In Ethiopia there are different known coffee types and place of origin of coffee having their own quality and flavor. Assessment of coffee quality is a key step in price setting and determines its export potential in coffee producing countries and to many coffee roasters and distributors. The study was conducted to evaluate Raya Azebo coffee landrace for bean quality traits. A total of ten (10) Raya Azebo coffee landrace along with two Hararghe coffee varieties were evaluated for bean physical and organoleptic coffee quality traits using Completely Randomized Design with three replications. The analysis of variance results showed significant difference among Raya Azebo coffee landrace for raw, cup and overall coffee quality. Most of the Raya Azebo coffee landraces possess mocha to slightly mocha flavor which represents the characteristics of typical quality profile of Hararghe coffee flavor. The coffee landraces had medium bean size as compared to other region coffee genotype. The bean size ranged from 88% to 97% with the overall mean of 94.33%. The coffee landraces had good and acceptable cup quality for aromatic quality, acidity, body, flavor and overall standards. The total cup and overall quality of Raya Azebo coffee landrace was in the range between 43.83% to 48.17% and 79.17% to 84%, respectively. Thus, the research results suggested the higher chance of selection of landraces to be developed as varieties for high and acceptable coffee quality.
Published in | Frontiers (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.frontiers.20250502.12 |
Page(s) | 72-76 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cup Quality, Raw Quality, Raya Azebo, Landrace
Sr/no. | Accn.no. |
---|---|
1 | RA-11/04 |
2 | RA-09/04 |
3 | RA-04/04 |
4 | RA-07/04 |
5 | RA-10/04 |
6 | RA-08/04 |
7 | RA-01/04 |
8 | RA-05/04 |
9 | RA-02/04 |
10 | RA-12/04 |
Checks | Mocha |
Mechara-1 |
Shape and make (15%) | Color (15%) | Odor (10%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Points | Quality | points | Quality | Points |
Very good | 15 | Bluish | 15 | Clean | 10 |
Good | 12 | Grayish | 12 | Fair clean | 8 |
Fair good | 10 | Greenish | 10 | Trace | 6 |
Average | 8 | Coated | 8 | Light | 4 |
Mixed | 6 | Faded | 6 | Moderate | 2 |
Small | 4 | White | 4 | Strong | 0 |
Parameters | Scale | Description of each scale | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
Aromatic intensity | 0-5 | Nil | V. light | Light | Medium | Strong | V. strong |
Aromatic quality | 0-5 | Nil | V. light | Light | Medium | Strong | V. strong |
Bitterness | 0-5 | Nil | V. light | Light | Medium | Strong | V. strong |
Astringency | 0-5 | Nil | V. light | Light | Medium | Strong | V. strong |
Parameters | Scale | Description of each scale | |||||
0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | ||
Acidity | 0-10 | Nil | Lacking | Light | Medium | M. pointed | pointed |
Body | 0-10 | Nil | V. light | Light | Medium | M. full | Full |
Flavor | 0-10 | Nil | Bad | Fair | Medium | Good | V. good |
Overall standard | 0-10 | Nil | Bad | Regular | Good | V. good | Excellent |
Accn.no. | Bean size | Raw (40%) | Cup (60%) | Total | Typicity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RA-01/04 | 91 | 35.83 | 48.17 | 84 | Mocha |
RA-02/04 | 90 | 34.17 | 47.67 | 81.83 | Mocha |
RA-04/04 | 88 | 35.33 | 43.83 | 79.17 | |
RA-05/04 | 96 | 35.5 | 48.17 | 83.67 | Spicy |
RA-07/04 | 97 | 35.33 | 44.5 | 79.83 | S. Mocha |
RA-08/04 | 97 | 35.67 | 43.83 | 79.5 | |
RA-09/04 | 96 | 35.67 | 45.67 | 81.33 | Mocha |
RA-10/04 | 94 | 34.5 | 45 | 79.5 | Mocha |
RA-11/04 | 95 | 35.67 | 47.33 | 83 | S. spicy |
RA-12/04 | 97 | 35 | 47.33 | 82.33 | S. Mocha |
Mechara | 96 | 36 | 47.5 | 83.5 | Mocha |
Mocha | 95 | 35.67 | 47.33 | 83 | Mocha |
Mean | 94.33 | 35.36 | 46.36 | 81.72 | |
LSD (5%) | 0.76 | 0.89 | 3.65 | 3.5 | |
CV (%) | 2.06 | 2.06 | 2.06 | 2.06 |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
ECX | Ethiopian Commodity Exchanges |
LSD | Least Significant Difference Test |
McARC | Mechara Agricultural Research Center |
RCBD | Completely Randomized Block Design |
RCBD | Completely Randomized Design |
[1] | Abrar Sualeh, Negussie Mekonnen and Meseret Degefa. 2014b. Hybrid coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Genotypes quality evaluation under different environment of Southern Ethiopia. Greener Journal of agricultural science, 4(6): 245-251. |
[2] | Agwanda CO, Baradat P, Eskes AB, Cilas C, Charrier, A. 2003. Selection for bean and liquor qualities within related hybrids of Arabica coffee in multi-local field trials. Euphytica 131: 1-14. |
[3] | Anwar Abasanbi. 2010. Assessment of coffee quality and its related problems in Jimma zone of Oromia regional state. Msc Thesis presented to School of Graduate Studies of Jimma University, Jimma. |
[4] | Berhanu Tsegaye, Ali Mohammed, Tesfaye Shimber, Yehenew Getachew and Essubalew Getachew. 2015. Impact of sun drying methods and layer thickness on the quality of highland Arabica coffee varieties at Limmu; Southewestern Ethiopia. Basic research journal of food science and technology, 2(1): 12-20. |
[5] | Ethiopian Commodity Exchanges (ECX). 2015. ECX Coffee Contracts. Ethiopia Commodity Exchange, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[6] | International Coffee Organization (ICO). 2016. World coffee consumption. Retrieved April 8, 2016, from |
[7] | Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Development (MoARD). 2008. Sustainable Production and Supply of fine Arabica Coffee to the World. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Wassu Mohammed. 2011b. Heterosis and combining ability analysis for coffee quality in diallel crosses of diverse coffee (Coffea arabica L.) parents in origin. East African Journal of Sciences, 5(1): 12-21. |
