Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Growth and Yield Response of Carrot (Daucus carota L.) to Fertilizer Rate in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia

Received: 8 January 2025     Accepted: 7 April 2025     Published: 29 April 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Carrot (Daucus carota L.) is a significant root vegetable cultivated and consumed in Ethiopia. However, there has been limited research on the optimal fertilizer rates to enhance carrot growth and yield in the Wolaita zone. A field experiment was carried out to assess the impact of four different rates of NPS fertilizer (0 kg ha-1, 60 kg ha-1, 120 kg ha-1, and 180 kg ha-1) and four rates of urea fertilizer (0 kg ha-1, 45 kg ha-1, 90 kg ha-1, and 135 kg ha-1) on carrot growth and yield. Most growth parameters, except root length per plant, leaf length per plant at both sites, and core diameter per plant at Delbo, were significantly affected by the fertilizer rates. The highest plant height (32.6 cm) with 120 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha urea, leaf number per plant (12.1) and shoot weight per plant (7.4 g) at 180 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha urea, shoot dry weight per plant (1.5 g) at 0 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha urea, root diameter (2.4 cm) at 60 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha urea, root fresh weight per plant (31.3 g), root yield, and marketable yield (31,333 kg/ha) at 180 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha urea, and root dry weight per plant (2.9 g) at 120 kg/ha NPS and 45 kg/ha urea were recorded at Delbo. At Soddo site, the highest plant height (43.3 cm), root weight per plant (29.0 g), root yield (32,333 kg/ha) at 120 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha urea, leaf number (9.5) at 0 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha urea, shoot weight per plant (11.1 g) at 60 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha urea, shoot dry weight per plant (2.4 g) at 60 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha Urea, marketable yield (27,800 kg/ha) at 120 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha Urea, root dry weight per plant (3.3 g) and shelf life (24.0 days) at 0 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha Urea was obtained, respectively. Applying a fertilizer rate of 180 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha at Delbo, along with a rate of 120 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha at Soddo, demonstrated the potential to enhance carrot productivity in the experimental region and in areas with comparable environmental conditions. It is advisable to conduct this study again in various seasons to provide more accurate recommendations.

Published in Engineering Science (Volume 10, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.es.20251002.11
Page(s) 24-31
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Carrot, Carrot Growth, NPS, Urea, Carrot Yield

