Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationship Among Eight Species of Order: Rodentia in Egypt Based on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Marker

Fawzeya Abdelhadi Zayed; Sobhy Hasab El-Naby; Fatma Ahmady Al-Zahaby; Sabha Elsayed Elballat

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationship Among Eight Species of Order: Rodentia in Egypt Based on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Marker

Fawzeya Abdelhadi Zayed, Sobhy Hasab El-Naby, Fatma Ahmady Al-Zahaby, Sabha Elsayed Elballat

Published in International Journal of Genetics and Genomics (Volume 8, Issue 2)

Received: 31 December 2019 Accepted: 20 January 2020 Published: 10 March 2020

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Of all mammals the rodents have an importance and great diversity. The phylogenetic relationships between the different species of the order Rodentia has an interest and investigations for many researchers. The current study suggests the ability of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR to estimate the genetic distance and reflect the genetic relations and variability among eight rodent species of order Rodentia in Egypt. After the use of five arbitrary short primers (OPA-4, OPT-7, OPG-2, OPN-4 and OPM-1) to generate polymorphic, reproducible and score able bands. The results explained that, the highest genetic distance 1 was pronounced between Rattus norvegicus and Mus musculus praetextus similarly between Mus musculus domesticus and Rattus norvegicus. This is followed by the genetic distance between Mesocricetus auratus and Mus musculus domesticus as well as between Cavia porcellus and Rattus norvegicus. Nonetheless, the lowest genetic distance 0.31 was noticeable between Mus musculus praetextus and Mus musculus musculus.

Published in	International Journal of Genetics and Genomics (Volume 8, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11
Page(s)	54-62
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Rodentia, Mus Musculus, Rattus Rattus, Acomys Cahirinus, Mesocricetus Auratus, Cavia Porcellus

