| Peer-Reviewed

Research on the Key Path to Improve the Collaborative Innovation Performance of Port Logistics Enterprise Cluster

Received: 13 November 2021    Accepted: 6 December 2021    Published: 24 December 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Under the new pattern of international and domestic double circulation, the scale of China's port logistics enterprise cluster is expanding, but the innovation difficulty of cluster enterprises is increasing sharply, the innovation power of core technology is insufficient, there are some problems, such as focusing on agglomeration rather than cooperation, the integration of industrial chain and innovation chain is not close, and the choice of innovation path is improper. The method and purpose of this paper are based on the theory of collaborative innovation, establish a structural equation model, empirically test the logistics clusters with ports above designated size in China, and put forward the key path for the collaborative innovation of port logistics enterprise clusters, and improve the collaboration degree and innovation performance of cluster enterprises. The empirical results show that the external environment of collaborative innovation (EECCI), the innovation learning ability of cluster enterprises (ILACE) and the cluster enterprises cooperation (CEC) can directly or indirectly affect the cluster collaborative innovation performance (CCIP), and the innovation learning ability of cluster enterprises (ILACE) plays a mediating role between the external environment of collaborative innovation (EECCI) and the cluster collaborative innovation performance (CCIP). Port logistics enterprise clusters need to develop environmental governance, knowledge governance, information governance and other mechanisms to promote collaborative innovation in the industrial chain, technology chain and value chain.

Published in Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.hss.20210906.19
Page(s) 280-289
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Port Logistics, Enterprise Cluster, Collaborative Innovation

References
[1] Du, J. Y. and Feng, G., 2020. Review on the theory of dynamic capability of technological innovation. Research on science and technology management, 448 (06), 8-13.
[2] Zhu, H.; Zhao, S.; Abbas, A., 2020. Relationship between R&D grants, R&D investment, and innovation performance: The moderating effect of absorptive capacity. Journal of Public Affairs, 20 (1), 1-10.
[3] Jiang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z., 2018. The effect of mandatory environmental regulation on innovation performance: evidence from China. Journal of cleaner production, 203 (1), 482-491.
[4] Liu, X., 2020. Research on Logistics Service Innovation of International Major Ports under Marine Economic Strategy. Journal of Coastal Research, 115 (sp1), 283-291.
[5] Xie, X. M. and Liu, S. Y., 2015. Influence mechanism of collaborative innovation mode on synergy and innovation performance. Management science, 28 (2), 27-39.
[6] Zhang, J. H.; Luo, S. G.; Luo, J., 2019. Research on the impact of partners and internal human capital on innovation performance of financial technology enterprises. Scientific management research, 37 (3), 155-159.
[7] Cao, J.; Fan, D. C.; Tang, X. X., 2010. Research on the performance evaluation of the combination of industry, University and research. Scientific and technological progress and countermeasures, 27 (7), 114-118.
[8] Luo, H. Y.; Lin, X. Y.; Wang, L., 2015. Research on innovation performance evaluation of industry university research collaborative knowledge innovation system. Modern intelligence, 35 (2), 8-11.
[9] Sun, S. L. and Peng, C., 2017. Research on performance evaluation index system of industry university research collaborative innovation project. Research on science and technology management, 37 (4), 89-95.
[10] Od, A.; Cbg, B.; Jm, B., et al., 2020. Developing a comprehensive approach to port performance assessment. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 36 (4), 169-180.
[11] Jiang, D. D., 2021. Innovation driving mechanism and development path of logistics enterprises in cluster environment. Commercial economy research, (01), 98-101.
[12] Sun, X.; Lin, G. L.; Liu, X. J., 2015. The influence of industrial cluster network structure on the innovation and development of enterprises: Based on the empirical study of Shanghai port logistics industrial cluster. Lanzhou academic journal, (02), 169-177.
[13] Chen, Y. J.; Liu, S.; Liu, X. J., 2021. Discussion on the transfer mechanism of innovation capability of logistics industry cluster. Business economics research, (08), 79-82.
[14] Guo, T.; Ding, X. Z.; Ren, X. J., 2019. Research on the relationship between institutional environment, business model and innovation performance -- Simulation Analysis Based on system dynamics. Management review, 31 (9), 193-206.
[15] Ganguly, A.; Talukdar, A.; Chatterjee, D., 2020. Social capital, knowledge quality, knowledge sharing, and innovation capability: an empirical study of the Indian pharmaceutical sector. Knowledge and process management, 27 (1), 25-42.
[16] Caporuscio, A.; Ferretti, M.; Leone, D., et al., 2020. Exploring Knowledge Sharing in Sea-Land Logistics Networks: Lessons from the Port of Genoa. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 33 (3), 31-45.
[17] Popescu, D. I.; Ceptureanu, S. I.; Alexandru, A., et al., 2019. Relationships between knowledge absorptive capacity, innovation performance and information technology. Case study: the Romanian creative industries SMEs. Studies in informatics and control, 28 (4), 463-475.
[18] Hughes, M.; Rigtering, J. P. C.; Covin, J. G., et al., 2018. Innovative behaviour, trust and perceived workplace performance. British journal of management, 29 (4), 750-768.
[19] Ardhi, R., 2019. Authentic leadership and organizational trust in improving company performance with innovative behavior as intervening: case study of BCA KCU Yogyakarta, Indonesia. International journal of innovative research and development, 8 (9), 121-131.
[20] Wang, J. and Ma, Z., 2019. Port Logistics Cluster Effect and Coordinated Development of Port Economy Based on Grey Relational Analysis Model. Journal of Coastal Research, 94 (sp1), 717-725.
[21] Duan, C.; Xiu, G., Zhang, Y., 2019. Coordinated Management Method of Information Contract in Port Logistics Service Supply Chain. Journal of Coastal Research, 93 (sp1), 1047-1059.
[22] Choi, H. and Zo, H., 2020. Network Closure Versus Structural Hole: The Role of Knowledge Spillover Networks in National Innovation Performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 99, 1-11.
[23] Zhang, E., 2020. Coordinated Development of Fujian Coastal Port Logistics after Port Resources Integration. Journal of Coastal Research, 115 (sp1), 113-125.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Dai Jianping. (2021). Research on the Key Path to Improve the Collaborative Innovation Performance of Port Logistics Enterprise Cluster. Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(6), 280-289. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210906.19