1. Introduction
Carrot (Daucus carota L.) is a biennial herbaceous plant that can thrive in various environments. During its first growing season, it focuses on developing leaves and roots, while in the second season, it utilizes the roots as a storage organ to produce new leaves and flowers . In Ethiopia, promoting carrot cultivation and increasing domestic consumption is seen as a strategy to enhance nutritional standards and mitigate the prevalence of night blindness in mothers and children, which is often linked to vitamin A deficiency. Additionally, carrots are rich in a variety of antioxidants, vitamins, carbohydrates, crude fiber, and essential minerals such as calcium, phosphorus, iron, and magnesium .
In Ethiopia, carrot productivity was recorded at approximately 3.87 tons per hectare in the 2014/15 growing season and 4.38 tons per hectare in 2015/16 . However, these yields remain significantly lower than the expected range of 8-12 tons per hectare for tropical regions and the global average of 21 tons per hectare . The lower productivity of carrots in the country can be attributed to inadequate agricultural practices, including improper sowing times, a lack of high-yielding varieties, insufficient spacing, and ineffective management of weeds, pests, and diseases, as well as inadequate irrigation . Factors such as fertilization levels and soil tillage may also interact in various ways, depending on the specific cultivar .
To achieve high yields, it is essential to have fertile soil that supports the production and movement of carbohydrates from the leaves to the roots. Key nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur are critical limiting factors that influence the growth, development, and yield of crops . Typically, carrot farmers rely on inorganic fertilizers as their primary nutrient source to enhance growth and yield .
While a recommendation of 100 kg/ha of DAP and 100 kg/ha of urea fertilizer has been made for Eastern Ethiopia , there has yet to be a systematic investigation into the optimal fertilizer rates for maximizing carrot root yield in the Wolaita zone. Consequently, this study aims to identify the suitable rates of NPS and urea for improving carrot production and productivity in the region.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Description of the Study Area
The experiments were carried out under rain-fed conditions on a farm located in the Damot Galee and Soddo Zuria districts of the Wolaita zone in Ethiopia during the 2019 cropping year. The site is situated at a latitude of 6° 49’N and a longitude of 37° 45’E, with an elevation of 1,886 meters above sea level. This region experiences a bimodal rainfall pattern, with the shorter rainy season occurring from March to April and the primary rainy season from June to September, which is when carrots are predominantly cultivated. Historical data from the past twelve years (2003-2015) indicates that the average annual rainfall is approximately 1,580 mm, while the average maximum and minimum temperatures are 23.7°C and 17.7°C, respectively. In August, the relative humidity in the area reaches 75.2%, whereas it can drop to as low as 56.0% in February . The prevalent soil type in the Wolaita region is a well-drained sandy loam characterized by low organic matter content .
2.2. Treatments and Experimental Designs
The experiment was carried out using a factorial combination of four urea application rates (0, 45, 90, and 135 kg ha-1) and four NPS application rates (0, 60, 120, and 180 kg ha-1) as treatments. It was organized in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Each plot measured 1.5 m² (1.25 m × 1.2 m). The spacing between rows was 25 cm, while the spacing between plants was 10 cm. A 1 m wide space separated the blocks, and there was a 0.5 m space between each plot. All plots received equal watering and other necessary cultural practices.
2.3. Field Management and Cultural Practice
The experimental field was meticulously ploughed using locally sourced materials to a depth of 30 cm to achieve a fine tilth. It was then leveled and segmented into plots according to the experimental design. Seeds were sown at a depth of 1.5 cm in rows. A half dose of nitrogen and a full dose of NPS were applied as a basal treatment on the sowing date and thoroughly mixed with the soil. The remaining half dose of nitrogen was applied as a top dressing following thinning, in accordance with the treatment protocols. Two rounds of thinning were conducted to ensure optimal plant population. The first thinning occurred 20 days after sowing, while the second took place 10 days after the first thinning. Additionally, earthing up of the plants was performed twice, at 30 and 60 days post-sowing, to cover any exposed roots.
2.4. Data Collected
Root yield was obtained from the entire net plot, while for the other parameters; ten plants from the central rows were randomly selected and tagged for data collection as follows:
Plant height (cm): was measured as the distance from the ground level to the tip of the plant at maturity.
Number leaf per plant: the total number of leaves per plant was counted at harvest, and the average number of leaves per plant was calculated.
Leaf length (cm): was measured from the apex to the base of the leaf, and the average was determined.
Plant shoot fresh weight (g plant-1): the above-ground portions of the plants were harvested to record their fresh weight, with the average expressed in grams.
Shoot dry weight (gm plant-1): following the fresh weight measurement, the above-ground parts were dried in an oven at 60°C until a constant weight was achieved, allowing for the recording of shoot dry weight with the average also expressed in grams.
Root weight per plant (g): was recorded by harvesting selected plants from each plot, and the average was expressed in grams.
Root length (cm): was measured from the apex to the base of the root, and the average was calculated.
Root diameter (cm): was measured from one edge through the center to the opposite edge at the middle of the root.
Root dry weight (g plant-1): the roots were subjected to drying in an oven at 60°C until a stable weight was reached, after which their dry weight was recorded. The average dry weight of the roots was reported in grams per plant.
Root yield (kg per hectare): roots were collected from the designated plot, weighed, and the yield was expressed in kilograms per hectare.
Marketable root yield (kg per hectare): the ratio of marketable to unmarketable roots was assessed by evaluating the roots for size and quality. Oversized, undersized, branched, cracked, and damaged carrots were classified as unmarketable based on farmers' perceptions, while the remaining roots were deemed marketable.
Core diameter (cm): the harvested roots were sliced, and the thickness of the slices taken from the middle section of the tap root was measured and recorded in centimeters.
Shoot water content and root water content (%): The water content of the carrots was calculated using the formula provided by Keshavarzpour (2011): Water content (%) = 100 x (M1 - M2) / M1, where M1 represents the weight before drying and M2 denotes the weight after drying.
Harvested root shelf life (days): Shelf life was defined as the duration (in days) from the harvest of the roots until the end of their edible life at room temperature. The end of shelf life was identified as the point at which 50% of the stored roots were no longer suitable for consumption.
Total soluble solids: This measurement was derived using a linear regression model as outlined by Keshavarzpour (2011): TSS = 34.9 - 0.30 WC, where TSS stands for total soluble solids and WC represents water content.
2.5. Data Analysis
The data were examined utilizing the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) procedures available in the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software . To distinguish significant differences among treatment means, Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) test was applied at α= 0.05, following the analysis of variance that indicated P≤0.05.
3. Results and Discussion
The impact of varying rates of NPS and Urea on plant height, leaf count, shoot weight per plant, shoot dry weight per plant, and shoot water content was found to be significant (P < 0.05), while leaf length did not show significant differences at both Delbo and Sodoo sites. At the Delbo site, the tallest plants (32.6cm) were observed with the application of 120 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha Urea. The highest leaf count per plant (12.1) and shoot weight per plant (7.4g) were achieved with 180 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha Urea. Additionally, the maximum shoot dry weight per plant (1.5g) was recorded with 0 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha Urea, while the highest shoot water content per plant (93.4%) was noted with 0 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha Urea. In the Soddo site, the greatest plant height (43.3cm) was also recorded with 120 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha Urea. The highest leaf count (9.5) was achieved with 0 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha Urea, while the maximum shoot weight per plant (11.1g) was noted with 60 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha Urea. Furthermore, the highest shoot dry weight per plant (2.4g) was obtained with 60 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha Urea, and the maximum shoot water content per plant (92.22%) was recorded with 120 kg/ha NPS and 45 kg/ha Urea, as detailed in Table 1.
The minimum plant height recorded was 21.9 cm, with a shoot weight per plant of 3.1 g and a shoot dry weight of 0.2 g, observed at 0 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha Urea. The lowest leaf count, which was 8.2, was noted at 180 kg/ha NPS combined with 0 kg/ha Urea. Additionally, the lowest shoot water content per plant, measured at 73.1%, occurred at 0 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha Urea at Delbo. In Soddo, the lowest plant height of 35.4 cm and the lowest shoot dry weight of 0.5 g were also recorded at 0 kg/ha NPS and 45 kg/ha Urea. Furthermore, the lowest leaf number of 7.1 was found at 0 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha Urea, while the lowest shoot weight per plant was 3.4 g and the shoot water content was 82.3%, both at 0 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha Urea (Table 1). Overall, as the rate of fertilization increased, so did vegetative growth, indicating that fertilizers play a crucial role in enhancing this growth. These findings align with previous studies by , which reported significant growth variations in carrots due to chemical fertilizer application. Additionally, noted that the use of commercial fertilizers significantly improved carrot growth, attributed to the readily available nutrients they provide. Similar observations were made by , who found that plant height increased progressively with higher fertilizer application levels in carrots. also reported that increased nitrogen application led to a greater number of leaves. Moreover, documented statistically significant variations in the fresh weight of leaves per plant at different phosphorus levels.
Table 1. Effect of fertilizer rate (kg/ha) on growth parameters of carrot.