[8] | Santos, M. F. V., Moura, F. G., Azevedo, K. M. G., Lima, I. M., Raimundo, C. and Pasquini, Anal. 2012. Lett. 45 774-781. |
[9] | Tadesse Woldemariam Gole. 2015. Coffee: Ethiopia’s Gift to the World: The traditional production systems as living examples of crop domestication, and sustainable production and an assessment of different certification schemes. Environment and Coffee Forest Forum. Addis Abeba, Ethiopia. |
[10] | Tessema A, Alamerew S, Kufa T and Garedew W (2011) Genetic Diversity Analysis for Quality Attributes of Some Promising Coffea arabica Germplasm Collections in Southwestern Ethiopia. J Biol Sci. 11: 236-244. |
[11] | Yigzaw, D. 2005. Assessment of genetic diversity of Ethiopian arabica coffee genotypes using morphological, biochemical and molecular markers. PhD Dissertation, University of the free state, Bloemfontein, South Africa. |
[12] | Wassu Mohammed. 2011. Heterosis and combining ability analysis for coffee quality in diallel crosses of diverse coffee (Coffea arabica L.) parents in origin. East African Journal of Sciences, 5(1): 12-21. |
APA Style
Girma, S., Chimdi, A., Kasim, I., Sualeh, A. (2025). Evaluation of Raya Azebo Coffee Landraces for Cup Quality Traits. Frontiers, 5(2), 72-76. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.frontiers.20250502.12
ACS Style
Girma, S.; Chimdi, A.; Kasim, I.; Sualeh, A. Evaluation of Raya Azebo Coffee Landraces for Cup Quality Traits. Frontiers. 2025, 5(2), 72-76. doi: 10.11648/j.frontiers.20250502.12
@article{10.11648/j.frontiers.20250502.12, author = {Sintayehu Girma and Ababa Chimdi and Ibrahim Kasim and Abrar Sualeh}, title = {Evaluation of Raya Azebo Coffee Landraces for Cup Quality Traits }, journal = {Frontiers}, volume = {5}, number = {2}, pages = {72-76}, doi = {10.11648/j.frontiers.20250502.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.frontiers.20250502.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.frontiers.20250502.12}, abstract = {In Ethiopia there are different known coffee types and place of origin of coffee having their own quality and flavor. Assessment of coffee quality is a key step in price setting and determines its export potential in coffee producing countries and to many coffee roasters and distributors. The study was conducted to evaluate Raya Azebo coffee landrace for bean quality traits. A total of ten (10) Raya Azebo coffee landrace along with two Hararghe coffee varieties were evaluated for bean physical and organoleptic coffee quality traits using Completely Randomized Design with three replications. The analysis of variance results showed significant difference among Raya Azebo coffee landrace for raw, cup and overall coffee quality. Most of the Raya Azebo coffee landraces possess mocha to slightly mocha flavor which represents the characteristics of typical quality profile of Hararghe coffee flavor. The coffee landraces had medium bean size as compared to other region coffee genotype. The bean size ranged from 88% to 97% with the overall mean of 94.33%. The coffee landraces had good and acceptable cup quality for aromatic quality, acidity, body, flavor and overall standards. The total cup and overall quality of Raya Azebo coffee landrace was in the range between 43.83% to 48.17% and 79.17% to 84%, respectively. Thus, the research results suggested the higher chance of selection of landraces to be developed as varieties for high and acceptable coffee quality.}, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of Raya Azebo Coffee Landraces for Cup Quality Traits AU - Sintayehu Girma AU - Ababa Chimdi AU - Ibrahim Kasim AU - Abrar Sualeh Y1 - 2025/07/22 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.frontiers.20250502.12 DO - 10.11648/j.frontiers.20250502.12 T2 - Frontiers JF - Frontiers JO - Frontiers SP - 72 EP - 76 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7197 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.frontiers.20250502.12 AB - In Ethiopia there are different known coffee types and place of origin of coffee having their own quality and flavor. Assessment of coffee quality is a key step in price setting and determines its export potential in coffee producing countries and to many coffee roasters and distributors. The study was conducted to evaluate Raya Azebo coffee landrace for bean quality traits. A total of ten (10) Raya Azebo coffee landrace along with two Hararghe coffee varieties were evaluated for bean physical and organoleptic coffee quality traits using Completely Randomized Design with three replications. The analysis of variance results showed significant difference among Raya Azebo coffee landrace for raw, cup and overall coffee quality. Most of the Raya Azebo coffee landraces possess mocha to slightly mocha flavor which represents the characteristics of typical quality profile of Hararghe coffee flavor. The coffee landraces had medium bean size as compared to other region coffee genotype. The bean size ranged from 88% to 97% with the overall mean of 94.33%. The coffee landraces had good and acceptable cup quality for aromatic quality, acidity, body, flavor and overall standards. The total cup and overall quality of Raya Azebo coffee landrace was in the range between 43.83% to 48.17% and 79.17% to 84%, respectively. Thus, the research results suggested the higher chance of selection of landraces to be developed as varieties for high and acceptable coffee quality. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -