For a number of reasons, many irrigation projects are underperforming; these need be fixed to raise the programs' productivity and efficiency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Ujummo irrigation scheme in western Ethiopia's West Wolega Zone. The average conveyance efficiency (70.3%), field application efficiency (38.62%), average water storage efficiency (61.1%), irrigation uniformity (90.68%), and overall irrigation efficiency (27.14%) were all measured in the field. But the distribution of water was uniform, maybe because canal portions experienced disproportionate losses. The scheme also had relative water supply of 15.91, relative irrigation supply of 10.89, output per unit command area was 1324.24 ($/ha), its output per unit irrigation supply was 0.103 ($/m3), its output per unit water consumed was 0.67 ($/m3), its sustainability of irrigation area was 0.82 and its irritation ratio was 1.34 and this indicate there is expansion of irrigate land without additional any irrigation structures and use only the design capacity of the scheme.
Published in | Engineering Science (Volume 10, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.es.20251002.13 |
Page(s) | 59-72 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Irrigation, Scheme, Project Performance, Overall Efficiency, Small-Scale
[1] | Molden DJ, Sakthivadivel R, Perry CJ, et al. Indicators for comparing performance of irrigated agricultural systems. Iwmi; 1998. |
[2] | Feyen J, Zerihun D (1999). Assessment of the performance of border and furrow irrigation systems and the relationship between performance indicators and system variables. Agric Water Manag. 40(2-3): 353-62. |
[3] | Mekonen BM, Gelagle DB, Moges MF (2022). The current irrigation potential and irrigated land in Ethiopia: areview. Asian J Adv Res 12(6): 1-8. |
[4] | Levine G. (1982). Relative water supply. An explanatory variable for irrigation systems. Technical Report No. 6. Ithaca, New York, USA: Cornell University. |
[5] | Moges MF. (2022). Indicators for evaluating the performance of small scale irrigation schemes. J Agric Sci Bot. 2022; 6(8): 136. |
[6] | Allen, R. G., Preira, L. S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration- Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO 56. Rome, Italy: FAO. |
[7] | Harrelson, C. C., Rawlins, C. L. and Potyondy, John P. 1994. Stream channel reference sites: an illustrated guide to field technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p. ILRI, the Netherlands. |
[8] | Ingle, P. M., Shinde, S. E., Mane, M. S., Thokal, R. T. and Ayare, B. L. 2015. Performance Evaluation of a Minor Irrigation Scheme. Research Journal of Recent Sciences. 4: 19-24. |
[9] | Rai RK, Singh VP, Upadhyay A (2017) Planning and evaluation of irrigation projects: methods and implementation. Academic Press. |
[10] | Michael, A. M. Irrigation theory and practice. Evaluating land for irrigation comman ds. vikas publishing house pvt ltd, New Delhi. 1997. |
[11] | Jaiswal, P. C. 2003. Soil, Plant and Water Analyses. Ludhiana Kalyani publishers. New Delhi, India. |
[12] | Menelik Hailu. 2008. Performance Evaluation of Small-Scale Irrigation Scheme: A Case Study of Selgie Irrigation Scheme, South Wollo. M. Sc. Thesis. Haramaya University. |
