Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Assessing Climate Vulnerability in the Haor Wetland Region of Bangladesh: Policy and Governance Implications for Livelihood Resilience and Ecosystem-Based Adaptation

Received: 9 September 2025     Accepted: 24 September 2025     Published: 28 October 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The Haor wetland region of Bangladesh faces growing climate vulnerability due to its unique geomorphology and hydrological complexity. This study assesses climate-induced hazards and their impacts on agriculture, ecosystems, and livelihoods using a nine-step methodology guided by the Climate Risk Vulnerability Assessment (CRVA) framework. Data were collected through household surveys, FGDs, and KIIs. Historical climate trends and future projections were analyzed using downscaled CMIP6 data under the SSP1-2.6 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. Findings indicate that by the 2030s and 2050s, the Haor region will experience increased temperatures and precipitation, by the 2030s, maximum winter temperatures are projected to rise by 0.87-0.9°C and under SSP5-8.5, winter rainfall may decrease by about 10%, while monsoon rainfall is expected to increase by 1.7-2% under SSP1-2.6, situation will be further aggravated by 2050; exacerbating risks such as floods, erosion, habitat degradation, and biodiversity loss. Agricultural systems are particularly susceptible to early flash floods, droughts, irrigation shortfalls, and labor shortages, all of which heighten the risk of crop failure and threaten food security. The vulnerability projections and mapping reveal more dynamic and location-specific trends. Under SSP1-2.6, Golapganj upazila’s vulnerability rises from low to moderate by the 2030s, with most other upazilas—except Kulaura—experiencing further deterioration by the 2050s. Under SSP5-8.5, Juri upazila enters a high vulnerability zone by the 2030s, while Kulaura shifts to moderate vulnerability during the same period but reverts to low vulnerability by the 2050s. Vulnerability is disproportionately borne by marginalized groups, including the poor, women, children, the elderly, and persons with disabilities. A logit regression model was used to identify determinants influencing agricultural vulnerability in the Haor region. It was found that household savings, access to credit, use of quality inputs, crop diversification, knowledge of climate-smart agriculture (CSA), land area affected by disasters, and access to irrigation and larger landholdings were significantly affecting agricultural vulnerability in the region. The findings underscore the need for improved extension services, access to climate-resilient inputs, farmer education, and infrastructural investments to enhance resilience in the Haor agricultural systems., The study also assessed sector-specific risks and adaptive responses. It identified existing indigenous coping strategies and proposed ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) approaches to strengthen long-term resilience. The findings offer critical policy insights and governance recommendations to support climate-resilient development and equitable adaptation in one of Bangladesh’s most ecologically sensitive regions.

Published in International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 10, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijae.20251006.11
Page(s) 317-342
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Haor Wetlands, Flash Flood, Climate Risk and Vulnerability, CRVA Framework, CMIP6 and SSP Projections, Adaptive Capacity, Ecosystem-based Adaptation, Livelihood Resilience and Policy Recommendations

References
[1] Aziz, M. S. B.., Alam, M. M.., Haque, M. M.., & Mondol, M. M. R. (2023). Reduction of Fish Production in Hakaluki Haor Caused by Climatic and Anthropogenic Factors. Journal of Bio-Science, 30(2), 23-37.
[2] Bangladesh Haor and Wetland Development Board (2012). Master Plan of Haor Area, Bangladesh Haor and Wetland Development Board, Ministry of Water Resources,
[3] Bayazid, A. A., Harun, A. B., Billah, M. M., et al. (2025). Impact of Flood on Livestock Farming and a Possible Solution to Reduce the Suffering of Livestock in the Haor Region of Bangladesh. Journal of Research in Veterinary Sciences, 5(2), 144-155.
[4] Bokhtiar, S. M., Islam, M. J., Samsuzzaman, S., et al. (2024). Constraints and Opportunities of Agricultural Development in Haor Ecosystem of Bangladesh. Ecologies, 5(2), 256-278.
[5] GIZ, (2014). Risk Supplement to the Vulnerability Sourcebook Guidance on how to apply the Vulnerability Sourcebook’s approach with the new IPCC AR5 concept of climate risk, GIZ, 2014.
