Background: Community-based health insurance (CBHI) is a non-profit health risk-pooling system for informal sectors. Its primary goal is to improve access to healthcare and provide financial protection against catastrophic medical expenses. In Ethiopia, 34% of healthcare funding comes from households’ out-of-pocket spending. This can lead to dire consequences, including financial ruin, debt, and the need to sell assets or forgo education. Avoiding care can result in long-term illness, disability, or death. Despite the urgent need for a solution, there has been a lack of empirical evidence on the willingness of urban populations in Ethiopia to participate in CBHI schemes, which is why this study was conducted. Methods: A mixed-methods, community-based, cross-sectional study was conducted in Mettu town from March 1 to 15, 2022. Quantitative data was collected using a pre-tested, structured questionnaire administered to 406 randomly selected households. For the qualitative portion, 18 participants were chosen via purposive sampling for three focused group discussions (FGDs). The quantitative data was analyzed using EPI Data 3.1 and SPSS ver. 20. Binary logistic regression was used to assess associations; variables with a P-value of ≤ 0.25 in the bivariate analysis were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. Variables with a P-value of < 0.05 in the final model were considered statistically significant predictors. The findings from the FGDs were triangulated with the quantitative results. Results: The study achieved a high response rate of 94.6%, with 384 of 406 participants completing the survey. The findings revealed a strong inclination towards CBHI, with 88.5% of participants willing to join the scheme. Among those willing to join, 87.6% were also willing to pay, representing 77.6% of the total study population. The statistical analysis identified several significant factors. Daily laborers were more than four times more likely to join than merchants (AOR: 4.15; 95% CI: 1.27-13.52). Households in the high-income quintile were also more than four times more likely to join compared to the middle-income group (AOR: 4.06; 95% CI: 1.18-14.00). Conversely, households in the lower-income quintile and those with a neutral perception of the quality of healthcare services had a statistically negative association with willingness to pay. The qualitative findings supported the quantitative data, with most participants finding the proposed scheme attractive but emphasizing the need to improve healthcare quality before implementation. Conclusion and Recommendations: The study concludes there is a high and promising willingness among urban households in Mettu town to join and pay for a CBHI scheme. The willingness to pay is, however, negatively influenced by perceptions of healthcare quality and income level. Despite these challenges, the study identifies a clear potential demand for such a program. Researchers suggest that for the successful execution and sustainability of the scheme, it is paramount to improve healthcare quality and to consider the financial capacity of lower-income families.
Published in | Economics (Volume 14, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.eco.20251403.13 |
Page(s) | 76-86 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Willingness to Join, Willingness to Pay, Proposed CBHIS, Urban Households, Mettu Town
Variables | Category | Frequency | % |
---|---|---|---|
Sex | Male | 230 | 59.9 |
Female | 154 | 40.1 | |
Age | 18-29 | 21 | 5.5 |
30-44 | 132 | 34.4 | |
45-64 | 203 | 52.9 | |
>=65 | 28 | 7.3 | |
Relation to HH head | Head | 333 | 86.7 |
Spouse | 51 | 13.3 | |