Delbo

Soddo

NPS rate

Urea rate

PH

LNPP

SWPP

SDWPP

PH

LNPP

SWPP

SDWPP

0

0

21.9b

8.7b

3.1e

0.2h

39.5abcdef

8.5abc

7.8bcd

1.3bc

45

26.9ab

8.5b

3.4de

0.7ef

35.4f

8.1abc

5.8ef

0.5i

90

29.2ab

8.9b

4.8c

0.5g

36.6cdef

7.3c

4.1g

0.7fghi

135

25.1ab

9.9b

3.9d

1.5a

37.7bcdef

7.1c

4.9fg

0.9efgh

60

0

24.4ab

8.7b

3.7de

0.7e

38.2bcdef

8.8ab

11.1a

1.5b

45

27.9ab

9.1b

4.7c

1.1cd

36.3def

7.5bc

5.8ef

0.7ghi

90

31.7a

9.5b

7.2a

1.1cd

36.1ef

7.5bc

6.8de

1.0cdef

135

31.9a

9.1b

5.1bc

0.5fg

40.7abc

7.7bc

8.1bcd

2.4a

120

0

26.8ab

9.5b

4.9c

1.1cd

43.3a

7.5bc

8.9b

1.1cde

45

26.8ab

9.3b

5.3bc

1.3b

40.9abc

8.4abc

8.5bc

0.6hi

90

32.6a

9.9b

5.7b

1.2bc

38.7bcdef

7.6bc

7.8bcd

1.2cd

135

27.9ab

8.9b

4.9c

0.5g

41.1ab

7.5bc

7.9bcd

1.2cde

180

0

29.4ab

8.2b

4.9c

0.6efg

40.5abcd

8.4abc

8.3bc

1.2cde

45

28.7ab

9.2b

4.9c

0.7e

40.0abcde

7.3c

7.3cd

1.1cde

90

29.4ab

9.4b

5.8b

1.1cd

36.3def

8.2abc

7.2cde

1.3bc

135

27.5ab

12.1a

7.4a

1.0d

39.1abcdef

9.5a

9.1b

0.9defg

LSD (0.05)

9.2

2.2

0.9

0.2

4.4

1.4

1.5

0.3

CV (%)