[6] IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J. C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
[7] Kamal, A., Shamsudduha, M., Ahmed, B., Hassan, S., Islam, M., Kelman, I., & Fordham, M. (2018). Resilience to Flash Floods in Wetland Communities of Northeastern Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, (31), 478-488.
[8] Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), (2018). The Nationwide Climate Vulnerability Assessment, 2018.
[9] Parvez, M., Islam, M., Dey, N. (2021). Household Food Insecurity After the Early Monsoon Flash Flood of 2017 Among Wetland (Haor) Communities of Northeastern Bangladesh: A Cross‐sectional Study. Food and Energy Security, 1(11).
[10] Hoq, M. S., Raha, S. K. & Hossain, M. I. Livelihood Vulnerability to Flood Hazard: Understanding from the Flood-prone Haor Ecosystem of Bangladesh. Environmental Management 67, 532-552 (2021).
[11] Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (2022) Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics, Statistics and Information Division (SID), Ministry of Planning.
[12] Alam, M. J., Al-Mahmud, A., Islam, M. A., Hossain, M. F., Ali, M. A., Dessoky, E. S., & Hossain, A. (2021). Crop diversification in rice-based cropping systems improves the system productivity, profitability and sustainability. Sustainability, 13(11), 6288.
[13] Cacho, O. J., Moss, J., Thornton, P. K., Herrero, M., Henderson, B., Bodirsky, B. L., Humpenöder, F., Popp, A. & Lipper, L. J. C. C. (2020). The value of climate-resilient seeds for smallholder adaptation in sub-Saharan Africa. 162(3), 1213-1229.
[14] Edoumiekumo, S., Tombofa, S., & Moses, T. (2013). Multidimensional energy poverty in the South-South Geopolitical zone of Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(20), 96-103.
[15] Evenson, R. E., & Gollin, D. (2002). Crop variety improvement and its effect on productivity. CABI Pub.
[16] Heitzmann, K., Canagarajah, R. S., & Siegel, P. B. (2002). Guidelines for assessing the sources of risk and vulnerability. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No. 218.
[17] Hoque, M. Z., Cui, S., Xu, L., Islam, I., Tang, J., & Ding, S. (2019). Assessing Agricultural Livelihood Vulnerability to Climate Change in Coastal Bangladesh. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(22), 4552.
[18] Hatfield, J. and Prueger, J. (2015). Temperature Extremes: Effect on Plant Growth and Development. Weather and Climate Extremes, (10), 4-10.
[19] Hossain, M. I., & Bari, M. N. (2022). The Unique Approaches to Water Management for Transforming Bangladesh’s Drought-prone Northwest Region into a Lush and Granary Landscape. In Arid Environment-Perspectives, Challenges and Management. IntechOpen.
[20] Hossain, M. I., Bari, M. N., & Miah, M. S. U. (2021). Opportunities and challenges for implementing managed aquifer recharge models in drought-prone Barind tract, Bangladesh. Applied Water Science, 11(12), 181.
[21] Ghosh, D., & Hamid, M. A. (2025). Challenges of Sustainable Haor Management in Bangladesh: A Study on Hakaluki Haor. International Journal of Sustainability and Multidisciplinary Research, 2025, 1(1).
[22] Imran et al, (2023), Seasonal variation and fish assemblage at Hakaluki Haor, Moulvibazar, Bangladesh, International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 2023; 11(3): 17-27
[23] Islam, M. S., Hossain, M. Z., & Sikder, M. B. (2019). Drought adaptation measures and their effectiveness at Barind Tract in northwest Bangladesh: a perception study. Natural Hazards, 97, 1253-1276.
[24] Md Nazrul Islam, Muhammad Rezaul Rakib, and Md Abu Sufian. (2019) Detection of Climate Change Impacts on the Hakaluki Haor Wetland in Bangladesh by Use of Remote Sensing and GIS, published as a chapter in Bangladesh I: Climate Change Impacts, Mitigation and Adaptation in Developing Countries, Springer International Publishing,
[25] Islam, M. A., Hasan, M. A. & Farukh, M. A., (2017). Application of GIS in general soil mapping of Bangladesh. Journal of Geographic Information System, 9(5), pp.604-621.