References

[1]	Stenseth N C, Leirs H, Skonhoft A, Davis S A, Pech R P et al 2003 Mice, rats, and people: the bio-economics of agricultural rodent pests. Front Ecol Environ 1 (7): 367-75
[2]	Singleton G R 2003 Impacts of rodents on rice production in Asia. IRRI Discussion Paper Series No. 45, Los Banos, Phillippines: 30 pp.
[3]	Fayenuwo J O, Olakojo S A, Akande M, Amusa N A, Olujimi O A 2007 Comparative evaluation of vertebrate pest damage on some newly developed quality protein maize (QPM) varieties in south-western Nigeria. Afri J Agri Res (2): 592-95.
[4]	Tsepo R, Nthabiseng M, Kutswa G, Moeti O T, Oriel M M et al 2019. Identification of Rodent Species That Infest Poultry Houses in Mafikeng, North West Province, South Africa. International Journal of Zoology, 2019 (1): 1-8.
[5]	Schlick NE, Jensen-Seaman MI, Orlebeke K, Kwitek AE, Jacob HJ, Lazar J 2006 Sequence analysis of the complete mitochondrial DNA in 10 commonly used inbred rat strains. Amer. J Physiol Cell Physiol (291): 1183-1192.
[6]	Francis CM, Borisenko AV, Ivanova NV, Eger JL, Lim BK, et al 2010 The role of DNA barcodes in understanding and conservation of mammal diversity in Southeast Asia. PLoS One 5 (9): e12575.
[7]	Huffman JE, Wallace JR 2012 Wildlife Forensics: Methods and applications. Huffman, Jane E. and Wallace, John R. eds., 1^st Edition, Wiley and Blackwell: 396 pp.
[8]	Amori G, Clout M 2003 Rodents on islands: a conservation challenge. In: Rats, mice and people: rodent biology and management, (eds) GR Singleton, LA Hinds, CJ Krebs, DM Spratt, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra: 63-68.
[9]	Puillandre N, Bouchet P, Boisselier-Dubale MC, Brisset J, Buge B, et al 2012 New taxonomy and old collections: integrating DNA barcoding into the collection curation process. Mol Ecol Resour 12 (3): 396-402.
[10]	Vesterinen EJ, Lilley T, Laine VN, Wahlberg N 2013 Next generation sequencing of fecal DNA reveals the dietary diversity of the widespread insectivorous predator Daubenton’s Bat (Myotis daubentonii) in Southwestern Finland. PLoS One 8 (11): e82168.
[11]	Hope PR, Bohmann K, Gilbert MTP, Zepeda-Mendoza ML, Razgour O, Jones G 2014 Second generation sequencing and morphological faecal analysis reveal unexpected foraging behaviour by Myotis nattereri (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in winter. Front Zool 11 (1): 39 pp.
[12]	Burgar JM, Murray DC, Craig MD, Haile J, Houston J et al 2014 Who’s for dinner? High-throughput sequencing reveals bat dietary differentiation in a biodiversity hotspot where prey taxonomy is largely undescribed. Mol Ecol 23 (15): 3605-3617.
[13]	Kruger F, Clare EL, Symondson WO, Keiss O, Petersons G 2014 Diet of the insectivorous bat, Pipistrellus nathusii, during autumn migration and summer residence. Mol Ecol 23 (15): 3672-3683.
[14]	Sedlock JL, Kruger F, Clare EL 2014. Molecular Ecology (Special issue): Molecular Detection of Trophic Interactions. Island bat diets: does it matter more who you are or where you live?. Mol Ecol 23 (15): 3684-3694.
[15]	Boyer S, Cruickshank RH, Wratten SD 2015 Faeces of generalist predators as biodiversity capsules: A new tool for biodiversity assessment in remote and inaccessible habitats. Food Webs (3): 1-6.
[16]	De Pasquale PP, Galimberti A 2014 New records of the Alcathoe bat, Myotis alcathoe (Vespertilionidae) for Italy. Barbastella (7): 1 p.
[17]	Wilson JJ, Sing KW, Halim MRA, Ramli R, Hashim R et al 2014). Utility of DNA barcoding for rapid and accurate assessment of bat diversity in Malaysia in the absence of formally described species. Genet Mol Res 13 (1): 920-925.
[18]	Johnson RN, Wilson-Wilde L, Linacre A 2014 Current and future directions of DNA in wildlife forensic science. Forensic Sci Int-Gen (10): 1-11.
[19]	Gehlot P, Purohit DK 2011 Molecular diagnostic of human pathogenetic Aspergillus species. Indian J Biotechnol (10): 207–211.
[20]	M, Dubey N, Totey SM 2002 Phylogenetic relationships and genetic polymorphisms in wild Indian mice. Biomol Eng (18): 281-288.
[21]	Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ Rafalski JA, Tingey SV 1990 DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18 (22): 6531-6535.
[22]	Ni M, Li WH 1979 Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction Endonucleases. Proc National Acad of Sci USA 76 (10): 5269–5273.
[23]	Farman AA, Aboud MN 2015 Biodiversity and Genetic Relationships to the Species for the genus Gladiolus L. (Iridaceae) Wild Growing in Iraq Using RAPD-PCR Technique. Ibn Al-Haitham J for Pure and Appl Sci 28 (3): 373-382.
[24]	Graphodatsky AS, Trifonov VA, Stanyon R 2011 The genome diversity and karyotype evolution of mammals. Molecular Cytogenetics 4 (22): 1-16.
[25]	Claussen U 2005 Chromosomics. Cytogenet Genome Res (111): 101-106.
[26]	Casiraghi M, Labra M, Ferri E, Galimberti A, De Mattia F 2010 DNA barcoding: a six question tour to improve users’ awareness about the method. Brief Bioinform 11 (4): 440-453.
[27]	Galimbertia A, Sandionigia A, Brunoa A, Bellatib A, Casiraghia M 2015 DNA barcoding in mammals: what’s new and where next? Hystrix, Italian J Mammal, Publ Assoc Teriol Italiana 26 (1): 13-24.
[28]	She JX, Bonhomme F, Boursot P, Thaler L, Catzeflis F 1990 Molecular phylogenies in the genus Mus: Comparative analysis of electrophoretic, scnDNA hybridization, and mtDNA RFLP data. Biol J Linn Soc (41): 83-103.
[29]	Lum JK, Cann RL, Martinson JJ, Jorde LB 1998 Mitochondrial and nuclear genetic relationships among Pacific Island and Asian populations. Am J Hum Genet 63 (2): 613-624.
[30]	Guenet JL, Bonhomme F 2003 Wild mice: an ever-increasing contribution to a popular mammalian model. Trends in Genetics 19 (1): 24-31.