19.7

14.0

9.4

10.3

6.6

12.0

16.5

23.5

Means followed by the same letter with in the column are not different from each other at P=0.05 level of significance. Where, PH = plant height (cm), SDWPP = shoot dry weight per plant (cm), SWPP = shoot weight per plant and LNPP = leaf number per plant.
The analysis of yield parameters, excluding root length per plant, indicated significant variations (P < 0.05) between different fertilizer rates of NPS and Urea. The maximum root diameter of 2.4 cm was observed with the application of 60 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha Urea. Additionally, the highest root fresh weight per plant was 31.3 g, and the root yield reached 31,333 kg/ha, both recorded at 180 kg/ha NPS combined with 90 kg/ha Urea. The peak root dry weight per plant, measuring 2.9 g, was noted at 120 kg/ha NPS and 45 kg/ha Urea at the Delbo site. In contrast, at the Soddo location, the largest root diameter of 2.3 cm was achieved with 120 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha Urea, while the highest root dry weight per plant of 3.3 g was found at 0 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha Urea. Furthermore, the greatest root weight per plant of 29.0 g and the root yield of 32,333 kg/ha were both noted at 120 kg/ha NPS with no Urea applied (Table 2).
The smallest root diameter recorded was 1.8 cm, observed at both 60 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha. Additionally, the lowest values for root fresh weight per plant (14.9 g), root yield (8,567 kg/ha), and root dry weight per plant (0.7 g) were noted at 0 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha Delbo. In Soddo, the minimum root diameter (1.8 cm), root fresh weight (15.1 g), and root yield (15,071 kg/ha) were also found at 0 kg/ha NPS combined with 90 kg/ha. Conversely, the least root dry weight (1.3 g) was recorded at 180 kg/ha NPS and 45 kg/ha Urea (Table 2). Overall, an increase in fertilizer application generally led to enhanced yield parameters, although this trend was not uniform. The growth and yield of plants are significantly affected by nitrogen uptake and its biochemical conversion; thus, a higher nitrate reduction to ammonium at 75 kg/ha may have contributed to improved carrot yields by facilitating greater nitrogen allocation to photosynthesis and carbon metabolism in the plants . This finding aligns with the observations of previous studies , which noted that the increase in root size or mass corresponds with higher fertilizer levels, particularly nitrogen, which is known to enhance plant growth and yield. Furthermore, it was established that the fresh weight of roots was significantly affected by both nitrogen dosage and plant variety . Other research indicated that root fresh weight increased with rising fertilizer levels up to a certain threshold before declining . Additionally, it was found that average root weight, root length, and yield improved with increasing fertilizer application rates, specifically up to 40 kg N + 36 kg P2O5 + 49 kg K2O per feddan .
Table 2. Effect of fertilizer rate (kg/ha) on yield and yield attributes of carrot.

Delbo

Soddo

NPS rate

Urea rate

RD

RDWPP

RWPP

RY

RD

RDWPP

RWPP

RY

0

0

1.9ab

0.7h

14.9f

8567e

2.2ab

3.3a

25.8abc

25800b

45

2.2ab

2.0de

23.9cd

23867bc

2.0ab

2.8bc

20.2cde

20200cde

90

2.0ab

1.3g

22.7cd

22667bc

1.8b

3.1abc

15.1e

15071e

135

1.9ab

2.5abcd

20.6de

20600cd

1.8b

3.1ab

15.3e

15333e

60

0

1.8b

2.3bcde

17.5ef

17467d

2.3a

2.0ef

24.1abcd

24067bcd

45

2.2ab

2.6abc

23.9cd

23933bc

2.0ab

1.8efg

18.8de

18800de

90

2.4a

2.4bcde

31.3a

31330a

2.1ab

3.1abc

19.9cde

19933de

135

2.2ab

1.9ef

30.8a

30833a

2.1ab

1.9ef

23.3abcd

23267bcd

120

0

2.3ab

2.7abc

23.5cd

23467bc

2.3a

2.9abc

25.5abc

25467bc

45

1.9ab

2.9a

21.7cde

21733bc

2.4a

2.7bcd

26.7ab

26700b

90

2.2ab

2.2cde

25.5bc

24867b

2.1ab

2.6cd

20.5bcde

18867de

135

2.1ab

1.5fg

21.8cde

22467bc

2.3a

1.5fg

26.1abc

27800ab

180

0

2.0ab

2.3cde

22.5cd

22533bc

2.1ab

1.9ef

29.0a

32333a

45

2.2ab

0.8h

29.7ab

29733a

2.1ab

1.3g

27.0a

27000b

90

2.4ab

2.7abc

31.3a

31333a

2.2ab

1.8ef

23.2abcd

23200bcd

135

2.2ab

2.8ab

30.3a

30333a

2.3a

2.2de

25.7abc

25733b

LSD (0.05)