[26] Islam, M. A., Shitangsu, P. K., & Hassan, M. Z. (2015). Agricultural vulnerability in Bangladesh to climate change induced sea level rise and options for adaptation: a study of a coastal Upazila. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development (JAEID), 109(1), 19-39.
[27] Lobell, D., Schlenker, W., Costa-Roberts, J. (2011). Climate Trends and Global Crop Production Since 1980. Science, 6042(333), 616-620.
[28] Inostroza, L., Palme, M., & de la Barrera, F. (2016). A heat vulnerability index: spatial patterns of exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity for Santiago de Chile. PLOS one, 11(9),
[29] Salam, M., Krupnik, T. J., Montes, C., Nessa, B., Khatun, M., Ali, M. P., Shahrin, S., Ishtiaque, S., Mannan, M. A., Hassan, S. M. and Aziz, M., 2019. Potential impact of climate change on crop insect pests and diseases in Bangladesh: Future scenarios and strategies for climate services.
[30] Sujakhu, N. M., Ranjitkar, S., Niraula, R. R., Salim, M. A., Nizami, A., Schmidt-Vogt, D., & Xu, J. (2018). Determinants of livelihood vulnerability in farming communities in two sites in the Asian Highlands. Water International, 43(2), 165-182.
[31] Tsue, P., Nweze, N., & Okoye, C. (2014). Vulnerability of farming households to environmental degradation in developing countries: Evidence from North Central Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(24), 206-216.
[32] Tessema, I., & Simane, B. (2019). Vulnerability analysis of smallholder farmers to climate variability and change: an agro-ecological system-based approach in the Fincha’a sub-basin of the upper Blue Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Ecological Processes, 8(1), 5.
[33] Sarker, M. A. R., Alam, K. and Gow, J., 2012. Exploring the relationship between climate change and rice yield in Bangladesh: An analysis of time series data. Agricultural Systems, 112, pp.11-16.
[34] Mojid, M. A., 2020. Climate change-induced challenges to sustainable development in Bangladesh. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 423, No. 1, p. 012001). IOP Publishing.
[35] Nahiduzzaman, M., Karim, E., Bhadra, A. et al. Environmental factors regulating temporal pattern of fish community and declining threats in the Khaliajuri haor wetland of Bangladesh. Environ Sci Pollut Res 32, 15962-15974 (2025).
[36] National Adaptation Plan (NAP, 2022), National Adaptation Plan (2023-50), Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of Bangladesh,
[37] Nkondze, M. S., Masuku, M. B., & Manyatsi, A. M. (2014). The impact of climate change on livestock production in Swaziland: The case of Mpolonjeni area development Programme. Journal of Agricultural Studies, 2(1), 1-15.
[38] Network for Information, Response And Preparedness Activities on Disaster, (2022). Overview of Hazard Incidences in November 2022,
[39] T. G. Rabby, G. M. Alam, P. K. Mishra, K. E. Hoque, S. Nair Different economic and policy perspectives in micro population for sustainable development: a study of the Haor livelihood in Bangladesh, Afr. J. Bus. Manag., 5 (6) (2011), pp. 2475-2492.
[40] Md. Raihan and Md. Ismail Hossain (2021). Livelihood vulnerability assessments and adaptation strategies to climate change: a case study in Tanguar Haor, Sylhet, Journal of Water and Climate Change, 12(7), 3448-3460.
[41] Andrew S. Fullerton (2009). A Conceptual Framework for Ordered Logistic Regression Models, Sociological Methods & Research, Volume 38, Issue 2,
[42] G. A. Gbetibouo, C. Ringler, and R. M. Hassan (2010). Vulnerability to climate change and its determinants in the Limpopo Basin, South Africa, IFPRI Discussion Paper, International Food Policy Research Institute,
[43] BDP 2100 (2018). Bangladesh Delta Plan, General Economics Division, Bangladesh Planning Commission, Ministry of Planning,
[44] Arias, M. E., Cochrane, T. A., Piman, T., Kummu, M., Caruso, B. S., & Killeen, T. J. (2014). Dams on Mekong tributaries as significant contributors of hydrological alterations to the Tonle Sap Floodplain in Cambodia. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18(12), 5303-5315.
