With recent advances in minimally invasive surgery, full endoscopic discectomy has been more involved, not only the interlaminar approach but also the transforaminal. Transforaminal endoscopic surgery (TFES) can decompress the nerve root with less insult to surrounding soft tissues compared to interlaminar or open approaches, resulting in less postoperative pain, reduced length of stay, and early return to work. We reviewed retrospectively the clinical presentation of 20 patients with symptomatic L5-S1 disc prolapse with unilateral radicular pain whom underwent Transforaminal endoscopic surgery (TFES). Clinical and satisfactory outcomes were assessed using the visual pain analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) at follow up period 6 months postoperative. This study included 20 patients 14 males (70%) and 6 females (30%) Male to female ratio was 2.3: 1 with a mean age of 42.38 years ± 13.1 (range 25- 58 years). The preoperative mean VAS scores for radicular pain significantly decreased from 8.1± 14 to 2.8± 1.1 at 6 months follow-up (p = 0.0034). There was significant difference in VAS scores for back pain (5.7± 2.1) preoperatively to 1.9± 2 (p=0.02). ODI decreased from 57±2.5 to 11±10.5. Average length of stay was 1-3 days (1±0.5). TFES can be done for herniated L5-S1 discs bypassing the iliac crest barrier, by using an appropriate suprailiac trajectory and tailoring the entry point based on the patient’s body mass index guided by fluoroscopy.
Published in | International Journal of Neurosurgery (Volume 6, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijn.20220602.23 |
Page(s) | 104-109 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Endoscope, Lumber Disc, Transforaminal, Minimally Invasive
[1] | J. Chen, X. Jing, C. Li, Y. Jiang, S. Cheng, and J. Ma, “Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation Using a Transforaminal Approach Versus an Interlaminar Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” World Neurosurg., vol. 116, pp. 412-420. e2, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.075. |
[2] | P. Kambin, Ed., Arthroscopic and Endoscopic Spinal Surgery. Humana Press, 2005. doi: 10.1385/1592599044. |
[3] | G. Choi, S.-H. Lee, P. P. Raiturker, S. Lee, and Y.-S. Chae, “Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy for Intracanalicular Disc Herniations At L5–S1 Using a Rigid Working Channel Endoscope,” Oper. Neurosurg., vol. 58, no. suppl_1, p. ONS-59-ONS-68, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000192713.95921.4a. |
[4] | D. Y. LEE and S.-H. LEE, “Effects of Facet Tropism and Disk Degeneration on Far Lateral Lumbar Disk Herniation: Comparison With Posterolateral Lumbar Disk Herniation,” Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo), vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 57–61, 2009, doi: 10.2176/nmc.49.57. |
[5] | M. Komp, S. Ruetten, and G. Godolias, “P21. Full-endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniations: a prospective 12-months outcome study of patients treated with new endoscopes and instruments,” Spine J., vol. 5, no. 4, p. S120, Jul. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.05.236. |
[6] | A. T. Yeung and P. M. Tsou, “Posterolateral Endoscopic Excision for Lumbar Disc Herniation,” Spine, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 722–731, Apr. 2002, doi: 10.1097/00007632-200204010-00009. |
[7] | Q. Ding et al., “Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Far Lateral L5/S1 Disc Herniation With High Iliac Crest,” Jan. 2021, doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-146660/v1. |
[8] | Kong M, Gao C, Cong W, Li G, Zhou C, Ma X. Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy with Modified Sensation-Motion Separation Anesthesia for Beginning Surgeons in the Treatment of L5-S1 Disc Herniation. Journal of Pain Research. 2021; 14:2039. |
[9] | K.-S. Ryu, “Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5–S1 Disc Herniation: Transforaminal versus Interlaminar Approach,” Pain Physician, vol. 6$\mathsemicolon$16, no. 6$\mathsemicolon$11, pp. 547–556, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.36076/ppj.2013/16/547. |
[10] | G. Choi, J.-S. Kim, P. Lokhande, and S.-H. Lee, “Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy by Transiliac Approach,” Spine, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. E443–E446, May 2009, doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e31817c4f39. |
[11] | Z. Sakçı, M. R. Önen, E. Fidan, Y. Yaşar, H. Uluğ, and S. Naderi, “Radiologic Anatomy of the Lumbar Interlaminar Window and Surgical Considerations for Lumbar Interlaminar Endoscopic and Microsurgical Disc Surgery,” World Neurosurg., vol. 115, pp. e22–e26, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.049. |
[12] | Ye H, Ren QS, Zhu F. Therapeutic effect of percutaneous transforaminal nucleus pulposus extraction on lumbar disc herniation under different anesthesia. Chin J Endosc. 2019; 25 (25): 68-72. |
[13] | J. Kim, S. Lee, Y. Ahn, D. Yoon, C. Lee, and S. Lim, “Recurrence after Successful Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy,” Min - Minim. Invasive Neurosurg., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 82–85, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1055/s-2007-982504. |
[14] | T. Sakai et al., “Conservative Treatment for Bony Healing in Pediatric Lumbar Spondylolysis,” Spine, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. E716–E720, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001931. |
[15] | K.-C. Choi, “In Response to Re: Choi KC, Park CK. Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy,” Pain Physician, vol. 3, no. 22$\mathsemicolon$3, pp. E243–E244, May 2019, doi: 10.36076/ppj/2019.22.e243. |
[16] | K. Sairyo et al., “A new concept of transforaminal ventral facetectomy including simultaneous decompression of foraminal and lateral recess stenosis: Technical considerations in a fresh cadaver model and a literature review,” J. Med. Invest., vol. 64, no. 1.2, pp. 1–6, 2017, doi: 10.2152/jmi.64.1. |
APA Style
Mohammed Helmy, Mohamed Nossier, Ahmed Hassan Abou-Zeid, Mahmoud Massoud, Ahmed Maamoun Ashour. (2022). Transforaminal Endoscopic L5–S1 Discectomy Case Series One Year Experience. International Journal of Neurosurgery, 6(2), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijn.20220602.23
ACS Style
Mohammed Helmy; Mohamed Nossier; Ahmed Hassan Abou-Zeid; Mahmoud Massoud; Ahmed Maamoun Ashour. Transforaminal Endoscopic L5–S1 Discectomy Case Series One Year Experience. Int. J. Neurosurg. 2022, 6(2), 104-109. doi: 10.11648/j.ijn.20220602.23
@article{10.11648/j.ijn.20220602.23, author = {Mohammed Helmy and Mohamed Nossier and Ahmed Hassan Abou-Zeid and Mahmoud Massoud and Ahmed Maamoun Ashour}, title = {Transforaminal Endoscopic L5–S1 Discectomy Case Series One Year Experience}, journal = {International Journal of Neurosurgery}, volume = {6}, number = {2}, pages = {104-109}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijn.20220602.23}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijn.20220602.23}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijn.20220602.23}, abstract = {With recent advances in minimally invasive surgery, full endoscopic discectomy has been more involved, not only the interlaminar approach but also the transforaminal. Transforaminal endoscopic surgery (TFES) can decompress the nerve root with less insult to surrounding soft tissues compared to interlaminar or open approaches, resulting in less postoperative pain, reduced length of stay, and early return to work. We reviewed retrospectively the clinical presentation of 20 patients with symptomatic L5-S1 disc prolapse with unilateral radicular pain whom underwent Transforaminal endoscopic surgery (TFES). Clinical and satisfactory outcomes were assessed using the visual pain analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) at follow up period 6 months postoperative. This study included 20 patients 14 males (70%) and 6 females (30%) Male to female ratio was 2.3: 1 with a mean age of 42.38 years ± 13.1 (range 25- 58 years). The preoperative mean VAS scores for radicular pain significantly decreased from 8.1± 14 to 2.8± 1.1 at 6 months follow-up (p = 0.0034). There was significant difference in VAS scores for back pain (5.7± 2.1) preoperatively to 1.9± 2 (p=0.02). ODI decreased from 57±2.5 to 11±10.5. Average length of stay was 1-3 days (1±0.5). TFES can be done for herniated L5-S1 discs bypassing the iliac crest barrier, by using an appropriate suprailiac trajectory and tailoring the entry point based on the patient’s body mass index guided by fluoroscopy.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Transforaminal Endoscopic L5–S1 Discectomy Case Series One Year Experience AU - Mohammed Helmy AU - Mohamed Nossier AU - Ahmed Hassan Abou-Zeid AU - Mahmoud Massoud AU - Ahmed Maamoun Ashour Y1 - 2022/11/29 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijn.20220602.23 DO - 10.11648/j.ijn.20220602.23 T2 - International Journal of Neurosurgery JF - International Journal of Neurosurgery JO - International Journal of Neurosurgery SP - 104 EP - 109 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1959 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijn.20220602.23 AB - With recent advances in minimally invasive surgery, full endoscopic discectomy has been more involved, not only the interlaminar approach but also the transforaminal. Transforaminal endoscopic surgery (TFES) can decompress the nerve root with less insult to surrounding soft tissues compared to interlaminar or open approaches, resulting in less postoperative pain, reduced length of stay, and early return to work. We reviewed retrospectively the clinical presentation of 20 patients with symptomatic L5-S1 disc prolapse with unilateral radicular pain whom underwent Transforaminal endoscopic surgery (TFES). Clinical and satisfactory outcomes were assessed using the visual pain analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) at follow up period 6 months postoperative. This study included 20 patients 14 males (70%) and 6 females (30%) Male to female ratio was 2.3: 1 with a mean age of 42.38 years ± 13.1 (range 25- 58 years). The preoperative mean VAS scores for radicular pain significantly decreased from 8.1± 14 to 2.8± 1.1 at 6 months follow-up (p = 0.0034). There was significant difference in VAS scores for back pain (5.7± 2.1) preoperatively to 1.9± 2 (p=0.02). ODI decreased from 57±2.5 to 11±10.5. Average length of stay was 1-3 days (1±0.5). TFES can be done for herniated L5-S1 discs bypassing the iliac crest barrier, by using an appropriate suprailiac trajectory and tailoring the entry point based on the patient’s body mass index guided by fluoroscopy. VL - 6 IS - 2 ER -