0.6

0.5

4.6

3892.9

0.4

0.5

6.3

5307.7

CV (%)

16.6

13.5

11.2

9.7

11.5

19.5

17.1

15.8

Means followed by the same letter with in the column are not different from each other at P=0.05 level of significance. Where, RD = root diameter (cm), RDWPP = root dry weight per plant (g), RWPP (g) = root weight per plant and RY = root yield (kg/ha).
The influence of varying rates of NPS and Urea on shelf life, marketable yield, and root water content was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05) at both the Delbo and Soddo locations, as well as for core diameter per plant at Soddo, although it was not significant at Delbo. At Delbo, the optimal shelf life of 20.0 days was achieved with 60 kg/ha of NPS and 135 kg/ha of Urea, while the highest marketable yield of 31,333 kg/ha was recorded with 180 kg/ha of NPS and 90 kg/ha of Urea. Additionally, the total soluble solute content reached 9.89% with 60 kg/ha of NPS and no Urea, and root water content was measured at 96.5% with 180 kg/ha of NPS and 45 kg/ha of Urea. In contrast, at Soddo, the longest shelf life of 24.0 days was noted with no application of NPS or Urea, the highest marketable yield of 27,800 kg/ha was obtained with 120 kg/ha of NPS and 135 kg/ha of Urea, total soluble solute content peaked at 11.2% with no NPS and 135 kg/ha of Urea, and root water content was recorded at 91.9% with 180 kg/ha of NPS and 90 kg/ha of Urea. The core diameter per plant reached 0.80 cm with 60 kg/ha of NPS and no Urea (Table 3).
The shortest shelf life recorded was 13.0 days with 0 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha Urea, while the list marketable yield of 14,867 kg/ha was achieved with both 0 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha Urea. Additionally, the lowest total soluble solute content reached 6.0% at 120 kg/ha NPS and 45 kg/ha Urea, and the root water content was measured at 83.4% with 60 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha Urea, all observed at Delbo (Table 3). In contrast, at Soddo, the lowest shelf life of 17.0 days and a marketable yield of 15,067 kg/ha were noted with 0 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha Urea. The total soluble solute content was 6.6% at 180 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha Urea, while the list root water content was 79.0%, and the core diameter per plant measured 0.57 cm at the combination of 0 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha Urea (Table 3).
Overall, an increase in fertilizer application generally led to enhanced marketable yield and shelf life, although this trend was not uniform. This finding aligns with the observations made by , which indicated that raising nitrogen fertilizer levels to 180 kg/ha boosts marketable yield. Similar conclusions were drawn by . Furthermore, noted that varying fertilizer levels had a slight yet significantly positive impact on the total soluble solids content in carrots.
Table 3. Effect of fertilizer rate (kg/ha) on quality parameters of carrot.

Delbo

Soddo

NPS rate

Urea rate

SL

MY

TSS

RWC

SL

MY

TSS

RWC

CDPP

0

0

14.0ab

14867g

8.2ab

88.9ab

24.0a

25467ab

8.8abcd

87.1abc

0.7ab

45

17.0ab

21467cde

7.8ab

90.4ab

19.7abcd

17667ef

8.8abcd

87.0abc

0.7abc

90

13.0b

21733cde

6.8ab

93.8ab

17.0d

15067f

10.9ab

79.9cd

0.6bc

135

17.0ab

20067e

8.8ab

87.2ab

17.0d

19400cdef

11.2a

79.0d

0.6c

60

0

17.0ab

17267f

9.9a

83.4b

21.7abc

24067abc

7.7cd

90.5ab

0.8a

45

20.0a

23933b

8.2ab

89.0ab

19.7abcd

17200f

7.8cd

90.3ab

0.7abc

90

17.0ab

31130a

7.5ab

91.4ab

18.3cd

19933cdef

9.6abc

84.2bcd

0.7abc

135

20.0a

23467bc

7.4ab

91.8ab

23.0ab

23267abcd

7.5cd

91.4ab

0.7abc

120

0

14.0ab

23467bc

8.3ab

88.7ab

21.7abc

25467ab

8.6bcd

87.8ab

0.8a

45

15.0ab

21733cde

9.1ab

86.0ab

21.7abc

26700ab

8.0cd

89.7ab

0.8a

90

17.0ab

23600bc

8.0ab

89.9ab

22.0abc

18533def

8.9abcd

86.8abc

0.7abc

135

15.0ab

21600cde

7.0ab

93.1ab

21.7abc

27800a

6.6d

94.2a

0.8a

180

0

15.0ab

20867de

8.7ab

87.5ab

23.0ab

25667ab

6.6d

94.3a

0.7abc

45

14.0ab

22900bcd

6.0b

96.5a

21.7abc

27000ab

9.6abc

89.8ab

0.7abc

90

17.0ab

31333a

7.4ab

91.5ab

19.33bcd

22533bcde

7.4cd

91.9a

0.7ab

135

20.0a

30333a

9.1ab

86.0ab

24.0a

24200abc

7.9cd

90.0ab

0.7ab

LSD (0.05)

6.0

2141.1

3.7

13.1

12.4

5047.4

2.5

9.3

0.2

CV (%)

22.0

5.6

28.0

8.3

12.5

15.6

17.6

5.4

12.8

Means followed by the same letter with in the column are not different from each other at P=0.05 level of significance. Where, SL = shelf life (days) MY = marketable yield, TSS = total soluble solute, RWC = root water content (%) and CDPP = core diameter per plant.
4. Conclusion
Overall, the root length per plant, leaf length per plant, and core diameter per plant at Delbo were not significantly influenced by the fertilizer rate. However, other growth, yield, and quality parameters were notably affected by the interaction between NPS and Urea fertilizer rates. Although this study was conducted over a single season, it clearly demonstrated that fertilizer rates had a significant impact on the growth and productivity of carrots. Utilizing a fertilizer rate of 180 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha Urea at Delbo, as well as 120 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha Urea at Soddo, showed promise for enhancing carrot productivity in the experimental area and similar environmental conditions. Nonetheless, additional research across different seasons is necessary to validate these findings.
Abbreviations