[45] Baran, E., Guerin, E., & Nasielski, J. (2015). Fish, sediments and dams in the Mekong. WorldFish Report, Phnom Penh.
[46] Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Murray, S., & Wheeler, D. (2014). Exposure of developing countries to sea-level rise and storm surges. Climatic Change, 123(2), 337-349.
[47] Johnston, R., Hoanh, C. T., Lacombe, G., Noble, A., Smakhtin, V., Suhardiman, D., & Kam, S. P. (2010). Rethinking agriculture in the Greater Mekong Subregion: How to sustainably meet food needs, enhance ecosystem services and cope with climate change. IWMI Research Report 136.
[48] Keskinen, M., Chinvanno, S., Kummu, M., Nuorteva, P., Snidvongs, A., Västilä, K., & Varis, O. (2015). Climate change and water resources in the Lower Mekong River Basin: Putting adaptation into the context. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 6(4), 759-774.
[49] Kondolf, G. M., Rubin, Z. K., & Minear, J. T. (2018). Dams on the Mekong: Cumulative sediment starvation. Water Resources Research, 54(10), 7790-7805.
[50] Lebel, L., Bennett, E., Lawrence, D., Saengnoree, A., Lebel, P., Garden, P., & Mungkung, R. (2014). Gender and the management of agrobiodiversity in Southeast Asia. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 161-173.
[51] Mainuddin, M., Kirby, M., & Hoanh, C. T. (2012). Adaptation to climate change for food security in the Lower Mekong Basin. Food Security, 4, 219-231.
[52] McElwee, P., Nghiem, T., Le, H., Vu, H., & Tran, N. (2017). Payments for environmental services and contested neoliberalisation in developing countries: A case study from Vietnam. Journal of Rural Studies, 51, 134-147.
[53] Ratner, B. D., Cohen, P., Barman, B., Mam, K., Nagoli, J., & Allison, E. H. (2012). Strengthening governance of small-scale fisheries: An initial assessment of the theory and practice. WorldFish Working Paper.
[54] Resurrección, B. P. (2011). The gender and climate debate: More of the same or new pathways of thinking and doing? Asia Security Initiative Policy Series Working Paper No. 10. RSIS Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies.
[55] Veettil, B. K., & Quang, N. X. (2019). Mangrove conservation in Vietnam: A review. Ocean & Coastal Management, 168, 202-213.
[56] Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268-281.
[57] Aguilar, L. (2009). Training manual on gender and climate change. IUCN & UNDP.
[58] Arora-Jonsson, S. (2011). Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender, and climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 744-751.
[59] Behrman, J., Bryan, E., & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2014). Gender in climate-smart agriculture. Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Working Paper 7. CGIAR.
[60] Djoudi, H., Locatelli, B., Vaast, C., Asher, K., Brockhaus, M., & Sijapati, B. B. (2016). Beyond dichotomies: Gender and intersecting inequalities in climate change studies. Ambio, 45(S3), 248-262.
[61] Doswald, N., & Osti, M. (2011). Ecosystem-based approaches to adaptation and mitigation: Good practice examples and lessons learned. WWF & IUCN.
[62] Eakin, H., & Luers, A. (2006). Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 365-394.
[63] Füssel, H. M. (2007). Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change, 17(2), 155-167.
[64] GIZ. (2014). Vulnerability sourcebook: Concept and guidelines for standardised vulnerability assessments. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ).
[65] Hahn, M. B., Riederer, A. M., & Foster, S. O. (2009). The Livelihood Vulnerability Index: A pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change. Global Environmental Change, 19(1), 74-88.
[66] IFRC. (2011). Mangrove planting saves lives and protects livelihoods in Vietnam. International Federation of the Red Cross.
[67] IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press.
[68] IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press.