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Dai Jianping. Research on the Key Path to Improve the Collaborative Innovation Performance of Port Logistics Enterprise Cluster. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2021, 9(6), 280-289. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20210906.19

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Dai Jianping. Research on the Key Path to Improve the Collaborative Innovation Performance of Port Logistics Enterprise Cluster. Humanit Soc Sci. 2021;9(6):280-289. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20210906.19

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.hss.20210906.19,
      author = {Dai Jianping},
      title = {Research on the Key Path to Improve the Collaborative Innovation Performance of Port Logistics Enterprise Cluster},
      journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
      volume = {9},
      number = {6},
      pages = {280-289},
      doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20210906.19},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210906.19},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20210906.19},
      abstract = {Under the new pattern of international and domestic double circulation, the scale of China's port logistics enterprise cluster is expanding, but the innovation difficulty of cluster enterprises is increasing sharply, the innovation power of core technology is insufficient, there are some problems, such as focusing on agglomeration rather than cooperation, the integration of industrial chain and innovation chain is not close, and the choice of innovation path is improper. The method and purpose of this paper are based on the theory of collaborative innovation, establish a structural equation model, empirically test the logistics clusters with ports above designated size in China, and put forward the key path for the collaborative innovation of port logistics enterprise clusters, and improve the collaboration degree and innovation performance of cluster enterprises. The empirical results show that the external environment of collaborative innovation (EECCI), the innovation learning ability of cluster enterprises (ILACE) and the cluster enterprises cooperation (CEC) can directly or indirectly affect the cluster collaborative innovation performance (CCIP), and the innovation learning ability of cluster enterprises (ILACE) plays a mediating role between the external environment of collaborative innovation (EECCI) and the cluster collaborative innovation performance (CCIP). Port logistics enterprise clusters need to develop environmental governance, knowledge governance, information governance and other mechanisms to promote collaborative innovation in the industrial chain, technology chain and value chain.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Research on the Key Path to Improve the Collaborative Innovation Performance of Port Logistics Enterprise Cluster
    AU  - Dai Jianping
    Y1  - 2021/12/24
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210906.19
    DO  - 10.11648/j.hss.20210906.19
    T2  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    JF  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    JO  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    SP  - 280
    EP  - 289
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8184
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210906.19
    AB  - Under the new pattern of international and domestic double circulation, the scale of China's port logistics enterprise cluster is expanding, but the innovation difficulty of cluster enterprises is increasing sharply, the innovation power of core technology is insufficient, there are some problems, such as focusing on agglomeration rather than cooperation, the integration of industrial chain and innovation chain is not close, and the choice of innovation path is improper. The method and purpose of this paper are based on the theory of collaborative innovation, establish a structural equation model, empirically test the logistics clusters with ports above designated size in China, and put forward the key path for the collaborative innovation of port logistics enterprise clusters, and improve the collaboration degree and innovation performance of cluster enterprises. The empirical results show that the external environment of collaborative innovation (EECCI), the innovation learning ability of cluster enterprises (ILACE) and the cluster enterprises cooperation (CEC) can directly or indirectly affect the cluster collaborative innovation performance (CCIP), and the innovation learning ability of cluster enterprises (ILACE) plays a mediating role between the external environment of collaborative innovation (EECCI) and the cluster collaborative innovation performance (CCIP). Port logistics enterprise clusters need to develop environmental governance, knowledge governance, information governance and other mechanisms to promote collaborative innovation in the industrial chain, technology chain and value chain.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Digital Economics, Changzhou College of Information Technology, Changzhou, China

  • Sections