Introduction: Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency (CMMR-D) syndrome is a rare tumour predisposition and polyposis syndrome that presents in childhood. It is caused by mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes that result in a tumour spectrum including colorectal cancers, high-grade gliomas, non-Hodgkin T-cell lymphomas and leukaemias. It is characterized by biallelic germline mutation of one of four MMR genes that can be identified by immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemistry is used in screening for Lynch syndrome (LS); however, the pattern of loss-of-staining in the background, non-tumour tissue is unique to CMMR-D syndrome. CMMR-D syndrome is seen in LS families and occurs as a result of consanguinity or founder effect. In South Africa, LS families in the Western and Northern Cape Provinces show a unique MLH1 c1528C>T mutation. The diagnosis of CMMR-D syndrome includes clinical findings outlined in the European Consortium’s Care of CMMRD document and confirmation of biallelic mutation in one MMR gene. Immunohistochemistry can be used in the diagnosis of CMMR-D syndrome by identifying cases for targeted molecular genetic tests. Loss of staining of the affected gene in the background, non-tumour tissue, is a key feature of CMMR-D syndrome. Methods: A retrospective analysis of archival, formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue was performed on specimens of children attending Red Cross Children’s Hospital with tumours that form part of the CMMR-D spectrum, outlined by the Care for CMMRD criteria. We used the criteria of high-grade gliomas (WHO Grade III or IV) occurring before 25 years of age, cutaneous lesions suggestive of CMMR-D syndrome and patients with a first or second degree relative diagnosed with LS. Immunohistochemistry was performed and the staining pattern was documented using a modified Allred Scoring system. Specific attention was given to the characterization of the staining pattern of the background normal tissue. Results: 21 samples evaluated from 18 patients. 16 samples represented brain tumours. Three inadequate samples were excluded. 12 samples showed intact staining. Two samples showed staining of unknown significance. Four samples from 3 different patients showed staining patterns compatible with MMR deficiency. Of these four samples, three samples showed loss of staining in background non-tumour tissue with positive external control. Conclusion: MMR immunohistochemistry can be used in the evaluation of CMMR-D syndrome. The pattern and scoring of both the tumour and the background non-tumour tissue is critical. The diagnosis of CMMR-D syndrome depends on clinical application of Care for CMMRD criteria, MMR immunohistochemistry in conjunction with molecular genetic testing.
| Published in | Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research (Volume 13, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jctr.20251304.14 |
| Page(s) | 119-139 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Pediatric, Mismatch Repair Deficiency Syndrome, Glioma, Histology, Immunohistochemistry, Tumour Syndrome, Oncology
| [1] | Amayiri, N, U Tabori, B Campbell, D Bakry, M Aronson, C Durno, P Rakopoulos, et al. 2016. “High frequency of mismatch repair deficiency among pediatric high grade gliomas in Jordan.” International Journal of Cancer 138: 380-385. |
| [2] | Bartley, AN, SR Hamilton, R Alsabeh, EP Ambinder, M Berman, E Collins, PL Fitzgibbons, et al. 2014. “Template for Reporting Results of Biomarker Testing of Specimens From Patients with Carcinoma of the Colon and Rectum.” December. Accessed June 2019. |
| [3] | Bruwer, Z, U Algar, A Vorster, K Fieggen, A Davidson, P Goldberg, H Wainwright, and R Ramesar. 2014. “Predictive genetic testing in children: Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency cancer predisposing syndrome.” Journal of Genetic Counselling 23: 147-155. |
| [4] | Carrato C, C Sanz, AM Muñoz-Mármol, I Blanco, M Pineda, J Del Valle, E Dámaso, M Esteller, E Musulen. 2021. The Challenge of Diagnosing Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency Syndrome in Brain Malignancies from Young Individuals. The Journal of Molecular Sciences. 22(9): 4629. |
| [5] | Colas, C, L Guerrini-Rousseau, M Suerink, R Gallon, CP Kratz, É Ayuso, ERN GENTURIS CMMRD Guideline Group, L Brugières, K Wimmer. 2024. “ERN GENTURIS guidelines on constitutional mismatch repair deficiency diagnosis, genetic counselling, surveillance, quality of life, and clinical management”. European Journal of Human Genetics. 32(12): 526–1541. |
| [6] | Durno, C, CR Boland, S Cohen, JA Dominitz, FM Giardiello, DA Johnson, T Kaltenbach, et al. 2017. “Recommendations on Surveillance and Management of Biallelic Mismatch Repair Deficiency (BMMRD) Syndrome: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.” Gastroenterology 152: 1605-1614. |