[69] McIvor, A., Spencer, T., Spalding, M., & Pontee, N. (2012). Storm surge reduction by mangroves. The Nature Conservancy & Wetlands International.
[70] Munang, R., Thiaw, I., Alverson, K., Liu, J., & Han, Z. (2013). The role of ecosystem services in climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(1), 47-52.
[71] Preston, B. L., Yuen, E. J., & Westaway, R. M. (2011). Putting vulnerability to climate change on the map: A review of approaches, benefits, and risks. Climatic Change, 106(1), 413-422.
[72] Reid, H. (2016). Ecosystem- and community-based adaptation: Learning from community-based natural resource management. Climate and Development, 8(1), 4-9.
[73] Resurrección, B. P. (2013). Persistent women and environment linkages in climate change and sustainable development agendas. Women’s Studies International Forum, 40, 33-43.
[74] Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., … Schiller, A. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8074-8079.
[75] UNDP. (2010). Gender, climate change and community-based adaptation. UNDP.
[76] UNEP. (2016). Making the case for ecosystem-based adaptation: Building resilience to climate change. United Nations Environment Programme.
[77] UN Women. (2014). World Survey on the Role of Women in Development: Gender Equality and Sustainable Development. United Nations.
[78] Vincent, K. (2004). Creating an index of social vulnerability to climate change for Africa. Tyndall Centre Working Paper No. 56.
[79] OECD, (2008). OECD Annual Report 2008, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development,
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Islam, S. M. F., Sanjida, L., Sabit, M. H., Hossain, B. M. T. A. (2025). Assessing Climate Vulnerability in the Haor Wetland Region of Bangladesh: Policy and Governance Implications for Livelihood Resilience and Ecosystem-Based Adaptation. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 10(6), 317-342. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20251006.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Islam, S. M. F.; Sanjida, L.; Sabit, M. H.; Hossain, B. M. T. A. Assessing Climate Vulnerability in the Haor Wetland Region of Bangladesh: Policy and Governance Implications for Livelihood Resilience and Ecosystem-Based Adaptation. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2025, 10(6), 317-342. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20251006.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Islam SMF, Sanjida L, Sabit MH, Hossain BMTA. Assessing Climate Vulnerability in the Haor Wetland Region of Bangladesh: Policy and Governance Implications for Livelihood Resilience and Ecosystem-Based Adaptation. Int J Agric Econ. 2025;10(6):317-342. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20251006.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijae.20251006.11,
      author = {Sheikh Mohammad Fakhrul Islam and Laila Sanjida and Mohammad Hasan Sabit and Bhuiya Mohammad Tamim Al Hossain},
      title = {Assessing Climate Vulnerability in the Haor Wetland Region of Bangladesh: Policy and Governance Implications for Livelihood Resilience and Ecosystem-Based Adaptation
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
      volume = {10},
      number = {6},
      pages = {317-342},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20251006.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20251006.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20251006.11},
      abstract = {The Haor wetland region of Bangladesh faces growing climate vulnerability due to its unique geomorphology and hydrological complexity. This study assesses climate-induced hazards and their impacts on agriculture, ecosystems, and livelihoods using a nine-step methodology guided by the Climate Risk Vulnerability Assessment (CRVA) framework. Data were collected through household surveys, FGDs, and KIIs. Historical climate trends and future projections were analyzed using downscaled CMIP6 data under the SSP1-2.6 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. Findings indicate that by the 2030s and 2050s, the Haor region will experience increased temperatures and precipitation, by the 2030s, maximum winter temperatures are projected to rise by 0.87-0.9°C and under SSP5-8.5, winter rainfall may decrease by about 10%, while monsoon rainfall is expected to increase by 1.7-2% under SSP1-2.6, situation will be further aggravated by 2050; exacerbating risks such as floods, erosion, habitat degradation, and biodiversity loss. Agricultural systems are particularly susceptible to early flash floods, droughts, irrigation shortfalls, and labor shortages, all of which heighten the risk of crop failure and threaten food security. The vulnerability projections and mapping reveal more dynamic and location-specific trends. Under SSP1-2.6, Golapganj upazila’s vulnerability rises from low to moderate by the 2030s, with most other upazilas—except Kulaura—experiencing further deterioration by the 2050s. Under SSP5-8.5, Juri upazila enters a high vulnerability zone by the 2030s, while