In this paper, to investigate the tolerance of some cowpea genotypes to imazaquin, seeds of 30 cowpea genotypes were treated with imazaquin at 0.06 kg active ingredient ha-1 and control were treated with distilled water. Treated seeds were planted in plastic pots and raised for 3 weeks in a green house. Samples leaves were detached for DNA isolation at 2 weeks after sowing. Phenotypic result revealed that Hen-me and Hodi were the most tolerant (with 12.5% mortality rate) to imazaquin while Maptwapa and many others (with 100% mortality rate) were highly sensitive to imazaquin. However, there were no sequences differences between tolerant and sensitive genotypes in amplified region of the annotated portion of AHAS (acetohydroxy-acid synthase) from cowpea. It can be concluded that the major significant difference between imazaquin tolerance and sensitive cowpea is as a result of rapid metabolic detoxification of herbicides in tolerant cowpea. It is therefore imperative that enzymology involve in the differential metabolism of this herbicide in this crop needs urgent and necessary attention.
Published in | International Journal of Genetics and Genomics (Volume 4, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijgg.20160402.11 |
Page(s) | 5-10 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group |
AHAS Enzyme, Imazaquin, Herbicide Tolerance and Cowpea Genotypes
[1] | Ashraf M. (1985). Farming-systems Approach. In: Kim SK. (ed) Combating Striga in Africa. Proceeding of the International Workshop held in Ibadan Nigeria; on 22–24 August, 1985.pp 341-357. |
[2] | Davis D. W., Oeke E. A., Oplinger E. S., Doll J. D., Hanson K. V. and Putnam D. D. (1991). Field Crops Manual Alternative http:www.hort.purdue.edu/new crop/afcm/cowpea.html. |
[3] | Barrett M. (1989). Reduction of imazaquin injury to corn (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) with antidotes. Weed Science, 37: 34-41. |
[4] | Congleton W. F., Vancantfort A. M. and Lignowski E. (1987). Imazaquin (scepter): A new soybean herbicide. Weed Technology, 1 (2): 186-188. |
[5] | Chen X. Laudeman T. W. Rushton P. J. Spraggins T. A. and Timko M. P. (2007). CGKB: An annotation knowledge base for cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Methylation filtered genomic gene space sequences. BMC Bioinformatic, http://ww.biomedcentral.com/1471 21058/129. |
[6] | Li C., Fatokun C. A., Ubi B., Singh B. B. and Scoles G. J. (2001). Determining genetic similarities and relationships among cowpea breeding lines and cultivars by microsatellite markers. Crop Science, 31(1): 189-197. |
[7] | Timko, M. P., Pau J. R., Thomas, W. L., Marta T. B., Edmond C., Foo cheung C. D. T. and Xianfeng C. (2008). Sequencing and analysis of the gene-rich space of cowpea. BMC Genomics 9: 103-123. |
[8] | Riskey, M. A. and Lawrence O. L (1991). Efficacy of Imazaquin on various weed species. Weed Science 39 (2): 243-250. |
[9] | Tecle, B. Cunha D. A. and Shaner L. D. (1993). Differential routes of metabolism of imidazolinones: Basis for soybean (Glycine max) selectivity. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 46: 120-130. |
[10] | Baerg R. J. and Barrett M. (1996). The basis of imazethapyr tolerance in cowpea (Vigna sinensis). Weed Science, 44: 769-775. |
[11] | Zhou, Q., Weiping, L., Yongsong Z. and Kevin L. (2007) Action mechanism of acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 89: 98-96. |
[12] | Durner J., Gailus V. and Boger P. (1991).New aspects of inhibition of plant acetolactate synthase by chlorsulfuron and imazaquin. Plant Physiology, 95: 1144-1149. |
[13] | Heap I. M. (2007). International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Weed science society of America. http://www.weedscience.org/Accessed 11/7/2012. |
[14] | Stidham M. A. (1991). Herbicide that inhibits acetohydroxy acid synthase. Weed Science 39(3): 428-434. |
[15] | Tuinstra, M. R., Soumana S., Al-khatip K., Kapranu I., Toure A., Bastiaans A. L., Ochanda N. W., Salmi I., Kayentao M. and Dembele S. (2009). Efficacy of herbicide seed treatments for controlling Striga infestation of sorghum. Crop Science 49: 923-929. |
[16] | Berner D. K., Award A. E. and Aigbokhan E. I. (1994). Potentials of imazaquin seed treatments for control of Striga gesnerioides and Alectra vogelii in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Plant Disease, 7: 18-23. |
[17] | Kanampiu F. K. Ransom J. K., Gressel J., Jewell D., Freiese D., Grimanell D. and Hoisington D. (2002). Appropriateness of biotechnology to African Agriculture: Striga and maize paradigms. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organs Culture, 69: 105–110. |
[18] | Kanampiu F. K., Ransom J. K., Friensen D. and Gressel J. (2002) b. Imazapyr and pyrithiobac movement in soil and from maize seed coats to control Striga in legume intercropping. Crop Protection, 21: 611-619. |
[19] | Kabambe V. H., Kananpiu F. K. and Ngwira N. (2008). Imazapyr (herbicide) seed dressing increases yield, suppresses Striga asiatica and has seed depletion role in maize (Zea mays L.) in Malawi. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7(18): 3293-3298. |