| [7] | Durno C, AB Ercan, V Bianchi, M Edwards, M Aronson, M Galati, EG Atenafu, On Behalf of the International Replication Repair Deficiency Consortium. 2021. Survival Benefit for Individuals With Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency Undergoing Surveillance. Journal of Clinical Oncology. Volume 39, Number 25. |
| [8] | Fedchenko, N, and J Reifenrath. 2014. “Different approaches for interpretation and reporting of immunohistochemistry analysis results in the bone tissue - a review.” Diagnostic Pathology (9): 221. |
| [9] | Huang, S, C Durno, and SH Erdman. 2014. “Lynch Syndrome: A Pediatric Perspective.” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 58: 144-152. |
| [10] | Kang, E, JK Suh and SD Kim. 2025. “Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency, the Most Aggressive Cancer Predisposition Syndrome: Clinical Presentation, Surveillance, and Management”. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 68(3): 294–304. |
| [11] | Lamola, L. 2018. Genomics of Lynch Syndrome and Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency Syndrome. Accessed April 10, 2020. |
| [12] | Peltomaki, P. 2003. “Role of DNA mismatch repair defects in the pathogenesis of human cancer.” Journal of Clinical Oncology 21: 1174-1179. |
| [13] | Ramchander, NC, NAJ Ryan, EJ Crosbie, and DG Evans. 2017. “Homozygous germ-linemutation of the PMS2 mismatch repair gene: a unique case report of constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMR-D).” BMC Medical Genetics. 18(40). |
| [14] | Tabori, U, JR Hansford, MI Achatz, CP Kratz, SE Plon, T Frebourg, and L Brugieres. 2017. “Clinical management and tumour surveillance recommendations of inherited mismatch repair deficiency in childhood.” Clinical Cancer Research 23: 32-37. |
| [15] | Wimmer, K, CP Kratz, and HFA Vasen. 2014. “Diagnostic criteria for constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome: suggestions of the European consortium 'Care for CMMR-D'.” Journal of Medical Genetics (Journal of Medical Genetics) 51: 355-365. |
APA Style
Tu, S. J., Wessels, A., Ramesar, R., Davidson, A., Pillay, K. (2025). Identifying Children with Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency Syndrome in the Expanding Lynch Syndrome Population in Cape Town, South Africa. Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research, 13(4), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20251304.14
ACS Style
Tu, S. J.; Wessels, A.; Ramesar, R.; Davidson, A.; Pillay, K. Identifying Children with Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency Syndrome in the Expanding Lynch Syndrome Population in Cape Town, South Africa. J. Cancer Treat. Res. 2025, 13(4), 119-139. doi: 10.11648/j.jctr.20251304.14
@article{10.11648/j.jctr.20251304.14,
author = {Sindy Jen-Yi Tu and Annesu Wessels and Raj Ramesar and Alan Davidson and Komala Pillay},
title = {Identifying Children with Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency Syndrome in the Expanding Lynch Syndrome Population in Cape Town, South Africa
},
journal = {Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research},
volume = {13},
number = {4},
pages = {119-139},
doi = {10.11648/j.jctr.20251304.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20251304.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jctr.20251304.14},
abstract = {Introduction: Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency (CMMR-D) syndrome is a rare tumour predisposition and polyposis syndrome that presents in childhood. It is caused by mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes that result in a tumour spectrum including colorectal cancers, high-grade gliomas, non-Hodgkin T-cell lymphomas and leukaemias. It is characterized by biallelic germline mutation of one of four MMR genes that can be identified by immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemistry is used in screening for Lynch syndrome (LS); however, the pattern of loss-of-staining in the background, non-tumour tissue is unique to CMMR-D syndrome. CMMR-D syndrome is seen in LS families and occurs as a result of consanguinity or founder effect. In South Africa, LS families in the Western and Northern Cape Provinces show a unique MLH1 c1528C>T mutation. The diagnosis of CMMR-D syndrome includes clinical findings outlined in the European Consortium’s Care of CMMRD document and confirmation of biallelic mutation in one MMR gene. Immunohistochemistry can be used in the diagnosis of CMMR-D syndrome by identifying cases for targeted molecular genetic tests. Loss of staining of the affected gene in the background, non-tumour tissue, is a key feature of CMMR-D syndrome. Methods: A retrospective analysis of archival, formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue was performed on specimens of children attending Red Cross Children’s Hospital with tumours that form part of the CMMR-D spectrum, outlined by the Care for CMMRD criteria. We used the criteria of high-grade gliomas (WHO Grade III or IV) occurring before 25 years of age, cutaneous lesions suggestive of CMMR-D syndrome and patients with a first or second degree relative diagnosed with LS. Immunohistochemistry was performed and the staining pattern was documented using a modified Allred Scoring system. Specific attention was given to the characterization of the staining pattern of the background normal tissue. Results: 21 samples evaluated from 18 patients. 