Emergent Universe from Many Unreal World Interpretation

Bhushan Bhoja Poojary

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Emergent Universe from Many Unreal World Interpretation

Bhushan Bhoja Poojary

Published in International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics (Volume 6, Issue 2)

Received: 11 April 2020 Accepted: 26 May 2020 Published: 15 June 2020

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

There are multiple interpretations of quantum mechanics, 2 most famous interpretations are Copenhagen interpretation and many world interpretations. Copenhagen interpretation fails to explain the mechanism behind wave function collapse and many world interpretations avoid collapse by adding infinite branching worlds. Goal of this paper is to provide alternate interpretations which explains mechanism behind collapse using finite pre-existent unreal worlds. All quantum weirdness can be narrowed down to few postulates, if we consider every particle has a dedicated address in event horizon, every address has its own dedicated spacetime fabric, particles will have its projected shadows on other space time fabric and whenever there is interaction between true particle and other shadow particle, new address is assigned for both interacting particles and instantaneously all projected shadow becomes void. We perceive universe from collapse perspective only when particles collapse and new address are assigned, thus giving an illusion that we live in one universe but its result of interaction of multiple worlds. From new postulates we were able to explain how one of the entangled photons can decides other photons path in Wheeler's delayed choice experiment and thus helps us to removes problematic retro causality speculation to explain the phenomenon observed in this experiment.

Published in	International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics (Volume 6, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11
Page(s)	14-18
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Quantum Mechanics Interpretation, Wave Function Collapse, Superposition, Wheeler's Delayed Choice Experiment

References

[1]	Jacob D. Bekenstein (2008) Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. Scholarpedia, 3 (10): 7375ei.
[2]	D. Bekenstein Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 11 (1974), p. 467 arXiv: 1603.08674 [quant-ph]
[3]	Pathria, R. K. (1972). "The Universe as a Black Hole". Nature. 240 (5379): 298–299. Bibcode: 1972Natur. 240.. 298P. doi: 10.1038/240298a0.
[4]	Good, I. J. (July 1972). "Chinese universes". Physics Today. 25 (7): 15. Bibcode: 1972PhT....25g..15G. doi: 10.1063/1.3070923.
[5]	Asher Peres, Quantum Theory, Concepts and Methods, Kluwer, 1993; ISBN 0-7923-2549-4 p. 115.
[6]	Ashby, Neil (2003). Relativity in the Global Positioning System". Living Reviews in Relativity. 6 (1): 1. Bibcode: 2003LRR.....6....1A. doi: 10.12942/lrr-2003-1. PMC 5253894. PMID 28163638.
[7]	Staley, Richard (2009), "Albert Michelson, the Velocity of Light, and the Ether Drift", Einstein's generation. The origins of the relativity revolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, ISBN 0-226-77057-5.
[8]	Zeilinger A (1999). "Experiment and the foundations of quantum physics". Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 (2): S288–S297. Bibcode: 1999RvMPS..71..288Z.
[9]	Fein, Y. Y., Geyer, P., Zwick, P. et al. Quantum superposition of molecules beyond 25 kDa. Nat. Phys. 15, 1242–1245 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0663-9.
[10]	J. von Neumann (1932). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (in German). Berlin: Springer.
[11]	Eibenberger, Sandra; et al. (2013). "Matter-wave interference with particles selected from a molecular library with masses exceeding 10000 amu". Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 15 (35): 14696–14700. arXiv: 1310.8343. Bibcode: 2013PCCP...1514696E. doi: 10.1039/C3CP51500A. PMID 23900710.
[12]	Kim, Yoon-Ho; R. Yu; S. P. Kulik; Y. H. Shih; Marlan Scully (2000). "A Delayed "Choice" Quantum Eraser". Physical Review Letters. 84 (1): 1–5. arXiv: quant-ph/9903047. Bibcode: 2000PhRvL..84....1K. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1. PMID 11015820.
[13]	Schrödinger, Erwin (1935). "Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik (The present situation in quantum mechanics)". Naturwissenschaften.
[14]	Bryce S. DeWitt (1970). "Quantum mechanics and reality". Physics Today. 23 (9): 30. doi: 10.1063/1.3022331. See also Leslie E. Ballentine; Philip Pearle; Evan Harris Walker; Mendel Sachs; Toyoki Koga; Joseph Gerver; Bryce DeWitt (1971). "Quantum-mechanics debate". Physics Today. 24 (4): 36. doi: 10.1063/1.3022676.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Bhushan Bhoja Poojary. (2020). Emergent Universe from Many Unreal World Interpretation. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, 6(2), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Bhushan Bhoja Poojary. Emergent Universe from Many Unreal World Interpretation. Int. J. Appl. Math. Theor. Phys. 2020, 6(2), 14-18. doi: 10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Bhushan Bhoja Poojary. Emergent Universe from Many Unreal World Interpretation. Int J Appl Math Theor Phys. 2020;6(2):14-18. doi: 10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11,
  author = {Bhushan Bhoja Poojary},
  title = {Emergent Universe from Many Unreal World Interpretation},
  journal = {International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics},
  volume = {6},
  number = {2},
  pages = {14-18},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijamtp.20200602.11},
  abstract = {There are multiple interpretations of quantum mechanics, 2 most famous interpretations are Copenhagen interpretation and many world interpretations. Copenhagen interpretation fails to explain the mechanism behind wave function collapse and many world interpretations avoid collapse by adding infinite branching worlds. Goal of this paper is to provide alternate interpretations which explains mechanism behind collapse using finite pre-existent unreal worlds. All quantum weirdness can be narrowed down to few postulates, if we consider every particle has a dedicated address in event horizon, every address has its own dedicated spacetime fabric, particles will have its projected shadows on other space time fabric and whenever there is interaction between true particle and other shadow particle, new address is assigned for both interacting particles and instantaneously all projected shadow becomes void. We perceive universe from collapse perspective only when particles collapse and new address are assigned, thus giving an illusion that we live in one universe but its result of interaction of multiple worlds. From new postulates we were able to explain how one of the entangled photons can decides other photons path in Wheeler's delayed choice experiment and thus helps us to removes problematic retro causality speculation to explain the phenomenon observed in this experiment.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Emergent Universe from Many Unreal World Interpretation
AU  - Bhushan Bhoja Poojary
Y1  - 2020/06/15
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11
T2  - International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics
JF  - International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics
JO  - International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics
SP  - 14
EP  - 18
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-5927
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11
AB  - There are multiple interpretations of quantum mechanics, 2 most famous interpretations are Copenhagen interpretation and many world interpretations. Copenhagen interpretation fails to explain the mechanism behind wave function collapse and many world interpretations avoid collapse by adding infinite branching worlds. Goal of this paper is to provide alternate interpretations which explains mechanism behind collapse using finite pre-existent unreal worlds. All quantum weirdness can be narrowed down to few postulates, if we consider every particle has a dedicated address in event horizon, every address has its own dedicated spacetime fabric, particles will have its projected shadows on other space time fabric and whenever there is interaction between true particle and other shadow particle, new address is assigned for both interacting particles and instantaneously all projected shadow becomes void. We perceive universe from collapse perspective only when particles collapse and new address are assigned, thus giving an illusion that we live in one universe but its result of interaction of multiple worlds. From new postulates we were able to explain how one of the entangled photons can decides other photons path in Wheeler's delayed choice experiment and thus helps us to removes problematic retro causality speculation to explain the phenomenon observed in this experiment.
VL  - 6
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Bhushan Bhoja Poojary

Bachelor of Science Physics, NIMS University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Bhushan Bhoja Poojary. (2020). Emergent Universe from Many Unreal World Interpretation. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, 6(2), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Bhushan Bhoja Poojary. Emergent Universe from Many Unreal World Interpretation. Int. J. Appl. Math. Theor. Phys. 2020, 6(2), 14-18. doi: 10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Bhushan Bhoja Poojary. Emergent Universe from Many Unreal World Interpretation. Int J Appl Math Theor Phys. 2020;6(2):14-18. doi: 10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11,
  author = {Bhushan Bhoja Poojary},
  title = {Emergent Universe from Many Unreal World Interpretation},
  journal = {International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics},
  volume = {6},
  number = {2},
  pages = {14-18},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijamtp.20200602.11},
  abstract = {There are multiple interpretations of quantum mechanics, 2 most famous interpretations are Copenhagen interpretation and many world interpretations. Copenhagen interpretation fails to explain the mechanism behind wave function collapse and many world interpretations avoid collapse by adding infinite branching worlds. Goal of this paper is to provide alternate interpretations which explains mechanism behind collapse using finite pre-existent unreal worlds. All quantum weirdness can be narrowed down to few postulates, if we consider every particle has a dedicated address in event horizon, every address has its own dedicated spacetime fabric, particles will have its projected shadows on other space time fabric and whenever there is interaction between true particle and other shadow particle, new address is assigned for both interacting particles and instantaneously all projected shadow becomes void. We perceive universe from collapse perspective only when particles collapse and new address are assigned, thus giving an illusion that we live in one universe but its result of interaction of multiple worlds. From new postulates we were able to explain how one of the entangled photons can decides other photons path in Wheeler's delayed choice experiment and thus helps us to removes problematic retro causality speculation to explain the phenomenon observed in this experiment.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Emergent Universe from Many Unreal World Interpretation
AU  - Bhushan Bhoja Poojary
Y1  - 2020/06/15
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11
T2  - International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics
JF  - International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics
JO  - International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics
SP  - 14
EP  - 18
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-5927
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijamtp.20200602.11
AB  - There are multiple interpretations of quantum mechanics, 2 most famous interpretations are Copenhagen interpretation and many world interpretations. Copenhagen interpretation fails to explain the mechanism behind wave function collapse and many world interpretations avoid collapse by adding infinite branching worlds. Goal of this paper is to provide alternate interpretations which explains mechanism behind collapse using finite pre-existent unreal worlds. All quantum weirdness can be narrowed down to few postulates, if we consider every particle has a dedicated address in event horizon, every address has its own dedicated spacetime fabric, particles will have its projected shadows on other space time fabric and whenever there is interaction between true particle and other shadow particle, new address is assigned for both interacting particles and instantaneously all projected shadow becomes void. We perceive universe from collapse perspective only when particles collapse and new address are assigned, thus giving an illusion that we live in one universe but its result of interaction of multiple worlds. From new postulates we were able to explain how one of the entangled photons can decides other photons path in Wheeler's delayed choice experiment and thus helps us to removes problematic retro causality speculation to explain the phenomenon observed in this experiment.
VL  - 6
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download