Respondents’ Ethnicity | Oromo | 288 | 75.0 |
Amhara | 59 | 15.4 | |
Guragie | 12 | 3.1 | |
Tigre | 10 | 2.6 | |
Wolaita | 9 | 2.3 | |
Siltie | 6 | 1.6 | |
Respondents’ Religion | Orthodox Christian | 217 | 56.5 |
Protestant Christian | 131 | 34.1 | |
Muslim | 22 | 5.7 | |
Wakefata | 13 | 3.4 | |
Jehovah’s witness | 1 | 0.3 | |
Marital Status | Married | 256 | 66.7 |
Widowed | 61 | 15.9 | |
Divorce | 53 | 13.8 | |
Single | 14 | 3.6 | |
Education of respondents | No Education | 37 | 9.6 |
Read &Write | 108 | 28.1 | |
Grade 1-8 | 129 | 33.6 | |
Secondary school & above | 110 | 29.6 | |
Education of Spouses (N= 256) | No Education | 38 | 14.8 |
Read &Write | 93 | 36.3 | |
Grade 1-8 | 95 | 37.1 | |
Secondary school & above | 30 | 21.8 | |
Family size | > 5 family members | 238 | 62 |
=< 5 Family members | 146 | 38 |
Variables | Categories of variables | Frequency | % |
---|---|---|---|
Respondent Occupation | Merchants | 144 | 37.5 |
Daily Laborers | 98 | 25.5 | |
Housewives | 75 | 19.5 | |
Farmers | 56 | 14.6 | |
Students | 11 | 2.9 | |
Spousal Occup (N=256) | Housewives | 141 | 55.1 |
Merchants | 69 | 27.0 | |
Daily Laborers | 35 | 13.7 | |
Farmers | 11 | 4.3 | |
Annual Income Quintile | Lowest Income Quintile (<= 7,800.00 ETB) | 78 | 20.3 |
2nd Income Quintile (7,801 – 9,600 ETB) | 68 | 17.7 | |
Middle Income Quintile (9,601 – 11,400 ETB) | 87 | 22.7 | |
4th Income Quintile (14,401 – 14,400 ETB) | 72 | 18.8 | |
Highest Income Quintile (14,401 – 50,400 ETB) | 79 | 20.6 | |
Wealth Quintile | Lowest wealth quintile | 68 | 17.7 |
2nd wealth quintile | 85 | 22.1 | |
Middle wealth quintile | 77 | 20.1 | |
4Th wealth quintile | 78 | 20.3 | |
Highest wealth quintile | 76 | 19.8 |
Variables | Categories of variables | Frequency | % |
---|---|---|---|
Self reported health status of the family (384) | Very Poor | 55 | 14.3 |
Poor | 33 | 8.6 | |
Medium | 84 | 21.9 | |
Good | 134 | 34.9 | |
Very good | 78 | 20.3 | |
Chronic Illness/disability in the Households (384) | Yes | 55 | 14.3 |
No | 329 | 85.7 | |
Illness experienced within three months before data collection (162) | Yes | 162 | 42.2 |
No | 222 | 57.8 | |
Number of family ill in households (162) | One illness | 125 | 77.2 |
Two illness | 37 | 28.8 | |
Family members sought treatment (161) | Yes | 198 | 99.5 |
No | 1 | 0.5 | |
Place preferred for treatment (161) | Private health institutions | 96 | 59.6 |
Public health institution | 65 | 40.4 | |
Reason for Preferring there (161) | Accessibility of facility | 76 | 47.2 |
Affordability of service | 13 | 8.1 | |
Absence of overcrowded | 6 | 3.7 | |
Better service | 48 | 29.8 | |
Respectful service | 7 | 4.3 | |
Free service for indigents | 11 | 6.8 | |
Health care cost of three months (161) | =< Median value (150ETB) | 87 | 54.0 |
> Median Value (150ETB) | 74 | 46.0 | |
Perceived quality on health service (161) | Negative | 83 | 51.6 |
Intermediate | 52 | 32.3 | |
Positive | 26 | 16.1 | |
Satisfaction with health service (161) | Dissatisfied | 95 | 59.0 |
Intermediate | 35 | 21.7 | |
Satisfied | 31 | 19.3 |
Variables | Variable categories | Frequency | % |
---|---|---|---|
Ever heard about CBHIS | Yes | 240 | 62.5 |
No | 144 | 37.5 | |
Source of information about CBHI | Radio | 164 | 42.7 |
Health Extension workers | 67 | 17.4 | |
Television | 136 | 35.4 | |
Neighbors | 54 | 14.1 | |
Developmental army leaders | 28 | 7.3 | |
IndividuallevelHorizontalTrust | Low | 95 | 24.7 |
Middle | 190 | 49.5 | |
High | 99 | 25.8 | |
Individuallevelreciprocity | Low | 103 | 26.8 |
Middle | 186 | 48.4 | |
High | 95 | 24.7 | |
“Iddir”participation | Yes | 365 | 95.1 |
No | 19 | 4.9 |
Variables | Var. Category | WTJ for CBHI | COR (95%CI) | AOR (95%CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes (%) | No (%) | ||||