CSA

Central Statistical Authority

LSD

Least Significant Difference

RCBD

Randomized Complete Block Design

SAS

Statistical Analysis System

TSS

Total Soluble Solids

WC

Water Content

Acknowledgments
The Authors went to acknowledge ATTSVE project of Dalhosie University for founding and Wolaita Sodo Agricultural Vocational Training Center for giving experimental site.
Author Contributions
Abdirshikur Reshid Jemal: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software
Zekiya Fitret Shikur: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software
Funding
The research was funded by ATTSVE project of Dalhosie University.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Ali M. K., Barkotulla, M. A. B., Alam, M. N. and Tawab, K. A. (2006). effect of nitrogen levels on yield and yield contributing characters of three varieties of carrot. Pakistan J. Bio. Sci. 9(3): 553-57.
[2] Aquino A. Assunção S., Aquino M., de Oliveir, A. and André de Carvalho X. (2015). Nutrient Demand by the Carrot Crop is Influenced by the Cultivar. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 39: 541-552.
[3] Clarke P. and Vilby K. (2011). Carrot growing in Ethiopia: the present and the possibilities. Carrot Aid, Vilvordevej 8, 2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark.
[4] CSA (Central Statistical Agency) (2016). The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. Agricultural Sample Survey 2015/2016 (2008 E. C.). Volume I. Statistical Bulletin 584. Report on Area and Production of Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season). Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
[5] Dauda S. N., Ajayi F. A. and Ndor E. (2008) Growth and Yield of Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) as Affected by Poultry Manure Application. Journal of Agriculture & Social Sciences, 4, 121-124.
[6] Djennane S., Quillere S. I., Leydecker M. T., Meyer C. and Chauvin J. E. (2004). Expression of a deregulated tobacco nitrate reductase gene in potato increases biomass production and decreases nitrate concentration in all organs. Plantar. 219: 884-93.
[7] El-Desuki, Salman M., El-Nemr S. R. and Abdel-Mawgoud. (2005). Effect of plant density and nitrogen application on the growth, yield and quality of radish. J. Agronomy. 4(3): 225-29.
[8] Gastal F. and Lemaire G. (2002). N uptake and distribution in crops: an agronomical and ecophysiological perspective. J. Exp. Botany, 53 (370): 789-799.
[9] George J. H., Jeffrey K. B, and Mark J. B. (1999). Nitrogen Fertilization to Maximize Carrot Yield and Quality on a Sandy Soil. Hortscience 34(4): 641–645.
[10] Gebru H. A. Mohammed N. Dechassa and Belew D. (2017a). Profitability of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) as affected by NP nutrition and variety in southern Ethiopia. J. Hort. Forestry, 9(2): 9-16.
[11] Hassan M. N. M., Abdel Ati Y. and Farrag M. M. (1992). Effect of planting arrangement and NPK fertilizers on carrot under El-Minia conditions. Asian J. Agri. Sci. 23(4): 121-35.
[12] Kahangi E. (2004). Daucus carota L. In: Grubben, G. J. H. and Denton, O. A. (eds.) Plant Resources of Tropical Africa 2. Vegetables. PROTA Foundation, Wageningen, Netherlands. p 280– 285.
[13] Khan M. Q. and Khan J. I. (2006). Impact of sewage waste (Effluent and Sludge) on soil properties and quality of vegetables. Final/Completion Report of ALP Project, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan.
[14] Kirad K. S., Barche S. and Singh D. B. (2010). Integrated nutrient management on growth, yield and quality of Carrot. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 23(3): 542-543.
[15] Kiran M., M. S. Jilani K. Waseem and Marwat S. K. (2016a). Response of carrot (Daucus carota L.) growth and yields to organic manure and inorganic fertilizers. American-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci., 16(6): 1211-1218.
[16] Kumar P. Y, (2000). Conjunctive use of castor cake and nitrogenous fertilizers on the performance of carrot. M. Sc. (Agri.) thesis, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad, India.
[17] Lawlor D. W. (2002). Carbon and nitrogen assimilation in relation to yield: mechanisms are the key to understanding production systems. J Exp. Botany 53 (370): 773-787.
[18] Lenka P. C., Dash P. K., Das J. N. and Dash D. K. (1990). Effect of nitrogen and lime on growth and yield of carrot (Dacus carota L). Orissa J. Hort. 18(1-2): 57-61.
[19] Martin N., Geert-jan V., Thiemo B. and Arne V. B. (2004). Parameter for Carrot Quality and the development of inner quality concept. Louis Bolk Institute.
[20] Mehedi T. A., Siddique M. A. and Shahid S. B. (2012). Effects of urea and cowdung on growth and yield of carrot. J. Bangladesh Agril. Univ. 10(1): 9-13.
[21] NMA (National Meteorological Agency). (2015). National Meteorological Agency, Hawassa Branch. Hawassa, Ethiopia.
[22] Parry MAJ, Flexas J, Medrono H (2005). Prospects for crop production under drought. Research priorities andfuture directions. Annual Appl. Biol., 147: 211-226.
[23] Rani S. N. and Reddy K. M. (2007). Effect of different organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of Carrot (Daucus carota L.). Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 20(3): 686-688.
[24] Sadia A. A., Mahasen M., Shahrin S., Roni M. Z. K. and Jamal A. F. M. U. (2013). Phsophorus levels on growth and yield of turnip (Brassica campestris var. rapifera). Bangladesh Res. Pub. J. 8(1): 29-33.
[25] Sanderson K. R. and Ivany J. A. (1997). Carrot yield response to nitrogen rate. J. Production Agr. 10: 336–339.
[26] SAS (Statistical Analysis System) Institute Inc, 2002. The SASR System FOR WINDOWS TM. Version 9.00, Cary, NC, USA.
[27] Sharma K. D., Karki S., Thakur N. S. and Attri S. (2011). Chemical composition, functional properties and processing of carrot - a review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 49(1): 22-32.
[28] Tadele, S. and Solomon, T. (2016). Effect of intra spacing on yield and yield component of carote (Daucus carota). Current Research Agri. Sci. 3(1): 1-6.
[29] Wassu M., Tewodros B., Nigussie D., Kebede W., Mulatua H., Bekele A. (2014). Registration of “Haramaya I” Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Variety. E. African J. Sci. 8(1): 65-70.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Jemal, A. R., Shikur, Z. F. (2025). Growth and Yield Response of Carrot (Daucus carota L.) to Fertilizer Rate in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Engineering Science, 10(2), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20251002.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Jemal, A. R.; Shikur, Z. F. Growth and Yield Response of Carrot (Daucus carota L.) to Fertilizer Rate in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Eng. Sci. 2025, 10(2), 24-31. doi: 10.11648/j.es.20251002.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Jemal AR, Shikur ZF. Growth and Yield Response of Carrot (Daucus carota L.) to Fertilizer Rate in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Eng Sci. 2025;10(2):24-31. doi: 10.11648/j.es.20251002.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.es.20251002.11,
      author = {Abdirshikur Reshid Jemal and Zekiya Fitret Shikur},
      title = {Growth and Yield Response of Carrot (Daucus carota L.) to Fertilizer Rate in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia
    },
      journal = {Engineering Science},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {24-31},
      doi = {10.11648/j.es.20251002.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20251002.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.es.20251002.11},
      abstract = {Carrot (Daucus carota L.) is a significant root vegetable cultivated and consumed in Ethiopia. However, there has been limited research on the optimal fertilizer rates to enhance carrot growth and yield in the Wolaita zone. A field experiment was carried out to assess the impact of four different rates of NPS fertilizer (0 kg ha-1, 60 kg ha-1, 120 kg ha-1, and 180 kg ha-1) and four rates of urea fertilizer (0 kg ha-1, 45 kg ha-1, 90 kg ha-1, and 135 kg ha-1) on carrot growth and yield. Most growth parameters, except root length per plant, leaf length per plant at both sites, and core diameter per plant at Delbo, were significantly affected by the fertilizer rates. The highest plant height (32.6 cm) with 120 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha urea, leaf number per plant (12.1) and shoot weight per plant (7.4 g) at 180 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha urea, shoot dry weight per plant (1.5 g) at 0 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha urea, root diameter (2.4 cm) at 60 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha urea, root fresh weight per plant (31.3 g), root yield, and marketable yield (31,333 kg/ha) at 180 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha urea, and root dry weight per plant (2.9 g) at 120 kg/ha NPS and 45 kg/ha urea were recorded at Delbo. At Soddo site, the highest plant height (43.3 cm), root weight per plant (29.0 g), root yield (32,333 kg/ha) at 120 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha urea, leaf number (9.5) at 0 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha urea, shoot weight per plant (11.1 g) at 60 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha urea, shoot dry weight per plant (2.4 g) at 60 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha Urea, marketable yield (27,800 kg/ha) at 120 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha Urea, root dry weight per plant (3.3 g) and shelf life (24.0 days) at 0 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha Urea was obtained, respectively. Applying a fertilizer rate of 180 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha at Delbo, along with a rate of 120 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha at Soddo, demonstrated the potential to enhance carrot productivity in the experimental region and in areas with comparable environmental conditions. It is advisable to conduct this study again in various seasons to provide more accurate recommendations.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Growth and Yield Response of Carrot (Daucus carota L.) to Fertilizer Rate in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia
    