[31]	Adkins RM, Gelke EL, Rowe D, Honeycutt RL 2001 Molecular phylogeny and divergence time estimates for major rodent groups: Evidence from multiple Genes. Molecular Biol Evol 18 (5): 777–791.
[32]	Dinesh KR, Chan WK, Lim TM Phange VE 1995 RAPD markers in fishes: an evaluation of resolution and reproducibility. Asia-Pac J Mol Biol Biotechnol (3): 112-118.
[33]	Cui S, Chesson C, Hope R 1993 Genetic variation within and between strains of outbred Swiss mice. Lab Anim (27): 116-123.
[34]	Spiridonova LN, Chelomina GN, Moriwaki K, Yonekawa H, Bogdanov AS 2004 Genetic and taxonomic diversity of the house mouse, Mus musculus, from the Asian Part of the former Soviet Union. Rus J Genet (40): 1134-1143.
[35]	Ruane J 1999 A critical review of the value of genetic distance studies in conservation of animal genetic resources. J Anim Breed Genet (116): 317-323.
[36]	Nagamine Y, Higuchi M 2001 Genetic distance and classification of domestic animals using genetic markers. J Anim Breed Genet (118): 101-109.
[37]	Dolmatova IY, Saitbatalov TF, Gareev FT 2000 Study of genetic polymorphism using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA in ducks: differences between breeds. Genet Moskva (36): 682-687.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fawzeya Abdelhadi Zayed, Sobhy Hasab El-Naby, Fatma Ahmady Al-Zahaby, Sabha Elsayed Elballat. (2020). Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationship Among Eight Species of Order: Rodentia in Egypt Based on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Marker. International Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 8(2), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fawzeya Abdelhadi Zayed; Sobhy Hasab El-Naby; Fatma Ahmady Al-Zahaby; Sabha Elsayed Elballat. Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationship Among Eight Species of Order: Rodentia in Egypt Based on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Marker. Int. J. Genet. Genomics 2020, 8(2), 54-62. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fawzeya Abdelhadi Zayed, Sobhy Hasab El-Naby, Fatma Ahmady Al-Zahaby, Sabha Elsayed Elballat. Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationship Among Eight Species of Order: Rodentia in Egypt Based on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Marker. Int J Genet Genomics. 2020;8(2):54-62. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11,
  author = {Fawzeya Abdelhadi Zayed and Sobhy Hasab El-Naby and Fatma Ahmady Al-Zahaby and Sabha Elsayed Elballat},
  title = {Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationship Among Eight Species of Order: Rodentia in Egypt Based on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Marker},
  journal = {International Journal of Genetics and Genomics},
  volume = {8},
  number = {2},
  pages = {54-62},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijgg.20200802.11},
  abstract = {Of all mammals the rodents have an importance and great diversity. The phylogenetic relationships between the different species of the order Rodentia has an interest and investigations for many researchers. The current study suggests the ability of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR to estimate the genetic distance and reflect the genetic relations and variability among eight rodent species of order Rodentia in Egypt. After the use of five arbitrary short primers (OPA-4, OPT-7, OPG-2, OPN-4 and OPM-1) to generate polymorphic, reproducible and score able bands. The results explained that, the highest genetic distance 1 was pronounced between Rattus norvegicus and Mus musculus praetextus similarly between Mus musculus domesticus and Rattus norvegicus. This is followed by the genetic distance between Mesocricetus auratus and Mus musculus domesticus as well as between Cavia porcellus and Rattus norvegicus. Nonetheless, the lowest genetic distance 0.31 was noticeable between Mus musculus praetextus and Mus musculus musculus.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationship Among Eight Species of Order: Rodentia in Egypt Based on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Marker
AU  - Fawzeya Abdelhadi Zayed
AU  - Sobhy Hasab El-Naby
AU  - Fatma Ahmady Al-Zahaby
AU  - Sabha Elsayed Elballat
Y1  - 2020/03/10
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11
T2  - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
JF  - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
JO  - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
SP  - 54
EP  - 62
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-7359
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11
AB  - Of all mammals the rodents have an importance and great diversity. The phylogenetic relationships between the different species of the order Rodentia has an interest and investigations for many researchers. The current study suggests the ability of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR to estimate the genetic distance and reflect the genetic relations and variability among eight rodent species of order Rodentia in Egypt. After the use of five arbitrary short primers (OPA-4, OPT-7, OPG-2, OPN-4 and OPM-1) to generate polymorphic, reproducible and score able bands. The results explained that, the highest genetic distance 1 was pronounced between Rattus norvegicus and Mus musculus praetextus similarly between Mus musculus domesticus and Rattus norvegicus. This is followed by the genetic distance between Mesocricetus auratus and Mus musculus domesticus as well as between Cavia porcellus and Rattus norvegicus. Nonetheless, the lowest genetic distance 0.31 was noticeable between Mus musculus praetextus and Mus musculus musculus.
VL  - 8
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Fawzeya Abdelhadi Zayed

Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
Sobhy Hasab El-Naby

Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Minufiya University, Minufiya, Egypt
Fatma Ahmady Al-Zahaby

Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
Sabha Elsayed Elballat

Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fawzeya Abdelhadi Zayed, Sobhy Hasab El-Naby, Fatma Ahmady Al-Zahaby, Sabha Elsayed Elballat. (2020). Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationship Among Eight Species of Order: Rodentia in Egypt Based on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Marker. International Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 8(2), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fawzeya Abdelhadi Zayed; Sobhy Hasab El-Naby; Fatma Ahmady Al-Zahaby; Sabha Elsayed Elballat. Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationship Among Eight Species of Order: Rodentia in Egypt Based on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Marker. Int. J. Genet. Genomics 2020, 8(2), 54-62. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fawzeya Abdelhadi Zayed, Sobhy Hasab El-Naby, Fatma Ahmady Al-Zahaby, Sabha Elsayed Elballat. Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationship Among Eight Species of Order: Rodentia in Egypt Based on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Marker. Int J Genet Genomics. 2020;8(2):54-62. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11,
  author = {Fawzeya Abdelhadi Zayed and Sobhy Hasab El-Naby and Fatma Ahmady Al-Zahaby and Sabha Elsayed Elballat},
  title = {Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationship Among Eight Species of Order: Rodentia in Egypt Based on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Marker},
  journal = {International Journal of Genetics and Genomics},
  volume = {8},
  number = {2},
  pages = {54-62},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijgg.20200802.11},
  abstract = {Of all mammals the rodents have an importance and great diversity. The phylogenetic relationships between the different species of the order Rodentia has an interest and investigations for many researchers. The current study suggests the ability of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR to estimate the genetic distance and reflect the genetic relations and variability among eight rodent species of order Rodentia in Egypt. After the use of five arbitrary short primers (OPA-4, OPT-7, OPG-2, OPN-4 and OPM-1) to generate polymorphic, reproducible and score able bands. The results explained that, the highest genetic distance 1 was pronounced between Rattus norvegicus and Mus musculus praetextus similarly between Mus musculus domesticus and Rattus norvegicus. This is followed by the genetic distance between Mesocricetus auratus and Mus musculus domesticus as well as between Cavia porcellus and Rattus norvegicus. Nonetheless, the lowest genetic distance 0.31 was noticeable between Mus musculus praetextus and Mus musculus musculus.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationship Among Eight Species of Order: Rodentia in Egypt Based on Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Marker
AU  - Fawzeya Abdelhadi Zayed
AU  - Sobhy Hasab El-Naby
AU  - Fatma Ahmady Al-Zahaby
AU  - Sabha Elsayed Elballat
Y1  - 2020/03/10
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11
T2  - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
JF  - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
JO  - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
SP  - 54
EP  - 62
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-7359
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20200802.11
AB  - Of all mammals the rodents have an importance and great diversity. The phylogenetic relationships between the different species of the order Rodentia has an interest and investigations for many researchers. The current study suggests the ability of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR to estimate the genetic distance and reflect the genetic relations and variability among eight rodent species of order Rodentia in Egypt. After the use of five arbitrary short primers (OPA-4, OPT-7, OPG-2, OPN-4 and OPM-1) to generate polymorphic, reproducible and score able bands. The results explained that, the highest genetic distance 1 was pronounced between Rattus norvegicus and Mus musculus praetextus similarly between Mus musculus domesticus and Rattus norvegicus. This is followed by the genetic distance between Mesocricetus auratus and Mus musculus domesticus as well as between Cavia porcellus and Rattus norvegicus. Nonetheless, the lowest genetic distance 0.31 was noticeable between Mus musculus praetextus and Mus musculus musculus.
VL  - 8
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download