Relation of respondent to household head | |||||
Head¥ | 298 (87.6%) | 35 (79.5%) | |||
Spouse | 42 (12.4%) | 9 (20.5%) | 1.824 (0.819,4.063)* | ||
Respondents’occupation | |||||
Merchants¥ | 123 (36.2%) | 21 (47.7%) | |||
Daily laborer | 91 (26.8%) | 7 (15.9%) | 2.220 (0.905,5.444)* | 4.148 (1.273,13.519)** | |
House wives | 65 (19.1%) | 10 (22.7%) | 1.110 (0.493,2.497) | 3.437 (0.699,16.902) | |
Farmer | 61 (17.9%) | 6 (13.6%) | 1.736 (0.666,4.523) | 2.395 (0.744,7.714) | |
Spousal Occupation | |||||
Housewives¥ | 123 (55.4%) | 18 (51.4%) | |||
Merchant | 63 (28.4%) | 7 (20.0%) | 1.317 (0.523,3.319) | ||
Laborer | 28 (12.6%) | 7 (20.0%) | 0.585 (0.223,1.536) | ||
Farmer | 8 (3.6%) | 3 (8.6%) | 0.390 (0.095,1.608)* | ||
Spousal Education | |||||
Grade 1-8¥ | 86 (38.7%) | 10 (28.6%) | |||
Only read & write | 75 (33.8%) | 18 (51.4%) | 0.484 (0.211,1.114)* | ||
No education | 34 (15.3%) | 4 (11.4%) | 0.988 (0.290,3.367) | ||
Second. & above | 27 (12.2%) | 3 (8.6%) | 1.047 (0.268,4.080) | ||
Household Annual Income quintile | |||||
Middle¥ | 73 (21.5%) | 14 (31.8%) | |||
Higher | 72 (21.2%) | 7 (15.9%) | 1.973 (0.752,5.172)* | 2.353 (0.746,7.417) | |
Lower | 72 (21.2%) | 6 (13.6%) | 2.301 (0.838,6.320)* | 2.231 (0.606,8.212) | |
High | 67 (19.7%) | 5 (11.4%) | 2.570 (0.878,7.519)* | 4.060 (1.177,14.002)** | |
Low | 56 (16.5%) | 12 (27.3%) | 0.895 (0.384,2.086) | 0.878 (0.296,2.605) |
Variable | Categories | WTP | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95%CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes (%) | No (%) | ||||
Age | |||||
45-64¥ | 160 (88.4%) | 21 (11.6%%) | |||
30-44 | 102 (87.7%) | 13 (11.3%) | 1.030 (0.494,2.147) | ||
>=65 | 19 (79.2%) | 5 (20.8%) | 0.499 (0.169,1.476)* | ||
18-29 | 17 (85%) | 3 (15%) | 0.744 (0.201,2.754) | ||
Relation of respondant to head | |||||
Head¥ | 258 (86.6%) | 40 (13.4%) | |||
Spouse | 40 (95.2%) | 2 (4.8%) | 3.101 (0.721,13.334)* | ||
Occupation of the respondents | |||||
Merchants¥ | 111 (9.2%) | 12 (9.8%) | 1 | ||
Daily laborer | 77 (84.6%) | 14 (15.4%) | 0.595 (0.261,1.355)* | ||
House wives | 59 (90.8%) | 6 (9.2%) | 1.063 (0.380,2.977) | ||
Farmer | 51 (83.7%) | 10 (16.4%) | 0.551 (0.224,1.359)* | ||
Annual income | |||||
Middle¥ | 65 (89.1%) | 8 (10.9%) | 1 | ||
Higher | 68 (94.5%) | 4 (5.5%) | 2.092 (0.601,7.284)* | 1.198 (0.155,9.275) | |
Lower | 56 (76.8%) | 16 (22.2%) | 0.431 (0.1721.082)* | 0.136 (0.025,0.732)** | |
High | 60 (89.6%) | 7 (10.4%) | 1.055 (0.361,3.086) | .311 (0.053,1.818) | |
Low | 49 (87.5%) | 7 (12.5%) | 0.862 (0.293,2.537) | 0.213 (0.035,1.313) | |
Individual level horizontal trust | |||||
Middle¥ | 149 (77.7%) | 21 (12.3%) | 1 | ||
High | 72 (82.8%) | 15 (17.2%) | 0.677 (0.329,1.390) | ||
Low | 77 (92.8%) | 6 (7.2%) | 1.809 (0.701,4.668)* | ||
Individual level reciprocity | |||||
Middle¥ | 143 (87.2%) | 21 (12.8%) | 1 | ||
Low | 77 (83.7%) | 15 (16.3%) | 0.754 (0.368,1.546) | ||
High | 78 (92.9%) | 6 (7.1%) | 1.909 (0.740,4.928)* | ||
Health status | |||||
High¥ | 103 (88%) | 14 (12%) | |||
Medium | 65 (84.4%) | 12 (15.6%) | 0.736 (0.321,1.690) | ||
Very High | 63 (92.7%) | 5 (7.3%) | 1.713 (0.589,4.984) | ||
Very Poor | 43 (91.5%) | 4 (8.5%) | 1.461 (0.455,4.693) | ||
Poor | 24 (77.5%) | 7 (22.5%) | 0.466 (0.170,1.280)* | ||
Health care cost | |||||
=< Median value¥ | 67 (88.2%) | 9 (11.8%) | 1 | ||
> Median value | 52 (77.6%) | 15 (22.4%) | 0.466 (0.189,1.148)* | ||
Perception on health care | |||||
Negative¥ | 64 (85.9) | 9 (14.1) | 1 | ||
Intermediate | 38 (73.7) | 10 (26.3) | 0.534 (0.199,1.432)* | 0.323 (0.109,0.960)** | |
Positive | 17 (70.6) | 5 (29.4) | 0.478 (0.142,1.615)* | 0.375 (0.103,1.361) | |