Kulaura shifts to moderate vulnerability during the same period but reverts to low vulnerability by the 2050s. Vulnerability is disproportionately borne by marginalized groups, including the poor, women, children, the elderly, and persons with disabilities. A logit regression model was used to identify determinants influencing agricultural vulnerability in the Haor region. It was found that household savings, access to credit, use of quality inputs, crop diversification, knowledge of climate-smart agriculture (CSA), land area affected by disasters, and access to irrigation and larger landholdings were significantly affecting agricultural vulnerability in the region. The findings underscore the need for improved extension services, access to climate-resilient inputs, farmer education, and infrastructural investments to enhance resilience in the Haor agricultural systems., The study also assessed sector-specific risks and adaptive responses. It identified existing indigenous coping strategies and proposed ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) approaches to strengthen long-term resilience. The findings offer critical policy insights and governance recommendations to support climate-resilient development and equitable adaptation in one of Bangladesh’s most ecologically sensitive regions.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Assessing Climate Vulnerability in the Haor Wetland Region of Bangladesh: Policy and Governance Implications for Livelihood Resilience and Ecosystem-Based Adaptation
    
    AU  - Sheikh Mohammad Fakhrul Islam
    AU  - Laila Sanjida
    AU  - Mohammad Hasan Sabit
    AU  - Bhuiya Mohammad Tamim Al Hossain
    Y1  - 2025/10/28
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20251006.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijae.20251006.11
    T2  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    JF  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
    SP  - 317
    EP  - 342
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-3843
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20251006.11
    AB  - The Haor wetland region of Bangladesh faces growing climate vulnerability due to its unique geomorphology and hydrological complexity. This study assesses climate-induced hazards and their impacts on agriculture, ecosystems, and livelihoods using a nine-step methodology guided by the Climate Risk Vulnerability Assessment (CRVA) framework. Data were collected through household surveys, FGDs, and KIIs. Historical climate trends and future projections were analyzed using downscaled CMIP6 data under the SSP1-2.6 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. Findings indicate that by the 2030s and 2050s, the Haor region will experience increased temperatures and precipitation, by the 2030s, maximum winter temperatures are projected to rise by 0.87-0.9°C and under SSP5-8.5, winter rainfall may decrease by about 10%, while monsoon rainfall is expected to increase by 1.7-2% under SSP1-2.6, situation will be further aggravated by 2050; exacerbating risks such as floods, erosion, habitat degradation, and biodiversity loss. Agricultural systems are particularly susceptible to early flash floods, droughts, irrigation shortfalls, and labor shortages, all of which heighten the risk of crop failure and threaten food security. The vulnerability projections and mapping reveal more dynamic and location-specific trends. Under SSP1-2.6, Golapganj upazila’s vulnerability rises from low to moderate by the 2030s, with most other upazilas—except Kulaura—experiencing further deterioration by the 2050s. Under SSP5-8.5, Juri upazila enters a high vulnerability zone by the 2030s, while Kulaura shifts to moderate vulnerability during the same period but reverts to low vulnerability by the 2050s. Vulnerability is disproportionately borne by marginalized groups, including the poor, women, children, the elderly, and persons with disabilities. A logit regression model was used to identify determinants influencing agricultural vulnerability in the Haor region. It was found that household savings, access to credit, use of quality inputs, crop diversification, knowledge of climate-smart agriculture (CSA), land area affected by disasters, and access to irrigation and larger landholdings were significantly affecting agricultural vulnerability in the region. The findings underscore the need for improved extension services, access to climate-resilient inputs, farmer education, and infrastructural investments to enhance resilience in the Haor agricultural systems., The study also assessed sector-specific risks and adaptive responses. It identified existing indigenous coping strategies and proposed ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) approaches to strengthen long-term resilience. The findings offer critical policy insights and governance recommendations to support climate-resilient development and equitable adaptation in one of Bangladesh’s most ecologically sensitive regions.
    
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections