Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Response of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties to NPSB Fertilizer Rates in Buno Bedele Zone, Southwestern Oromia, Ethiopia

Received: 22 February 2025     Accepted: 19 April 2025     Published: 22 May 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) is one of the most important pulse crops contributing to food security and livelihoods for the majority of farmers in Ethiopia. However, low soil fertility and absence of recovering package practices are major constraints that limit the production and productivity of haricot bean in the study area. Therefore, the study was conducted to determine the optimum NPSB rates and identify the best performing haricot bean varieties that reply successfully to a specific application rate of NPSB fertilizers and select economically viable treatment/s that can increase the productivity of haricot bean. Factorial combination of five levels of NPSB (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg ha-1) and two Haricot bean varieties (SER-119 and SER-125) were laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The results shown that plant height, number of pods per plant, number of seed per pod, 100 seed weight and grain yield were significantly affected by main effect of varieties. Likewise, number of pod per plant, plant height, and grain yield (1574.9 kg ha-1) were significantly affected by the main effects of NPSB fertilizer rates. The highest net benefit (55357.2 Birr ha-1) and Marginal Rate of Return (358.61%) were obtained from SER-125 variety applied with the combination of 100 kg NPSB ha-1. Therefore, producing haricot bean with the application of 100 kg NPSB ha-1 was most productive for economical production. Furthermore, emphasis and consideration are required to the issue in future research studies; since the soil is dominantly acidic, there the limiting macro and micro nutrients in the study area, and therefore, more attention must be given to treating the soil by lime.

Published in International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry (Volume 10, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijbc.20251001.13
Page(s) 24-34
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Haricot Bean, NPSB Fertilizer and Varieties, Yield

References
[1] Pandey, M. and Kumar, N. (2024). Diversity of traditional grain legumes of himalayan region of uttarakhand: A review. Agricultural Reviews. 45(1): 96-102.
[2] Wodajo, D., Shimelis, A. and Belay, D. (2021). Geometric characteristics and mass-volume-area properties of haricot beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) effect of Variety. International Journal of Food Properties. 24(1): 885-894.
[3] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2023). Faostat.
[4] Buruchara, R., Rowland, C., Sperling, L., Claire, M., Jean-Claude, R., Mutonhi, R. and Mathew M. A. (2011). Development and delivery of bean varieties in Africa: the Pan-Africa Bean Research Alliance (PABRA) model. African Crop Science Journal. 19(4): 227-245.
[5] Tigist, S., Julia, S., Assefa, A. and Gemechu, K. (2023). Agromorphological and physiological performance of Ethiopian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes under different agroecological conditions. Plants. 12(12): 23-42.
[6] Zebire Asefa, Gelgelo Samuel (2019). Effect of phosphorus fertilizer levels on growth and yield of haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris. L.) in South Ommo Zone, Ethiopia. Agricultural Science Digest. 39(1): 55-58.
[7] Cholo, M., Marisennayya, S., Bojago, E., Leja, D. and Divya, R. K. (2023). Determinants of adoption and intensity of improved haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties: A Socio-agronomic study from southern Ethiopia. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 13, 100656.
[8] FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organizations of the United Nations. Statistics Division; 2022.
[9] Chilot, Y., Shahidur, R., Befekadu, B., & Solomon, L. (2010). Pulses Value Chain Potential in Ethiopia: Constraints and opportunities for enhancing exports. International Food Pol icy Research Institute (IFPRI).
[10] Central Statistical Agency (CSA). (2022). Agricultural Sample Survey Series: Report on Area and Production for Major Crops (Private Holdings, Main Season). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[11] Asfaw A, Blair MW (2014) Quantification of drought tolerance in Ethiopian common bean varieties. Agricultural Sciences 5(2): 124-136.
[12] Girma W, Yeshialem M, Tsegaye B. (2017) Response of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) to Lime Application and Rhizobium Inoculation on Nitosols at Bench-Maji Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia. J Plant Biol Soil Health.
[13] Ethio-SIS (Ethiopia Soil Fertility Status). 2016. Fertilizer Recommendation Atlas of the Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples’ Regional State, Ethiopia. pp81.
[14] EthioSIS (Ethiopian Soil Information System), (2014). Soil analysis report Agricultural Transformation Agency.
[15] Chimdessa D, “Determination of NPS Fertilizer Rate Based on Calibrated Phosphorus for Maize in Dabo Hana District, Buno Bedele Zone, Western Oromia,” vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 105 110, 2022,
[16] SAS (Statistical Analysis System Institute). 2014. SAS Version 9.4 © 2002-2012. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.
[17] CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center). 1988. From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economics Workbook. Mexico, D. F.: CIMMYT.
[18] Tekalign Tadese. 1991. Soil, plant, water, fertilizer, animal manure and compost analysis. Working Document No. 13. International Livestock Research Center for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[19] Landon JR (Ed.). 1991. Booker Tropical Soil Manual: A Handbook for Soil Survey and Agricultural Land Evaluation in the Tropics and Subtropics. Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, New York 474.
[20] Bray and Kurtz. 1945. Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus soil. science 59(1) 39-45.
[21] Tadesse N, Dechassa N (2012) Effect of nitrogen and sulphur application on yield components and yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Eastern Ethiopia. Acad Res J Agric Sci Res 5: 77-89.
[22] Etana, D. and Nebiyu, A. (2023). Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to lime and TSP fertilizer under acid soil. Heliyon, 9(4).
[23] Nuru Seid, 2020. Effect of Blended NPS Fertilizer and Rhizobium Inoculation on Yield Components and Yield of Common Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Varieties at Mekdela District, South Wollo, Ethiopia. Academic Journal of Research and Scientific Publishing: 18(2), 2706-6495.
[24] Jawahar, S. V., Vaiyapuri, V., Suseendran, K., Kalaiyarasan C., and Sriramachandra sekharan, M. V. 2017. Effect of sources and levels of sulphur on growth and yield of rice fallow blackgram (Vigna mungo). International Journal of Chemistry, ISSN: 2123-2845(online).
[25] Turuko, M. and Mohammed, A. 2014. Effect of Different Phosphorus Fertilizer Rates on Growth, Dry Matter Yield and Yield Components of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). World Journal of Agricultural Research, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 3, 88-92.
[26] Wondimu W, Tana T. 2017. Yield response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties to combined application of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers at Mechara, Eastern Ethiopia. J Plant Biol Soil Health. 4(2): 7.
[27] Zewde P. 2016. Effect of phosphorous rates on yield and yield related traits of common bean varieties on NitisolsatWolaita Sodo, southern Ethiopia [A Thesis]. Haramaya University, Ethiopia.
[28] Shumi D. Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties to rates of blended NPS fertilizer in Adola district, Southern Ethiopia. Afr J Plant Sci. 2018; 12(8): 164–79.
[29] Deresa S, Demissie A, Tekalign A, Belachew D. Response of Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties to Rates of Blended NPS Fertilizer in Adola District, Southern Ethiopia. J Plant Biol Soil Health. 2018; 5(1): 1–10.
[30] Mourice, S. K. and Tryphone, G. M. 2012. Evaluation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes for adaptation to low phosphorus. International Scholarly Research Network Agronomy. ISRN Agronomy, 2012, Research Article.
[31] Arega A, Zenebe M. 2019. Commonbean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) varieties response to rates of blended NPKSB fertilizer at Arba Minch, Southern Ethiopia. Adv Crop Sci Technol. 7(3): 429.
[32] Devi, M. J., Sinclair, T. R., Beebe, S. E. and Rao, I. M., 2013. Comparison of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes for nitrogen fixation tolerance to soil drying. Plant and Soil, 364(1), pp. 29-37.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Abdeta, A., Firdisa, G., Tesiso, M. (2025). Response of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties to NPSB Fertilizer Rates in Buno Bedele Zone, Southwestern Oromia, Ethiopia. International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry, 10(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20251001.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Abdeta, A.; Firdisa, G.; Tesiso, M. Response of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties to NPSB Fertilizer Rates in Buno Bedele Zone, Southwestern Oromia, Ethiopia. Int. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2025, 10(1), 24-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbc.20251001.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Abdeta A, Firdisa G, Tesiso M. Response of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties to NPSB Fertilizer Rates in Buno Bedele Zone, Southwestern Oromia, Ethiopia. Int J Bioorg Chem. 2025;10(1):24-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbc.20251001.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijbc.20251001.13,
      author = {Alemayehu Abdeta and Garoma Firdisa and Mohammed Tesiso},
      title = {Response of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties to NPSB Fertilizer Rates in Buno Bedele Zone, Southwestern Oromia, Ethiopia
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry},
      volume = {10},
      number = {1},
      pages = {24-34},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijbc.20251001.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20251001.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijbc.20251001.13},
      abstract = {Haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) is one of the most important pulse crops contributing to food security and livelihoods for the majority of farmers in Ethiopia. However, low soil fertility and absence of recovering package practices are major constraints that limit the production and productivity of haricot bean in the study area. Therefore, the study was conducted to determine the optimum NPSB rates and identify the best performing haricot bean varieties that reply successfully to a specific application rate of NPSB fertilizers and select economically viable treatment/s that can increase the productivity of haricot bean. Factorial combination of five levels of NPSB (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg ha-1) and two Haricot bean varieties (SER-119 and SER-125) were laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The results shown that plant height, number of pods per plant, number of seed per pod, 100 seed weight and grain yield were significantly affected by main effect of varieties. Likewise, number of pod per plant, plant height, and grain yield (1574.9 kg ha-1) were significantly affected by the main effects of NPSB fertilizer rates. The highest net benefit (55357.2 Birr ha-1) and Marginal Rate of Return (358.61%) were obtained from SER-125 variety applied with the combination of 100 kg NPSB ha-1. Therefore, producing haricot bean with the application of 100 kg NPSB ha-1 was most productive for economical production. Furthermore, emphasis and consideration are required to the issue in future research studies; since the soil is dominantly acidic, there the limiting macro and micro nutrients in the study area, and therefore, more attention must be given to treating the soil by lime.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Response of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties to NPSB Fertilizer Rates in Buno Bedele Zone, Southwestern Oromia, Ethiopia
    
    AU  - Alemayehu Abdeta
    AU  - Garoma Firdisa
    AU  - Mohammed Tesiso
    Y1  - 2025/05/22
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20251001.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijbc.20251001.13
    T2  - International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry
    JF  - International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry
    JO  - International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry
    SP  - 24
    EP  - 34
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-9392
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20251001.13
    AB  - Haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) is one of the most important pulse crops contributing to food security and livelihoods for the majority of farmers in Ethiopia. However, low soil fertility and absence of recovering package practices are major constraints that limit the production and productivity of haricot bean in the study area. Therefore, the study was conducted to determine the optimum NPSB rates and identify the best performing haricot bean varieties that reply successfully to a specific application rate of NPSB fertilizers and select economically viable treatment/s that can increase the productivity of haricot bean. Factorial combination of five levels of NPSB (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg ha-1) and two Haricot bean varieties (SER-119 and SER-125) were laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The results shown that plant height, number of pods per plant, number of seed per pod, 100 seed weight and grain yield were significantly affected by main effect of varieties. Likewise, number of pod per plant, plant height, and grain yield (1574.9 kg ha-1) were significantly affected by the main effects of NPSB fertilizer rates. The highest net benefit (55357.2 Birr ha-1) and Marginal Rate of Return (358.61%) were obtained from SER-125 variety applied with the combination of 100 kg NPSB ha-1. Therefore, producing haricot bean with the application of 100 kg NPSB ha-1 was most productive for economical production. Furthermore, emphasis and consideration are required to the issue in future research studies; since the soil is dominantly acidic, there the limiting macro and micro nutrients in the study area, and therefore, more attention must be given to treating the soil by lime.
    
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Agronomy and Crop Physiology, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bedele, Ethiopia

  • Department of Agronomy and Crop Physiology, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bedele, Ethiopia

  • Department of Agronomy and Crop Physiology, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bedele, Ethiopia

  • Sections