How to get health care cost | |||||
Very difficult | 28 (71.4) | 8 (28.6) | 0.438 (0.153,1.247)* | ||
Difficult | 19 (63.2) | 7 (36.8) | 0.339 (0.112,1.029)* | ||
Not difficult¥ | 72 (87.5) | 9 (12.5) | 1 | ||
Information about CBHIS | |||||
Yes¥ | 181 (83.4) | 30 (16.6) | 1 | ||
No | 117 (89.7) | 12 (10.3) | 0.619 (0.305,1.257)* |
BPR | Business Process Reengineering |
CBHF | Community Based Health Fund |
CBHI | Community Based Health Insurance |
CBHIS | Community Based Health Insurance Schemes |
CHI | Community Health Insurance |
CVM | Contingent Valuation Method |
DAL | Developmental Army leaders |
EFY | Ethiopian Fiscal Year |
ETB | Ethiopian Birr |
FMOH/EthMoH | Federal Ministry of Health/ Ethiopian Ministry of Health |
HIV/AIDS | Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome |
LMICs/LICS | Low & Middle Income Countries/Low Income Countries |
MDG | Millennium Development Goals |
NHIF | National Health Insurance Fund |
ORHB | Oromia Regional Health Bureau |
OOP | Out- Of – Pocket |
PCA | Principal Component Analysis |
PHCU | Primary Health Care Unit |
SACCO | Saving and Credit Co-Operatives |
SHI | Social Health Insurance |
SSA | Sub-Saharan Africa |
UHC | Universal Health Coverage |
US$ | United States Dollar |
WHO | World Health Organization |
WTJ | Willingness to Join |
WTP | Willingness to Pay |
[1] | World Health Organization. 2010. Health systems financing: the path to universal coverage. The world health report, Geneva. |
[2] | Ethiopia Federal Ministry of Health. 2014. Ethiopia’s Fifth National Health Accounts Highlight of Major Findings Briefing Notes. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[3] | Haile M., Ololo S. &Megersa B., 2014. Willingness to join community-based health insurance among rural households of Debub Bench District, Bench Maji Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. BMC Public Health, 14(1), p. 591. |
[4] | Ethiopian Health Insurance Agency. 2015. Evaluation of Community-Based Health Insurance Pilot Schemes in Ethiopia. Final Report May 2015, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[5] | Igna Elisabeth Johanna Bonfrer. 2015. Evaluating Health Care Financing Reforms in Africa. |
[6] | Ethiopia Federal Ministry of Health. April 2014. Ethiopia’s Fifth National Health Accounts 2010/2011. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[7] | Ethiopian Health Insurance Agency. July 2016. Community based health insurance system implementation manual: Manual number 005/2008. Amharic version Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[8] | Mebratie, Anagaw, Robert Sparrow, GetnetAlemu, and Arjun Singh Bedi. 2013. Community-based health insurance schemes. ISS Working Paper Series/General Series 568, no. 568(2013): 1-47. |
[9] | Stoermer M., Fuerst F., Rijal K., Bhandari R., Nogier C., Gautam G. S., Hennig J., Hada J. & Sharma S., 2012. Review of community-based health insurance initiatives in Nepal. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur InternationaleZusammenarbeit (GIZ) Gmbh. |
[10] | AdaneKebede, MeashoGebreslassie&MezgebuYitayal. 2014. Willingness to Pay for Community Based Health Insurance among Households in the Rural Community of Fogera District, North West Ethiopia. International Journal of Economics, Finance and ManagementSciences, 2(4): Pp. 263-269. |
[11] | Andinet W., Daniel Zerfu G. &Abebe S. 2016. Community-Based Health Insurance and Out-of-Pocket Healthcare Spending in Africa: Evidence from Rwanda. |
[12] | Abt Associates Inc. 2009. Feasibility Study on Community-Based Health Insurance Schemes in Oromia Region. |
APA Style
