867. |
[16] | Sanders, D., Tan, Y. C., Rogers, I., & Tewkesbury, G. E. (2009). An Expert System for Automatic Design-for-Assembly. Assembly Automation, 29 (4), 378-388. |
[17] | Shafir, E., & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2004). Context and Conflict in Multiattribute Choice. In D. J. Koehler, & N. Harvey, Blackwell Handbook for Judgment & Decision Making (pp. 341-359). Malden: Blackwell Publishing. |
[18] | Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2016). Product Design and Development, Sixth Edition. New York: McGraw Hill Education. |
[19] | Weston, R. H. (2012). Model Driven Integrated Decision-Making in Manufacturing Enterprises. Advances in Decusion Sciences. doi: 10.1155/2012/328349. |
[20] | Yang, Y., & Liu, S.-f. (2011). Reliability of Operations of Grey Numbers Using Kernels. Grey Systems, 1 (1), 57-71. |
[21] | Zutshi, A., Creed, A., Sohal, A. S., & Wood, G. (2012). Consideration of Selflessness and Self-Interest in Outsourcing Decisions. European Business Review, 24 (3), 287-303. Retrieved from ABI/INFORM Global. |
APA Style
Kristina Galuppo. (2019). Application of Strategic Decision Making to Design for Manufacture. American Journal of Operations Management and Information Systems, 4(3), 92-98. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajomis.20190403.14
ACS Style
Kristina Galuppo. Application of Strategic Decision Making to Design for Manufacture. Am. J. Oper. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2019, 4(3), 92-98. doi: 10.11648/j.ajomis.20190403.14
AMA Style
Kristina Galuppo. Application of Strategic Decision Making to Design for Manufacture. Am J Oper Manag Inf Syst. 2019;4(3):92-98. doi: 10.11648/j.ajomis.20190403.14
@article{10.11648/j.ajomis.20190403.14, author = {Kristina Galuppo}, title = {Application of Strategic Decision Making to Design for Manufacture}, journal = {American Journal of Operations Management and Information Systems}, volume = {4}, number = {3}, pages = {92-98}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajomis.20190403.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajomis.20190403.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajomis.20190403.14}, abstract = {Design for manufacture connects the product design process directly with the manufacturing process. The implementation of this system can be basic and done without much care. Companies face common issues when using this system such as large discrepancies between the initial idea for a product and the final product offering. An emphasis of cost savings over all other values is an easy trap to fall into when using design for manufacture. Despite low production costs, a product that tested well with audiences can still fail if the cost cutting initiatives affected the final offering too heavily. The intent of this essay is to introduce strategic decision making systems into the process to illustrate how design for manufacture can be implemented and maintained to create a more fluid product development process without sacrificing other aspects of product development; such as quality of design or consumer value. A multiple criteria decision making system can be introduced to the process to help tighten the reigns on costs while still allowing consideration for other factors. Using these two systems together allows a company to save on costs without sacrificing sales due to low quality or loss of consumer confidence.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Application of Strategic Decision Making to Design for Manufacture AU - Kristina Galuppo Y1 - 2019/09/16 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajomis.20190403.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ajomis.20190403.14 T2 - American Journal of Operations Management and Information Systems JF - American Journal of Operations Management and Information Systems JO - American Journal of Operations Management and Information Systems SP - 92 EP - 98 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-8310 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajomis.20190403.14 AB - Design for manufacture connects the product design process directly with the manufacturing process. The implementation of this system can be basic and done without much care. Companies face common issues when using this system such as large discrepancies between the initial idea for a product and the final product offering. An emphasis of cost savings over all other values is an easy trap to fall into when using design for manufacture. Despite low production costs, a product that tested well with audiences can still fail if the cost cutting initiatives affected the final offering too heavily. The intent of this essay is to introduce strategic decision making systems into the process to illustrate how design for manufacture can be implemented and maintained to create a more fluid product development process without sacrificing other aspects of product development; such as quality of design or consumer value. A multiple criteria decision making system can be introduced to the process to help tighten the reigns on costs while still allowing consideration for other factors. Using these two systems together allows a company to save on costs without sacrificing sales due to low quality or loss of consumer confidence. VL - 4 IS - 3 ER -