[13] | Michael, A. M. 2008. Irrigation theory and Practice, Second edition VIKAS Publishing house Pvt Ltd. India. |
[14] | Jurriens M, Zerihun D, Boonstra J,. Surdev: surface irrigation software; design, operation, and evaluation of basin, border, and furrow irrigation. ILRI; 2001. |
[15] | Bos MG. Performance indicators for irrigation and drainage. Irrig Drain. 1997; 11(2): 119-37. |
[16] | FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). Guidelines for designing and evaluating surface irrigation systems: Irrig Drain. 1989; 45. |
[17] | Minichil Taye. (2019). Evaluating and comparing the performance of small scale irrigation systems: a case study Jedeb and Kulech small scale irrigation schemes in East Gojam Zone. MSc Thesis. Bahr Dar University. Bahri Dar, Ethiopia. 114p. |
[18] | Kenneth HS 1988. Irrigation Systems and water application efficiencies. California State University, Fresno, California. |
[19] | Alemayehu Serbessa. Performance evaluation of irrigation system (Welenchity Surface Irrigation Scheme). MSc. Thesis. Addis Ababa University. 2018. |
[20] | Ahmed, B., 2017. Bayan Ahmed Technical Performance Evaluation of Mada Batu Small Scale Irrigation Scheme, West Arsi Zone of Oromia Region. Int. J. Eng. Res. 5. |
[21] | Cakmak Belgin, Beyri̇bey, Mevlut Yildirim, Yasin. (2004) Benchmarking Performance of Irrigation Schemes: A Case Study from Turkey. Irrigation and Drainage. 163: 155-163. |
[22] | Alebachew, S., Ing, P. S., 2018. Evaluation of canal water conveyance and on-farm water application for a small-scale irrigation scheme in Ethiopia. Int. J. Water Resour. Environ. Eng. 10, 100-110. |
[23] | Bayan Ahmed. 2017. Technical performance evaluation of Mada Batu small-scale irrigation scheme, West Arsi zone of Oromia Region. International Journal of Engineering Research-Online. Vol. 5, Issue. 3. |
[24] | Muhammedziyad Geleto, Mihret Dananto, Demisachew Tadele (2019). Performance evaluation of selected surface irrigation schemes in Kacha Bira Woreda, SNNPRS, Ethiopia. Discovery Science, 15, 16-25. |
[25] | Raghuwanshi, S. and W. Walender, 1998. Optimal furrow irrigation scheduling under heterogeneous conditions, Agricultural Systems, 56: 39-35. |
[26] | Kandiah K., 1981. Evaluation of furrow irrigation system for cotton, Melka Werer Research Station, IAR, Ethiopia. |
[27] | Değirmencİ H, Büyükcangaz H, Kuşcu H (2003) Assessment of Irrigation Schemes with Comparative Indicators in the Southeastern Anatolia Project. Turkish J Agric For. 2003; 27(5). |
[28] | Awulachew S., Yilma A., Loulseged M., W. Loiskandl, Ayana., Tena A., 2007. Water Resources and Irrigation Development in Ethiopia. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute. IWMI Working Paper 123. |
[29] | Zeleke AD, Bart S, Laszlo H. Comparative irrigation performance assessment in community-managed schemes in Ethiopia. J Afr Agric Res. 2012; 7(35): 4956-70. |
[30] | Eshetu Adane Kibret, Abebech Abera, Workineh Tadesse Ayele, Neway Asrat Alemie (2021) Performance evaluation of surface irrigation system in the case of Dirma small-scale irrigation scheme at Kalu woreda, northern Ethiopia. Water Conserv Sci Eng 6:263-274. |
[31] |
USBR. 2014. Parshall flumes-United States Bureau of Reclamation.