Dagne, D. (2025). Willingness to Join and Pay for Community-Based Health Insurance Among Urban Households of Mettu Town, Oromia, South West Ethiopia in 2022. Economics, 14(3), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eco.20251403.13
ACS Style
Dagne, D. Willingness to Join and Pay for Community-Based Health Insurance Among Urban Households of Mettu Town, Oromia, South West Ethiopia in 2022. Economics. 2025, 14(3), 76-86. doi: 10.11648/j.eco.20251403.13
@article{10.11648/j.eco.20251403.13, author = {Dagim Dagne}, title = {Willingness to Join and Pay for Community-Based Health Insurance Among Urban Households of Mettu Town, Oromia, South West Ethiopia in 2022 }, journal = {Economics}, volume = {14}, number = {3}, pages = {76-86}, doi = {10.11648/j.eco.20251403.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eco.20251403.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.eco.20251403.13}, abstract = {Background: Community-based health insurance (CBHI) is a non-profit health risk-pooling system for informal sectors. Its primary goal is to improve access to healthcare and provide financial protection against catastrophic medical expenses. In Ethiopia, 34% of healthcare funding comes from households’ out-of-pocket spending. This can lead to dire consequences, including financial ruin, debt, and the need to sell assets or forgo education. Avoiding care can result in long-term illness, disability, or death. Despite the urgent need for a solution, there has been a lack of empirical evidence on the willingness of urban populations in Ethiopia to participate in CBHI schemes, which is why this study was conducted. Methods: A mixed-methods, community-based, cross-sectional study was conducted in Mettu town from March 1 to 15, 2022. Quantitative data was collected using a pre-tested, structured questionnaire administered to 406 randomly selected households. For the qualitative portion, 18 participants were chosen via purposive sampling for three focused group discussions (FGDs). The quantitative data was analyzed using EPI Data 3.1 and SPSS ver. 20. Binary logistic regression was used to assess associations; variables with a P-value of ≤ 0.25 in the bivariate analysis were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. Variables with a P-value of Results: The study achieved a high response rate of 94.6%, with 384 of 406 participants completing the survey. The findings revealed a strong inclination towards CBHI, with 88.5% of participants willing to join the scheme. Among those willing to join, 87.6% were also willing to pay, representing 77.6% of the total study population. The statistical analysis identified several significant factors. Daily laborers were more than four times more likely to join than merchants (AOR: 4.15; 95% CI: 1.27-13.52). Households in the high-income quintile were also more than four times more likely to join compared to the middle-income group (AOR: 4.06; 95% CI: 1.18-14.00). Conversely, households in the lower-income quintile and those with a neutral perception of the quality of healthcare services had a statistically negative association with willingness to pay. The qualitative findings supported the quantitative data, with most participants finding the proposed scheme attractive but emphasizing the need to improve healthcare quality before implementation. Conclusion and Recommendations: The study concludes there is a high and promising willingness among urban households in Mettu town to join and pay for a CBHI scheme. The willingness to pay is, however, negatively influenced by perceptions of healthcare quality and income level. Despite these challenges, the study identifies a clear potential demand for such a program. Researchers suggest that for the successful execution and sustainability of the scheme, it is paramount to improve healthcare quality and to consider the financial capacity of lower-income families. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Willingness to Join and Pay for Community-Based Health Insurance Among Urban Households of Mettu Town, Oromia, South West Ethiopia in 2022 AU - Dagim Dagne Y1 - 2025/09/26 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eco.20251403.13 DO - 10.11648/j.eco.20251403.13 T2 - Economics JF - Economics JO - Economics SP - 76 EP - 86 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-6603 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eco.20251403.13 AB - Background: Community-based health insurance (CBHI) is a non-profit health risk-pooling system for informal sectors. Its primary goal is to improve access to healthcare and provide financial protection against catastrophic medical expenses. In Ethiopia, 34% of healthcare funding comes from households’ out-of-pocket spending. This can lead to dire consequences, including financial ruin, debt, and the need to sell assets or forgo education. Avoiding care can result in long-term illness, disability, or death. Despite the urgent need for a solution, there has been a lack of empirical evidence on the willingness of urban populations in Ethiopia to participate in CBHI schemes, which is why this study was conducted. Methods: A mixed-methods, community-based, cross-sectional study was conducted in Mettu town from March 1 to 15, 2022. Quantitative data was collected using a pre-tested, structured questionnaire administered to 406 randomly selected households. For the qualitative portion, 18 participants were chosen via purposive sampling for three focused group discussions (FGDs). The quantitative data was analyzed using EPI Data 3.1 and SPSS ver. 20. Binary logistic regression was used to assess associations; variables with a P-value of ≤ 0.25 in the bivariate analysis were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. Variables with a P-value of Results: The study achieved a high response rate of 94.6%, with 384 of 406 participants completing the survey. The findings revealed a strong inclination towards CBHI, with 88.5% of participants willing to join the scheme. Among those willing to join, 87.6% were also willing to pay, representing 77.6% of the total study population. The statistical analysis identified several significant factors. Daily laborers were more than four times more likely to join than merchants (AOR: 4.15; 95% CI: 1.27-13.52). Households in the high-income quintile were also more than four times more likely to join compared to the middle-income group (AOR: 4.06; 95% CI: 1.18-14.00). Conversely, households in the lower-income quintile and those with a neutral perception of the quality of healthcare services had a statistically negative association with willingness to pay. The qualitative findings supported the quantitative data, with most participants finding the proposed scheme attractive but emphasizing the need to improve healthcare quality before implementation. Conclusion and Recommendations: The study concludes there is a high and promising willingness among urban households in Mettu town to join and pay for a CBHI scheme. The willingness to pay is, however, negatively influenced by perceptions of healthcare quality and income level. Despite these challenges, the study identifies a clear potential demand for such a program. Researchers suggest that for the successful execution and sustainability of the scheme, it is paramount to improve healthcare quality and to consider the financial capacity of lower-income families. VL - 14 IS - 3 ER -