    AU  - Abdirshikur Reshid Jemal
    AU  - Zekiya Fitret Shikur
    Y1  - 2025/04/29
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20251002.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.es.20251002.11
    T2  - Engineering Science
    JF  - Engineering Science
    JO  - Engineering Science
    SP  - 24
    EP  - 31
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-9279
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20251002.11
    AB  - Carrot (Daucus carota L.) is a significant root vegetable cultivated and consumed in Ethiopia. However, there has been limited research on the optimal fertilizer rates to enhance carrot growth and yield in the Wolaita zone. A field experiment was carried out to assess the impact of four different rates of NPS fertilizer (0 kg ha-1, 60 kg ha-1, 120 kg ha-1, and 180 kg ha-1) and four rates of urea fertilizer (0 kg ha-1, 45 kg ha-1, 90 kg ha-1, and 135 kg ha-1) on carrot growth and yield. Most growth parameters, except root length per plant, leaf length per plant at both sites, and core diameter per plant at Delbo, were significantly affected by the fertilizer rates. The highest plant height (32.6 cm) with 120 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha urea, leaf number per plant (12.1) and shoot weight per plant (7.4 g) at 180 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha urea, shoot dry weight per plant (1.5 g) at 0 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha urea, root diameter (2.4 cm) at 60 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha urea, root fresh weight per plant (31.3 g), root yield, and marketable yield (31,333 kg/ha) at 180 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha urea, and root dry weight per plant (2.9 g) at 120 kg/ha NPS and 45 kg/ha urea were recorded at Delbo. At Soddo site, the highest plant height (43.3 cm), root weight per plant (29.0 g), root yield (32,333 kg/ha) at 120 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha urea, leaf number (9.5) at 0 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha urea, shoot weight per plant (11.1 g) at 60 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha urea, shoot dry weight per plant (2.4 g) at 60 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha Urea, marketable yield (27,800 kg/ha) at 120 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha Urea, root dry weight per plant (3.3 g) and shelf life (24.0 days) at 0 kg/ha NPS and 0 kg/ha Urea was obtained, respectively. Applying a fertilizer rate of 180 kg/ha NPS and 90 kg/ha at Delbo, along with a rate of 120 kg/ha NPS and 135 kg/ha at Soddo, demonstrated the potential to enhance carrot productivity in the experimental region and in areas with comparable environmental conditions. It is advisable to conduct this study again in various seasons to provide more accurate recommendations.
    
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information