http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/hydraulics_lab/pubs/wmm/chap08_10.html |
[32] | WWAP (United Nations World Water Assessment Programme). 2012. The United Nations World WaterDevelopment Report 4. Managing Water under Uncertainty and Risk. UNESCO, Paris. |
[33] | Worku Negussie. 2013. Technical Performance Evaluation of Midhegdu Small-scale Irrigation Scheme in West Hararge Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. M. Sc. Thesis. Haramaya University. |
[34] | FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2011. Irrigation Manual: Planning, Development Monitoring and Evaluation of Irrigated Agriculture with Farmer Participation. Volume II Module 7. Harare. |
[35] | Dessalew, T., Ayalew, A., Desalegn, T., Mathewos, M. and Alemu, G. 2016. Performance Evaluation of Bedene Alemtena Small Scale Irrigation Scheme in Hallaba Special Woreda, Southern Ethiopia. Open Access Library Journal, 3: e2021. |
[36] | Abo, M. A., Assefa, S. and W/Michael, A., 2024. Performance evaluation of the Bilate and Furfuro irrigation schemes in Silti Zone, southern Ethiopia. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 71(1), p. 88. |
[37] | Wachyan, E., Rushton, K. R., 1987. Water losses from irrigation canals. J. Hydrol. 92, 275-288. |
[38] | Tesfaye, H., Dananto, M., Woldemichael, A., 2019. Comparative Performance Evaluation of IrrigationSchemes in Southern 8, 2-6. |
[39] | Miller, H., 2001. Evaluation of transferred irrigation networks with comparison indicators. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Agriculture, 15, pp. 31-41. |
APA Style
Bekele, Z. T., Dibaba, B. T., Mengasha, A. A., Bedane, M. T. (2025). Technical Evaluations of Ujummo Irrigation Scheme Performance at Haru, Western Ethiopia. Engineering Science, 10(2), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20251002.13
ACS Style
Bekele, Z. T.; Dibaba, B. T.; Mengasha, A. A.; Bedane, M. T. Technical Evaluations of Ujummo Irrigation Scheme Performance at Haru, Western Ethiopia. Eng. Sci. 2025, 10(2), 59-72. doi: 10.11648/j.es.20251002.13
@article{10.11648/j.es.20251002.13, author = {Zalalem Tamiru Bekele and Bikila Takala Dibaba and Adisu Asefa Mengasha and Minda Tadase Bedane}, title = {Technical Evaluations of Ujummo Irrigation Scheme Performance at Haru, Western Ethiopia }, journal = {Engineering Science}, volume = {10}, number = {2}, pages = {59-72}, doi = {10.11648/j.es.20251002.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20251002.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.es.20251002.13}, abstract = {For a number of reasons, many irrigation projects are underperforming; these need be fixed to raise the programs' productivity and efficiency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Ujummo irrigation scheme in western Ethiopia's West Wolega Zone. The average conveyance efficiency (70.3%), field application efficiency (38.62%), average water storage efficiency (61.1%), irrigation uniformity (90.68%), and overall irrigation efficiency (27.14%) were all measured in the field. But the distribution of water was uniform, maybe because canal portions experienced disproportionate losses. The scheme also had relative water supply of 15.91, relative irrigation supply of 10.89, output per unit command area was 1324.24 ($/ha), its output per unit irrigation supply was 0.103 ($/m3), its output per unit water consumed was 0.67 ($/m3), its sustainability of irrigation area was 0.82 and its irritation ratio was 1.34 and this indicate there is expansion of irrigate land without additional any irrigation structures and use only the design capacity of the scheme. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Technical Evaluations of Ujummo Irrigation Scheme Performance at Haru, Western Ethiopia AU - Zalalem Tamiru Bekele AU - Bikila Takala Dibaba AU - Adisu Asefa Mengasha AU - Minda Tadase Bedane Y1 - 2025/05/19 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20251002.13 DO - 10.11648/j.es.20251002.13 T2 - Engineering Science JF - Engineering Science JO - Engineering Science SP - 59 EP - 72 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-9279 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20251002.13 AB - For a number of reasons, many irrigation projects are underperforming; these need be fixed to raise the programs' productivity and efficiency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Ujummo irrigation scheme in western Ethiopia's West Wolega Zone. The average conveyance efficiency (70.3%), field application efficiency (38.62%), average water storage efficiency (61.1%), irrigation uniformity (90.68%), and overall irrigation efficiency (27.14%) were all measured in the field. But the distribution of water was uniform, maybe because canal portions experienced disproportionate losses. The scheme also had relative water supply of 15.91, relative irrigation supply of 10.89, output per unit command area was 1324.24 ($/ha), its output per unit irrigation supply was 0.103 ($/m3), its output per unit water consumed was 0.67 ($/m3), its sustainability of irrigation area was 0.82 and its irritation ratio was 1.34 and this indicate there is expansion of irrigate land without additional any irrigation structures and use only the design capacity of the scheme. VL - 10 IS - 2 ER -