16 samples represented brain tumours. Three inadequate samples were excluded. 12 samples showed intact staining. Two samples showed staining of unknown significance. Four samples from 3 different patients showed staining patterns compatible with MMR deficiency. Of these four samples, three samples showed loss of staining in background non-tumour tissue with positive external control. Conclusion: MMR immunohistochemistry can be used in the evaluation of CMMR-D syndrome. The pattern and scoring of both the tumour and the background non-tumour tissue is critical. The diagnosis of CMMR-D syndrome depends on clinical application of Care for CMMRD criteria, MMR immunohistochemistry in conjunction with molecular genetic testing.
},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Identifying Children with Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency Syndrome in the Expanding Lynch Syndrome Population in Cape Town, South Africa AU - Sindy Jen-Yi Tu AU - Annesu Wessels AU - Raj Ramesar AU - Alan Davidson AU - Komala Pillay Y1 - 2025/11/07 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20251304.14 DO - 10.11648/j.jctr.20251304.14 T2 - Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research JF - Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research JO - Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research SP - 119 EP - 139 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7790 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20251304.14 AB - Introduction: Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency (CMMR-D) syndrome is a rare tumour predisposition and polyposis syndrome that presents in childhood. It is caused by mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes that result in a tumour spectrum including colorectal cancers, high-grade gliomas, non-Hodgkin T-cell lymphomas and leukaemias. It is characterized by biallelic germline mutation of one of four MMR genes that can be identified by immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemistry is used in screening for Lynch syndrome (LS); however, the pattern of loss-of-staining in the background, non-tumour tissue is unique to CMMR-D syndrome. CMMR-D syndrome is seen in LS families and occurs as a result of consanguinity or founder effect. In South Africa, LS families in the Western and Northern Cape Provinces show a unique MLH1 c1528C>T mutation. The diagnosis of CMMR-D syndrome includes clinical findings outlined in the European Consortium’s Care of CMMRD document and confirmation of biallelic mutation in one MMR gene. Immunohistochemistry can be used in the diagnosis of CMMR-D syndrome by identifying cases for targeted molecular genetic tests. Loss of staining of the affected gene in the background, non-tumour tissue, is a key feature of CMMR-D syndrome. Methods: A retrospective analysis of archival, formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue was performed on specimens of children attending Red Cross Children’s Hospital with tumours that form part of the CMMR-D spectrum, outlined by the Care for CMMRD criteria. We used the criteria of high-grade gliomas (WHO Grade III or IV) occurring before 25 years of age, cutaneous lesions suggestive of CMMR-D syndrome and patients with a first or second degree relative diagnosed with LS. Immunohistochemistry was performed and the staining pattern was documented using a modified Allred Scoring system. Specific attention was given to the characterization of the staining pattern of the background normal tissue. Results: 21 samples evaluated from 18 patients. 16 samples represented brain tumours. Three inadequate samples were excluded. 12 samples showed intact staining. Two samples showed staining of unknown significance. Four samples from 3 different patients showed staining patterns compatible with MMR deficiency. Of these four samples, three samples showed loss of staining in background non-tumour tissue with positive external control. Conclusion: MMR immunohistochemistry can be used in the evaluation of CMMR-D syndrome. The pattern and scoring of both the tumour and the background non-tumour tissue is critical. The diagnosis of CMMR-D syndrome depends on clinical application of Care for CMMRD criteria, MMR immunohistochemistry in conjunction with molecular genetic testing. VL - 13 IS - 4 ER -