[20] | Adagba M. A., Lagoke S. T. O. and Singh B. N. (2002). Potentials of Cinosulfuron and CGA152005 seed treatment for control of Striga hermonthica in upland rice. Act Agronomica Hungarica, 50(1): 7-18. |
[21] | FAO. (2005). Status research and application of crop biotechnology in developing countries. http:www.Fao.org/docrep/008/y5800e/y 5800.htm. Accessed 9/15/2012. |
[22] | Menalled F, D. and Dyer W. E. (2006). Preventing and managing herbicideresistance in Montana. MSU Extension Montana Guige. MT 200506AG. |
[23] | Newsom L. J. and Shaw D. R. (1992). Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar tolerance to chlorimuron and imazaquin with varying hydoponic solution pH. Weed Technology, 6(2): 382-388. |
APA Style
Abdulrahman Lado, Muhammad Auwal Hussaini, Alpha Yaya Kamara. (2016). Molecular Characterization of Imazaquin Tolerant and Sensitive Cowpea Genotypes. International Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 4(2), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20160402.11
ACS Style
Abdulrahman Lado; Muhammad Auwal Hussaini; Alpha Yaya Kamara. Molecular Characterization of Imazaquin Tolerant and Sensitive Cowpea Genotypes. Int. J. Genet. Genomics 2016, 4(2), 5-10. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20160402.11
AMA Style
Abdulrahman Lado, Muhammad Auwal Hussaini, Alpha Yaya Kamara. Molecular Characterization of Imazaquin Tolerant and Sensitive Cowpea Genotypes. Int J Genet Genomics. 2016;4(2):5-10. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20160402.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijgg.20160402.11, author = {Abdulrahman Lado and Muhammad Auwal Hussaini and Alpha Yaya Kamara}, title = {Molecular Characterization of Imazaquin Tolerant and Sensitive Cowpea Genotypes}, journal = {International Journal of Genetics and Genomics}, volume = {4}, number = {2}, pages = {5-10}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijgg.20160402.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20160402.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijgg.20160402.11}, abstract = {In this paper, to investigate the tolerance of some cowpea genotypes to imazaquin, seeds of 30 cowpea genotypes were treated with imazaquin at 0.06 kg active ingredient ha-1 and control were treated with distilled water. Treated seeds were planted in plastic pots and raised for 3 weeks in a green house. Samples leaves were detached for DNA isolation at 2 weeks after sowing. Phenotypic result revealed that Hen-me and Hodi were the most tolerant (with 12.5% mortality rate) to imazaquin while Maptwapa and many others (with 100% mortality rate) were highly sensitive to imazaquin. However, there were no sequences differences between tolerant and sensitive genotypes in amplified region of the annotated portion of AHAS (acetohydroxy-acid synthase) from cowpea. It can be concluded that the major significant difference between imazaquin tolerance and sensitive cowpea is as a result of rapid metabolic detoxification of herbicides in tolerant cowpea. It is therefore imperative that enzymology involve in the differential metabolism of this herbicide in this crop needs urgent and necessary attention.}, year = {2016} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Molecular Characterization of Imazaquin Tolerant and Sensitive Cowpea Genotypes AU - Abdulrahman Lado AU - Muhammad Auwal Hussaini AU - Alpha Yaya Kamara Y1 - 2016/04/16 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20160402.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijgg.20160402.11 T2 - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics JF - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics JO - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics SP - 5 EP - 10 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7359 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20160402.11 AB - In this paper, to investigate the tolerance of some cowpea genotypes to imazaquin, seeds of 30 cowpea genotypes were treated with imazaquin at 0.06 kg active ingredient ha-1 and control were treated with distilled water. Treated seeds were planted in plastic pots and raised for 3 weeks in a green house. Samples leaves were detached for DNA isolation at 2 weeks after sowing. Phenotypic result revealed that Hen-me and Hodi were the most tolerant (with 12.5% mortality rate) to imazaquin while Maptwapa and many others (with 100% mortality rate) were highly sensitive to imazaquin. However, there were no sequences differences between tolerant and sensitive genotypes in amplified region of the annotated portion of AHAS (acetohydroxy-acid synthase) from cowpea. It can be concluded that the major significant difference between imazaquin tolerance and sensitive cowpea is as a result of rapid metabolic detoxification of herbicides in tolerant cowpea. It is therefore imperative that enzymology involve in the differential metabolism of this herbicide in this crop needs urgent and necessary attention. VL - 4 IS - 2 ER -